Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S M Retchin

Publications and source records attributed to S M Retchin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Electronic medical record systems at academic health centers: advantages and implementation issues.

The growth of managed care has fueled expectations for a more coordinated delivery of clinical services and a reduction of unnecessary utilization. Among the most important issues that constrain these expectations is the transfer of medical information. Electronic medical record (EMR) systems appear to offer substantive advantages over paper records for both containing costs and improving the quality of care. However, incorporation of EMR systems into practice settings has languished. Among the barriers to implementation are software problems of codification and entry of data, security issues, a dearth of integrated delivery systems, reluctant providers, and prohibitive costs. The training programs of academic health centers (AHCs) are optimal environments for testing and implementing EMR systems. AHCs have the expertise to resolve remaining software issues, the components necessary for integrated delivery, a culture for innovation in clinical practice, and a generation of future providers that can be acclimated to the requisites for computerized records. The authors critically review these and other issues of implementing EMR systems at AHCs and propose four necessary steps for financing their implementation.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed1999

A sociodemographic and economic comparison of breast reconstruction, mastectomy, and conservative surgery.

BACKGROUND: There are a variety of surgical choices for women with early-stage breast cancer, including breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy, or mastectomy plus reconstructive surgery. This report examines some of the factors that affect these choices and the costs of the various treatment options. METHODS: Data from the Virginia Cancer Registry were linked to insurance claims from the Trigon Blue Cross and Blue Shield Company for women with local and regional staged breast cancer from 1989 to 1991 in Virginia. Multivariate analyses and cost studies were performed. RESULTS: There were 592 women who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS, 26%), mastectomy (58%), or mastectomy plus reconstruction (16%). Increasing age reduced the use of reconstruction. The choice of reconstruction was not affected by tumor size, nodal status, or race. Sixty percent of women had immediate breast reconstruction at the time of mastectomy; the majority had the implant procedure. The cost of BCS ($21,582) was higher than that of mastectomy ($16,122, P < .01). The costs for BCS and mastectomy were significantly lower than for mastectomy plus reconstruction ($31,047, P < .05). The 2-year cost for immediate reconstruction was $8200 less than for delayed procedures and was similar to the cost of BCS. CONCLUSIONS: Age was the driving force in reconstruction decisions. Clinical factors such as tumor size and nodal status were more important for the choice between BCS and mastectomy. There are significant cost differences between the various procedures. For a similar cosmetic outcome, BCS is less expensive than breast reconstruction. When reconstruction is required, a simultaneous procedure is less expensive.

Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans↗
PubMed1998

A comparison of patterns of care of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma patients in a younger and Medigap commercially insured cohort.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine and compare lifetime treatment patterns and hospitalization of incident nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) between pre-Medicare eligible (age < 65 years) and supplemental Medigap (age > or = 65 years) enrollees in a commercially insured cohort using insurance claims. METHODS: Claims from Virginia Blue Cross and Blue Shield beneficiaries with NSCLC submitted between 1989-1991 were merged with records from the Virginia Cancer Registry (VCR). Data from the VCR identified incident cases, disease stage, and type of tumor. Initial treatment categories were stratified using Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology codes. RESULTS: There were 1706 incident NSCLC patients; 349 were age < or = 64 years ("younger") and 1212 were age > or = 65 years ("elderly"). Having commercial insurance was not associated with any survival advantage compared with national averages at 2 years. In comparison with elderly patients, younger patients more often were treated with surgery for local disease (80.2% vs. 54.8%) and surgery alone or in combination with radiation for regional disease (51.9% vs. 32.0%). Radiation was used more often in elderly patients compared with younger patients with local disease (30.5% vs. 14.0%) but less often in patients with distant disease (76.2% vs. 54.9%). Compared with elderly patients, younger patients presenting with distant disease received more chemotherapy (18.8% vs. 5.1%; P <0.001); late palliative use of chemotherapy or radiation occurred in only 4-8% of younger patients. Compared with elderly patients, younger patients with regional or distant disease spent more days in the hospital (compared with national averages at 2 years: regional disease, 30.0 vs. 23.9 days; distant disease, 33.0 vs. 21.4 days; P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that more comprehensive health insurance is not associated with better outcomes in patients with NSCLC. Age specific trends for greater use of surgery, radiation, and total hospitalization in younger patients is consistent with other reports. Commercial health care claims supplemented by clinical staging from cancer registries can address long term practice patterns in patients with cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Costs of care associated with non-small-cell lung cancer in a commercially insured cohort.

PURPOSE: To examine the cost of incident cases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a commercially insured cohort. METHODS: Claims from Virginia Blue Cross and Blue Shield (BCBS) beneficiaries with lung cancer from 1989 to 1991 were merged with records from the Virginia Cancer Registry (VCR). Data from the VCR identified incident cases, stage, and type of cancer at diagnosis. Costs for all medical care included insurance payment, copayments, and deductibles for 2 years after diagnosis or until death. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-nine incident NSCLC patients were evaluated. The mean 2-year cost for each patient after diagnosis or until death was $47,941 (95% confidence interval, $43,758 to $52,124). Total average costs and hospital days were significantly lower for local disease ($37,514, 21.2 days), but were similar for regional ($52,797, 30.0 days) and distant ($49,382, 33.0 days) disease. Hospital days accounted for 48% and hospital-based claims for 70% of costs. Initial treatments, which included radiation, unadjusted for stage, had the lowest survival rates and the highest costs, and were associated with the most hospital days. Initial stage, race, gender, and age were not predictors of total 2-year costs. The independent predictors of total 2-year costs were type of treatment: any radiation therapy, any surgery, or any chemotherapy (all, P < .001). Inpatient hospital days was only a modest predictor of costs after adjusting for type of treatment. Patients who survived less than 1 year spent 30.5 days in hospital and had an average cost of $47,280. CONCLUSION: The direct health care costs of younger NSCLC patients care are substantial. These results should serve as a benchmark for future comparisons as the United States market shifts to managed care.

Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans↗
PubMed1997

Perioperative management of colon cancer under Medicare risk programs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in perioperative care and outcomes for patients with colon cancer enrolled in Medicare health maintenance organizations compared with similar fee-for-service nonenrollees. METHODS: Cross-sectional evaluation of hospital care and posthospital outcomes with data obtained from medical records. Nineteen health maintenance organizations representing all model types were selected from 12 states. The nonenrollee sample was drawn from the same areas. The sample included 412 enrollees and 401 nonenrollees, representing 65 hospitals for health maintenance organizations and 61 hospitals for fee-for-service. RESULTS: Nonenrollees were slightly older and had higher preoperative risk. Enrollees had shorter intervals between admission and surgery (enrollees, 1.55 days vs nonenrollees, 2.85 days). Differences in length of stay (enrollees, 10.9 days vs nonenrollees, 14.2 days) persisted even after controlling for preoperative health status. Differences in admissions to intensive care units (enrollees, 36.4% vs nonenrollees, 44.4%) were highly influenced by preoperative health status. Nonenrollees were more significantly likely to receive preoperative antibiotics, postoperative testing (eg, postoperative chest radiographs and electrocardiograms), and postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. Tumor staging was similar for both groups. Enrollees were more likely to be discharged home, while nonenrollees were more likely to be discharged to a nursing home. There were no significant differences in hospital deaths or postdischarge readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Health maintenance organization enrollees with colon cancer received less clinical services of several types than similar patients in fee-for-service settings, had shorter hospital stays, and were less likely to be discharged to nursing homes. However, there was no evidence that they experienced different outcomes.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Outcomes of stroke patients in Medicare fee for service and managed care.

CONTEXT: Increasing numbers of Medicare beneficiaries have been enrolling in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) because HMO participation reduces out-of-pocket expenses, and the federal government views HMOs as a way to contain Medicare costs. However, results comparing outcomes and quality of care in HMOs vs fee for service (FFS) have been mixed, and outcomes after stroke have not been adequately assessed. OBJECTIVE: To compare discharge destinations and survival rates following stroke in Medicare HMOs with similar FFS settings. DESIGN: An observational study for 2 groups evaluating stroke patients' discharge destinations and survival times from the date of hospital admission. SETTING: A total of 19 HMOs were selected from 12 states. The FFS sample was drawn from the same geographic areas. PATIENTS: The sample included 402 HMO patients from 71 hospitals and 408 FFS patients from 60 hospitals. PROCESS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were abstracted from medical records on demographics, clinical characteristics of stroke, comorbid illnesses, and discharge destinations following hospitalization. Data on survival were obtained from Medicare files and included 25 to 37 months of follow-up (median, 30.4 months, HMO; 31.1 months, FFS) from the date of hospital admission. RESULTS: There were 109 patients who died during the hospitalization (49 HMO, 12.2%; 60 FFS, 14.7%), and a total of 410 patients had died by the end of follow-up (191 HMO, 47.5%; 219 FFS, 53.7%). Approximately one fourth of both groups had do-not-resuscitate orders (HMO, 25.4%; FFS, 27.9%; P=.68). After controlling for age, marital status, and characteristics of dependency at discharge, HMO patients were more likely than FFS patients to be sent to nursing homes (HMO, 41.8%; FFS, 27.9%; P=.001) and less likely to be discharged to rehabilitation hospitals or units (HMO, 16.2%; FFS, 23.4%; P=.03). At follow-up, no significant differences in relative risk of dying were found between HMO and FFS groups (relative risk, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.26; P=.77). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in Medicare HMOs who experience strokes are more likely to be discharged to nursing homes and less likely to go to rehabilitation facilities following the acute event. However, they have similar survival patterns compared with comparable patients in FFS settings after adjusting for other factors.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Measuring standards of care for early breast cancer in an insured population.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the use of a combined data base to evaluate the care for local/regional invasive breast cancer in a large insured population of women aged less than 64 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We linked the procedural and hospital claims from Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) of Virginia with clinical stage data from the Virginia Cancer Registry (VCR) from 1989 to 1991. A total of 918 women were assessed with a median age of 50 years; 68% had tumors less than 2 cm, 30% had positive axillary nodes, and 68% were assessed as having local summary stage. A quality-of-care "report card" was used based on standards of care from international Consensus Conferences. RESULTS: Eight percent had a mastectomy as the initial biopsy procedure. Sixty-nine percent of women ultimately underwent mastectomy. Of those women who underwent lumpectomy, 86% had subsequent radiation. Within 3 months of diagnosis, 43% had a bone scan and 20% a computed tomography (CT) scan. Of women with positive axillary lymph nodes, 83% aged less than 51 years and 52% aged 51 to 64 years received chemotherapy. Fifty-six percent of all women had claims from a medical oncologist. Of women having a total mastectomy, 27% had claims from a plastic surgeon. Sixty-six percent to 76% of women had a mammogram, 24% a bone scan, and 14% a CT scan in the 0-18 and 18-36 month intervals following primary treatment. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the feasibility of linking sources of data that provide complementary information needed to develop measurements regarding standards of quality and efficiency of oncologic care. This report should serve as an initial benchmark while we await reports from other populations to define the best practice.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1996

The effect of age and comorbidity in the treatment of elderly women with nonmetastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Increasing age has most often been associated with less aggressive approaches to treatment of nonmetastatic breast cancer in elderly women even after controlling for stage of disease at diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of patient age on the initial treatment for breast cancer received by elderly women while controlling for the effect of patient comorbidity. METHODS: Cancer registry records for a cohort of 2252 women aged 66 years or older who were diagnosed as having nonmetastatic, invasive breast cancer between 1984 and 1989 and identified through the Virginia Cancer Registry were linked to Medicare Provider and Reimbursement data files. Multivariate models were used to assess the effects of age and comorbidity (as measured by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, codes recorded on Medicare claims) on initial treatment approach while adjusting for stage of disease, race, residential location, marital status, and year of diagnosis. RESULTS: In baseline multivariable models, age was negatively associated with any surgical treatment, non-breast-conserving procedures, and radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery. The odds of women aged 85 years and older receiving surgery were less than one third those of women aged 66 to 74 years (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.60), while odds ratios across the same two age groups for nonbreast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy were 0.55 (95% confidence interval, 33 to 92) and 0.03 (confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.13), respectively. With additional adjustment for aggregate comorbidity, odds ratio estimates in these same age-group comparisons were virtually unchanged at 0.31, 0.56, and 0.04. CONCLUSION: Aggregate comorbidity measured by inpatient International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, codes on Medicare inpatient hospital claims does not explain age-related patterns in the initial treatment of elderly patients with breast cancer.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1996

Variation in staging and treatment of local and regional breast cancer in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Few studies of practice variation in the management of early breast cancer for elderly women have examined the process of care in depth. This study evaluated the effects of age and other factors on surgical staging techniques and treatment. METHODS: Virginia cancer registry data were linked with Medicare claims and 1990 census data. The sample included all newly diagnosed patients with pathologic confirmed local and regional breast cancer in 1985-1989 (n = 3,361). Analyses included descriptive univariate statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis for staging and treatment alternatives. Process of care variables included tumor size determination, axillary lymph node dissection, use of adjuvant therapy, and radiation if breast conserving surgery (BCS) was performed. RESULTS: About 75 percent of women had tumor size and axillary node dissection. Increasing comorbidity was associated with a lower likelihood of axillary node dissection. Nine percent of local compared to 44 percent of regional disease patients received adjuvant therapy. Hormonal therapy increased from 13 percent of women in 1985-1988 to 24 percent in 1989. Hormonal therapy did not vary with patient age. One-third of the patients with positive lymph nodes compared to 8 percent of node negative women received hormonal therapy. Blacks were more likely to present with advanced disease. A logistic regression model evaluated the multiple effects of patients and clinical characteristics: older women were more likely to present with larger tumors, were less likely to have axillary node dissections, and were less likely to receive chemotherapy or radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age was most consistently associated with staging and the use of chemotherapy in this cohort of elderly breast cancer patients. Based on the reported initial treatment plan, hormonal therapy was infrequently used and information from axillary lymph node assessment was used to stratify treatment. Although the low use of adjuvant hormonal therapy in elderly women may compromise survival, neither comorbid nor socioeconomic factors as measured in this study explained this practice pattern.

Black or African American↗
PubMed1996

Factors that determine the treatment for local and regional prostate cancer.

This article assesses the significance of comorbid and nonclinical factors in type of treatment received by elderly male patients with local-regional stage prostate cancer. Multivariate analysis of data from the Virginia Cancer Registry was linked to Medicare claim files, the Area Resource File, and 1990 Census Data. The type of initial treatment received was studied in 3117 men with local-regional staged prostate cancer diagnosed from 1985 to 1989. The frequency of surgical and radiation therapy for prostate cancer rose between 1985 and 1989 (12.5% to 18.5% for surgery, P < 0.001; 25% to 32% for radiation, P < 0.001). Age was the most important predictor of therapeutic choice; no therapy was given to 26% of men 65 to 69 years old versus 63% of men 85 years or older P < 0.001). Race, residence (rural versus urban), and comorbidity were also strong factors in predicting initial therapy. Using logistic regression, three treatment alternatives were evaluated. Age (odds ratio [OR] .51; 99% confidence interval [CI] = .43, .60), comorbidity (OR .72; 99% CI .63, .82), income (OR 1.14; 99% CI 1.01, 1.28), residence (OR .65; 99% CI .48, .87), diagnosis year (OR 1.15; 99% CI 1.07, 1.23) all were associated independently with treatment versus no treatment. For surgery versus radiation, age (OR .40; 99% CI .27, .57), race (OR 2.92; 99% CI 1.65, 5.15) and education (OR 1.75; 99% CI 1.31, 2.34) were significant factors. For hormonal/orchiectomy versus surgery/radiation, age (OR 5.19; 99% CI 3.84, 7.01), comorbidity (OR 1.28; 99% CI 1.03, 1.58), distance to radiation oncologist (OR .89; 99% CI .80, .99), and diagnosis year (OR .89; 99% CI .79, 1.00) were significant. The number of men receiving surgical and radiation treatments for prostate cancer increased between 1985 and 1989. During that period, age consistently played a significant role in all therapeutic decisions. Other factors, such as comorbidity, race, socioeconomic status, and distance, also were important considerations, depending on the treatment alternative.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1995

Differences in initial treatment patterns and outcomes of lung cancer in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for substantial deaths and costs in the elderly greater than 65 years old. The current practice of NSCLC treatment in a Medicare population was examined to ascertain important areas of practice variation, and differences in clinical outcome and costs. METHODS: Data from incident cases of NSCLC from the Virginia Cancer Registry (VCR), 1985-89, were matched with claims from Medicare Part A and B, census tract data and the Area Resource File. Multivariate models were created to include clinical data, demographics, and access information. RESULTS: For patients with locoregional disease, increasing age was associated with lower likelihood of therapy (odds ratio (OR) 0.35; confidence intervals (CI) 0.29, 0.43), thoracotomy (OR 0.27; CI 0.21, 0.34), and more use of radiation therapy compared to surgery (OR 1.69; CI 1.39, 2.03). Low education levels were associated with less likelihood of treatment (OR 0.78; CI 0.66, 0.94), or radiation instead of surgery (OR 1.22; CI 1.05, 1.47). Patients in urban areas were less likely to receive therapy (OR 0.67; CI 0.49, 0.92). For distant disease, increasing age was also associated with lower likelihood of treatment (OR 0.48; CI 0.41, 0.56), as was increasing co-morbidity (OR 0.84; CI 0.75, 0.93). Distance to radiation oncologists made no difference in radiotherapy utilization. Two year survival according to therapy was surgery 66%, radiation 15%, no therapy 17%. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of care, and survival according to therapy, vary widely for elderly NSCLC patients. Age, low education, higher co-morbidity and urban residence all decrease the likelihood of surgical therapy for locoregional NSCLC. Despite the availability of coverage through the Medicare program, use of therapies and survival is not uniform for all beneficiaries. Possible discrimination by age, co-morbid illnesses not recorded in the Medicare files, or patient and provider choice could all be involved; administrative billing files cannot resolve these important differences.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Access and outcomes of elderly patients enrolled in managed care.

OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in access to care and medical outcomes for Medicare patients with an acute or a chronic symptom who were enrolled in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) compared with similar fee-for-service (FFS) nonenrollees. DESIGN: A 1990 household telephone survey of Medicare beneficiaries who reported joint pain or chest pain during the previous 12 months. SAMPLE: Stratified random sample of HMO enrollees (n = 6476) and comparable sample of FFS Medicare beneficiaries (n = 6381). ACCESS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Care-seeking behavior, physician visits, diagnostic procedures performed, therapeutic interventions prescribed, follow-up recommended by a physician, and symptom response to treatment. RESULTS: After controlling for demographic factors, health and functional status, and health behavior characteristics, HMO enrollees with joint pain (n = 2243) were more likely than nonenrollees (n = 2009) to have a physician visit (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.38) and medication prescribed (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.60). Patients with chest pain who were enrolled in HMOs (n = 556) were less likely than nonenrollees (n = 524) to have a physician visit (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.82). For both joint and chest pain, HMO enrollees were less likely to see a specialist for care, have follow-up recommended, or have their progress monitored. There were no differences in complete elimination of symptoms, but HMO enrollees with continued joint pain reported less symptomatic improvement than nonenrollees (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced utilization of services for patients with specific ambulatory conditions was observed in HMOs with Medicare risk contracts, with less symptomatic improvement in one of the four outcomes studied.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1993

Should the elderly receive chemotherapy for node-negative breast cancer? A cost-effectiveness analysis examining total and active life-expectancy outcomes.

PURPOSE: This study determines the survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly women with breast cancer. In addition, the analysis measures the impact of substituting active life expectancy for survival in the clinical decision. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two cohorts of women with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, stage I breast cancer from age 60 to 80 years were monitored using a Markov process. One group received standard chemotherapy following primary therapy, and the other had no postoperative treatment. Data were derived from recently published clinical trials and a major meta-analysis. Outcome included the average survival, active life-expectancy, and incremental cost/quality-adjusted life-year (cost/QALY). RESULTS: Adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs survival in older women, but to a lesser extent compared with younger women. The average gain in quality-adjusted months was 1.8 months in a 75-year-old cohort at a cost/QALY of $4,400. These small benefits were not substantially altered when univariate changes were made in toxicity, recurrence risk, or effectiveness of chemotherapy. When active life expectancy replaced survival as an end point, the benefit for 75-year-old women decreased to 2 weeks at a cost of more than $96,000/QALY. CONCLUSION: There is a small survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients. The cost of this benefit is high, but within the range of commonly reimbursed procedures until a point between 75 and 80 years old. The use of active life expectancy as the primary outcome reduces the benefit and adds to the cost. If physicians and policymakers agree that active life expectancy is a relevant outcome, withholding chemotherapy for patients > or = 70 years old is a reasonable approach.

Age Factors↗