Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S K Arya

Publications and source records attributed to S K Arya.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Newborn liver gene transfer by an HIV-2-based lentiviral vector.

Newborn gene therapy, because it can prevent the damage caused by the onset of a disease, deserves specific attention. To evaluate gene transfer in tissues of newborn mice, we used a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-2 based lentiviral vector pseudotyped with vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein expressing the green fluorescent protein reporter gene under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter. We found that very low doses of HIV-2 could infect and be expressed in newborn mice. Under these conditions, the virus was preferentially expressed in the liver and hepatocytes were the predominant target. The treatment was not toxic, the infected liver cells proliferated and the transduced gene was stably expressed. Adult mice could be infected by HIV-2, but the vector was detected in the liver only utilizing the sensitive method of polymerase chain reaction coupled with Southern blot. Direct comparison between newborn and adult recipients demonstrated a much greater efficiency of liver transduction in the newborn mouse. These results indicate that the combination of early intervention and low multiplicity of infection may be a strategy for preferentially and efficiently targeting newborn liver for gene therapy applications.

Adenoviridae↗

Induction of potent human immunodeficiency virus type 1-specific T-cell-restricted immunity by genetically modified dendritic cells.

A novel technology combining replication- and integration-defective human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vectors with genetically modified dendritic cells was developed in order to induce T-cell immunity. We introduced the vector into dendritic cells as a plasmid DNA using polyethylenimine as the gene delivery system, thereby circumventing the problem of obtaining viral vector expression in the absence of integration. Genetically modified dendritic cells (GMDC) presented viral epitopes efficiently, secreted interleukin 12, and primed both CD4(+) and CD8(+) HIV-specific T cells capable of producing gamma interferon and exerting potent HIV-1-specific cytotoxicity in vitro. In nonhuman primates, subcutaneously injected GMDC migrated into the draining lymph node at an unprecedentedly high rate and expressed the plasmid DNA. The animals presented a vigorous HIV-specific effector cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL) response as early as 3 weeks after a single immunization, which later developed into a memory CTL response. Interestingly, antibodies did not accompany these CTL responses, indicating that GMDC can induce a pure Th1 type of immune response. Successful induction of a broad and long-lasting HIV-specific cellular immunity is expected to control virus replication in infected individuals.

Animals↗

Ocular fireworks injuries. Clinical features and visual outcome.

In a prospective analysis of ocular fireworks injuries over three consecutive years (1997 to 1999) during the Indian festival of Diwali, 42 patients presented with various types of fireworks-related ocular injuries. Twenty two (52%) patients had to be admitted for the management of their ocular injuries.

Adolescent↗

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 lentivirus vectors for gene transfer: expression and potential for helper virus-free packaging.

In addition to the long-term expression of the transgene provided by all retroviral vectors, lentiviruses present the opportunity to transduce nondividing cells and potentially achieve regulated expression. The development of lentiviral vectors requires the design of transfer vectors to ferry the transgene with efficient encapsidation of the transgene RNA and with full expression capability, and of a packaging vector to provide packaging machinery in trans but without helper virus production. For both vectors, a knowledge of packaging signal is required-the signal to be included in the transfer vector but excluded from the packaging vector. Among the human lentiviruses, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and type 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2), we think HIV-2 is better suited for gene transfer than HIV-1. It is less pathogenic and thus safer during design and production; its desirable nuclear import and undesirable cell-cycle arrest functions are segregated on two separate genes. In HIV-1 infection, it is less likely to recombine with the resident HIV-1, and it may itself downregulate HIV-1 expression. Evidently, elements located both upstream and downstream of the splice donor site in the leader sequence participated in RNA encapsidation and these sequences appeared necessary and sufficient. Deletion of both sequence elements resulted in a dramatic curtailment of RNA encapsidation and helper virus production. This was accompanied by some but acceptable loss of gene expression capability. The helper virus-free phenotype and expression capability of the double mutant was maintained upon replacement of its 3' long terminal repeat with a minigene cassette containing a transcriptional termination signal and a drug resistance marker gene. Deletion of the splice donor site itself had a dramatic negative effect on gene expression, supporting the important role of this element in the life of RNA.

Cell Line↗

Molecular inhibition of HIV type 1 by HIV type 2: effectiveness in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

HIV-2 downregulates HIV-1 in human primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Although the effect of HIV-2 on HIV-1 in human CD4+ T cell lines was previously reported, the present observations with PBMCs are a necessary demonstration before considering animal model and clinical studies. Notably, the downregulation was observed with at least three phenotypically different HIV-1 proviruses and three different HIV-2 proviruses and was independent of the mode of introduction of the proviruses. HIV-2 inhibited both the production of extracellular HIV-1 p24 antigen and intracellular viral RNA, suggesting the involvement of transcriptional downmodulation. Some of the defective HIV-2 proviruses also inhibited HIV-1. In some cases, these defects were transcomplemented by the corresponding HIV-1 gene products, emphasizing cross-regulation between the two viruses. The phenotype of one of the mutant HIV-2 proviruses suggested that the posttranscriptional effects may also occur. In addition to the possible HIV-2 suppression of HIV-1 in vivo by cross-protective immune mechanisms, intracellular inhibition, noted here, may be another line of defense. We have proposed that the inhibition may be the result of competition between HIV-1 and HIV-2 for cellular factors, possibly involving the long terminal repeats (LTRs). For safety reasons, it may be advantageous to use subunits of HIV-2 for vaccines and gene therapy. HIV-2, specifically noncytopathic HIV-2, could be viewed as an attenuated HIV-1 vaccination model. HIV-2-derived gene transfer vectors may not only be inhibitory themselves but also allow for the insertion of additional protective genes to aim at multiple targets in the HIV-1 life cycle, thus curtailing the evolution of escape mutants.

Antibiosis↗

Towards developing HIV-2 lentivirus-based retroviral vectors for gene therapy: dual gene expression in the context of HIV-2 LTR and Tat.

Because of the distinct ability of retroviruses to integrate into the target cell genome and thus achieve long-term expression, retrovirus vectors hold great promise for stable gene transfer. Such vectors derived from human immunodeficiency retroviruses (HIVs) and other lentiviruses are envisioned to possess several advantages, especially for in vivo gene therapy of HIV infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) where targeting CD4+ T cells/macrophages and pluripotent non-dividing stem cells would be required. Among these is the ability of HIVs to transduce nondividing cells in contrast to the murine retroviruses which require target cell mitosis. The advantages of the lentivirus vectors will be further enhanced by the development of multigenic vectors carrying more than one gene in a dependent or independent transcriptional unit. Separate from the issue of transduction efficiency, information is needed about the impact of the configuration of the genes in a multigenic vector on their expression. Towards this end, we investigated the expression of genes specifically directed by the HIV-2 LTR and Tat in a prototypic minimal transfer vector. We found that the expression of a gene in a dual gene configuration depended upon its position in the transcriptional unit and that the insertion of an internal translational initiation mechanism improved the expression of the downstream gene. Apparently not sufficiently appreciated previously, these effects were promoter and cell-type dependent. Our data also suggest that the commonly used cellular or viral promoters may be orders of magnitude less effective than HIV-2 LTR in the presence of Tat, and thus may not be useful as internal promoters in the context of the HIV-2 LTR:Tat regulatory loop.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

C-C chemokine RANTES and HIV long terminal repeat-driven gene expression.

The C-C chemokines RANTES, MIP-1alpha, and MIP-1beta have been characterized as constituents of an HIV- and SIV-suppressive factor released by CD8+ cells. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that chemokine receptors cooperate in HIV entry. However, these proteins are also known to have an effect on multiple intracellular signaling cascades that may affect the process of transcription. In the present study we demonstrate that treatment of CD4+ T cells with these chemokines or with cell supernatants from HTLV-I-immortalized CD8+ T cells results in significant reduction in the abundance of HIV-1-specific RNA as analyzed by Northern blot hybridization. To examine the possibility that such suppressive factors may inhibit HIV RNA transcription, we studied the effect of RANTES, the most effective HIV-suppressive chemokine, on basal and Tat-induced HIV-directed LTR expression of a reporter gene. Neither recombinant RANTES nor conditioned medium from CD8+ cells significantly altered HIV-1 LTR-directed chloramphenicol acetyltransferase expression in either transiently or stably transfected CD4+ T cell lines, either in the presence or in the absence of Tat. These results suggest that C-C chemokines do not inhibit viral RNA transcription.

CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes↗

Domain-switched mouse IgM/IgG2b hybrids indicate individual roles for C mu 2, C mu 3, and C mu 4 domains in the regulation of the interaction of IgM with complement C1q.

Although polymeric IgM and monomeric IgG are potent activators of the classical complement pathway, previous studies have indicated that monomeric IgM is inactive. To understand this and to examine the roles of the individual mu domains in complement activation, we created a set of IgM/IgG2b mouse chimeric Abs in which homologous domains of both Abs have been interchanged, either singly or together with adjacent domains. The monomer subunits (H2L2) of the resulting chimeras were analyzed for their capacities to bind C1q and to initiate complement-mediated lysis (CML) of haptenated erythrocytes. When C gamma 2 was flanked by C mu 4, the inherent C1q-binding activity of the C gamma 2 domain was lost. This demonstrates that C mu 4 can suppress the C1q-binding activity of the adjacent C gamma 2 domain, and suggests that C mu 4 may exert a similar effect on the C mu 3 domain in the IgM monomer subunit. When C mu 3 was located in an IgG2b background and potentially freed from the constraints imposed by the IgM background, the monomer was not able to bind C1q or initiate CML. This suggests that these activities are not expressed inherently in the C mu 3 domain. The transplantation of C mu 3 together with C mu 4 into the IgG background permitted polymer formation. This polymer was able to bind C1q, although neither the monomer nor the polymer forms were active in CML; conversely, all IgM polymers with a transplanted C gamma 2 domain were active in both C1q binding and CML, and demonstrated apparent Kd values similar to that of wild-type IgM.

Animals↗

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 2-mediated inhibition of HIV type 1: a new approach to gene therapy of HIV-infection.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 2, the second AIDS-associated human retrovirus, differs from HIV-1 in its natural history, infectivity, and pathogenicity, as well as in details of its genomic structure and molecular behavior. We report here that HIV-2 inhibits the replication of HIV-1 at the molecular level. This inhibition was selective, dose-dependent, and nonreciprocal. The closely related simian immunodeficiency provirus also inhibited HIV-1. The selectivity of inhibition was shown by the observation that HIV-2 did not significantly downmodulate the expression of the unrelated murine leukemia virus; neither did the murine leukemia virus markedly affect HIV-1 or HIV-2 expression. Moreover, while HIV-2 potently inhibited HIV-1, the reverse did not happen, thus identifying yet another and remarkable difference between HIV-1 and HIV-2. Mutational analysis of the HIV-2 genome suggested that the inhibition follows a complex pathway, possibly involving multiple genes and redundant mechanisms. Introduction of inactivating mutations into the structural and regulatory/accessory genes did not render the HIV-2 provirus ineffective. Some of the HIV-2 gene defects, such as that of tat and rev genes, were phenotypically transcomplemented by HIV-1. The HIV-2 proviruses with deletions in the putative packaging signal and defective for virus replication were effective in inducing the suppressive phenotype. Though the exact mechanism remains to be defined, the inhibition appeared to be mainly due to an intracellular molecular event because it could not be explained solely on the basis of cell surface receptor mediated interference. The results support the notion that the inhibition likely occurred at the level of viral RNA, possibly involving competition between viral RNAs for some transcriptional factor essential for virus replication. Induction of a cytokine is another possibility. These findings might be relevant to the clinical-epidemiological data suggesting that infection with HIV-2 may offer some protection against HIV-1 infection.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Identification of RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, and MIP-1 beta as the major HIV-suppressive factors produced by CD8+ T cells.

Evidence suggests that CD8+ T lymphocytes are involved in the control of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in vivo, either by cytolytic mechanisms or by the release of HIV-suppressive factors (HIV-SF). The chemokines RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, and MIP-1 beta were identified as the major HIV-SF produced by CD8+ T cells. Two active proteins purified from the culture supernatant of an immortalized CD8+ T cell clone revealed sequence identity with human RANTES and MIP-1 alpha. RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, and MIP-1 beta were released by both immortalized and primary CD8+ T cells. HIV-SF activity produced by these cells was completely blocked by a combination of neutralizing antibodies against RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, and MIP-1 beta. Recombinant human RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, and MIP-1 beta induced a dose-dependent inhibition of different strains of HIV-1, HIV-2, and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). These data may have relevance for the prevention and therapy of AIDS.

Adult↗

Inhibition of HIV-1 expression by HIV-2.

HIV-1 and HIV-2 are co-endemic in certain geographic areas. HIV-2 is more weakly pathogenic than HIV-1, and progression to AIDS occurs less frequently and over a longer period of time. Recent epidemiologic studies suggest that individuals infected with HIV-2 have a lower risk of HIV-1 infection. Both immune mechanisms and various modes of viral interference have been proposed to account for these results. Our findings, described in this paper, suggest that HIV-2 inhibits HIV-1 replication. To study the molecular interactions between HIV-1 and HIV-2, proviral clones were transfected alone or in combination into the human T cell line CEM. LTR-CAT indicator constructs were included for the purpose of monitoring viral promoter activity. Viral replication in transfected cells was monitored by p24 antigen capture assay of cell culture supernatants and Western blot analysis of cell extracts. HIV-2 inhibited HIV-1 replication as determined by intracellular and extracellular p24 antigen levels. Similar results were obtained with simultaneous virus infection using HIV-1 and HIV-2, rather than transfections of proviral DNA. Using cotransfection of HIV-1 and HIV-2 LTR indicator gene constructs, the mechanism of inhibition was found to be suppression of the HIV-1 LTR by HIV-2. The inhibitory effect of HIV-2 is not due to Tat-2, but appears to discriminate between the HIV-1 and HIV-2 LTRs based on differences in the Tat activation response element, TAR. These results suggest both a molecular mechanism for HIV-2 interference with HIV-1 replication and a potential molecular approach to therapy.

Base Sequence↗

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2): packaging signal and associated negative regulatory element.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2)-based retroviral vectors will have several desirable features as vehicles for gene therapy. These include target cell specificity, regulated expression, and attenuated cytopathicity. Such vectors require efficient packaging of RNA into retroviral particles which depends on a cis-acting sequence element called packaging signal or psi site. For most retroviruses, the principal part of this element is located between the major splice donor site and the gag initiator codon (AUG) in the leader sequence. The deletion of the corresponding region of HIV-2 did indeed cause a packaging defect; however, it did not abolish RNA encapsidation and viral infectivity. Additionally, deletions in this region resulted in an increase in intracellular viral RNA and extracellular p27 core antigen. However, only a fraction of the intracellular viral RNA was packaged into mature particles. These effects appeared to be sequence specific as deletion of the sequence elements upstream of the splice donor site did not result in increased viral RNA and proteins. A computer-assisted analysis of the leader sequence of viral RNA shows it to be rich in secondary structure, which was markedly altered in the deletion mutants. Thus, the leader sequence of HIV-2 between the splice donor site and the gag ATG has at least two regulatory functions: one positive, affecting encapsidation, and the other negative, regulating virus expression. Because there is only a limited sequence or structural homology between the corresponding region of HIV-1 and HIV-2, they are likely to differ in their pathways regulating packaging and gene expression.

Base Sequence↗

Conditional regulatory elements of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 long terminal repeat.

Mutational analysis of the human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) long terminal repeat (LTR) revealed a novel cis-acting positive and a negative regulatory element in the U3 region, located upstream of the enhancer-promoter region. These elements acted in a cell type-specific manner, being most active in human lymphocytic CEM cells, more active in Jurkat cells than in human monocytic U937 cells and least active in epithelioid HeLa cells. The down-modulatory effect of the negative regulatory element was abolished by HIV-2 Tat, suggesting the involvement of upstream DNA elements in optimal Tat-mediated trans-activation. The sequence elements that respond to T cell activation signals were also located in the upstream U3 region. Notably, the magnitude of the effect of the upstream regulatory elements depended on the basal activity of the LTR, which was also cell type-dependent. This emphasizes the importance of the cell-specific transcriptional factors and other effectors in regulating HIV gene expression. These observations may be relevant to the cell type-specific restriction of virus replication in vivo.

Base Sequence↗

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 multiply spliced transcripts.

Viral transcripts, particularly those of the regulatory genes (e.g., rev) in lymphocytic cells chronically infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 2, consist of two types, differing in the structure of the leader sequence derived from the 5' long terminal repeat (LTR). Some transcripts undergo a specific splicing event within the 5' LTR, removing an intron consisting of a part of the R region whereas others do not. Because this spliced-out R region is a part of the trans-activation response element (TAR), it could influence trans-activator (Tat)-mediated trans-activation of viral gene expression. Moreover, this part of the R region is predicted to contain a stable secondary structure that could affect the efficiency of translation of the transcripts without this splicing. Thus, the 5' LTR splicing could have important consequences for virus replication, latency, and pathogenicity.

Base Sequence↗

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) trans-activator (Tat): functional domains and the search for trans-dominant negative mutants.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) trans-activator (Tat) is an important trans-regulator of viral gene expression. It differs from the related HIV-1 Tat in certain aspects of its structure and function. HIV-2 Tat is composed of 130 amino acids versus 86 amino acids for HIV-1 Tat. Apart from certain conserved regions, there is little homology between the two Tats. They also differ in their ability to trans-activate HIV-2 and HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR)-directed gene expression. As an aid to understanding its mechanism of action, the functional domains important for HIV-2 Tat trans-activation of HIV-2 and HIV-1 LTR-directed gene expression were investigated. Like HIV-1 Tat, HIV-2 Tat contains conserved cysteine- and arginine-rich domains important for its function. However, HIV-2 Tat differs from HIV-1 Tat in that about 20% of the HIV-2 Tat at the amino terminus was not essential for its trans-activation function while HIV-1 Tat amino terminus is reportedly a part of its activation domain. Similarly, about 30% of the protein at the carboxy terminus of HIV-2 Tat was not essential. A domain critical for HIV-2 Tat-mediated trans-activation was located just upstream of the cysteine-rich domain. This segment is predicted to adopt an alpha-helical conformation and also contains acidic amino acid residues; thus, it may resemble amphipathic helix-type activation domains found in some transcriptional factors. A region with predicted hydrophobic alpha-helical character located between the cysteine- and arginine-rich domains was also important for HIV-2 Tat function. HIV-2 Tat mutants that were analogs of HIV-1 Tat trans-dominant negative mutants did not display such a phenotype.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Fusogenicity of mutant and chimeric proviruses derived from molecular clones of cytopathic and noncytopathic human immunodeficiency virus type 2.

Analysis of the phenotype of the molecular clones of cytopathic and fusogenic, noncytopathic and nonfusogenic, and chimeric proviruses of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) suggests that the major determinant of the attenuated fusogenicity and cytopathicity of HIV-2 was located in the 3'-half of the genome, with envelope playing the more dominant role. However, no single linear domain within the envelope, including the major CD4 binding domain and fusogenic domain, was sufficient by itself for syncytia induction and cytopathic effects. Truncation of the transmembrane envelope glycoprotein downstream of the transmembrane region was not a major factor in this regard. However, truncation within the transmembrane region rendered the provirus replication incompetent. The regulatory genes (tat, rev) and auxiliary gene (nef) did not seem to play a critical role in determining HIV-2 fusogenicity in vitro. The results suggest the importance of the overall conformation of the envelope in the divergent phenotypes of HIV-2.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) gene expression: downmodulation by sequence elements downstream of the transcriptional initiation site.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) gene expression is downmodulated by sequence elements downstream of the transcriptional initiation site, corresponding to the U5 region of the long terminal repeat (LTR) and further downstream. This repression appeared to be related more to the length of the sequence intervening the transcriptional initiation site and the coding region than to a particular sequence content. The repressive effect of the downstream segment was not affected by HIV-2 and HIV-1 TAT or by the cytomegalovirus transactivator IE-2 gene. Nor was it affected by T-cell activation signals or by such cytokines as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon-gamma (IFN gamma), and interferon-alpha (IFN alpha). In contrast to HIV-1, HIV-2 LTR-directed gene expression was not modulated by TNF-alpha. A specific sequence element, located downstream of the TAR element in the R region, seemed to participate in modulation of gene expression. This element interacted with a nuclear protein with a mobility of about 26 kD. The repressive effect of the downstream sequence was to a certain extent cell type dependent, suggesting the involvement of cell type-specific factors. It was more effective in human lymphocytic CEM cells than in Jurkat cells. This may be relevant to the HIV-2 cell tropism (replication), latency, and virulence.

Animals↗

Stimulation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) gene expression by the cytomegalovirus and HIV-2 transactivator gene.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) often causes latent infection. Transactivation by some DNA viruses has been implicated in inducing HIV-1 replication and pathogenesis. The transactivator (IE-2) gene of the human cytomegalovirus (CMV) can enhance HIV-2 as well as HIV-1 gene expression in vitro. This inducer can act in concert with the HIV-2 tat gene and T-cell activation in enhancing gene expression in human CD4+ lymphocytes. While the HIV-2 and HIV-1 tat genes and T-cell activators apparently employ independent modes of action, the CMV transactivator in combination with the HIV-2 tat or T-cell activators may employ a gene activation pathway with some common and some distinct components. Both HIV-2 and CMV transactivators enhance HIV-2 gene expression by transcriptional activation involving transcript initiation as well as elongation, with CMV transactivator affecting elongation more than the initiation. A significant proportion of transcripts appear to terminate prematurely in the absence of transactivators. Deletion mutation analysis of the HIV-2 long terminal repeat (LTR) suggests that the element that responds to CMV transactivation in human CD4+ lymphocytes is either a diffuse one or located downstream of the HIV-2 enhancer element.

CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes↗