Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S Jonas.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Survival rates of hepatitis B patients after liver transplantation improved significantly by introduction of passive immunoprophylaxis. Due to viral escape mutations recurrence still occurs, but recently a combination prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobuline plus lamivudine is evaluated in transplant centers in terms of a further reduction of recurrence rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2000 a postoperative combination prophylaxis with HBIg and lamivudine was initiated in 44 HBsAg positive liver transplant recipients. In total 14 patients were HBV-DNA negative and 30 were HBV-DNA positive at the time of evaluation. In 22 HBV-DNA positive patients a pre-operative lamivudine treatment (150 mg/die) was started. Five of them developed pre-transplant lamivudine resistance with high viral replication (mean HBV-DNA prior to transplantation 728 +/- 219 pg/ml). In all patients passive immunoprophylaxis was started in the anhepatic phase with application of 10.000 units hepatitis B immunoglobuline. It was continued after seroconversion to HBsAg negativity with an aimed titer of more than 100 U/l and only stopped in case of HBV recurrence. Lamivudine was also continued indefinitely after liver transplantation. RESULTS: Overall recurrence rate in the 44 patients, including retransplantations and patients with pretransplant lamivudine resistance, was 11.5 % under combination prophylaxis. Recurrence was seen only in one of 39 patients (2.6 %) without preoperative lamivudine resistance, in contrast 4 out of 5 patients (80 %) with pre-existing lamivudine resistance suffered from early hepatitis B recurrence. The single patient without preoperative lamivudine resistance, who developed recurrence was pre-transplant HBV-DNA negative without lamivudine treatment, but a postoperative seroconversion to negative HBsAg could not be achieved. The overall 3 year patient survival rate was 91 % in the study population. One patient, who was retransplanted with preoperative lamivudine resistance, died 4.5 months after retransplantation due to hepatitis B recurrence and sepsis, three other patients died for reasons not related to hepatitis B recurrence. Combination prophylaxis was well tolerated in all patients and no severe side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Combination prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine is safe and highly effective in prevention of HBV recurrence after liver transplantation, even in case of positive viral replication. In accordance with the results of other centers it should therefore be the standard regimen. However it fails in the majority of patients with preoperative evolution of YMDD mutations, in which the optimal management has to be determined yet. To minimize preoperative resistance formation universal preoperative antiviral treatment of HBV-DNA positive patients should be replaced by individualized indication for preoperative treatment.
Eight patients (seven women), mean +/- SD T1 age 68.57 +/- 12.43 years, average educational level 5.83 +/- 3.70 years, had two Tc-99m ECD SPECT examinations separated by an average 8.49 +/- 5.59 months. Patients were imaged using standard Harlem Hospital acquisition and processing protocols with approximately 30 mCi of ECD on a Prism 3000 triple head gamma camera. Images were interpreted by an independent reader blinded to the patients' clinical history and imaging date. T1 psychiatric diagnosis was seven Alzheimer's dementia (AD) and one depression. Eight T1 images were interpreted as abnormal, six indicative of AD. Binomial 95% two-tail confidence interval for T1 agreement between diagnosis and interpretation was 0.25 0.63 0.92. T2 diagnosis was seven AD and one none. Seven T2 images were abnormal and indicative of AD, and one was normal. T2 confidence interval was 0.34 0.75 0.97. These findings suggest SPECT's value in assessing AD in uneducated socioeconomically disadvantaged geriatric patients.
BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic Osler's disease with multiple arteriovenous malformations and high intrahepatic shunting may lead to secondary pulmonary hypertension followed by right-heart stress and insufficiency. Until now, therapy with arterial embolization, banding, or ligation of the hepatic arteries is still limited and provides unsatisfactory long-term results. Liver transplantation offers another therapeutic option. METHODS: We report on four patients with intrahepatic involvement of Osler's disease who were liver transplanted between 1995 and 1999. All patients suffered from restricted liver function and right-heart insufficiency with multiple cardiac decompensations. One patient received one course of embolization, and another received six courses of embolization and then banding of the main hepatic artery before transplantation. In both patients, the clinical symptoms improved for only a few months. RESULTS: All patients had high degrees of intrahepatic arteriovenous shunting, and cardiac output measurements were between 8.0 to 13.3 L/min preoperatively. Preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure was between 24 to 35 mmHg. After liver transplantation, cardiac output and right-heart diameter decreased or normalized and pulmonary pressure reached the normal range after 2 months. All patients received tacrolimus and steroids for primary immunosuppression. In one case, temporary hemodialysis was necessary for 2 weeks after transplantation, but renal function recovered completely. After follow-up time of 12 to 65 months, all patients had normal graft function and good cardiopulmonary condition. CONCLUSIONS: Indication for liver transplantation should be considered in patients with intrahepatic Osler's disease, high arteriovenous shunting with right-heart stress, and restricted liver function before irreversible fixed pulmonary hypertension leads to severe right-heart insufficiency or failure. Our therapeutic regimen of early liver transplantation in the case of intrahepatic Osler's disease in four patients has promising results.
BACKGROUND: The best surgical approach for bilateral resections in the therapy of benign multinodular goiter is still controversial. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to compare different modes of resection concerning differences in complication rates and risk factors influencing the outcome. 2235 thyroid resections for multinodular goiter between 1985 and 1999 were analysed. RESULTS: When compared to bilateral subtotal resection (n = 327; 14.6%), those patients who received lobectomy and contralateral subtotal resection (n = 952; 42.6%) showed a statistically significant higher incidence of temporary hypocalcaemia (22.6% versus 15.9%) only. The "nerve at risk"-analysis demonstrated no significant difference of laryngeal nerve paralysis between the side of lobectomy and subtotal resection, respectively. In comparison to the entire patient population operations for recurrent goiters had an equal operative risk, whereas patients with goiter WHO III or an intrathoracic location had significant higher rates of temporary laryngeal nerve paralysis and hypocalcaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Lobectomy and contralateral subtotal resection offers numerous advantages concerning intraoperative variability and definitive resection of suspicious nodules. With an adequate standardized surgical technique and identification of the laryngeal nerve, the complication rate is comparable to bilateral subtotal resection.
Hilar resections and hemihepatectomies as surgical strategies for hilar cholangiocarcinoma achieve only limited rates of resectability and radicality. Principles of surgical oncology have to be applied in order to increase the numbers of patients undergoing resection as well as their long-term survival. Due to the anatomical architecture of the hepatic hilum and side-specific variations within the biliary tree, right trisectorectomy and principal portal vein resection have the potential to comply with basic rules of surgical oncology, i.e. wide tumor-free margins and a no-touch dissection technique. In our experience, 5-year survival after formally curative right trisectorectomy and portal vein resection is 65% in spite of advanced tumor stages. Resection of the entire biliary tract without dissection of the tumor is possible by combining total hepatectomy, partial pancreatoduodenectomy and liver transplantation. However, even this procedure does still not fully prevent tumor cell dissemination. So far, a putative alteration of tumor cell kinetics due to posttransplant immunosuppressive treatment results in an increased rate of implantation metastases.
BACKGROUND: Patient death after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis is caused by tumor recurrence as well as by complications of cirrhosis. Liver transplantation represents the only simultaneous treatment of tumor and primary liver disease. Certain criteria regarding the number (up to three) and size (up to 5 cm) of tumor nodules have to be observed in order to ensure a low risk of extrahepatic spread or vascular infiltration. Liver transplantation, as treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma, has to observe the same rules. Only few patients have undergone liver transplantation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. The reason for this restraint is not fully evident. Poor survival rates after liver transplantation as therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the 1980s and an increasing shortage of donor grafts are certainly two factors. METHODS: We report on two cases from our experience and review the European literature. RESULTS: Outcome in a few selected patients has been rather favorable, despite varying approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The only conclusion that can be drawn is that tumor control by liver transplantation is possible in individual patients suffering from recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Adult living donor liver transplantation is one way to overcome graft shortage. Other strategies, for example, salvage transplantation, are presented.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Selection of patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis for liver transplantation follows limits of number and diameter of tumor nodules. It has not been investigated whether there is a correlation of these parameters with vascular invasion. From 1989 to 2000, 1,188 liver transplantations were performed in 1,087 patients, including 120 patients (11%) with an HCC in cirrhosis. Selection criteria were a maximal diameter of up to 5 cm if the tumor appeared to be uninodular or of up to 3 cm in the case of 2 or 3 nodules. The postoperative mortality rate was 1.7%. One-, 5-, and 10-year survival was 90%, 71%, and 60%, respectively. In 940 transplantation patients without an HCC, these rates were 93%, 87%, and 83% (P < .0001). Vascular invasion and histopathologic grading were identified as prognostic parameters by multivariate analysis. In a logistic regression analysis, histopathologic grading and maximal diameter showed a significant correlation with a vascular invasion. Analyzing tumors larger than 5 cm, i.e., tumors not fulfilling the selection criteria as a result of diagnostic inaccuracy or progression thereafter, the rates of vascular invasion were significantly (P < .01) lower in patients suffering from well-differentiated tumors (25%) when compared with moderately and poorly differentiated tumors (100%). Liver transplantation is a safe and effective long-term treatment for small HCC in cirrhosis. Tumor diameter and number of nodules in correlation with the histopathologic grading were predictive of a vascular invasion only in HCC larger than 5 cm.
The debate on rationalisation vs. rationing of health care interventions is of great importance for the shaping of social and health care policies. Nevertheless, concrete evaluations mostly deal with health interventions in the grey zone between rationing--withholding effective measures--and rationalisation--avoiding ineffective interventions. The assessment of erythropoietin in tumour anaemia is presented as an example: the results of the treatment of tumour-induced anaemia with EPO are partly unsatisfactory. Only 50-60% of anemic tumor-patients respond to EPO; of these responders 20-30% still require transfusions. The assessment presents the evidence for an "appropriate" application of erythropoietin in tumour anaemia and proposes standard values for a limited access and use of EPO. Additionally the assessment reveals what is known as the benefit of this treatment, and what is questionable. Applying the results of the assessment to clinical practice can be considered as "explicit rationing" according to effectiveness criteria.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Agents claimed to be neuroprotective in animal stroke models have all failed in human trials. Thrombolysis has been reported as beneficial in animal and human stroke. We explore the reasons for this disparity, using a review of published results of agents tested both in animal stroke models and in human stroke trials. In animals the effect of neuroprotective agents and of thrombolytic agents on infarct size is time-dependent: early initiation of treatment works best; and benefit is progressively--and eventually totally--lost with increasing delay of time of first treatment. The animal data also show that, overall, the beneficial effects of the neuroprotective agents are weaker, and are totally lost sooner, than those of thrombolytics. The human data show that the failed trials of the neuroprotective agents had entry windows that went far beyond the windows of (any) success seen in tests of these agents in animals. By contrast, human thrombolysis trials uniformly restricted time of entry to windows in which these agents have shown beneficial effect in animals. In clinical stroke trials, neuroprotective agents failed to produce benefit because their effects at best are too weak, and they were used at times predictable from the animal models as too late. Thrombolytic therapy, which has a stronger effect than neuroprotective agents in animal models, was used clinically during the early window of optimal effectiveness, and produced beneficial results. "Too little/too late" is the recipe for failure in the treatment of ischemic stroke.