Survey on the safety of a no-updosing regimen of sublingual immunotherapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Administration, Sublingual↗
Biomedical subjects
S Pecora
Publications and source records attributed to S Pecora.
Post-marketing survey on the safety of sublingual immunotherapy in children below the age of 5 years.
BACKGROUND: The age below 5 years is considered a prudential limit for immunotherapy in view of the possible severity of side-effects. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) seems to be safe, but no study in very young children is available. We performed a safety post-marketing surveillance study in children below 5 years. METHODS: Children aged 3-5 years with respiratory allergy receiving SLIT were followed-up for at least 2 years. A diary card for side-effects was filled by parents at each dose given. Local and systemic side-effects were graded as: mild (no intervention, no dose adjustment), moderate (medical treatment and/or dose reduction), severe (life-threatening/hospitalization/emergency care). The comparative safety of different allergens and regimens was also assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-six children (mean age 4.2 years, 67 male) were included. Seventy-six (60%) had rhinitis with asthma, 34 (27%) rhinitis only and 16 (13%) only asthma. Immunotherapy was prescribed for mites (62%), grasses (22.2%), Parietaria (11.9%), Alternaria (2.4%) and olive (1.5%). Eighteen children underwent an accelerated build-up. The total number of doses was about 39,000. Nine side-effects were reported in seven children (5.6% patients and 0.2/1000 doses). Two episodes of oral itching and one of abdominal pain were mild. Six gastrointestinal side-effects were controlled by reducing the dose. All side-effects occurred during up-dosing phase. No difference in terms of safety among the allergens used was observed. CONCLUSION: SLIT is safe also in children under the age of 5 years.
Administration, Sublingual↗
Three-year follow-up of clinical and inflammation parameters in children monosensitized to mites undergoing sub-lingual immunotherapy.
Parallel follow-up of clinical and inflammatory markers during sub-lingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is highly beneficial. Twenty-four children (age 4-16) monosensitized to house dust mite were randomized to receive either active or placebo SLIT for 1 yr in a double-blind placebo controlled design (Marcucci et al., Allergy 2003: 58: 657-62). Thereafter, for 2 yr they all received active treatment. Symptom scores for rhinitis, asthma, and drug usage were daily recorded. Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and tryptase in sputum and nasal secretions, serum and nasal mite-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) were recorded before treatment and at 10-12 months intervals. Nasal ECP and nasal tryptase after specific nasal provocation tests were significantly reduced as compared to baseline values (p = 0.0043 and 0.0195, respectively) in the third year of active treatment. None of the other inflammatory parameters was increased. In placebo treated patients all these parameters tended to decrease only after switching to active treatment. Clinical scores did not improve in treated vs. placebo patients in the double-blind placebo-controlled phase of the study. In both cohorts a clinical benefit was observed as intra-group score reduction as compared to baseline. A significant difference was reached in patients treated for 2 yr for rhinitis and asthma (p = 0.0009 and 0.0019, respectively) but not for drug usage and in patients treated for 3 yr for rhinitis, asthma, and drug usage (p = 0.0105, 0.0048, and 0.02, respectively). SLIT in children monosensitized to mites reverted the spontaneous increase in nasal IgE and in local parameters of allergic inflammation. These outcomes were followed by a consolidated clinical improvement in the second and third year of treatment.
Administration, Sublingual↗
Early decrease in nasal eosinophil proportion after nasal allergen challenge correlates with baseline bronchial reactivity to methacholine in children sensitized to house dust mites.
BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is induced by an IgE mediated inflammation after allergen exposure of the membranes lining the nose which, in predisposed individuals, may constitute a risk factor for the occurrence of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To detect early changes in nasal inflammation after allergen exposure, 11 children [9.0 (7, 11) yrs], sensitized to house dust mites (HDM), with rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma and an age- and gender-matched control group (Ctr) were studied. METHODS: The following parameters were evaluated: i) pulmonary function; ii) bronchial reactivity to methacholine (MCh), expressed as Pd20MCh; iii) nasal brushing (NB) 'at baseline' and, on a separate day, 30 min after nasal allergen challenge (NAC). On NBs, the following markers of inflammation were evaluated: a) neutrophil and eosinophil proportion, b) 'intact to degranulated eosinophil' ratio, and c) expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 and HLA-DR by nasal epithelial cells. RESULTS: 'At baseline', allergic children showed elevated nasal eosinophilia and increased ICAM-1 and HLA-DR expression (p<0.05), as compared to Ctr. In allergic children, nasal eosinophilia correlated with Pd20MCh (p=0.002). The significant decrease in nasal eosinophilia observed after NAC (p=0.002) was associated with a significant decrease in the 'intact to degranulated eosinophil' ratio (p=0.001). Interestingly, correlations were still present between Pd20MCh and 'post NAC' eosinophilia (p=0.004) or the NAC-induced decrease in eosinophilia (p=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: In children sensitized to HDM, experimental allergen exposure is followed by an early depletion of nasal eosinophils. The correlation between allergen-induced changes in nasal eosinophilia and bronchial reactivity to MCh further supports the concept of a tight link between upper and lower respiratory tract involvement in respiratory allergy.
Allergens↗
Methodology and potential pitfalls in allergic diseases study designs: measurements for the assessment of the overall severity of atopic dermatitis--the four step severity score (FSSS), SCORAD-related, electronic system, for the simple and rapid evaluation of the skin and mucosal allergic inflammation.
Medical statistics may contribute to ameliorate research by improving the design of studies and identifying the optimal method for the analysis of results. Sometimes, nevertheless, it could be misemployed flawing the benefit potential. Allergic diseases pathogenesis is recognized to be systemic but global initiatives such as GINA and ARIA documents define allergic asthma and rhinitis as organ diseases; such an asymmetrical view raises a set of known and unknown confounding that could influence the quality of the process of evidence-based decision-making (topic symptomatic therapeutic interventions versus systemic pathogenetic interventions). This article shows the first scoring system for the assessment of atopic dermatitis lesions developed in the allergy-area. A four-step severity score (FSSS) was chosen in agreement with those developed for asthma and rhinitis in global initiatives, to avoid any further differences in evaluating the severity of allergic diseases. FSSS relates each step with the objective signs of the SCORAD and rates the disease course as intermittent or persistent. A devoted electronic program has been also framed to allow a quick and simple contemporary evaluation of the SCORAD Index (Section I) and of the FSSS (Section II); the program furthermore foresees a third section named ESAS (Extra Skin Allergic Signs) (Section III) in which it is possible to check whether organs other than the skin are involved by the allergic inflammation. The limitations potential generated by a misemployment of medical statistics for clinical trials designed to establish benefits rising from specific immunotherapy for allergic diseases have been also discussed extensively.
Asthma↗
Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy with a biologically standardized extract of Ambrosia artemisiifolia pollen: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
BACKGROUND: The allergological relevance of Ambrosia in Europe is growing but the efficacy of the injective immunotherapy for this allergen has been documented only in Northern America. OBJECTIVE: We sought to study the safety and efficacy of injective immunotherapy in European patients sensitized to Ambrosia artemisiifolia. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (18 M/14 F, mean age 36.78, range 23-60 years) suffering from rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma and sensitized to Ambrosia were enrolled and randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPC) study lasting 1 year. A maintenance dose corresponding to 7.2 microg of Amb a 1 was administered at 4-week intervals after the build-up. During the second and the third year, all patients were under active therapy in an open fashion. Symptom and medication scores, skin reactivity to Ambrosia (parallel line biological assay), and pollen counts were assessed throughout the trial. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients completed the trial. No severe adverse event was observed. During the DBPC phase, actively treated patients showed an improvement in asthmatic symptoms (P=0.02) and drug (P=0.0068) scores days with asthmatic symptoms (P=0.003), days with rhinitis symptoms (P=0.05), and days with intake of drugs (P=0.0058), as compared to before therapy. No improvement for any of these parameters was detected in the placebo group. Moreover, the number of days with rhinitis and asthma was significantly higher in the placebo as compared to the active group (P=0.048 and P<0.0001, respectively). Patients who switched from placebo to active therapy improved in rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, and drug intake. The skin reactivity decreased significantly (12.2-fold, P=0.0001) in the active group whereas a slight increase (1.07-fold, P=0.87) was observed in the placebo group after the DBPC phase. After switching to active therapy, patients previously under placebo showed a significant decrease of this parameter (4.78-fold, P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Injective immunotherapy is safe and clinically effective in European patients sensitized to Ambrosia.
Adult↗
Effects on inflammation parameters of a double-blind, placebo controlled one-year course of SLIT in children monosensitized to mites.
BACKGROUND: Clinical documentation about effects on local markers of inflammation of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in children is still poor. METHODS: Twenty-four children (age range 4-16 years, average 8.5 years) monosensitized to house dust mites (HDMs) were randomized to receive active or placebo SLIT for this allergen according to a double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Before treatment and 10-12 months later the following parameters were checked: ECP and tryptase in sputum and nasal secretion, serum and nasal mite-specific IgE (sIgE), allergen-specific nasal challenge test (sNCT), nasal symptoms and tryptase after sNCT. RESULTS: Nasal tryptase and nasal IgE in basal conditions were unchanged in treated children but significantly increased in untreated children (P = 0.0156 and P = 0.0313, respectively). The threshold for sNCT was unchanged in both groups of children, but the symptom score after sNCT was unchanged in the placebo group and significantly decreased in the active group (P = 0.0084). The nasal tryptase after sNCT was unchanged in the active group and significantly increased in the placebo group (P = 0.0218). Intergroup comparison showed a significant difference in oral tryptase and nasal tryptase after sNCT in favour of the active group. CONCLUSIONS: These interim results after only 1 year of treatment show that SLIT in children monosensitized to HDMs is able to avoid the spontaneous increase in both nasal sIgE antibodies and in local allergic inflammation in basal conditions. These outcomes are confirmed and supported by the decrease of symptoms in the active group combined with the increase of nasal tryptase only in the control group in both cases after sNCT.
Administration, Sublingual↗
Nasal inflammation and bronchial reactivity to methacholine in atopic children with respiratory symptoms.
BACKGROUND: In atopic subjects, dysfunctions of the upper and lower airways frequently coexist and allergic rhinitis seems to constitute a risk factor for the occurrence of asthma in predisposed individuals. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate whether in atopic subjects nasal inflammation could reflect changes in respiratory functions, 11 allergic children, sensitized to house dust mites (HDM), with rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma and 10 nonatopic controls (ctrs) were studied. METHODS: All subjects underwent nasal brushing to detect percentages of nasal eosinophils (Eos %) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression by nasal epithelial cells. In the same day pulmonary function tests, i.e. forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced expiratory flows at 25-75% of the vital capacity (FEF25-75%) and methacholine (MCh) bronchial inhalation challenge were also evaluated. RESULTS: Pulmonary function parameters were not significantly different in allergic children and in ctrs (P > 0.05), while a significant increase in bronchial reactivity to MCh, expressed as Pd20 MCh, was detected in the former population (P < 0.05). As compared with ctrs, allergic children showed elevated Eos % and ICAM-1 expression (P < 0.05). When nasal inflammation and pulmonary function parameters were compared, a significant correlation was found between nasal Eos % and bronchial reactivity to MCh (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the concept of significant links between upper and lower respiratory tract involvement in atopic children sensitized to HDM.
Adolescent↗
[Hemodialysis equipment].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Hemodialysis Solutions↗
A pre-seasonal birch/hazel sublingual immunotherapy can improve the outcome of grass pollen injective treatment in bisensitized individuals. A case-referent, two-year controlled study.
BACKGROUND: The study tests the hypothesis of a reduction of priming due to tree allergy in patients sensitised to both birch/hazel and grass pollen undergoing an associated preseasonal Sublingual/Injective immunotherapy. METHODS: 36 out of 49 bisensitized candidates were pair-matched into 18 case-referent couples. During two years all patients were administered preseasonal grass-SIT and one patient in each couple received also birch/hazel-SLIT. Diary cards were fulfilled for three consecutive grass pollen seasons. Specific Nasal Provocation Test (NPT) for grass and aspecific bronchial challenge were done; sera were analyzed for specific IgE and IgG. RESULTS: During the peak of the grass pollen season both groups showed a significant improvement in total symptom-score. Conjunctivitis and cough improved significantly more in patients with associated therapies. While antihistamine score decreased significantly in both groups, antiasthmatics did only in the SLIT-SIT group. The follow-up documented a significant increase in grass- and birch-specific IgG and a decrease in grass-specific IgE. Grass-NPT threshold was clearly higher in SLIT-SIT-group (p = 0.01) and only in this group PD20 methacholine improved significantly (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined birch/hazel-SLIT and grass-SIT are safe and improve clinical outcomes of SIT alone in young bisensitized patients. Priming reduction is supported by specific NPT and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
Administration, Sublingual↗
[The lipid model in hemodialyzed patients].
In the context of metabolic alteration in dialysis patients the Authors have studied the characteristics, incidence, pathogenesis, effect of dialysis, atherogenic risk and therapeutic approach to hyperlipemia in hemodialysis patients. Hypertriglyceridemia secondary to reduced lipolytic activity is the most frequent alteration observed in hemodialytic patients (36.7% of cases). In addition, hemodialysis reduces the levels of lipoprotein in the blood whereas the atherogenic role of hyperlipemia does not appear to be as important as that of arterial hypertension and smoking. Simvastatin breaks down the lipidic fractions which are involved in atherogenesis and coronary cardiopathy, thus acting as a valuable prevention against cardiovascular involvement in dialysis.
Adult↗
[The intradialytic kinetics of uremic toxins in the diffusion-convection hemodialysis method].
A kinetic evaluation of dialytic methods using a diffusive-convective mechanism in comparison to the standard bicarbonate dialysis was performed in order to verify the possible therapeutic uses. The "kinetic" comparison of PFD and HDF to HBD, using equal quantities of dialysate, showed no significant change in the mention of uremic toxins of small molecular weight and a more efficient capacity to extract beta 2M by the diffusive-convective methods. The biophysical evaluation of dialysis still appears to represent the best means of defining the clearance possibilities and of identifying the most suitable technique for achieving a dialytic adequacy.
Creatinine↗
[Separate and combined effects of an ACE-inhibitor and low-protein low-phosphorus diet in chronic proteinuric glomerular nephropathies].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
[Antihypertensive drugs and the kidney].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
[Blood ferritin in the periodic monitoring of uremic patients in substitute therapy].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Blood Transfusion↗
Sublingual immunotherapy in Parietaria pollen-induced rhinitis: a double-blind study.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of immunotherapy was conducted in 31 patients with allergic rhinitis due to Parietaria pollen to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high doses of allergen via the sublingual route. The patients were assessed before and after a 10-month period of treatment by clinical (symptom-medication scores and specific nasal reactivity) and immunological (total IgE, specific IgE, IgG and IgG4 antibodies) parameters. High doses of Parietaria extract corresponding to a cumulative dose of 105 BU for each patient were administered with negligible side effects. The actively treated patients had significantly lower medication scores than those on placebo (p < 0.05) when the maximum pollen count was recorded, and at the end of the trial they showed a significant decrease in nasal reactivity (p < 0.02) and a significant increase in serum specific IgG4 (p = 0.02). No differences were detected in any of these parameters in the placebo group. Possible explanations for the mechanisms of sublingual immunotherapy are proposed.
Administration, Sublingual↗
Preseasonal specific immunotherapy with modified Phleum pratense allergenic extracts: tolerability and effects.
UNLABELLED: The preparation of chemically modified allergens, with a reduced IgE binding capacity (responsible for side effects with traditional immunotherapy) but with the same or greater immunogenic activity, is one of the paths followed to obtain better results with specific immunotherapy (IT). The aim of the study was to evaluate the tolerability and effects of an extract Phleum pratense, modified with glutaraldehyde and absorbed on aluminium hydroxide, in controlling the seasonal symptomatology induced by grass pollen in a group of 10 monosensitized patients, compared to a group of 10 similar patients not treated with specific IT but with drugs alone. The monitoring parameters were: 1) Clinical: a) symptomatology after specific conjunctival provocation test (pre and post seasonal) and during the natural exposure to the allergen b) drug consumption. 2) Immunological (peripheral blood eosinophils, total and specific IgE, total specific IgG). 3) Cytological, before, during and after the pollen season. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects treated with specific IT a) both the overall symptomatology and the drug consumption resulted significantly reduced compared to the controls (p = 0.045); b) the phlogistic infiltrate showed a tendency to decrease during the pollen season; c) the peripheral blood eosinophils, total and specific IgE and IgG did not show any significant variation compared to the controls; d) no systemic reactions occurred and there were only two slight local reactions.
Adjuvants, Immunologic↗