Aluminium hydroxide (AH) and aluminium phosphate (AP) adjuvants, labelled with 26Al, were injected intramuscularly (i.m.) in New Zealand White rabbits. Blood and urine samples were collected for 28 days and analysed for 26Al using accelerator mass spectrometry to determine the absorption and elimination of AH and AP adjuvants. 26Al was present in the first blood sample (1 h) for both adjuvants. The area under the blood level curve for 28 days indicates that three times more aluminium was absorbed from AP adjuvant than AH adjuvant. The distribution profile of aluminium to tissues was the same for both adjuvants (kidney > spleen > liver > heart > lymph node > brain). This study has demonstrated that in vivo mechanisms are available to eliminate aluminium-containing adjuvants after i.m. administration. In addition, the pharmacokinetic profiles of AH and AP adjuvants are different.

Absorption↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Solubilization of aluminum-containing adjuvants by constituents of interstitial fluid.

The solubilization of three commercially available aluminum-containing adjuvants by citrate anion was studied. Amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate and boehmite were both solubilized, however, amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate dissolved significantly faster than boehmite. The results suggest that citrate and other alpha-hydroxy carboxylate anions in the interstitial fluid are able to solubilize and thereby facilitate the excretion of aluminum from aluminum-containing adjuvants which are administered by intramuscular injection. The results also suggest that the release of antigen following administration may be significantly more rapid from an amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate-adjuvanted vaccine in comparison to a boehmite-adjuvanted vaccine.

Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Characterization of aluminum hydroxide for use as an adjuvant in parenteral vaccines.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Role of the electrostatic attractive force in the adsorption of proteins by aluminum hydroxide adjuvant.

The fact that both aluminum hydroxide adjuvant and proteins have a pH dependent surface charge means that electrostatic forces play a role in the adsorption of proteins by aluminum hydroxide adjuvant during the preparation of vaccines. The objective of this study was to examine the contribution of the electrostatic attractive force in the adsorption of proteins by aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. Since the surface charge characteristics of aluminum hydroxide adjuvant can be modified by the adsorption of phosphate anion, a series of aluminum hydroxide adjuvants were prepared by treatment with various concentrations of phosphate anion. The isoelectric points (iep) of these adjuvants ranged from 11.0 to 4.6 and the electrophoretic mobilities at pH 7.4 ranged from 2.0 to -3.3 microns cm/V s. The line broadening of the (020) band of the X-ray diffraction pattern indicated that treatment with phosphate anion did not change the primary crystallite dimension. Adsorption at pH 7.4 of positively charged lysozyme (iep = 11.1) was directly related to the negative surface charge of the adjuvant. No adsorption occurred when the surface charge was positive. In contrast, negatively charged ovalbumin (iep = 4.6) was adsorbed by all of the adjuvants at pH 7.4, although the adsorptive capacity was the greatest when the surface charge was positive. The results indicate that adsorptive forces in addition to the electrostatic attractive force play an important role in the adsorption of some proteins by aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. It is believed the structurally flexible proteins, like ovalbumin, exhibit more complex adsorption behavior than structurally rigid proteins, like lysozyme, for which adsorptive behavior can be explained by electrostatic forces.

Adsorption↗