Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Marlin

Publications and source records attributed to S Marlin.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

[Etiological diagnosis of sensorineural deafness in children: a year-long review of genetic counseling for deaf people].

From February 1996 to January 1997, 74 patients from 53 sibships underwent genetic counselling for sensorineural deafness at the Pasteur Hospital, Paris, France. Genetic counselling was based on the etiological diagnosis of the hearing impairment, by an audiological and non-audiological examination program. At the first examination, 31 families presented with a familial deafness and 22 families with apparently one affected individual. However, familial audiological examinations revealed familial deafness in 5 of these 22 families. Consequently, a total of 36 families had hereditary hearing impairment and the etiological groups showed the following distribution: non-syndromic deafness (14 families), syndromic deafness (12 families), probable syndromic deafness (5 families), and incomplete assessment (5 families). Out of the remaining 17 families in which affected individuals were sporadic cases, the etiological groups were as follows: acquired deafness (2 families), probable syndromic deafness (5 families), unknown cause (5 families), and incomplete assessment (5 families). Etiological assessment is discussed, with reference to the cost-effectiveness of this examination program. In light of this preliminary report, we present a model of assessment for the etiological diagnosis of sensorineural deafness in children and young adults.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Prelingual deafness: high prevalence of a 30delG mutation in the connexin 26 gene.

Prelingual non-syndromic (isolated) deafness is the most frequent hereditary sensory defect. In >80% of the cases, the mode of transmission is autosomal recessive. To date, 14 loci have been identified for the recessive forms (DFNB loci). For two of them, DFNB1 and DFNB2, the genes responsible have been characterized; they encode connexin 26 and myosin VIIA, respectively. In order to evaluate the extent to which the connexin 26 gene (Cx26) contributes to prelingual deafness, we searched for mutations in this gene in 65 affected Caucasian families originating from various countries, mainly tunisia, France, New Zealand and the UK. Six of these families are consanguineous, and deafness was shown to be linked to the DFNB1 locus, 10 are small non consanguineous families in which the segregation of the trait has been found to be compatible with the involvement of DFNB1, and in the remaining 49 families no linkage analysis has been performed. A total of 62 mutant alleles in 39 families were identified. Therefore, mutations in Cx26 represent a major cause of recessively inherited prelingual deafness since according to the present results they would underlie approximately half of the cases. In addition, one specific mutation, 30delG, accounts for the majority (approximately 70%) of the Cx26 mutant alleles. It is therefore one of the most frequent disease mutations so far identified. Several lines of evidence indicate that the high prevalence of the 30delG mutation arises from a mutation hot spot rather than from a founder effect. Genetic counseling for prelingual deafness has been so far considerably impaired by the difficulty in distinguishing genetic and non genetic deafness in families presenting with a single deaf child. Based on the results presented here, the development of a simple molecular test could be designed which should be of considerable help.

Australia↗
PubMed1994

Obesity: a new feature of WAGR (del 11p) syndrome.

A 6-year-old girl with del(11)(p14p12) is reported. This girl has the multiple congenital anomalies that defines the WAGR syndrome (aniridia, external genital hypoplasia and severe mental retardation). She has, in addition, very severe obesity (+10 SD) which is not a feature usually described with WAGR association.

Aniridia↗
PubMed1993

Position-specific adaptation in complex cell receptive fields of the cat striate cortex.

1. Responses of complex cells in cat striate cortex were studied with flashed light slit stimuli. The responses to slits flashed in different positions in the receptive field were assessed quantitatively before and after periods of prolonged stimulation of one small region of the receptive field. This type of prolonged stimulation resulted in reduced responsivity over a limited zone within the complex cell receptive field. 2. The adaptation-induced responsivity decrement was generally observed in both the ON and OFF response profiles but could also be restricted to one or the other. In general, the magnitude of the response decrements was greatest in the ON response profiles. The adaptation-induced response decrement did not necessarily spread throughout the receptive field but was restricted to a small region surrounding the adapted receptive field position (RFP). Adaptation spread equally widely across the ON and OFF response profiles despite the smaller adaptation effects in the OFF profile. 3. The adaptation effects from repeated stimulation at a single RFP did not spread symmetrically across the receptive field, and a given cell's preferred direction of motion indicated the direction of the asymmetric spread of the adaptation. RFPs that would be stimulated by a light slit originating at the point of adaptation and moving in the preferred direction (preferred side) showed greater adaptation-induced response decrements than did RFPs that would be stimulated by a light slit moving in the opposite direction from the point of adaptation (nonpreferred side). There was significant enhancement of responses at some RFPs on the non-preferred side of the point of adaptation. This asymmetric spread of adaptation could be caused by adaptation of inhibitory connections that contribute to complex cell direction selectivity. 4. The asymmetry of adaptation was significantly different for the ON and OFF response profiles. The asymmetric spread of adaptation for the ON response profile was similar to that observed previously in simple cells with greater decrements in the preferred direction side of the point of adaptation. However, the OFF response profiles showed less directional asymmetry in the spread of adaptation and showed greater decrements at RFPs in the nonpreferred direction side of the point of adaptation. 5. The similarity between the spread of adaptation in simple and complex cells suggests that the adaptation in these cells is occurring through a common mechanism. The directional asymmetry of the spread of adaptation is likely due to a local postsynaptic mechanism of adaptation rather than presynaptic transmitter depletion.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1993

The time course of direction-selective adaptation in simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex.

1. Responses of single cortical neurons in area 17 of anesthetized cats were recorded in response to prolonged stimulation with a patch of drifting square-wave grating. 2. During adaptation in the preferred direction, all neurons showed some reduction in response to motion in the stimulated direction and most showed some reduction in the opposite, nonstimulated direction. 3. For complex cells, the time course of response decrement in both the stimulated and nonstimulated directions was exponential, with an average time constant of 5 s. Response recovery was also exponential but significantly slower, with time constants of 8 and 13 s in the stimulated and nonstimulated directions, respectively. 4. For simple cells the dynamics of the adaptation effect depended on the direction of testing. In the nonstimulated direction the time course of the change in sensitivity was similar to that of complex cells. In the stimulated direction during both the adaptation and recovery periods, simple cells showed an initial rapid exponential change on the order of a few seconds that was followed by a more gradual exponential change. 5. During prolonged stimulation in the nonpreferred direction, there was less overall change in sensitivity. For some neurons the change in sensitivity during adaptation and recovery was exponential, with a short time constant for both simple and complex cells and for stimulated and nonstimulated directions. Other neurons showed no change in sensitivity in either direction and a few neurons showed facilitation during the adaptation period. 6. There appears to be a rapid general or nonspecific process, which may be related to contrast gain control, underlying motion adaptation in striate cortical neurons. An additional slow, direction-selective process is revealed when simple but not complex cells are stimulated in the preferred direction. We suggest that this latter type of adaptation is a key feature underlying the perceptual motion aftereffect.

Animals↗