Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S M Grunberg

Publications and source records attributed to S M Grunberg.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Phase I trial of intravenous carboplatin added to oral etoposide and oral cyclophosphamide for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

The combination of oral etoposide and oral cyclophosphamide is an active and easily administered outpatient regimen for non-small cell lung cancer with leukopenia as the most common severe toxicity. To maintain ease of outpatient administration and to take advantage of a differing dose-limiting toxicity, we attempted to add escalating doses of intravenous carboplatin to full-dose oral etoposide and oral cyclophosphamide for chemotherapy-naive patients with Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. The first 4 patients received etoposide and cyclophosphamide (each at 50 mg PO BID Days 1-12 every 28 days) with intravenous carboplatin on Day 1 at a dose calculated by the Calvert formula to achieve AUC 4. With this regimen dose-limiting toxicity (2 patients with Grade 4 leukopenia/granulocytopenia) was noted. An additional 3 patients therefore received etoposide and cyclophosphamide at a 25% reduced dose (each at 50 mg PO BID Days 1-9 every 28 days) with intravenous carboplatin on Day 1 at a dose calculated to achieve AUC 4. Dose-limiting toxicity (2 patients with Grade 4 leukopenia/granulocytopenia) was again noted. One patient achieved a partial response maintained for 6 months. However potentiation of leukopenia/granulocytopenia by carboplatin prevents full-dose use of either cyclophosphamide and etoposide or of carboplatin in this regimen.

Administration, Oral↗

Impact of nausea/vomiting on quality of life as a visual analogue scale-derived utility score.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis is often based upon incremental cost per increase in survival (cost-effectiveness). Using this definition supportive care measures, which increase quality but not quantity of life, generate a zero denominator and cannot be directly compared with other components of health care cost. Cost-utility analysis, which measures incremental cost per increase in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), where QALY = utility score x time at risk, addresses this problem, since successful supportive intervention increases the utility score and thus provides a finite denominator in QALY even when absolute survival is unchanged. However, utility scores for various supportive care modalities have not been well defined. As a pilot study to generate a first approximation of a utility score for nausea/vomiting, we used a rating scale technique and administered two visual analogue scale questions to 30 patients completing a cycle of chemotherapy. Patients rated their global quality of life during their previous cycle of chemotherapy with hypothetical absence or presence of nausea/vomiting as the only variable. The study population included 8 male and 22 female patients, with a median age of 56 years. The most common malignancies were breast cancer (8 patients), lung cancer (7 patients), and hematologic malignancies (7 patients). On a 100 mm visual analogue scale, the mean score for overall quality of life during chemotherapy was 79 mm without nausea/vomiting and 27 mm with nausea/vomiting (P < 0.001, paired t-test). The implied marked increase in utility with relief of nausea/vomiting suggests a significant impact on cost-utility analysis. Similar methodology could be used to estimate utility scores in other areas of supportive care.

Adult↗

Strange bedfellows.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Growth inhibition of androgen-insensitive human prostate carcinoma cells by a 19-norsteroid derivative agent, mifepristone.

Mifepristone, also known as RU 486, is a 19-norsteroid derivative. Currently, mifepristone is being tested in clinical trials on meningioma and breast cancer. In this study we analyzed whether mifepristone could inhibit the growth of human prostate cancer cells including androgen-insensitive (PC-3 and DU145) and androgen-sensitive (LNCaP) cell lines. At 1-nM concentration, mifepristone exhibited a marginal stimulatory action on LN-CaP and PC-3 cells. Nevertheless, a dose-dependent growth inhibition on those same cell lines was observed at concentrations of 1 microM and 10 microM. Twenty-day exposure to the clinically achievable concentration of 1 microM mifepristone resulted in consistent inhibition of all three cell lines studied. Furthermore, this in vitro growth inhibition was reflected in an in vivo nude mouse system. Mifepristone at the dosage of 4 mg/100 g body weight completely suppressed the growth of PC-3 tumors for 21 days, although this was followed by a growth rate similar to that of the control tumor. To understand the possible mechanism of mifepristone inhibition, PC-3 cells were exposed to mifepristone in comparison with dexamethasone (Dex), progesterone, and 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), each at 1-microM concentration. The results demonstrated that while both DHT and Dex alone had essentially no effect on cell growth, progesterone alone resulted in a 20% growth inhibition, while mifepristone had more than 60% inhibition with a 16-day exposure. At an equal concentration, the degree of growth inhibition of PC-3 cells by mifepristone or progesterone was partially diminished by simultaneous exposure to Dex. In conclusion, our results demonstrated that the growth of androgen-insensitive prostate cancer cells can be directly inhibited by mifepristone in cultures. This in vitro inhibition is reflected in xenografted tumors.

Animals↗

Economic impact of antiemesis.

Control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a major concern for patients receiving cancer therapy and a major quality of life issue. However, the fact that antiemetic control improves quality (but not duration) of survival and the significant cost of newer antiemetic agents have led to discussions about the relative priority of supportive care interventions and the appropriate use of newer and more expensive medications. Various decision trees can be constructed to estimate appropriate use and pricing of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. Additional costs of ineffective antiemetic therapy can be taken into account when calculating the advantages of effective antiemesis. Use of appropriate doses for appropriate indications will also have an impact. Since supportive care leads to qualitative rather than quantitative improvement in survival, the appropriate form of analysis is not cost-effectiveness (which considers only increase in years of survival) but rather cost-utility (which considers quality-adjusted life years).

Antiemetics↗

Measurement of quality of life in patients with lung cancer in multicenter trials of new therapies. Psychometric assessment of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale.

BACKGROUND: This study continued the development and psychometric testing of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), a disease- and site-specific instrument primarily measuring the physical and functional dimensions of quality of life for individuals with lung cancer. The instrument contains two scales, one for patients and a counterpart for health professionals as observers. METHODS: Feasibility, reliability, construct validity, and criterion-related validity were evaluated with 207 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from six cancer centers. Within an interview with an observer, patients completed part of a battery of instruments by self-report and were interviewed for the remaining measures. Observers also completed measures after the interview. RESULTS: Feasibility, reliability, and validity were well supported for this lung cancer population. Feasibility was demonstrated by patient and staff compliance in completion at all six cancer centers. Internal consistency was good, with coefficient alphas of 0.82 for the patient scale and 0.75 for the observer scale. Construct validity was supported by 1. contrasted groups approach: regression lines (with 95% confidence bands) were obtained between the Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) and each of the two LCSS scales; 2. as a refinement, relationship testing: significant correlations between the LCSS and KPS for each item (except hemoptysis for the patient scale); and 3. multitrait-multimethod approach: good reliability (alphas ranging from 0.75 to 0.93), good convergent validity for the two LCSS scales (r = 0.77), and a good discriminant validity pattern from the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Criterion-related validity with relevant gold standard measures (American Thoracic Society Questionnaire [ATS] and McGill Pain questionnaire, KPS, Profiles of Mood States [POMS], and Sickness Impact Profile [SIP]) was supported with significant correlations (0.40-0.67 for the LCSS patient scale; 0.54-0.65 for the LCSS observer scale). CONCLUSIONS: These psychometric properties demonstrate that the LCSS patient and observer scales are feasible, reliable, and valid quality of life measures that are ready for research and clinical use with lung cancer populations.

Adult↗

Future of the management of emesis.

Development of effective antiemesis has depended upon identification of critical neurotransmitter receptors within the emetic reflex arc. Investigations of cholinergic, histaminergic, dopaminergic, and serotonergic receptors led to our present generation of antiemetics. Opiate and adrenergic receptors are the likely targets of the next generation of antiemetics. The recently identified critical neurotransmitter receptors (opiate, adrenergic, and serotonergic) also provide a link to cancer pain, anticipatory vomiting, and cancer anorexia respectively. Future collaborations are likely to include investigators from various areas of supportive care working together on these common problems.

Antiemetics↗

Phase II study of edatrexate in advanced head and neck cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Fifty-two patients with persistent, recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck were treated with weekly edatrexate, 80 mg/m2. Nine patients had received previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of the 46 eligible patients, two complete responses and one partial response were observed (6%, 95% confidence interval of 1-18%). The most common toxicities were myelosuppression and mucositis, but dermatologic toxicity was also observed in 25% of patients. Edatrexate appears to have limited activity in advanced head and neck cancer.

Adult↗

Role of antiprogestational therapy for meningiomas.

Epidemiological evidence, including the greater incidence of female patients, a positive association with pregnancy, and a positive association with breast cancer suggested a role for female sex hormones (and hormonal modulation) in regulating the growth of meningioma. The detection of hormone receptors on meningioma specimens provided a mechanism for this effect. However, unlike breast cancer, progesterone receptors (not oestrogen receptors) predominate in meningioma. Clinical trials with anti-oestrogens have shown little effect while trials with progesterone agonists have shown no effect or possible stimulation of meningioma growth. Three trials have now indicated an inhibitory activity of the antiprogestational agent mifepristone. In the largest of these trials, 28 patients received daily oral mifepristone for up to 62 months with a suggestion of response in eight patients. Long-term therapy has been well tolerated. Adverse events include fatigue, hot flushes, gynaecomastia/breast tenderness, skin rash, cessation of menses and decrease in libido. Increases in cortisol and thyroid-stimulating hormone are the most striking endocrine changes. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase III trial is underway to confirm the activity of mifepristone in unresectable meningioma.

Buserelin↗

Efficacy and safety of granisetron, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by high-dose cisplatin.

PURPOSE: To assess the antiemetic effects and safety profile of four different doses of granisetron (Kytril; SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA) when administered as a single intravenous (IV) dose for prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty-four chemotherapy-naive patients receiving high-dose cisplatin (81 to 120 mg/m2) were randomized to receive one of four granisetron doses (5, 10, 20, or 40 micrograms/kg) administered before chemotherapy. Patients were observed on an inpatient basis for 18 to 24 hours, and vital signs, nausea, vomiting, retching, and appetite were assessed. Safety analyses included incidence of adverse experiences and laboratory parameter changes. RESULTS: After granisetron doses of 5, 10, 20, and 40 micrograms/kg, a major response (< or = two vomiting or retching episodes, and no antiemetic rescue) was recorded in 23%, 57%, 58%, and 60% of patients, respectively, and a complete response (no vomiting or retching, and no antiemetic rescue) in 18%, 41%, 40%, and 47% of patients, respectively. There was a statistically longer time to first episode of nausea (P = .0015) and vomiting (P = .0001), and fewer patients were administered additional antiemetic medication in the 10-micrograms/kg dosing groups than in the 5-micrograms/kg dosing group. As granisetron dose increased, appetite return increased (P = .040). Headache was the most frequently reported adverse event (20%). CONCLUSION: A single 10-, 20-, or 40-micrograms/kg dose of granisetron was effective in controlling vomiting in 57% to 60% of patients who received cisplatin at doses greater than 81 mg/m2 and totally prevented vomiting in 40% to 47% of patients. There were no statistically significant differences in efficacy between the 10-micrograms/kg dose and the 20- and 40-micrograms/kg doses. Granisetron was well tolerated at all doses.

Adolescent↗

Dose-ranging evaluation of the serotonin antagonist dolasetron mesylate in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin.

PURPOSE: This dose-ranging trial of intravenous dolasetron mesylate (MDL73,147EF) was performed to determine its adverse and antiemetic effects in patients receiving cisplatin at doses > or = 100 mg/m2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine patients treated with initial cisplatin received a single intravenous dose of dolasetron mesylate administered over 20 minutes beginning 30 minutes before chemotherapy. The following four dose levels were studied: 1.8, 2.4, 3.0, and 5.0 mg/kg. Emesis and adverse effects were measured for 24 hours after cisplatin. RESULTS: All adverse effects were mild and transient including loose stools, headache, serum AST/ALT elevations, and asymptomatic prolongation of ECG intervals. Among the dose levels, no-emesis rates from 24% to 52% were observed, and the percentage of patients having zero, one, or two emetic episodes ranged from 48% to 82%. Complete control of vomiting increased as the dose was escalated to 2.4 mg/kg, but did not improve further with higher doses. CONCLUSION: Dolasetron mesylate can be administered safely at doses up to 5.0 mg/kg, with comparable complete protection rates and increased adverse effects at doses greater than 2.4 mg/kg. Antiemetic activity was seen after cisplatin. Trials comparing single infusions of dolasetron mesylate and ondansetron are under way.

Adult↗

Analysis of physician attitudes concerning requests for autopsy.

To quantify the role of failure to request consent as a determinant of the autopsy rate, questionnaires asking whether an autopsy had been requested and the reasons for that decision were distributed to primary physicians after each death in a consecutive series of 75 patient deaths. Autopsies were requested in only 56% of cases. Common reasons to request an autopsy included unanswered medical questions (37%), medical education (22%), research protocol participation (16%), or routine policy (14%). When autopsies were not requested, the most common reason was the belief that there were no outstanding medical questions (64%). Follow-up interviews with 14 oncologists and hematologists revealed that 8 generally request autopsies (usually to contribute to medical education or to discover unexpected findings) and 6 generally do not (usually because no unexpected findings are anticipated). Attempts to increase the current low autopsy rate should address the question of when and why physicians are willing to request this procedure.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Control of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

The development of antiemetic drugs has been one of the most rewarding areas of oncologic research, since therapeutic advances in this area can result in immediate improvement in the quality of life for patients undergoing chemotherapy. Antiemetic therapy has progressed dramatically during the past decade and a half. Fifteen years ago, patients receiving cisplatin for the first time had a median of 12 vomiting episodes within the first 24 hours, whereas now more than 50 percent of such patients have no vomiting episodes at all. Theoretical and clinical challenges remain, however, in the effort to control chemotherapy-induced emesis. The mechanisms of anticipatory vomiting and delayed vomiting are still not understood, and consistently effective therapeutic approaches to these problems have yet to be developed.

Animals↗

Phase I study of (6R)-5,10-dideazatetrahydrofolate: a folate antimetabolite inhibitory to de novo purine synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer chemotherapy with folate antimetabolites has been traditionally targeted at the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase and is based on the requirement of dividing tumor cells for a supply of thymidylate and purines. However, a new compound, 5,10-dideazatetrahydrofolate (DDATHF, whose 6R diastereomer is also known as Lometrexol), has become available that prevents tumor cell growth by inhibiting the first of the folate-dependent enzymes involved in de novo purine synthesis, glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. PURPOSE: We investigated the toxicity and therapeutic activity of DDATHF in a phase I clinical trial. METHODS: DDATHF was given at one of the following dose levels to 33 patients (16 females and 17 males) with malignant solid tumors: 3.0 mg/m2 per week (level A) to 10 patients, 4.5 mg/m2 per week (level B) to 13 patients, or 6.0 mg/m2 per week (level C) to 10 patients. Each drug cycle consisted of three weekly injections of DDATHF followed by a 2-week rest prior to redosing in the next cycle. RESULTS: Of 33 patients, 27 received at least one full cycle of DDATHF. Thrombocytopenia was the major dose-limiting toxicity, and it was severe in one of 10 patients during the first cycle and in two of four patients during the second cycle. Because of cumulative toxicity at 6.0 mg/m2, second or later cycles were abbreviated to two weekly doses. Stomatitis was generally mild, but it was dose-limiting in one patient. Neutropenia was infrequent and mild, and normocytic anemia requiring blood transfusion was common with repeat dosing. Leucovorin was given for grade 2 or greater thrombocytopenia and resulted in hematologic recovery within 1 week in all eight patients so treated. Without leucovorin, the thrombocytopenia lasted from 7 to 49 days in three patients. A partial response was noted in one patient with non-small-cell lung cancer and a minor response in one patient with breast cancer. Three patients with colorectal cancer achieved stable disease for greater than 3 months with improvement in carcinoembryonic antigen levels in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: DDATHF has an unusual pattern of toxicity with repetitive dosing, and humans with advanced cancer are considerably more sensitive than would be predicted from previous animal studies. Although doses of 6.0 mg/m2 per week on our schedule have been determined to be safe, repeated cycles require careful monitoring because of cumulative toxic effects. IMPLICATIONS: Additional phase I studies of DDATHF that relate toxicity to folate intake and tissue folate pools appear warranted.

Adult↗

Randomized double-blind comparison of three dose levels of intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis.

The selective 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5HT3) antagonist ondansetron has been shown to be an effective antiemetic in patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy. This double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of three doses of intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with high-dose (> or = 100 mg/m2) cisplatin chemotherapy. A total of 125 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 0.015, 0.15, or 0.30 mg/kg every 4 h for a total of 3 doses. All patients were monitored for emetic episodes, adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 h following cisplatin administration. The 0.15-mg/kg dose was superior to the 0.015-mg/kg dose with respect to the median number of emetic episodes (P = 0.033) and complete response (no emetic episodes, P = 0.005). No statistically significant difference was found between the 0.15 and the 0.30-mg/kg groups. The most common adverse event was headache. Three 0.15-mg/kg doses of intravenous ondansetron are safe, effective, and adequate for the control of cisplatin-induced emesis.

Adult↗

Potential for combination therapy with the new antiserotonergic agents.

Appreciation of the major role played by serotonergic (5-HT3) neuroreceptors in the emetic reflex arc has introduced an additional factor into the rational design of combination antiemetic therapy. Combinations of an antidopaminergic agent and a corticosteroid have previously served as the basis for many successful antiemetic regimens. Three pilot studies and three randomised studies have now demonstrated potentiation of antiemetic activity of a 5-HT3 antagonist by dexamethasone as well. Further development of combination antiemetic regimens may involve antagonism of additional receptors including those for benzodiazepines, opiates, and catecholamines. Even antidopaminergic agents may continue to have a role. Although high-dose metoclopramide has both antiserotonergic and antidopaminergic activity, other pure antidopaminergic agents retain significant antiemetic activity. The combination of an antiserotonergic agent and a low-dose antidopaminergic agent has already shown promise in one pilot study. Newer and more effective antiemetic combinations will be needed to continue to improve the quality of life of patients receiving chemotherapy.

Antiemetics↗