Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

S Leurgans

Publications and source records attributed to S Leurgans.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Determination of enzyme or binding constants using generalized linear models, with particular reference to Michaelis-Menten models.

The estimation of Michaelis-Menten pharmacokinetic parameters in patients with epilepsy receiving phenytoin continues to be a vexing problem. The various approximate methods suggested in the literature have serious shortcomings, primarily due to the role of the error term in the statistical model. In this report we present an accurate statistical approach using the Generalized Linear Interactive Modeling (GLIM) computer package developed by the Numerical Algorithms Group, Oxford, U.K. There are several advantages to this model: a meaningful error term can be maintained by means of a link function, the model can incorporate within-subject and between-subject variables, and additional potential explanatory variables can be added to the model. The method is applied to predicting serum phenytoin levels of pregnant women monitored at monthly intervals during pregnancy and for two to five months after pregnancy. Michaelis-Menten parameters are estimated for each women and compared.

Adult

Does adoption affect subsequent fertility?

A hypothesis derived from the old wives' tale that adoption increases subsequent fertility was tested by analysis of follow-up data obtained from 895 couples who were "at risk" of pregnancy and of adoption after they had registered in the Stanford Infertility Clinic between 1963 and 1977. Of the 767 couples who did not adopt, 329 later conceived; of the 128 who did adopt, 41 later conceived. Simple comparison of the percentages or, indeed, of the life tables suggests reduced fertility after adoption. However, this is probably a spurious effect related to a number of factors which differ between two groups. These differences were controlled in the statistical analysis by methods which take into account the length of time each couple was at risk of either conception or adoption and the presence or absence of explanatory variables. The relative risk of conception estimated by the Cox model was not significantly different from 1 and the Mantel-Haenszel statistic (m = 0.208) indicates no significant difference in subsequent conception rates between adoptive and not-adoptive couples. The same methods were used to control for seven covariates, including age and duration of infertility, which could affect conception rates. In each instance, the estimate of relative risk of conception for adoptive versus not-adoptive couples was not significantly different from 1. Therefore, our data do not support the hypothesis that adoption affects subsequent fertility.

Adoption