Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S K Morcos

Publications and source records attributed to S K Morcos.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Review article: Acute serious and fatal reactions to contrast media: our current understanding.

Serious or fatal reactions to a contrast medium (CM) are unpredictable but fortunately rare. History of serious reaction to CM, bronchial asthma or multiple allergies increases the incidence of serious reactions by a factor of 5. Serious or fatal reaction to CM could be due to direct effect on basophils and mast cells or IgE mediated (type 1 hypersensitivity reaction). Activation of the kinin system leading to the formation of bradykinin could also be involved. Complement activation is unlikely to be a primary factor in initiating a serious reaction to CM. Avoiding CM administration in patients at high risk of serious reaction is advisable, but if the administration is deemed essential all precautions should be implemented and measures to treat serious reactions should be readily available. Oxygen supplementation, intravenous administration of physiological fluids and intramuscular injection of 0.5 ml adrenalin (1:1000) should be considered in the first line management of acute anaphylaxis. The ability to assess and treat serious CM reaction effectively is an essential skill that the radiologist should have and maintain.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Prevention of contrast media nephrotoxicity--the story so far.

Contrast media nephrotoxicity (CMN) in patients with pre-existing renal impairment remains a clinically significant problem. The first step to reduce the chance of CMN is to identify patients at risk through the use of screening questionnaires and renal function measurement. Patients at risk requiring injection of contrast medium (CM) because of important clinical indications should receive a small dose of either non-ionic iso-osmolar dimeric or non-ionic low osmolar monomeric CM and hydration. Intravenous infusion (1 ml/kg body weight/h) of 0.9% saline starting 4 h before CM injection and continuing for at least 12 h afterwards is effective in reducing the incidence of CMN. Prophylactic haemodialysis does not lower the risk of this complication. The value of pharmacological manipulation with renal vasodilators (calcium channel blockers, dopamine, atrial natriuretic peptide, fenoldopam (selective dopamine-1 receptor agonist), prostaglandin E(1), non-selective adenosine receptors antagonist (theophylline), non-selective endothelin receptor antagonist or the antioxidant acetylcysteine has not been fully proven. However, haemofiltration for several hours before and after contrast medium injection offers good protection against CMN in patients with advanced renal disease.

Acetylcysteine↗
PubMed2004

Multislice CT.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2004

High resolution volume imaging of airways and lung parenchyma with multislice CT.

The value of multislice CT (MSCT) in imaging the peripheral airways and lung parenchyma has not been widely investigated. In this article the authors' experience in the use of MSCT (4-slice scanner) in imaging patients with suspected parenchymal lung disease or airways abnormalities will be presented. The technique described should be modified with the more modern 8-slice or 16-slice scanners. The whole thorax is scanned contiguously using 4 x 1 mm collimation from the lung bases up to apices in end-inspiration while the patient is in the prone position. Collimation of 2 x 0.5 mm is used at 8-10 levels evenly spaced in expiratory scans and also in the breathless patient who is scanned during gentle breathing. High resolution images of the lungs (1 mm slice thickness) are reconstructed in the following planes: axial (10 mm apart from apices to bases), coronal (six evenly spaced through the chest) and sagittal (four images evenly spaced through each lung). Paddlewheel reconstruction is used if further assessment of the airways is required, and three-dimensional imaging is used mainly for assessment of the trachea and major bronchi. Contiguous axial images (10 mm slice thickness) of the whole lung and mediastinum are also produced and referred to as a screenogram. Axial images of 1 mm slice thickness are produced with expiratory scans and for breathless patients. All the images are produced independently by the radiographic staff and are provided as hard copies (20 frames/film) for reporting. However, if facilities are adequate, direct reporting from the workstation is more effective in reviewing large number of images. The technique is effective in assessment of infiltrative lung disease, emphysema, bronchiectasis and central airways. The screenogram offers comprehensive evaluation of the lung and mediastinum, but the radiation dose associated with high resolution volume imaging remains a source of concern.

Bronchial Diseases↗
PubMed2003

Filling defect artefacts in magnetic resonance urography.

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of filling defect artefacts (FDA) in magnetic resonance urography (MRU). Retrospectively, we assessed MRU examinations of 45 patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction (21 men, 24 women; mean age 35 years, age range 18-71 years). The MRU was performed 30 min after intramuscular injection of 20 mg frusemide using heavily T2-weighted fast-spin-echo techniques [axial, thick coronal slab, coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images] with fat saturation. The images were reviewed by two observers to determine the presence of filling defects and dilatation of pelvicalyceal system and ureters. The filling defects were classified into central, eccentric and complete. Clinical course and plain films were reviewed to determine significance of the detected filling defects. True filling defects were observed in 5 patients (11%) and all due to stones seen on the plain radiograph of the abdomen. Filling defects artefacts (FDAs) were seen in 23 patients (51%; 17 pelvicalyceal system, 17 upper third of ureters, 7 mid ureters and 1 distal ureter). No stones were seen on the plain radiograph of these patients and they had a favourable clinical course for over 24 months. The true filling defects were large in size, eccentric in position and seen in more than one sequence of the MRU examination (axial, n=5; slab, n=5; and MIP, n=4). Four (80%) of the patients with true defects and 21 (91%) of those with FDAs had dilatation of the pelvicalyceal system and ureters. The FDAs were small in size, centrally placed (74%) and always seen in axial images, rarely in slab images (2 cases) and not seen in MIP images. Artefactual filling defects can be seen in MRU examinations. The cause of the FDAs is not fully explained and could be secondary to turbulent and fast flow of the urine. Some of the FDAs seen in the calyces could be due to the tips of the papillae. Awareness of such defects obviates misinterpretation and prevents unnecessary further investigations or interventions.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Multislice helical CT: the value of multiplanar image reconstruction in assessment of the bronchi and small airways disease.

We examined 23 consecutive patients (11 males and 12 females with mean age of 56 years) with possible airway diseases to assess the impact of multiplanar image reconstruction (MPR) on the degree of confidence and accuracy in diagnosing bronchial abnormalities and emphysema. The thorax was scanned contiguously at 1 mm slice thickness using Siemens Volume Zoom Multislice CT scanner. Images were reconstructed at 1 mm slice thickness (lung windows L-600HU W-1600HU utilizing high spatial frequency algorithm) in the axial (10 mm apart), sagittal (4 images per lung) and coronal (6 images) plane. Paddle wheel image reconstructions were also performed in the assessment of bronchiectasis. Axial images were assessed with and without the help of MPR by three chest radiologists at two separate occasions (at least 4 weeks apart). The presence of bronchiectasis, emphysema and bronchiolitis in each lobe was documented on a confidence scale of 0 to 3. The overall mean confidence for each observer with and without MPR was compared. Consensus diagnosis was used as the gold standard for the assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of each observer. A confidence score of 2 or more for any lobe was considered diagnostic of the particular airway disease. The diagnostic accuracy for each observer with and without MPR was compared. Consensus reporting diagnosed bronchiectasis in 7 patients (30.4%), bronchiolitis in 5 patients (21.7%) and emphysema in 12 patients (52%). MPR did not increase the confidence of assessing the different abnormalities for all observers but improvement in diagnosing bronchiectasis was noted in two observers. The improvement did not reach statistical significance. However, agreement between observers in the diagnosis of bronchiectasis and emphysema was improved when the MPR images were used in conjunction with standard axial imaging (Kappa statistic improved from 0.29 to 0.54 for bronchiectasis and from 0.7 to 0.81 for emphysema). Agreement on the diagnosis of bronchiolitis was not improved by MPR for all observers. Our results suggest that MPR seems to improve the confidence in diagnosing bronchiectasis and emphysema.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Contrast media and the kidney: European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines.

The Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) has looked at the effects of contrast media on the kidney including prevention of contrast medium induced nephropathy. This has resulted in four reports dealing with 1) contrast medium induced nephrotoxicity, 2) haemodialysis and contrast media, 3) use of gadolinium contrast media instead of iodinated contrast media and 4) contrast media injection in diabetic patients receiving metformin. The review presents an overview of these four reports and offers the current understanding of the interaction between contrast agents and the kidney.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed2003

Review article: Effects of radiographic contrast media on the lung.

The pulmonary adverse effects of intravascular use of water soluble radiographic contrast media (RCM) include bronchospasm, pulmonary oedema and increase in the pulmonary arterial blood pressure (Ppa). Symptomatic bronchospasm is rare but subclinical increase in airways resistance is common after intravascular injection of RCM. Experimental studies have demonstrated that the low osmolar ionic dimer ioxaglate can induce significant bronchospasm in comparison with other types of RCM. Histamine and endothelin, which are potent bronchoconstrictors and released in response to the administration of RCM, do not seem to mediate the bronchospastic effect of RCM. Pretreatment with corticosteroids or antihistamine does not appear to prevent RCM induced bronchospasm, but the administration of beta(2) adrenergic agonist can abolish this adverse effect. RCM induced pulmonary oedema can be secondary to endothelial injury causing an increase in the permeability of the microcirculation. It may also occur in patients with incipient cardiac failure, when large doses of RCM particularly of the high osmolar type are used. A rise in Ppa induced by RCM seems to be secondary to an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance through direct effects on the pulmonary circulation. Low osmolar non ionic monomers induce the least changes in the pulmonary circulation and should be the contrast media of choice for intravascular use in patients with pulmonary hypertension. The mechanisms responsible for the effects of RCM on airway resistance and pulmonary circulation remain unclear. Intrabronchial administration of high osmolar water soluble RCM is dangerous and can induce severe bronchial irritation and pulmonary oedema. Low osmolar RCM are well tolerated by the lungs following aspiration with minimal histological reaction.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Contrast medium extravasation injury: guidelines for prevention and management.

Extravasation of contrast material is a well-recognized complication of contrast-enhanced imaging studies. The management of this complication is contentious; therefore, the Contrast Media Safety Committee of The European Society of Urogenital Radiology decided to review the literature and issue guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was carried out. The resulting report was discussed at the 8th European Symposium on Urogenital Radiology in Genoa, Italy. Automated power injection may result in extravasation of large volumes and may or can lead to severe tissue damage. Infants, young children and unconscious and debilitated patients are particularly at risk of extravasation during contrast media injection. Fortunately, most extravasations result in minimal swelling or erythema, with no long-term sequelae; however, severe skin necrosis and ulceration may occur. Large volumes of high osmolar contrast media are known to induce significant tissue damage. Compartment syndrome may be seen associated with extravasation of large volumes. Conservative management is often adequate, but in serious cases the advice of a plastic surgeon is recommended. Based on the review simple guidelines for prophylaxis and management of contrast medium extravasation injuries are proposed.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Magnetic resonance urography in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction and spinal dysraphism.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reliability of magnetic resonance urography (MRU) using heavily T2-weighted very fast spin-echo sequences in imaging the upper urinary tract in patients with spinal dysraphism and neuropathic bladder dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with neuropathic bladder dysfunction secondary to spinal dysraphism may have gross spinal deformity, which makes assessing the urinary tract extremely difficult by ultrasonography or intravenous urography. The study included 50 patients (median age 33 years, range 19-52) with a median (range) Cobb's angle of 60 (0-240) degrees. No contrast medium was given but all patients received 20 mg of intramuscular frusemide 20-30 min before MRU. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients had previous ultrasonography, during which only 42 kidneys and no ureters were visible. Of the 94 renal tracts, MRU visualized all kidneys and 86 (89%) ureters. There was good agreement amongst observers on assessing the kidneys and pelvicalyceal systems (kappa > or = 0.61) but only moderate agreement on evaluating the ureters (kappa < or = 0.61). There was disagreement on normality vs renal parenchymal scarring in 14 (15%) kidneys, about no dilatation vs dilatation of the pelvicalyceal system in 14 (15%) systems and about no dilatation vs dilatation of the ureter in 20 (22%) ureters. The overall quality of the MRU images was rated highly, with a mean (range) score of 4.6 (3-5). CONCLUSION: MRU provides a reliable noninvasive technique for imaging the upper tract in patients who were previously difficult to investigate.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media.

Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) are more likely to develop in patients with asthma, a history of allergy or contrast reaction and in those who are debilitated or medically unstable. These reactions can be divided into renal and general, and the latter are subdivided into acute and delayed. Acute general reactions can be minor, intermediate or severe. Fatal reactions are rare. The introduction of low-osmolality agents has caused an overall reduction in the number of non-fatal contrast reactions. Prompt recognition and treatment of acute adverse side effects to ICM is invaluable and may prevent a reaction from becoming severe. Familiarity with cardiopulmonary resuscitation is essential for successful management of life-threatening reactions. Contrast-media-induced renal impairment can be reduced with the use of low-osmolality contrast media and extracellular volume expansion. The use of ICM in diabetic patients receiving metformin should be carried out with care to avoid metformin-induced lactic acidosis. However, this problem is mainly observed in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Acidosis, Lactic↗
PubMed2001

Prevention of generalized reactions to contrast media: a consensus report and guidelines.

The aim of this study was to document, using consensus methodology, current practice for prevention of generalized reactions to contrast media, to identify areas where there is disagreement or confusion and to draw up guidelines for reducing the risk of generalized contrast media reactions based on the survey and a review of the literature. A document with 165 questions was mailed to 202 members of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. The questions covered risk factors and prophylactic measures for generalized contrast media reactions. Sixty-eight members (34%) responded. The majority indicated that a history of moderate and severe reaction(s) to contrast media and asthma are important risk factors. The survey also indicated that patients with risk factors should receive non-ionic contrast media. In patients at high risk of reaction, if the examination is deemed absolutely necessary, a resuscitation team should be available at the time of the procedure. The majority (91%) used corticosteroid prophylaxis given at least 11 h before contrast medium to patients at increased risk of reaction. The frequency of the dosage varied from one to three times. Fifty-five percent also use antihistamine Hl, mainly administered orally and once. Antihistamine H2 and ephedrine are rarely used. All essential drugs are available on the emergency resuscitation trolley. Patients with risk factors are observed up to 30 min by 48% and up to 60 min by 43% of the responders. Prophylactic measures are not taken before extravascular use of contrast media. Prophylactic drugs are given to patients with a history of moderate or severe generalized reaction to contrast media. In patients with asthma, opinion is divided with only half of the responders giving prophylactic drugs. Aspirin, beta-blockers, interleukin-2 and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs are not considered risk factors and therefore are not stopped before injection of contrast media. The survey showed some variability in rating of risk factors for generalized contrast medium reactions, and marked variability in the prophylactic measures used. There remain major areas of uncertainty, and there is insufficient data in the literature to guide practice. Some simple guidelines for prophylaxis of generalized contrast medium reactions are proposed.

Contrast Media↗