Biomedical subjects

S L Linder

Publications and source records attributed to S L Linder.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Atomoxetine treatment in children and adolescents with ADHD and comorbid tic disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that atomoxetine does not significantly worsen tic severity relative to placebo in children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and comorbid tic disorders. METHODS: Study subjects were 7 to 17 years old, met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV criteria for ADHD, and had concurrent Tourette syndrome or chronic motor tic disorder. Patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with placebo (n = 72) or atomoxetine (0.5 to 1.5 mg/kg/day, n = 76) for up to 18 weeks. RESULTS: Atomoxetine treatment was associated with greater reduction of tic severity at endpoint relative to placebo, approaching significance on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale total score (-5.5 +/- 6.9 vs -3.0 +/- 8.7, p = 0.063) and Tic Symptom Self-Report total score (-4.7 +/- 6.5 vs -2.9 +/- 5.2, p = 0.095) and achieving significance on the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) tic/neurologic severity scale score (-0.7 +/- 1.2 vs -0.1 +/- 1.0, p = 0.002). Atomoxetine patients also showed greater improvement on the ADHD Rating Scale total score (-10.9 +/- 10.9 vs -4.9 +/- 10.3, p < 0.001) and CGI severity of ADHD/psychiatric symptoms scale score (-0.8 +/- 1.1 vs -0.3 +/- 1.0, p = 0.015). Discontinuation rates were not significantly different between treatment groups. Atomoxetine patients had greater increases in heart rate and decreases of body weight, and rates of treatment-emergent decreased appetite and nausea were higher. No other clinically relevant treatment differences were seen in any other vital sign, adverse event, or electrocardiographic or laboratory measures. CONCLUSIONS: Atomoxetine did not exacerbate tic symptoms. Rather, there was some evidence of reduction in tic severity with a significant reduction of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms. Atomoxetine treatment appeared safe and well tolerated.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Pediatric headache.

Headaches are frequent in children and adolescents and at times can be extremely disabling. Disability scales, such as the MIDAS scale, have been useful in helping follow adult patients. Modifications of this scale have been helpful in following pediatric and adolescent patients. Greater attention has been paid to epidemiology and classification of headache in children. Studies are being done on serotonin 1B/1D agonist for treating acute migraine, and this agent has been found to be efficacious despite a high placebo response. It is anticipated that FDA approval of sumatriptan nasal spray in adolescents is forthcoming. Despite advancements, there is no wonder drug. There continues to be a need for studying preventive therapies in a double-blind, placebo-controlled environment, and plans are under way for such studies. Many adult patients with chronic daily headaches report that their headaches began in childhood and adolescence. A better understanding of diagnostic criteria, early diagnosis, and more effective treatment may be the key to influencing the prevalence of headaches in adults. Continued research is the only answer to the questions raised by the most recent studies in this population.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Chronic nonprogressive headaches in children and adolescents.

Chronic nonprogressive headaches (CNPHA) are common in children and increase in frequency in adolescents. Features are usually, but not always, distinct from those of migraine. CNPHA have also been called chronic daily headaches, tension-type headaches, muscle contraction headaches, and psychogenic headaches. These headaches represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to family physicians, pediatricians, and pediatric neurologists. The evaluation is time-consuming and the treatment frustrating and often unsuccessful. They are a significant cause of school absences. This review addresses the epidemiology classification, pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, evaluation, and treatment of this disorder.

Absenteeism↗

PubMed2000

Zolmitriptan provides effective migraine relief in adolescents.

Data from a subgroup of adolescents (12-17 years) entered into a one-year open-label phase of a large international study were analysed to evaluate response rates and tolerability of zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. In the open-label phase of this study, the first two migraine attacks were treated with zolmitriptan 2.5 mg and subsequent attacks with zolmitriptan 2.5 mg or 5 mg, at the patient's discretion, for up to 12 months. Two-hour headache and pain-free responses were evaluated and adverse events were recorded. Thirty-eight adolescents treated 276 migraine attacks of any intensity. The overall headache response at 2 hours was 80% (88% and 70% with zolmitriptan 2.5 mg and 5 mg, respectively), and the pain-free response was 66% (76% and 52% for zolmitriptan 2.5 mg and 5 mg, respectively). Response rates were independent of whether or not migraine was associated with aura or menses. During prolonged use, patients learned to adjust the dose of zolmitriptan to effectively manage their migraine. Treatment was well tolerated. In conclusion, preliminary data indicate that zolmitriptan is effective in the acute treatment of migraine in adolescents and is well tolerated.

Acute Disease↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Subcutaneous sumatriptan in the clinical setting: the first 50 consecutive patients with acute migraine in a pediatric neurology office practice.

An open prospective study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sumatriptan in 50 consecutive children ages 6 to 18 years with severe migraine. There were 28 females and 22 males. The dose of sumatriptan was 0.06 mg/kg. Parameters included overall efficacy, time to relief, recurrence rate, adverse events, and objective global rating. Overall efficacy, defined by headache reduction from severe or moderate to mild or none, was 78%. Twenty-six percent responded within 30 minutes, 46% responded in 60 minutes, and 6% responded between 1 to 2 hours. Twenty-two percent had no response or a suboptimal response. Recurrence rate was only 6%. There was a difference in efficacy between male and female, as 91% of the males responded, while only 68% of the females responded. The males had more migraine alone while the females had migraine often with a coexistent tension-type headache. Eighty percent of all the patients had some adverse event which was usually mild and transient; however, one patient developed a transitory confusional state which resolved in 2 hours. Eighty-four percent reported a global rating of good to excellent, while 16% rated the treatment only fair to poor. These findings suggest that subcutaneous sumatriptan can be both effective and safe in childhood migraine, especially in dealing with migraine alone.

Acute Disease↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Treatment of childhood headache with dihydroergotamine mesylate.

This study was undertaken to determine whether pediatric patients with migraine without aura who have failed standard outpatient regimens including intravenous dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE) in conjunction with oral metoclopramide would respond to an inpatient treatment protocol of intravenous DHE and oral metoclopramide. Thirty patients were evaluated in this study which was an open label, retrospective review of treatment. Independent of the duration of the refractory migraine, 80% of the patients responded to the protocol with only minimal side effect. The dose of DHE mesylate ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 mg. The dose of DHE is lower than is typically utilized in standard adult protocols. The patients received an average of five doses of DHE.

Adolescent↗