Drugs in British prisons. Policies need outside scrutiny if they are to do more good than harm.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S M Gore.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether injecting drug users have a higher than usual risk of death from overdose in the 2 weeks after release from prison. DESIGN: Soundex coding of surnames and information on date of birth were used to link entry and release dates from the local prison between 1983 and 1994 with clinical data from Edinburgh City Hospital's cohort of male injecting drug users who are infected with HIV. SETTING: Edinburgh City Hospital and Edinburgh Prison. SUBJECTS: 316/332 male injecting drug users infected with HIV in the City Hospital HIV cohort; 16 were excluded because they were enrolled after developing AIDS or because their precise date of death was not available. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relative risk of dying from overdose before developing AIDS and relative risk of dying of all causes before developing AIDS during the 2 weeks after release from prison; this was compared with relative risks of death during other time at liberty. RESULTS: 238/316 (75%) injecting drug users served time in the prison between 1983 and 1994. 33 out of 316 injecting drug users who were infected with HIV died before developing AIDS during 517,177 days at risk. 20 of these men died of an overdose; 6 of these deaths occurred within 2 weeks of release during 5903 days at risk. Death rates from overdose before the development of AIDS were 1.02/1000 days during the 2 weeks after release (recently released) and 0.029/1000 days during other times of liberty. The relative risk of death from overdose became 7.7 (1.5 to 39.1) after temporal matching (when the comparison was limited to the first 2 weeks after release v the next 10 weeks). The crude relative risk in an analysis combining stratified prison term and the 2 weeks after release was 4.5 (1.7 to 11.7) for death from overdose. After temporal matching these risks became 1.8 (0.4 to 9.2). CONCLUSION: Prisons should evaluate interventions to reduce the risk of death from overdose after release.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate Hepatitis C prevalence in 1983-1984, and survivorship to 1 January 1995, of patients who tested were for Hepatitis B surface antigen in 1983-1984; and to do so according to risk of blood-borne virus transmission, including injector status. SETTING: Regional Virus Laboratory in Edinburgh. SAMPLES: Sera from 1983-1984 which were originally received for hepatitis B surface antigen testing and were classified as being at high, medium, or low risk for blood-borne virus transmission. RESULTS: Available 1983-1984 sera were tested from: (i) all 246 patients aged 15-55 years who were Hepatitis B surface antigen positive in 1983-1984; and (ii) a 10% systematic sample of 355 patients aged 15-55 years who had tested Hepatitis B surface antigen negative in 1983-1984. Patients' survival status at 1 January 1995 was established via the records of the Registrar General for Scotland. A Hepatitis C prevalent case cohort of 500 survivors to 1 January 1995- who were already infected with Hepatitis C in 1983-1984--could be established from group (i) and high or medium risk group (ii) patients with, as controls, 1460 individuals of similar age and risk group whose 1983-1984 sample was negative when tested retrospectively for Hepatitis C antibodies. Two hundred out of these 500 cases are not known to be injecting drug users, and the total would rise to 300 out of 600 if the case cohort were expanded to include low risk group (ii) surviving patients who were Hepatitis C antibody positive in 1983-1984. Between 82% (40/49) and 97% of injectors (57/59 if also HIV-infected) who were Hepatitis B surface antigen positive in 1983-1984 were already Hepatitis C antibody positive; and 72% (95% confidence interval (CI) 51%-93%) of injectors who were Hepatitis B surface antigen negative in 1983-1984 were nonetheless infected with Hepatitis C. Known drug user/contacts (excluding the major group of 59 identified HIV-infecteds) had Hepatitis C prevalence in 1983-1984 of 79% (53/67, with 95% CI 69%-89%), substantially higher than our prior assumption, which was 50%. Hepatitis C prevalence in 1983-1984 for patients who were not known to be injectors, were Hepatitis B surface antigen negative and were rated as moderate risk for blood-borne virus transmission was 13% (95% CI 4%-23%) and 8% (95% CI 3%-14%) even for low risk patients. Deaths by end December 1994 in 1983-1984 prevalent Hepatitis C infections were low: 2/35 (6%) for patients who were Hepatitis B surface antigen negative in 1983-1984 and 2/40 (5%) for Hepatitis B surface antigen positive injectors who were not HIV-infected. The latter rate with upper 95% confidence limit of 12% is modest when compared to the 10% mortality that would be expected of injectors over 11 years. CONCLUSION: Retrospective Hepatitis C testing of 1700 stored sera from high or medium risk group (ii) patients who were not known to be injectors will identify an estimated 200 (11.7%) who were already Hepatitis C infected in 1983-1984 and still alive on 1 January 1995. Retrospective Hepatitis C testing of 1300 low risk samples is expected to yield 100 (7.6%) apparently non-injector patients who were already Hepatitis C infected in 1983-1984 and still alive on 1 January 1995.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the early death-rate in HIV infected injectors whose HIV infection was during the injection-related HIV outbreak in Lothian region in Scotland in 1983-1984, which was coincident with Hepatitis B transmissions. SETTING: Regional Virus Laboratory in Edinburgh. SAMPLES: Sera from 1983-1984, originally received for Hepatitis B surface antigen testing, from individuals aged 15-55 years who were positive for Hepatitis B surface antigen in 1983-1984 (group A: census) or tested negative but were at high risk for blood-borne virus transmission according to their reason for testing (group B: 50% sample). METHODS: Survival status of individuals in groups A and B who had not been diagnosed with HIV disease by the end of December 1995 was checked against the deaths' records of the Registrar General for Scotland. Stored sera from 1983-1984 for patients who had died early (that is: in 1983-1984) were tested anonymously for HIV and Hepatitis C antibodies; and prior to testing, causes of death were scored by RPB according to the likelihood of their being HIV or drugs related. RESULTS: Three early deaths were found in group A patients who were not known to be HIV infected. None of the deaths was likely to be HIV-related; the sera were not tested in order not to risk deductive disclosure. Twenty-four early deaths were found in group B patients who were not known to be HIV-infected, five of whom were both HIV and Hepatitis C antibody positive, and one other was HIV antibody negative but Hepatitis C positive. Reclassification after unlinked anonymous testing and multiplying up of the group B results (to account for 50% sample) gave the early death rate (that is: in 1983-1986) as 15/155 (10%) for HIV-infected drug users (95% CI: 6%-13%). CONCLUSION: Injection-related outbreaks of HIV infection in Lothian in 1983-1984 and at Glenochil Prison in 1993 were each associated with substantial--estimated 10%--early death-rate in HIV-infected injectors. Both HIV outbreaks were coincident with Hepatitis B transmissions, which may be relevant. Further investigations of the death-rate within 2 years of HIV infection are warranted in other exposure categories than injection-related and for injectors who have been immunized against Hepatitis B.
This data linkage study examined the extent of hepatitis B transmission and co-infection with HIV among 636 former inmates of Glenochil prison, Scotland, during an outbreak of bloodborne diseases in 1993 which was related to needle sharing. Eleven inmates imprisoned during the first half of 1993 presented with hepatitis B infection, of whom co-infection with HIV was detected in six. Based on dates of test results in relation to time of imprisonment, seven definitely acquired their hepatitis B infection within the prison. Only two infections were reported to Scotland's hepatitis B register and neither could be prison-linked. This outbreak of hepatitis B is the first of its kind to be reported but not the first to have occurred. It not only highlights the urgency for measures to prevent further spread of infection among prisoners but also illustrates the need for comprehensive surveillance of hepatitis B infection, and the need for a protocol on how to manage such outbreaks and on how to establish the extent of transmissions when acute hepatitis B occurs in prison.
We used existing data on hepatitis C prevalence, injection-related hepatitis C transmission and needle use in prisons and new data on infectiousness, to estimate the size of study required to detect injection-related hepatitis C in UK prisons. A pilot study of 500 prisoners followed for 10 weeks would have a 65% chance of detecting a hepatitis C seroconversion, conservatively assuming one injection per prisoner per week, and a 3% transmission rate per injection, but uncertainty might persist as to whether transmission had occurred during a short incarceration or before it. If the actual transmission rate was 10%, as recently documented, then such a study would have more adequate statistical power. A definitive study of 3000 prisoners for 10 weeks would expect to detect about six seroconversions, even with conservative estimates of injection frequency and transmission rate. Adequate design and power of these studies is important because of the complacency that could result from false-negative findings. We suggest six risk-factor themes that studies should document.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In this paper, we look at the incidence and predictive factors of pre-AIDS mortality among HIV-infected individuals, and injecting drug users (IDUs) in particular, and compare IDUs with non-IDUs. 627 patients (73 per cent IDUs) of the Edinburgh City Hospital HIV Cohort were enrolled pre-AIDS and followed up until September 1994. Analyses were performed using cumulative hazard and cumulative incidence estimators for a competing risks model, the Cox proportional hazards model and the non-parametric hazard estimator of Fusaro et al. (1993). The effects of age and CD4 T-lymphocyte cell count, progressively depleted during HIV progression, were investigated. 60 deaths occurred in AIDS-free patients during follow-up; 25 were drug-related deaths in IDUs. Pre-AIDS mortality was higher among IDUs than non-IDUs (p = 0.07). The cumulative incidences of pre-AIDS death after five years from enrollment were 11 per cent in IDUs and 6 per cent in non-IDUs; the cumulative AIDS incidences were, respectively, 19 per cent and 32 per cent. After eight years, cumulative pre-AIDS death incidence was 15 per cent among IDUs; cumulative AIDS incidence among IDUs was 35 per cent. Both groups had similar risks of medically-related (non-AIDS)-MRNA-death. Age and CD4 count were both individually predictive of MRNA death (relative risks (RRs); 2.1 per decade of life, p < 0.01; and 1.9 for each 100 cells per 100 microliters lost, p < 0.0001), although when used together age was less significant (RR 1.6, p = 0.07). Neither was statistically significant for drug-related mortality, although hazard may be lower in older individuals and may increase with falling CD4 count. The drug-related mortality was 1.1 per cent: 2.3 per cent in the first two years after enrollment, and 0.4 per cent thereafter. We conclude that older HIV-infected individuals are at greater risk of medically-related death before AIDS. This risk increases as CD4 count declines. Drug-related hazard may be greater in younger individuals and may increase as CD4 counts fall, but neither effect was formally significant.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: (a) To determine both the frequency of injecting inside prison and use of sterilising tablets to clean needles in the previous four weeks; (b) to assess the efficiency of random mandatory drugs testing at detecting prisoners who inject heroin inside prison; (c) to determine the percentage of prisoners who had been offered vaccination against hepatitis B. DESIGN: Cross sectional willing anonymous salivary HIV surveillance linked to a self completion risk factor questionnaire. SETTING: Lowmoss prison, Glasgow, and Aberdeen prison on 11 and 30 October 1996. SUBJECTS: 293 (94%) of all 312 inmates at Lowmoss and 146 (93%) of all 157 at Aberdeen, resulting in 286 and 143 valid questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of injecting inside prison in the previous four weeks by injector inmates who had been in prison for at least four weeks. RESULTS: 116 (41%) Lowmoss and 53 (37%) Aberdeen prisoners had a history of injecting drug use but only 4% of inmates (17/395; 95% confidence interval 2% to 6%) had ever been offered vaccination against hepatitis B. 42 Lowmoss prisoners (estimated 207 injections and 258 uses of sterilising tablets) and 31 Aberdeen prisoners (229 injections, 221 uses) had injected inside prison in the previous four weeks. The prisons together held 112 injector inmates who had been in prison for more than four weeks, of whom 57 (51%; 42% to 60%) had injected in prison in the past four weeks; their estimated mean number of injections was 6.0 (SD 5.7). Prisoners injecting heroin six times in four weeks will test positive in random mandatory drugs testing on at most 18 days out of 28. CONCLUSIONS: Sterilising tablets and hepatitis B vaccination should be offered to all prisoners. Random mandatory drugs testing seriously underestimates injector inmates' harm reduction needs.
We tested the validity of a previously-published AIDS staging system by examining AIDS-defining diseases (ADDs) and CD4 counts as prognostic factors for survival of the 248 AIDS patients in the Edinburgh City Hospital Cohort, of whom 56% were injecting drug-users (IDUs). Cox regression was used to model the proportionality of risk of death as the CD4 count declined and more ADDs were experienced, and dependence upon post-AIDS treatment. Using the system of Mocroft et al. (Lancet 1995; 346:12-17) to grade severity, our data were well enough modelled, but we suggest: (i) regrading of HIV dementia (RR 3.9, 95% CI 2.5-6.0), mainly attributed to the drug users, to a very severe ADD; (ii) reduction in risk from zidovudine (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.0) during AIDS follow-up for patients starting treatment at or after AIDS diagnosis; (iii) improved management of first mild ADDs (from 1987-89 to 1994-95: 40% reduction in IDUs appearing with mild index diseases, and an approximate three-fold reduction in risk associated with a mild ADD). This study supports previous findings on the significance of ADDs and lowest CD4 count in predicting the lifetime of AIDS patients.
AIM: On the basis of finalised data from the Corneal Transplant Follow up Study to identify and quantify factors influencing corneal graft outcome in terms of graft survival, rejection, visual acuity, and astigmatism. METHODS: Multifactorial analysis of 2777 grafts registered by the UK Transplant Support Service from July 1987 to June 1991. RESULTS: Several recipient factors influencing graft survival, rejection, and visual acuity were identified, but no donor factors. Of the operative factors amenable to change, mixed suturing was associated with reduced graft survival, and larger grafts with increased risk of rejection but better visual acuity when surviving. There was increased risk of rejection with poor matching at HLA class I antigens, but mismatched HLA-DR grafts suffered less rejection than those with zero HLA-DR mismatches. Recipient age below 10 years was associated with increased risk of both rejection and graft failure. However, whereas increasing age above 10 years was not associated with differential graft survival, it was significantly associated with decreasing risk of rejection. CONCLUSIONS: While confirming possible benefits of HLA-A and B matching, the expense and delay involved in awaiting matched HLA-DR tissue is unlikely to be justified. Other donor factors are unrelated to graft outcome following screening of tissue by eye banks. The highest rates of graft failure and rejection happen in the early postoperative period, and factors influencing visual outcome are also apparent at this stage.
434 male and 145 female prisoners were available to participate in cross-sectional, voluntary anonymous HIV surveillance (using saliva samples) with linked self-completion questionnaire at HMP (Her Majesty's Prison) Perth on 17 May and at HMP Cornton Vale on 18 May 1995. Three hundred and four men (70%) and 136 women (94%) completed a risk-factor questionnaire and 304 and 135 samples were received for HIV antibody testing. Two hundred and eighty-two and 132 questionnaires passed logical checks. Six saliva samples from Perth (all injectors) out of 304 and none from Cornton Vale out of 134 tested were HIV antibody positive. Four were presumptively from known HIV-infected male inmates; the other 2 were local men, under 26 years, who began injecting in 1989-91, and both reported having had a recent HIV test. Overall HIV prevalence was estimated at 2% compared to a known prevalence of 1.4% (6/434), giving a 1.5 ratio of overall: disclosed HIV prevalence at HMP Perth. HIV prevalence was estimated at 7% (6/82) for injector-participants and 14% (5/35) for local injector participants. At Cornton Vale, where both known HIV-infected inmates abstained, overall and disclosed HIV prevalence, were equal at 1.4%. At Perth Prison, 29% of prisoners had injected drugs (82/278); 85% of injector-inmates reported having injected inside (some prison and 31% (25/80) had started to inject while inside, 7 during their present sentence. Of all 21 injector-inmates who first injected after 1991, 10 had started to inject inside, including one of 69 male inmates who had never been inside before. The corresponding figures for Cornton Vale, where 46% of inmates were injectors (58/132), were that 57% of injector-inmates had injected inside (32/56) but only one woman, for whom this was not her first sentence, had started to inject inside. Twenty-eight per cent of male prisoners (78/277) and 57% of male injector-inmates (47/82) had had a personal HIV test since January 1993, as had 35% of female prisoners (43/124) and 57% of female injector-inmates (30/53). A much higher proportion of Glasgow's female prisoners (64%: 38/60) were injectors than of women prisoners from the Edinburgh, Dundee and Fife area (21%: 5/26) or from elsewhere (34%: 15/45). Rape was reported by 23% of women (30/130). Women who had been raped had a more polarized distribution of male sexual partners (none to 2 plus) in the year before sentencing than other women and were more likely to report anal sex (11/30 vs 11/100, P < 0.001). Prostitution had been engaged in by 19% of female injector-inmates (11/57) and was acknowledged by one other woman. However, only 5% of women (6/130) reported ever having been treated for an STD.
BACKGROUND: Compulsory urine testing of prisoners for drugs, a control initiative, was introduced in eight prisons in England and Wales early in 1995. Despite no evidence of effectiveness, testing was extended to all prisons in England and Wales by March 1996. We consider the cost of testing. METHODS: We combined the costs of refusals, confirmatory tests, punishment of confirmed positives for cannabis or for class A drugs to estimate the average costs of random compulsory drugs testing. These costs were then compared to: i) the healthcare budget for a prison; and ii) the cost of putting in place a credible prisons' drugs reduction programme. We then used Scottish data on incarceration and regional prevalence of injecting drug users to estimate the extent of the injecting drug use problem that prisons face. FINDINGS: Costs per 28 days of the random mandatory drugs testing control initiative in an establishment for 500 inmates where refusal rate is a) 10% or b) nil; and 35% of urine samples test positive, one tenth of them for class A drugs were estimated at between a) 22,800 UK pounds and b) 16,000 UK pounds per 28 days [a) $US35,100 and b) $US24,600]. This cost was equivalent to twice the cost of running a credible drugs reduction and rehabilitation programme, and around half the total healthcare expenditure for a prison of 500 which averaged 41,114 UK pounds per 28 days [$US64,860]. Major cost-generating events were the punishment of refusals--over one third of cost a)--and testing positive for cannabis--over 50% of cost a). In Scotland, around 5% of injecting drug users (IDUs) are incarcerated at any time: 5% of Lothian's drugs care, treatment and prevention costs and 2.5% of its HIV/AIDS prevention budget in 1993-94 amounted to 101,300 UK pounds per annum--or 7770 UK pounds per 28 days ($US11,970)--and about 35% of monthly MDT costs. INTERPRETATION: We suggest that 5% of current resources for drugs prevention and treatment and for IDU-targetted HIV/AIDS prevention should be directed towards the prisons because in the prisons, where 5% of the clients are at any time, injectors have less access to harm reduction measures than on the outside.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Mandatory drugs testing of prisoners applies throughout England and Wales. Data from the 1995 pilot study in eight prisons show that the proportion testing positive for opiates or benzodiazepines rose from 4.1% to 7.4% between the first and second phase of random testing and that there was a 20% increase over 1993-4 in the provisional total of assaults for 1995. Interpretation of these data is difficult, but this is no excuse for prevarication over the danger that this policy may induce inmates to switch from cannabis (which has a negligible public health risk) to injectable class A drugs (a serious public health risk) in prison. The performance indicators for misuse of drugs that are based on the random mandatory drugs testing programme lack relevant covariate information about the individuals tested and are not reliable or timely for individual prisons.