S Nojima — Page 11 | Search PubMed

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this descriptive study was to identify the decision-making style among the dialysis patients. Subjects were a Convenience sample of hemodialysis patients who agreed to participate this study. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews. The interviews were recorded on the tape and transcribed. Decision-making episodes were picked and interpreted by searchers. Data was analyzed based on the Inductive Theory Approach. RESULT: Subject were 21 patients from 4 hospitals. The mean age was 51.1 and the mean duration after they started the hemodialysis was 9.1 years. The 16 decision-making styles were identified: accept, unvacillate, resignation, compromise, perseverance, challenge, self-activation, groupie, crisis-avoidance, withdrawal, prudent, reserve, escape, refusal, dogmatic, and entrust. These 16 decision-making styles were characterized by the reality oriented perception, the constructive regimes, the higher quality of social support. On the other hand, the passive decision-making styles were characterized by the distorted perception, the passive regimes, and the poor social support. DISCUSSION: The reality orientation, energy, openness, values system were discussed as key factors which determined the decision-making style among hemodialysis patients. The nursing approach supporting the patients to make their decision were discussed.

Adolescent↗