Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Kaasa

Publications and source records attributed to S Kaasa.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Prognostic factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

From 1971 to 1985 a total of 122 patients with non-distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospital with radiation doses that increased from 50 Gy (at 2 Gy/fractions) to 70 Gy (at 2 Gy/fractions) during the treatment period. Possible relationship between the increase in dose and survival time was investigated. The median cancer-specific survival time was 50 months, and the median crude survival time 38 months. No correlation was found between radiation dose and survival time. In a multivariate analysis histology was found to be the most important prognostic factor for survival with a relative risk of death from cancer of 3.4 and 3.2 for non-keratinizing carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma respectively compared with undifferentiated carcinoma. When assessed in terms of N category the relative death risk for N2/N3 was 2.1 compared to N0/N1.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

[Information and support to cancer patients. Experience from a course for young cancer patients at the Montebello Center].

The Montebello Centre offers courses for cancer patients from the whole country. The intention is to improve the patients' quality of life and ability to cope through information, group discussions and various kinds of activities. During Easter 1991 the Centre arranged a course for young people. An oncologist and a psychiatrist served as teachers and group participants, and offered individual consultations. Most of the patients had received insufficient information about their cancer. The period after end of active treatment was experienced as particularly distressing due to psychological reactions. The establishment of more self-help groups, and contact with already established groups, seem to be valuable psychosocial interventions.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

The influence of low fat, low lactose diet on diarrhoea during pelvic radiotherapy.

In a prospective clinical trial 143 women undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for gynaecological malignancies, were randomized to receive either a low-fat, low-lactose diet (intervention group) or a regular diet (control group) in order to evaluate the possible impact of diet therapy on radiation induced diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting. The daily number and consistency of stools, use of antidiarrhoeal agents, nausea and vomiting were recorded before radiotherapy was begun (week 0), in the last week of therapy (week 6) and 6 weeks after the end of therapy (week 12). The intervention group used half the amount of antidiarrhoeal agents in week 6, than used by the control group (mean 0.6 tablets per day versus 1.1, p < 0.01). 14 patients (23%) in the intervention group reported diarrhoea, versus 32 (48%) in the control group (p < 0.01). In week 12 there were no differences in the use of antidiarrhoeal agents and the prevalence of diarrhoea between the groups.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1992

Efficacy of twice daily versus three times daily oral ondansetron in the prevention of chemotherapy induced emesis: a randomized, single-blind, multicentre study. The Ondansetron International Emesis Study Group.

Following a single intravenous dose given pre-chemotherapy, the efficacy and tolerability of oral ondansetron treatment given twice daily was compared with the established three times daily oral supplementary regimen in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting induced by cyclophosphamide (greater than or equal to 500 mg/m2) in combination with doxorubicin (greater than or equal to 40 mg/m2) or epirubicin (greater than or equal to 40 mg/m2). Oral ondansetron given twice daily or three times daily was equally effective in controlling nausea and emesis. The twice daily oral treatment prevented emesis in 73% of patients in the first 24 hours and in 65% of patients over 3 days. Both dose schedules were safe and were tolerated well. Twice daily oral ondansetron showed good efficacy for controlling emesis and nausea in oncology outpatients.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1992

Psychometric validation of the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, 30-item version and a diagnosis-specific module for head and neck cancer patients.

A cancer-specific self-reporting quality of life questionnaire has been validated. The questionnaire is designed to assess physical functioning, role functioning, cognitive functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, pain, fatigue, emesis and quality of life by means of multi-item scales, and other disease- and treatment-related symptoms by means of single items. The questionnaire was completed by 126 head and neck cancer patients with a mean age of 67 years. The internal consistency (scale reliability) was satisfactory for all scales but one. Correlations between scales and items assessing the same underlying dimension were also satisfactory. The questionnaire discriminates between patient subgroups and between acute, subacute and late toxicity. Patient compliance was high. The questionnaire provided valuable information, and most of the scales/items functioned well. A few problems were found, especially with the modified visual analogue scales, and minor modifications will be made.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1992

Measurement of quality of life in clinical trials.

Information on patients' quality of life (QOL) will give a more comprehensive evaluation of the treatment outcome than only measures of tumour response and survival. Psychosocial indicators have rarely been used in clinical trials. This may in part be explained by physicians' lack of familiarity with these measures, methodological insufficiency and a basic philosophical reason, i.e., most doctors tend to focus on curative treatment and not on palliative treatment. A series of QOL questionnaires has been validated in the last decade for use in cancer clinical trials. Selection of the optimal method in the given trial is important. The trial ought to be designed so the proportion of missing data is low. QOL should be used as an end point in selective trials with an optimal study design and with a study coordinator who is willing to collect QOL data.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1991

Symptomatic treatment versus combination chemotherapy for patients with extensive non-small cell lung cancer.

In a randomized clinical trial, 87 patients with inoperable, extensive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomized to receive either combination chemotherapy (cisplatin at 70 mg/m2 intravenously [i.v.] on day 1 and etoposide at 100 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and 200 mg/m2 orally on days 2 and 3) or symptomatic treatment. No statistically significant differences in survival time were found between the two treatment techniques. A major problem in the interpretation of the results was the use of semicurative radiation therapy (3000 to 4200 cGy) to the primary tumor and mediastinum, which was given with symptomatic intent. Three long-term survivors were seen in the latter group.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

[Nausea and vomiting during treatment with cytostatics].

Combination chemotherapy can often induce severe side effects such as nausea and vomiting. These unpleasant symptoms can delay or stop potentially curative therapy. Metoklopramid has traditionally been the most potent antiemetic drug, either given in doses of 20-50 mg or as high doses combined with dexamethazone and diazepam. The authors review antiemetic regimens and make a recommendation on antiemetic treatment.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1991

Phase I/II study of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma.

59 patients with histological verified squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, 39 with primary disease and 20 with relapse were given carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in escalated carboplatin doses. The starting dose with carboplatin was 200 mg/m2 and the dose was escalated to 300 mg/m2, 350 mg/m2, 400 mg/m2 and thereafter by 20 mg/m2 per step. All patients received a dose of 1000 mg/m2 5-FU as a continuous infusion for 5 days. The myelotoxicity was moderate. No patients had grade 4 haemoglobin toxicity, while 7 patients had grade 3 toxicity. 2 patients had grade 4 leucocyte toxicity and 1 patient had grade 3. 4 patients were observed with a grade 4 platelet toxicity. 2 early deaths occurred at a dose level of 420 mg/m2. 18 out of 39 patients in primary treatment responded while 2 out of 20 patients treated for relapse responded. On the basis of the present study the maximum tolerable dose for carboplatin in combination with 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 is between 350 and 400 mg/m2.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Psychosocial well-being in testicular cancer patients.

149 testicular cancer patients with no evidence of disease for 3 or more years filled in a questionnaire which covered the following subjects: psychosocial well-being, working ability and use of analgesics/tranquilisers. The questions were chosen to compare cancer patients' morbidity with that of age-matched controls. The patients had been treated with surgery (32 patients), radiotherapy (39 patients), cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus surgery (46 patients) or chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with or without surgery (32 patients). Since no systematic differences between the treatment groups were found, the analyses were undertaken with all patients combined. The patients felt significantly less exhausted after a working day, were more satisfied with life and felt stronger and more fit than the controls. On the other hand, the patients reported a significantly higher incidence of anxiety and depression than the normal population. The results indicate that patients treated for a malignant disease may have greater fluctuations in mood and affect than the general population.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

A comparison of ondansetron with metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind study. International Emesis Study Group.

The efficacy of ondansetron was compared with metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting induced by cyclophosphamide greater than or equal to 500 mg/m2 in combination with doxorubicin greater than or equal to 40 mg/m2 or epirubicin greater than or equal to 40 mg/m2. complete anti-emetic protection in the 24 h following chemotherapy was achieved in 26 of 40 (65%) patients treated with ondansetron compared with 17 of 42 (41%) patients treated with metoclopramide. Severe nausea was present in 3% of patients in the ondansetron group and 31% in the metoclopramide group. A worst day analysis of control of emesis and nausea on days 2 and 3 following chemotherapy also demonstrated ondansetron to be more effective than metoclopramide. Both treatments were well tolerated. Ondansetron is more effective as an anti-emetic than metoclopramide in this type of cytostatic therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Long-term somatic side-effects and morbidity in testicular cancer patients.

In order to evaluate long-term somatic morbidity after treatment for testicular cancer 149 patients with NED greater than or equal to 3 years answered a questionnaire. The patients had been treated with surgery only (32 patients, radiotherapy only (39 patients), cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus surgery (46 patients) or chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with or without surgery (32 patients). Raynaud-like phenomena were the most frequent side-effect occurring significantly more often after cisplatin-based chemotherapy than after surgery or radiotherapy (33/72 patients versus 5/68 patients). Peripheral sensory 'neuropathy' was reported by 18% of all the patients. Seventeen per cent and 11% complained of pulmonary symptoms and auditory symptoms, respectively. Gastrointestinal side-effects were more frequent after any type of cytotoxic therapy than after surgery only (34/47 patients versus 5/22 patients). Twenty-six patients had fathered children after treatment. About 80% of the patients were in full time wage-earning activity when they answered the questionnaire. In conclusion, 3-7 years after treatment for testicular cancer, 30-50% of the patients had minor somatic complaints whereas serious side-effects seldom occurred.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Prognostic factors for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer, limited disease. The importance of patients' subjective experience of disease and psychosocial well-being.

In a prospective controlled clinical trial, 102 patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), limited disease, stage II and III were treated with combination chemotherapy, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 i.v. on day one and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v. on day one, and etoposide 200 mg/m2 orally on days 2 and 3, or radiotherapy given in 15 fractions of 2.8 Gy with two anterior/posterior fields during a period of three weeks. The patients completed a validated self-administered questionnaire before the start of treatment that assessed their psychosocial well-being, disease-related symptoms, personal functioning, and everyday activity. These subjective variables were evaluated together with treatment modality, WHO performance status, weight loss, and stage of disease, with regard to their value in predicting survival. Univariate survival analyses were undertaken for each individual factor, median survival was calculated according to life-table analyses. A step-wise multiple regression analysis was used to measure the prognostic value of the various factors. In the univariate analysis, general symptoms (p = 0.0006) psycho-social well-being (p = 0.0002) and stage of disease (p = 0.007) were the best predictive factors. In the multiple regression analyses the subjective variables, general symptoms (p less than 0.01) and psychosocial well-being (p less than 0.05) were shown to have the best predictive value for the patients' survival.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗