Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Kippax

Publications and source records attributed to S Kippax.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Seroconversion in context.

This paper describes the accounts that homosexually active men give of their HIV seroconversion and interrogates these accounts for risk discourses. In particular, this paper asks whether the risk discourses of HIV researchers and educators are present in the men's narratives of their own seroconversion. Such discourses make reference to 'unsafe' sex--particularly the practice of unprotected anal intercourse, numbers of sexual partners or 'promiscuity', and the disinhibiting effect of drugs and alcohol. The data are drawn from an ongoing case-series study of seroconversion in which men who had seroconverted were asked to give an account of the occasion on which they believe they were infected. A number of themes were identified in the men's accounts. The men's descriptions of what they believe to be the seroconversion event indicate that their attributions, i.e., the reasons they give for their HIV infection, vary depending on the context. Within regular relationships, breakdown of negotiated safety, love and intimacy, and fatalism were among the explanations given. Seroconversion attributed to casual sexual encounters was more likely to be explained in terms of pleasure, lack of control, and with reference to particular sexual settings. The ways in which men understood their HIV infection were informed both by the risk discourse of HIV researchers and also by the discourses of love and pleasure, as well as that of control.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Predictors of recent HIV testing in homosexual men in Australia.

OBJECTIVES: To describe time trends and other predictors of recent HIV testing among homosexual men enrolled in behavioural surveillance studies in Australia. METHODS: Repeated cross-sectional studies during the period 1996-2001 in Australian capital cities. Men were recruited from a variety of community-based settings, including gay community outdoor events, sex on premises venues, and social venues. They underwent a brief self-administered questionnaire in which they reported their HIV status, HIV-testing history, sexual behaviour and demographic information. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned for 22,161 HIV-negative or status-unknown participants. While 85.3% had ever tested for HIV, 57.6% had tested in the last 12 months. Recent testing was greater in those living in Sydney, in younger men, in gay-identified men, in gay community-attached men, in those who reported unprotected anal intercourse and a higher number of sexual partners, and in partners of HIV-positive men. Although recent testing declined from 1996 to 2001, this trend was no longer significant when adjusted for other testing predictors. CONCLUSIONS: In Australia, HIV testing among gay men decreased slightly from 1996 to 2001, but the trend was not significant when adjusted for other predictors. Testing levels were highest among those at highest risk of HIV infection, and lowest among non gay-identified and non gay-community attached homosexual men.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

In a minority of gay men, sexual risk practice indicates strategic positioning for perceived risk reduction rather than unbridled sex.

The aim of this analysis was to examine gay men's sexual risk practice to determine patterns of risk management. Ten cross-sectional surveys of gay men were conducted six-monthly from February 1996 to August 2000 at Sydney gay community social, sex-on-premises and sexual health sites (average n = 827). Every February during this period, five identical surveys were conducted at the annual Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras Fair Day (average n = 1178). Among the minority of men who had unprotected anal intercourse which involved ejaculation inside with a serodiscordant regular partner, there was a clear pattern of sexual positioning. Few regular couples were both receptive and insertive. Most HIV-positive men were receptive and most HIV-negative men were insertive. Among the minority of men who had unprotected anal intercourse which involved ejaculation inside with casual partners, there was also a pattern of sexual positioning. Whereas many casual couples were both receptive and insertive (especially those involving HIV-positive respondents), among the remainder HIV-positive men tended to be receptive and HIV-negative men tended to be insertive. These patterns of HIV-positive/receptive and HIV-negative/insertive suggest strategic risk reduction positionings rather than mere sexual preferences among a minority of gay men. If so, they point not to complacency but to an ever more complex domain of HIV prevention.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Increasing proportions of Australian gay and homosexually active men engage in unprotected anal intercourse with regular and with casual partners.

We examined trends in sexual practice among gay and homosexually active men in Australia. Self-complete questionnaires were distributed with mail-order sex video catalogues in 2000 and returned anonymously through a reply-paid facility. The data were compared with those from men who responded to promotional material sent out with the same catalogues and who participated in national telephone surveys of men who have sex with men conducted in 1992 and 1996. A key independent variable was gay community attached (GCA) versus non-GCA (NGCA) derived from two items about number of gay friends and amount of free time spent with gay men. Responses came from 1,832 men ranging in age from 16 to 80 (median = 39) years. HIV status was 73% negative, 5% positive, 22% untested; 1,181 men were GCA and 651 men were NGCA. Overall, from 1992 to 2000 there was a significant upward trend in the proportion of men reporting any unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) in the previous six months with regular partners: 21.5%, 24.7%, 46.4% of the total sample (p < 0.001). And similarly for UAI with casual partners: 12.4%, 16.2%, 25.5% (p < 0.001). The upward trends in UAI-regular and UAI-casual were similar and significant (p < 0.001) for both GCA and NGCA men. These nationwide Australian data provide evidence of continuing increases in unprotected anal intercourse with regular and with casual partners. Whereas the majority of men do not engage in any unprotected anal intercourse during a defined interval, ever increasing proportions of them do.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Modelling the effect of combination antiretroviral treatments on HIV incidence.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the competing effects on HIV incidence in homosexual men of the decreased infectiousness of men with HIV receiving effective combination antiretroviral treatments and homosexual men engaging in unprotected anal intercourse with increased numbers of partners (levels of unsafe sex). METHODS: A mathematical model of HIV transmission in homosexual men was developed, based on the HIV epidemic in Australia in 1996, when effective antiretroviral treatments first became widely available. Uncertainties in parameters were modelled using 1000 simulations. The effect of treatments on decreasing infectiousness was randomly sampled with a median 10-fold decrease in infectiousness (range 100-fold to no decrease). Levels of unsafe sex were randomly sampled with a median 50% increase in unsafe sex (range 100% to no increase). The percentage change in HIV incidence after one year was obtained by comparison with a null model in which there was no decrease in infectiousness as a result of treatment and no change in unsafe sex. RESULTS: Results of the models suggested that whereas increased levels of unsafe sex were linearly associated with increases in HIV incidence, decreases in infectiousness because of treatments were non-linearly associated with decreases in HIV incidence. An assessment of the competing effects suggested that decreases in infectiousness of two-, five-, and 10-fold would be counterbalanced by increases in unsafe sex of approximately 40, 60 and 70%, respectively. CONCLUSION: These models suggest that apparently large decreases in infectiousness as a result of treatment could be counterbalanced in terms of new HIV infections by much more modest increases in unsafe sex.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2001

Gay men's casual sex encounters: discussing HIV and using condoms.

Some gay men disclose their HIV serostatus to enable them to decide to discard condoms in at least some casual encounters. In this paper we consider under what circumstances this occurs. We draw on data from the Sydney Men and Sexual Health cohort study, including both structured and semi-structured interviews. We find that casual sexual encounters among gay men are complex events, involving a broad range of types of partner and circumstance. A significant minority of men disclose their HIV serostatus; 36.3% of those who discussed their serostatus with casual partners engaged in unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) with those partners, while only 9.9% of those who did not discuss their serostatus engaged in UAI with those partners. We also find that disclosure of HIV serostatus, discussion and use of condoms during casual encounters are affected by the particular circumstances of those encounters, including the degree of familiarity between casual partners.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Negotiated safety and other agreements between men in relationships: risk practice redefined.

This study examines patterns of agreement, knowledge and practice which can prevent or facilitate HIV transmission among men who are in regular ('primary') male-to-male relationships. Data are from a national volunteer phone-in survey of homosexually-active men in Australia. A sub-sample of 1070 men from a larger sample (n=3039) were found to have one or more regular partners for longer than 6 months. Self-reported HIV serostatus of survey participant and his regular partner, type of agreement regarding anal intercourse both within and outside the regular relationship, and engaging in unprotected anal intercourse with regular and with casual partners were examined. Risk practice was defined as unprotected anal intercourse with a regular partner of different or unknown serostatus and/or unprotected anal intercourse with a casual partner. Agreements were classified as: negotiated safety (28.8%); no unprotected anal intercourse (33.6%); unsafe (10.6%) and no agreement (17.0%). Risk practice was reported by 17.8% of the men. Type of agreement was found to be the strongest predictor of risk practice. Negotiated safety agreements were common, and were kept on the whole. Men with unsafe agreements, although only a small proportion of men in relationships, had high levels of risk practice.

Australia↗
PubMed2001

Increasing realism among gay men in Sydney about HIV treatments: changes in attitudes over time.

It is important to know if optimism about HIV treatments is widespread and whether it is growing. To this end, cross-sectional surveys of gay men were conducted 6-monthly in Sydney between February 1997 and February 1999 (n = 3012). Recruitment was consistent at 4 gay community venues. The participants responded True, False or Unsure to 5 statements about the effectiveness of HIV treatments (2 items), and transmission (2 items) and 'worry' (1 item) in the context of treatments. In terms of effectiveness, HIV-positive men were more likely than non-positive men to dismiss 'cure' (P < 0.05) and more likely to support 'treatments prevent serious illness' (P < 0.001). Uncertainty about effectiveness decreased over time (P < 0.001 for each item). In terms of transmission, HIV-positive men were more likely than non-positive men to reject notions of reduced infectivity (P < 0.001). Over time, there was less uncertainty among non-positive men about undetectable viral load and transmission possibilities (P < 0.001). Overall, HIV-positive men were less 'worried' than non-positive men (P < 0.001) but there were no changes over time. On the whole, gay men in Sydney are now less uncertain about highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART) than at the time of their introduction. Most men remain sceptical that these treatments can cure HIV infection and prevent HIV transmission, but in regard to managing illness among those infected, some initial uncertainty is being replaced by a growing optimism about the efficacy of treatments.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

A scale of optimism-scepticism in the context of HIV treatments.

The aim of this research was to develop a brief scale of gay men's optimism-scepticism in the context of new HIV treatments. Following comprehensive literature search and communication with other researchers, 34 items about viral load testing, HIV therapies and concern about HIV infection were generated. By way of anonymous, self-complete questionnaires, these items were put to 532 gay men recruited at the Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras Fair Day in February 1999. Principal axes factor analysis and item refinement yielded an optimism-scepticism scale based on 12 items (range 12-48, with higher scores indicating greater optimism). The sample mean was 19.8 (SD = 4.7). The scale had high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79). Providing preliminary evidence of validity, men who reported unprotected anal intercourse with a causal partner 'in the past six months' had a significantly higher mean score (21.3) than those who did not report this risk practice (19.5, p < 0.001). Similar validation was provided from separate samples of gay men in Queensland and Sydney. Our scale of optimism-scepticism in the context of new HIV therapies is a brief, reliable instrument which can be incorporated within broader questionnaires and interview schedules. It is a useful tool to monitor attitudes toward HIV therapies and possible associations with risk practices.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Condom use and 'withdrawal': exploring gay men's practice of anal intercourse.

Some gay men who have unprotected anal intercourse avoid ejaculation-they practise 'withdrawal'. Using data collected in 1997 from a sample of Sydney gay men (n=625), we explored the relation between men's practice of ejaculation and their use of condoms. We also investigated whether men who had unprotected withdrawal but not unprotected ejaculation were more likely to think unprotected withdrawal was safe, liked condoms less, liked anal intercourse more, or were more sexually adventurous. Considering separately insertive and receptive anal intercourse with regular and with casual partners, we found that the majority of men who practised unprotected withdrawal also practised unprotected ejaculation. Of those whose only unprotected sex was withdrawal ('true withdrawers'), most never used condoms (they did not also have protected sex with ejaculation). True withdrawers were compared with men who had unprotected ejaculation, who always used condoms, who had no anal sex and who had no partners. Those who were true withdrawers with casual partners were more likely to believe withdrawal was safe; no group effects were found with regular partners. No significant differences in condom attitudes were found. True withdrawers with regular partners liked anal intercourse less than other men, but true withdrawers with casual partners were indistinguishable from those who had unprotected ejaculation. True withdrawers did not differ in sexual adventurousness from other men who had anal intercourse. Most withdrawers avoided anal sex with ejaculation rather than use condoms. Converting them into reliable condom users may be a considerable challenge for health promotion.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Gay men in Australia who do not have HIV test results.

Whereas most gay men in Australia know their HIV test result, a consistent minority do not. From Gay Community Periodic Surveys (n=6831) conducted during 1998 in the 5 largest cities, those who did not have HIV test results (13.3% overall) comprised 10.0% in Sydney, 15.7% in Melbourne, 13.6% in Brisbane, 15.2% in Perth and 14.0% in Adelaide, representing a significant difference between cities (P < 0.001). Gay men who did not have HIV test results differed from those who did in several ways. They were on average younger (31 vs 35 years, P<0.001) and less likely to be in professional occupations (P<0.001). They were less likely to identify themselves as 'gay' (P<0.001), spent less time with other gay men (P<0.001) and had fewer gay friends (P<0.001). They had sex with fewer different men 'in the previous 6 months' (P<0.001) and were more likely to be in a monogamous relationship or without sexual partners at the time of the survey (P<0.001). With respect to both regular and casual partners, they were more likely (P<0.001) to have 'no such partner'/'no anal intercourse' rather than 'anal intercourse' (either always protected or sometimes unprotected). These differences between gay men who did and did not have HIV test results were confirmed in a logistic regression (apart from 'amount of free time spent with gay men' and 'relationship status' which were accounted for by closely correlated variables in the reduced logistic model). Social and sexual environment appears to exert an influence on HIV testing rather than sexual risk per se.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

HIV treatments optimism and sexual behaviour among gay men in Sydney and Melbourne.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate associations between gay men's optimism and sexual behaviour in the context of new HIV treatments. METHODS: Cross-sectional surveys (using anonymous, self-completed questionnaires) were conducted in Sydney during February 1998 (n = 2200) and in Melbourne during January 1998 (n = 1891). Gay men were recruited at social and sex-on-premises venues, clinics and fair days/carnivals. RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis, unprotected anal intercourse with casual partners (UAIC) was associated with being recruited at a sex-on-premises venue (rather than a clinic or fair day/carnival), HIV positivity, having been tested for HIV less than 6 months ago (rather than over 2 years ago or never having been tested), and not having a regular partner. Over and above these factors, UAIC was associated with agreement with the statements 'An HIV-positive person who is on combination therapy is unlikely to transmit HIV' and 'I'm less worried about HIV infection than I used to be'. CONCLUSIONS: The data reveal a significant relationship between UAIC and certain aspects of optimism in the context of new HIV treatments. Whereas the direction of causality cannot be specified, there is a clear need for HIV and sexual health education programmes to clarify issues of viral load, new and drug resistant strains of HIV, and other infectious agents.

Attitude↗
PubMed1998

Cultures of sexual adventurism as markers of HIV seroconversion: a case control study in a cohort of Sydney gay men.

A case control analysis within an ongoing cohort study was used to examine differences between seroconverters and men who remained HIV-negative. The cases were interviewed within one to 13 months prior to their seroconversion. Their responses to a structured questionnaire were compared with those of HIV-negative controls drawn from the same time period and from the same longitudinal study, Sydney Men and Sexual Health. Data collected from both cases and controls included: demographic and contextual variables, knowledge of HIV transmission, sexual practices, drug and alcohol use and attitudinal factors. The aim was to compare the sexual behaviours, and the social and cultural contexts of such behaviours, of men prior to their HIV seroconversion with men who did not seroconvert. Twenty-three men had seroconverted within the cohort. Cases were identified by a positive HIV antibody test or self-report of positive HIV status following a previous negative HIV test. Three-hundred-and-sixty-nine controls were selected on the basis of being HIV negative at interview in 1994, and having at least one subsequent medically-confirmed negative HIV antibody test. Univariate predictors of seroconversion were: being in a regular relationship with a known HIV-positive partner, drug use, and engaging in a range of anal and esoteric sexual practices. Practices commonly used to enhance sexual pleasure, such as group sex, watching and being watched having sex, the use of sex toys and dressing up/fantasy, were engaged in more frequently by seroconverters. Engaging in these esoteric sexual practices was highly correlated with drug use, involvement in the gay community and engagement in a wide range of anal practices. In the multivariate analysis independent predictors of seroconversion were: younger age; being in a regular relationship with a known HIV-positive partner; believing withdrawal to be safe with regard to HIV transmission; and range of esoteric practices. These results indicate the importance of the social and cultural contexts of particular sexual practices and consequent HIV transmission. Sexually adventurous men may be at increased risk for HIV because they seek sex within particular sexual sub-cultures.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

AIDS impact.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗