Biomedical subjects

S J Kiebel

Publications and source records attributed to S J Kiebel.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

Anatomically informed basis functions.

This paper introduces the general framework, concepts, and procedures of anatomically informed basis functions (AIBF), a new method for the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. In contradistinction to existing voxel-based univariate or multivariate methods the approach described here can incorporate various forms of prior anatomical knowledge to specify sophisticated spatiotemporal models for fMRI time-series. In particular, we focus on anatomical prior knowledge, based on reconstructed gray matter surfaces and assumptions about the location and spatial smoothness of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) effect. After reconstruction of the grey matter surface from an individual's high-resolution T1-weighted MRI, we specify a set of anatomically informed basis functions, fit the model parameters for a single time point, using a regularized solution, and finally make inferences about the estimated parameters over time. Significant effects, induced by the experimental paradigm, can then be visualized in the native voxel-space or on the reconstructed folded, inflated, or flattened cortical surface. As an example, we apply the approach to a fMRI study (finger opposition task) and compare the results to those of a voxel-based analysis as implemented in the Statistical Parametric Mapping package (SPM99). Additionally, we show, using simulated data, that the approach offers several desirable features particularly in terms of superresolution and localization.

Brain↗

PubMed1999

Robust smoothness estimation in statistical parametric maps using standardized residuals from the general linear model.

The assessment of significant activations in functional imaging using voxel-based methods often relies on results derived from the theory of Gaussian random fields. These results solve the multiple comparison problem and assume that the spatial correlation or smoothness of the data is known or can be estimated. End results (i. e., P values associated with local maxima, clusters, or sets of clusters) critically depend on this assessment, which should be as exact and as reliable as possible. In some earlier implementations of statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (SPM94, SPM95) the smoothness was assessed on Gaussianized t-fields (Gt-f) that are not generally free of physiological signal. This technique has two limitations. First, the estimation is not stable (the variance of the estimator being far from negligible) and, second, physiological signal in the Gt-f will bias the estimation. In this paper, we describe an estimation method that overcomes these drawbacks. The new approach involves estimating the smoothness of standardized residual fields which approximates the smoothness of the component fields of the associated t-field. Knowing the smoothness of these component fields is important because it allows one to compute corrected P values for statistical fields other than the t-field or the Gt-f (e.g., the F-map) and eschews bias due to deviation from the null hypothesis. We validate the method on simulated data and demonstrate it using data from a functional MRI study.

Brain↗

PubMed1997

MRI and PET coregistration--a cross validation of statistical parametric mapping and automated image registration.

Coregistration of functional PET and T1-weighted MR images is a necessary step for combining functional information from PET images with anatomical information in MR images. Several coregistration algorithms have been published and are used in functional brain imaging studies. In this paper, we present a comparison and cross validation of the two most widely used coregistration routines (Friston et al., 1995, Hum. Brain Map. 2: 165-189; Woods et al., 1993, J. Comput. Assisted Tomogr: 17: 536-546). Several transformations were applied to high-resolution anatomical MR images to generate simulated PET images so that the exact (rigid body) transformations between each MR image and its associated simulated PET images were known. The estimation error of a coregistration in relation to the known transformation allows a comparison of the performance of different coregistration routines. Under the assumption that the simulated PET images embody the salient features of real PET images with respect to coregistration, this study shows that the routines examined reliably solve the MRI to PET coregistration problem.

Algorithms↗