Biomedical subjects

S P Balcerzak

Publications and source records attributed to S P Balcerzak.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Infusional CHOP chemotherapy (CVAD) with or without chemosensitizers offers no advantage over standard CHOP therapy in the treatment of lymphoma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: Two phase II studies were conducted to evaluate infusional cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone chemotherapy, termed the CVAD regimen, alone (Southwest Oncology Group [SWOG] 9240) and with the chemosensitizers verapamil and quinine (SWOG 9125) to assess effects on response, survival, and toxicity in intermediate- and high-grade advanced-stage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The results were compared with the historic group of patients randomized to CHOP chemotherapy on Intergroup (INT) 0067 (SWOG 8516). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had biopsy-proven intermediate- or high-grade NHL (lymphoblastic histology excluded), were ambulatory and previously untreated, and had bulky stage II, III, or IV disease. One hundred twelve patients were registered on SWOG 9240 and received cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) by intravenous bolus day 1, doxorubicin 12.5 mg/m(2)/d and vincristine 0.5 mg/d delivered as a continuous 96-hour infusion on days 1 through 4, and dexamethasone 40 mg/d orally on days 1 through 4 (CVAD). Cycles were repeated every 21 days for eight cycles. One hundred patients on SWOG 9125 received the same chemotherapy and the chemosensitizers verapamil 240 mg bid and quinine 40 mg tid. Chemosensitizers were begun 24 hours before chemotherapy and continued for a total of 6 days. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were eligible for each study. The complete response (CR) rates were 39% on SWOG 9125 and 31% on SWOG 9240. With a median follow-up of 5.8 years on SWOG 9125 and 4.5 years on SWOG 9240, the 2-year failure-free survival (FFS) rate was 42% on SWOG 9125 and 41% on SWOG 9240. Two-year overall survival (OS) rate was 64% on SWOG 9125 and 58% on SWOG 9240. These results are comparable to a 44% CR rate, a 2-year FFS of 46%, and 2-year OS of 63% observed in 225 patients treated with CHOP on INT 0067 (SWOG 8516). CONCLUSION: CVAD combination chemotherapy alone or with the chemosensitizers verapamil and quinine is not promising therapy with respect to improved response or OS in intermediate- and high-grade advanced-stage NHL.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2001

Comparison of the L10M consolidation regimen to an alternative regimen including escalating methotrexate/L-asparaginase for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

The effectiveness of intensive post-remission chemotherapy regimens for adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is limited by both a high rate of disease recurrence and a substantial incidence of treatment toxicity. To evaluate a potentially more effective and less toxic approach, we conducted a multicenter phase III trial of consolidation therapies comparing the standard L10M regimen with one combining the brief, intensive L17M regimen and escalating methotrexate (MTX) and L-asparaginase (L-asp). Patients over age 15 with previously untreated ALL were eligible. Induction therapy included vincristine, prednisone, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and intrathecal methotrexate administered over 36 days. Patients who achieved complete remission (CR) were randomized to receive consolidation with either the L10M regimen or with DAT (daunomycin, cytosine arabinoside, 6-thioguanine) and escalating MTX and L-asp. The randomization was stratified by age, WBC and Ph chromosome status. Maintenance therapy was the same in both arms. Of 353 eligible patients, 218 (62%) achieved CR and 195 were randomized. The treatment arms did not differ significantly with respect to disease-free survival (DFS; P= 0.46) or overall survival (P= 0.39). Estimated DFS at 5 years was 32% (95% confidence interval (CI) 23-42%) in the L10M arm and 25% (95% CI 16-33%) in the DAT/MTX/L-asp arm. In each arm, 4% of patients died of toxicities (infection in all but one case). Infections and nausea/vomiting were somewhat more common in the L10M arm (occurring in 68% and 53% of patients respectively) than the DAT/MTX/L-asp arm (56% and 33%). The DAT/MTX/L-asp consolidation regimen was associated with some reduction in nonfatal toxicities, but no significant improvement in DFS, overall survival or non-relapse mortality when compared to the standard L10M regimen.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Combination cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and radiation therapy for locally advanced unresectable or medically unfit bladder cancer cases: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: Patients with locally advanced bladder cancer or who are not medically fit for surgery are a therapeutic dilemma. Radiotherapy with or without single agent cisplatin has been the major therapeutic modality. A phase II Southwest Oncology Group trial investigated the efficacy and feasibility of 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and radiation in this patient subset. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had muscle invasive bladder cancer (clinical stages T2-T4) with nodal involvement at or below the level of bifurcation of the iliac vessels, were medically or surgically inoperable, or refused cystectomy. Patients underwent pretreatment cystoscopy and detailed tumor mapping, and were treated with 75 mg. /m.2 cisplatin on day 1 and 1 gm./m.2 daily, 5-fluorouracil on days 1 to 4 and definitive radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was repeated every 28 days, twice during and twice after radiation. RESULTS: From October 1993 to April 1998, 60 patients were enrolled in study. Of the 56 eligible patients 34% had unresectable tumors, 21% were not medically fit for surgery and 45% refused cystectomy. Overall, 68% of the patients had clinical T3 tumors or greater and 22% had nodal metastasis. Treatment was completed as planned in 32 of 56 (57%) patients. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia, stomatitis or mucositis, diarrhea, neuropathy and nausea. There were 53 patients who were evaluable for response, although response was not determined for 18. The overall response rate was 51% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37 to 65) based on intent to treat with a complete response rate of 49% (95% CI 35 to 63). Estimated median survival of the 56 patients was 27 months (95% CI 21 to 40 months) with an overall 5-year survival of 32%. The 5-year survival of the 25 patients who refused surgery was 45%. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and radiation therapy is feasible. Despite a promising complete response rate, the overall 5-year survival suggests the need for more effective systemic therapy. The 5-year survival of patients who refused cystectomy suggests that this combined modality may provide another alternative to cystectomy for these patients.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Phase II evaluation of cisplatin and etoposide followed by mitotane at disease progression in patients with locally advanced or metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

BACKGROUND: A previous Southwest Oncology Group study demonstrated a 30% response rate with the combination of cisplatin and mitotane in the treatment of patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. Several case reports suggested that the combination of etoposide and cisplatin may be an active regimen in this disease. Because of these reports of potential activity, the authors conducted a Phase II trial evaluating the combination of etoposide and cisplatin. Due to the lack of data regarding the objective response rates to mitotane, the authors planned to evaluate the response rate to mitotane after disease progression on etoposide and cisplatin in patients with no prior mitotane therapy. METHODS: Patients with advanced, unresectable, or metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma with objectively measurable disease or biochemical abnormalities received cisplatin, 50 mg/m(2), intravenously on Days 1 and 2, and etoposide, 100 mg/m(2), on Days 1, 2, and 3. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. At the time of disease progression, patients who had not previously received mitotane received 1000 mg orally 4 times a day along with cortisone acetate and fludrocortisone acetate. RESULTS: Of the 47 patients entered onto the study, 45 were eligible. Nine patients had received mitotane previously and 36 had not. Objective responses were noted in 11% of patients (5 of 45 patients) (95% confidence interval, 3.7-24%). The median survival was 10 months. The most common toxic effects were hematologic, gastrointestinal, and neurologic. Only 16 patients with no prior mitotane therapy went on to receive mitotane at the time of disease progression. An objective response was noted in 13% of patients (2 of 16 patients). The most common toxic effects were edema and gastrointestinal effects. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates that the combination of cisplatin and etoposide has minimal activity in advanced and metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma and other treatment strategies are warranted.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Interferon alpha consolidation after intensive chemotherapy does not prolong the progression-free survival of patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of the Southwest Oncology Group randomized phase III study 8809.

PURPOSE: S8809 is a randomized phase III trial determining whether intensive cytoreductive treatment, followed by interferon consolidation at the time of minimal residual disease, prolongs the progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) of indolent lymphoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred seventy-one patients with previously untreated stage III or IV low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were registered. Patients received six to eight cycles of prednisone, methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide/mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (ProMACE[day 1]-MOPP[day 8]) chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. Responding patients were randomized to observation alone or to interferon consolidation. Interferon alpha-2b 2 mU/m(2) was given subcutaneously three times weekly for 2 years. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-eight eligible patients were randomized to interferon alpha consolidation (n = 144) or observation alone (n = 124). With a median follow-up time from randomization among patients still alive of 6.2 years, the median PFS time was 4.1 years for patients who received interferon consolidation therapy and 3.2 years for patients who were observed after ProMACE-MOPP induction (P =.25). The adjusted hazard ratio for relapse for observation to interferon was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 1.13). The median OS has not been reached in either group. At 5 years, OS is 78% for the interferon group and 77% for the observation group (P =.65). The adjusted hazard ratio for survival for observation to interferon is 1.11 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1. 79). CONCLUSION: Interferon alpha consolidation therapy after intensive treatment with anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy and involved-field radiation therapy does not prolong the PFS or OS of patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

A phase II study of 9-aminocamptothecin in patients with refractory breast cancer.

We evaluated 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) in patients with metastatic or locally recurrent breast cancer who were no longer responsive to standard therapy. Patients were treated with 9-AC with a 72-hr continuous infusion given at a dose of 45 micrograms/m2/hr every 2 weeks. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 micrograms/kg was given subcutaneously for 7-10 days after completion of the treatment. Eighteen patients were treated, with all patients assessable for toxicity and 15 patients assessable for response. There were two partial responses seen in the 15 patients lasting 3.5 and 5 months, respectively. The major toxicity seen was myelosuppression, with 12 patients having grade 3 or greater granulocytopenia with four episodes of significant infectious complications. In addition, significant thrombocytopenia was seen in 14 patients. The other complications commonly seen were nausea and vomiting and alopecia. 9-AC given as a 3-day continuous infusion has limited activity in previously treated metastatic and locally recurrent breast cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1999

Treatment of poor-prognosis extensive disease small-cell lung cancer with an all-oral regimen of etoposide and cyclophosphamide - a Southwest Oncology Group clinical and pharmacokinetic study.

PURPOSE: An all-oral regimen of etoposide and cyclophosphamide was developed for use in poor-prognosis extensive disease small-cell lung cancer. Limited pharmacokinetic sampling was used to derive a pharmacodynamic model predictive of myelosuppression early in the course of therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were chemotherapy-naive and had extensive disease small-cell lung cancer with either SWOG performance status 2 or serum albumin <3.5 g/dl. The first cohort (n = 18) received etoposide orally at 50 mg daily and cyclophosphamide orally at 50 mg daily days 1-14 every 28 days. Due to good hematologic tolerance, the second cohort (n = 39) received both agents orally at 50 mg twice daily days 1-14 every 28 days. Plasma etoposide levels were determined in samples drawn at baseline, and at 1 h, 2 h, and 23.5 h (trough) after the first dose. Linear regression analysis was used to determine pharmacokinetic and demographic parameters predictive of myelosuppression. RESULTS: A total of 173 treatment cycles were delivered. Patients on the daily regimen had a 22% response rate (complete and partial), a 22% unconfirmed response rate, and a 5-month median survival, while patients on the twice-daily regimen had a 28% response rate (complete and partial), a 13% unconfirmed response rate, and a 7-month median survival. Granulocytopenia and alopecia were the most common toxicities seen. Significant granulocytopenia could be predicted for the twice-daily regimen according to the formula ln(AGC nadir)=7.80 - 1.88(trough), with an increased incidence of granulocytopenia if the etoposide trough value was >/=1.49 microg/ml. CONCLUSION: Oral etoposide and oral cyclophosphamide given days 1-14 every 28 days is well tolerated and results in an acceptable response rate and median survival in poor-prognosis (poor performance status or low serum albumin) extensive disease small-cell lung cancer. A trough etoposide level obtained within 24 h of starting therapy can predict severe granulocytopenia.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1998

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest oncology group study (9031).

Older age is a poor prognosis factor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This double-blind trial was designed to test the hypothesis that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) used as supportive care could improve the treatment of elderly AML patients. Two hundred thirty-four patients 55 or more years of age with a morphologic diagnosis of de novo or secondary AML, French-American-British (FAB) M0-M7, excluding M3, were randomly assigned to a standard induction regimen (daunorubicin at 45 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] on days 1 through 3 and Ara-C at 200 mg/m2 IV continuous infusion on days 1 through 7) plus either placebo or G-CSF (400 microg/m2 IV over 30 minutes once daily). Results are reported here for 211 centrally confirmed cases of non-M3 AML. The two groups were well balanced in demographic, clinical, and hematological parameters, with median ages of 68 years in the G-CSF and 67 years in the placebo groups. The complete response (CR) rate was not significantly better in the G-CSF group: 50% in the placebo and 41% in the G-CSF group (one-tailed P = .89). Median overall survival was also similar, 9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7 to 10 months) in the placebo and 6 months (95% CI, 3 to 8 months) in the G-CSF arms (P = .71). We found a significant 15% reduction in the time to neutrophil recovery in the G-CSF group (P = .014). G-CSF had no impact on recovery from thrombocytopenia (P = .80) or duration of first hospitalization (P = .27). When infection complications were evaluated, G-CSF had a beneficial effect on the duration but not on incidence of infection. G-CSF patients had fewer days with fever and shorter duration of antibiotic use. However, there was no difference in the frequency of total documented infections or in the number of fatal infections (19% placebo v 20% G-CSF). In this study of elderly AML patients, G-CSF improved clinical parameters of duration of neutropenia and antibiotic use, but did not change CR rate or survival or shorten hospitalization.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1998

A Southwest Oncology Group and Cancer and Leukemia Group B phase II study of doxorubicin, dacarbazine, ifosfamide, and mesna in adults with advanced osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Ewing's sarcomas, osteosarcomas, and rhabdomyosarcomas are significantly more responsive to chemotherapy than other sarcomas. Adjuvant chemotherapy is used routinely based on data from randomized trials. Although a percentage of children with locally advanced or metastatic tumors remain curable, few data exist regarding the tumor's natural history or response and survival in adults. METHODS: This Phase II study evaluated doxorubicin, dacarbazine, ifosfamide, and mesna (MAID) in adults with inoperable or metastatic Ewing's sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, or osteosarcoma. RESULTS: Between 1987-1991, 81 patients were entered; 69 patients were eligible. One patient died of neutropenic infection. Ten patients (14%) responded completely and 34 patients (49%) had a complete or partial response. Response rates were significantly higher for patients with Ewing's sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma than for those with osteosarcoma (77%, 64%, and 26%, respectively; P < 0.005). Although there were no significant differences in progression free survival by histology, survival for patients with Ewing's sarcoma was significantly longer than for patients with osteosarcoma (P = 0.004.) At the time of last follow-up, 7 patients (10%) were alive without progression: 3 with Ewing's sarcoma, 1 with osteosarcoma, and 3 with rhabdomyosarcoma. CONCLUSIONS: MAID chemotherapy is an active regimen in adults with advanced or metastatic Ewing's sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. Although there was no direct comparison with a doxorubicin and cisplatin-based regimen, the response rate and survival in patients with osteosarcoma suggest that doxorubicin and cisplatin-based chemotherapy would remain the accepted initial chemotherapy regimen. For patients with rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma, 10-20% of patients remained disease free at 5 years.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Phase II trial of paclitaxel by 24-hour continuous infusion for relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: Southwest Oncology Group trial 9246.

PURPOSE: The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) recently conducted a multiinstitutional phase II trial to determine the complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates, toxicities, and progression-free and overall survivals of patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs) treated with a 24-hour continuous infusion of paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients with relapsed NHL who had received minimal prior therapy (one prior chemotherapy regimen for intermediate- to high-grade NHL [44 patients] or one or two prior regimens for low-grade NHL [22 patients]) were premedicated with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine and then treated with continuous intravenous infusion paclitaxel over 24 hours every 21 days. RESULTS: Eleven of 66 patients (17%) achieved rigorously documented objective remissions, including two CRs (3%) and nine PRs (14%). In addition, another five patients (8%) achieved apparent PRs on a single computed tomographic (CT) scan. Responses were brief, lasting a median of 3 months (5 months for indolent lymphomas and 3 months for intermediate- to high-grade lymphomas). Grade 4 or 5 granulocytopenia was the only common serious toxicity, and occurred in 42 of 66 patients (64%). CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel is generally well tolerated when given as a continuous infusion of 175 mg/m2 over 24 hours, despite predictable granulocytopenia. However, single-agent paclitaxel has modest clinical efficacy compared with other available treatments for relapsed NHL.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Interferon versus interferon plus prednisone remission maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) regimen alone or with chemosensitizers for remission induction and interferon (IFN) versus IFN plus prednisone (IFN/P) for remission maintenance in previously untreated multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirty-three patients were registered for remission-induction therapy with VAD or VAD plus the chemosensitizers verapamil and quinine. Patients who achieved remission were randomized to maintenance therapy with IFNalpha 3 MU in the evening three times weekly or IFN plus 50 mg of prednisone (IFN/P) on the morning after IFN until relapse. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients were eligible for induction. Fatal toxicities in nine patients who received VAD plus verapamil and quinine led to closure of this arm after 47 registrations. Subsequently, all patients received VAD induction. Despite the high early mortality rate on VAD plus sensitizers, overall survival by induction arm did not differ for median or 5-year survival with approximately 40% of patients surviving 5 years. Eighty-nine eligible patients who achieved remission were randomized to maintenance. Patients who received IFN/P had improved progression-free survival (median, 19 v9 months for IFN; P = .008). After 48 months, progression-free survival on IFN/P was at the thirtieth percentile, whereas it was below the tenth percentile on IFN alone. Median survival from start of maintenance was long on both arms (57 months for IFN/P v 46 months for IFN; P = .36). CONCLUSION: IFN/Pwas more effective than IFN alone. Improved relapse-free survival may be attributable to IFN/P or to the use of prednisone for maintenance. This latter alternative is currently being studied.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Randomized trial comparing cisplatin with cisplatin plus vinorelbine in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: Cisplatin has played a major role in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This randomized trial was performed by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) to determine whether the combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin has any advantage with regard to response rate, survival, and time to treatment failure over single-agent cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Between October 1993 and April 1995, 432 patients with advanced stage NSCLC were randomized to receive arm I (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 4 weeks) or arm II (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 4 weeks and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 weekly). All patients were chemotherapy-naive, had performance status (PS) 0 or 1, and had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. RESULTS: Four hundred fifteen patients were eligible and assessable. On arm I (cisplatin), there was a 12% partial response rate. Arm II (cisplatin and vinorelbine) had a 26% response rate (2% complete responses and 24% partial responses, P = .0002). There was a statistically significant advantage with regard to progression-free survival (median, 2 v 4 months; P = .0001) and overall survival (median, 6 v 8 months; P = .0018) for the cisplatin and vinorelbine arm. One-year survival was 20% for cisplatin alone and 36% for the combination arm. There was more hematologic toxicity on arm II of the study (81% grades 3 and 4 granulocytopenia v 5% on arm I). Other toxicities, such as renal insufficiency, ototoxicity, and nausea and vomiting, and neuropathy were similar. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine is a superior treatment when compared with single-agent cisplatin in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Cisplatin and vinorelbine is the new standard for SWOG against which new therapies will be evaluated.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Differential diagnosis of hereditary hemochromatosis from other liver disorders by genetic analysis: gene mutation analysis of patients previously diagnosed with hemochromatosis by liver biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary hemochromatosis, a common autosomal recessive trait caused by mutations in the HLA-H gene, is often diagnosed by the pathologist at the time of histologic examination. Unfortunately, histologic parameters alone do not differentiate between hereditary hemochromatosis and other causes of iron overload. We performed a retrospective study to determine the frequency of familial hemochromatosis in patients diagnosed with he mochromatosis by abnormal liver histology. METHODS AND RESULTS: DNA was isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 15 patients and used in a polymerase chain reaction-based assay in which we tested for the C282Y and H63D mutations. We found that in this group of patients, 5 (33%) were homozygous for the common C282Y genetic mutation, 3 (20%) were heterozygous, and 7 (47%) were normal. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the molecular assay is the gold standard for the diagnosis of hereditary hemochromatosis. The case study also illustrates that a definitive diagnosis of familial hemochromatosis has significant counseling implications allowing for accurate family studies.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

A phase II Southwest Oncology Group study of cisplatin and continuous infusion vinblastine in the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: Bone and soft tissue sarcomas currently comprise 1% of adult malignancies and 15% of pediatric malignancies [1]. While doxorubicin and ifosfamide are active agents, no significant impact on survival has been observed. More active regimes are required in sarcoma. This trial studied cisplatin and a 5 day continuous infusion of vinblastine for patients who had had disease progression of advanced soft tissue sarcoma after a doxorubicin based regimen. RESULTS: Between July 1983 and October 1986, 20 patients entered the study. There were no treatment related deaths. Seven patients required dose adjustment for neutropenia. No responses were observed.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Phase II trial of topotecan in advanced gastric cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Topotecan (NSC 609099) is a camptothecin analogue that demonstrated activity against a variety of human tumors in preclinical studies. A phase II trial was performed with topotecan given to patients with locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Topotecan was administered IV Bolus over 30 minutes on a daily X 5 schedule, every three weeks, with a starting dose of 1.5 mg/m2. Twenty patients were entered onto the study, all of whom were eligible. All patients were evaluable for toxicities. Half of these patients experienced at least one Grade 4 hematologic toxicity, comprised of either granulocytopenia or leukopenia (4 patients with both, 3 patients with grade 4 granulocytopenia, and 2 patients with only grade 4 leukopenia). Other non-life threatening (Grade 3) toxicities included nausea (2 patients), weakness (2 patients), weight loss (1 patient), blurred vision (1 patient), diarrhea (1 patient) and malaise/fatigue/lethargy (1 patient). Two patients achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 10% (95% confidence interval of 1.2 to 31.7%). The median survival for the 20 patients was five months.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1997

Phase II trial of topotecan in malignant melanoma.

Topotecan (S-9-dimethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin hydrochloride SKF 104864-A) is a semisynthetic analog of the alkaloid camptothecin and, similar to the parent compound, a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase I. The cytotoxicity induced by topotecan appears due to interference with the normal breakage reunion reaction of topoisomerase I leading to DNA damage and cell death. Since preclinical studies of topotecan suggested antitumor activity against refractory solid tumors, a phase II trial of the drug was initiated in melanoma patients with recurrent and/or metastatic disease. Topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 was given as a daily 30-min infusion for 5 days and repeated every 21-28 days. Seventeen patients were entered into the treatment program with all evaluable for toxicity but I patient, inevaluable for response. There were no objective responses. Toxicity was predominantly severe myelosuppression, which occurred in 12 of 17 (70%) patients. Topotecan in this dose and schedule is inactive in malignant melanoma.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Interest in high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) for both induction and postremission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) prompted the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) to initiate a randomized trial comparing HDAC with standard-dose cytarabine (SDAC) for remission induction of previously untreated AML and to compare high-dose treatment versus conventional doses for consolidation therapy. Patients less than 65 years of age with de novo or secondary AML were randomized for induction between SDAC 200 mg/ m2/d for 7 days by continuous infusion or HDAC at 2 g/ m2 intravenously every 12 hours for 12 doses; both groups received daunorubicin (DNR) at 45 mg/m2/d intravenously for 3 days. Complete responders to SDAC were randomized to receive either two additional courses of SDAC plus DNR or one course of HDAC plus DNR. Complete responders to HDAC were nonrandomly assigned to receive one additional course of HDAC plus DNR. Of patients randomized between SDAC (n = 493) and HDAC (n = 172) induction, 361 achieved complete remission (CR). The CR rate was slightly poorer with HDAC: 55% versus 58% with SDAC for patients aged less than 50, and 45% (HDAC) versus 53% (SDAC) for patients aged 50 to 64 (age-adjusted one-tailed P = .96). With a median follow-up time of 51 months, survival was not significantly better with HDAC (P = .41); the estimated survival rate at 4 years was 32% (HDAC) versus 22% (SDAC) for those aged less than 50, and 13% (HDAC) versus 11% (SDAC) for those aged 50 to 64. However, relapse-free survival was somewhat better following HDAC Induction (P = .049): 33% (HDAC) versus 21% (SDAC) at 4 years for those aged less than 50, and 21% (HDAC) versus 9% (SDAC) for those aged 50 to 64. Induction with HDAC was associated with a significantly increased risk of fatal (P = .0033) and neurologic (P < .0001) toxicity. Among patients who achieved CR with SDAC, survival and disease-free survival (DFS) following consolidation randomization were not significantly better with HDAC compared with SDAC (P = .77 and .46, respectively). Patients who received both HDAC induction and consolidation had the best postremission outcomes; however, the proportion of CR patients who did not go on to protocol consolidation therapy was more than twice as high after HDAC induction compared with SDAC. Induction therapy with HDAC plus DNR was associated with greater toxicity than SDAC plus DNR, but with no improvement in CR rate or survival. Following CR induction with SDAC, consolidation with HDAC increased toxicity but not survival or DFS. In a nonrandomized comparison, patients who received both HDAC induction and consolidation had superior survival and DFS compared with those who received SDAC induction with either SDAC or HDAC consolidation.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1996

GM-CSF did not allow doxorubicin dose escalation in the MAID regimen: a phase I trial. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Since dose intensity of doxorubicin is correlated with the clinical response of patients with soft tissue sarcomas and since doxorubicin dose intensity may be compromised in combination chemotherapy, we evaluated the use of recombinant granulocytemacrophage colony-stimulating factor (rGM-CSF) to ameliorate myelosuppression and allow doxorubicin dose escalation in a phase I trial utilizing the MAID combination [Mesna 2.5 g/m2/day x 4 days, Adriamycin (doxorubicin) 15 mg/m2/day x 4 days, ifosfamide 2.0 g/m2/day x 3 days, dacarbazine 250 mg/m2/day x 4 days; to be repeated every 21 days]. Thirteen patients were treated. The doxorubicin dose for the first 6 patients was at the standard dose of 15 mg/m2/day x 4 days (level 1), while the doxorubicin dose for the next 7 patients was escalated by 25% to 18.75 mg/m2/day x 4 days (level 2). rGM-CSF was given at 5 micrograms/kg/day, days 5-14. All patients experienced moderate to severe myelosuppression, with all patients at dose level 2 requiring doxorubicin dose reduction to dose level 1 or lower by their third course of treatment. rGM-CSF failed to allow sustained escalation of the doxorubicin dose in the MAID regimen.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗