Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Mattioli

Publications and source records attributed to S Mattioli.

74 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Duodenogastric and non acid gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with reflux oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The role and the identification criteria of non acid gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) are still debated. Moreover, the relationship between nonacid GOR and gastric alkalinizations, particularly if secondary to duodeno-gastric reflux is yet to be defined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty one patients affected by GORD symptoms and oesophagitis entered the study. Oesophagitis was divided into four categories, according to a modified Savary and Miller classification. Acid (pH<4), alkalacid (4 7), alkaline (pH>7) GOR and duodenogastric reflux were measured by means of ambulatory three channel esophago-gastric pH monitoring with a combined analysis of the pH traces recorded in the oesophagus fundus and antrum. RESULTS: Total time percentage (T%) of acid GOR was significantly greater in patients than in healthy volunteers (HV) and between groups of patients in direct relation with the severity of the oesophagitis. Alkaline GOR was hardly detectable in every class of esophagitis. Alkalacid GOR increased with the grade of severeness of oesophagitis. Alkalacid GOR occurred prevalently in the postprandial period; it was only 8% of the time in patients with mild reflux oesophagitis and even less in patients with moderate or severe oesophagitis. The 24 hr total time percentage of duodenogastric reflux was similar in the patients and healthy volunteer groups. The frequency distribution in 0.1 intervals of fundic and antral pH samples showed a greater number of them in the acid range (0.8-1.2) in the patients than in healthy volunteer group (0.0006 7) samples was similar in patients and in healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that alkaline GOR is rare in GORD patients and that non acid GOR has a minor role in the pathophysiology of reflux esophagitis.

Adolescent↗

Surgery for esophageal achalasia. long-term results with three different techniques.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In surgery for achalasia, the length of the myotomy and the opportunity of associating an antireflux procedure are still debated. Prospective and comparative studies on different techniques are few. The aims of this work is to compare the long term results of three different techniques successively adopted by the same surgical group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1955 and December 1991, 185 achalasic patients were submitted to myotomy by using in temporal sequence three different techniques. The first technique utilized (1955-1972) was a long esophagogastric abdominal myotomy (83 patients), secondly (1973-1978) a limited transthoracic myotomy (30 patients) and at last (1979-1991) a long esophagogastric abdominal myotomy associated to the Dor gastroplasty (72 patients). Since 1972, patients were prospectively followed up according to a protocol which included a clinical interview, x-rays, manometry and endoscopy at given dates. Post-operative esophagogastric transit and gastro-esophageal reflux were assessed to verify the therapeutical outcome. Results obtained with the three different techniques were analyzed and compared by using the actuarial Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The mean follow up was 193.3 months for the patient group that underwent abdominal myotomy (62/83 patients), 137.3 months for the thoracic myotomy group (30/30 patients) and 86.9 months for the abdominal myotomy plus Dor gastroplasty group (69/72 patients). Long-term results in the abdominal myotomy and in the thoracic myotomy groups were respectively poor in 51.6% and in 46.6% of patients. Major causes of failure were insufficient myotomy (6.5%), periesophageal scarring (9.6%) and reflux esophagitis (22.6%) for the abdominal myotomy group; insufficient myotomy (20%) and reflux esophagitis (23%) for the thoracic myotomy group. In the abdominal myotomy plus Dor gastroplasty group long-term results were excellent or good in 87% of patients and poor in 13%. Reflux esophagitis (10% of cases) was the principal cause of failure. CONCLUSIONS: The comparison of the actuarial curves shows a significantly better long term outcome for the abdominal myotomy plus Dor antireflux procedure than for the abdominal myotomy (p = 0.01) and for the thoracic myotomy (p = 0.002) techniques.

Actuarial Analysis↗