Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S J Gaunt

Publications and source records attributed to S J Gaunt.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

Mouse Hox-3.4: homeobox sequence and embryonic expression patterns compared with other members of the Hox gene network.

A putative mouse homeobox gene (Hox-3.4) was previously identified 4kb downstream of the Hox-3.3 (Hox-6.1)* gene (Sharpe et al. 1988). We have now sequenced the Hox-3.4 homeobox region. The predicted amino acid sequence shows highest degree of homology in the mouse with Hox-1.3 and -2.1. This, together with similarities in the genomic organisation around these three genes, suggests that they are comembers of a subfamily, derived from a common ancestor. Hox-3.4 appears to be a homologue of the Xenopus Xlhbox5 and human cp11 genes (Fritz and De Robertis, 1988; Simeone et al. 1988). Using a panel of mouse-hamster somatic cell hybrids we have mapped the Hox-3.4 gene to chromosome 15. From the results of in situ hybridization experiments, we describe the distribution of Hox-3.4 transcripts within the 12 1/2 day mouse embryo, and we compare this with the distributions of transcripts shown by seven other members of the Hox gene network. We note three consistencies that underlie the patterns of expression shown by Hox-3.4. First, the anterior limits of Hox-3.4 transcripts in the embryo are related to the position of the Hox-3.4 gene within the Hox-3 locus. Second, the anterior limits of Hox-3.4 expression within the central nervous system are similar to those shown by subfamily homologues Hox-2.1 and Hox-1.3, although the tissue-specific patterns of expression for these three genes show many differences. Third, the patterns of Hox-3.4 expression within the spinal cord and the testis are very similar to those shown by a neighbouring Hox-3 gene (Hox-3.3), but they are quite different from those shown by Hox-1 genes (Hox-1.2, -1.3 and -1.4).

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1990

Homeogene expression patterns and chromosomal imprinting.

In both mouse and Drosophila, Antennapedia-like homeobox-containing genes (homeogenes) display a strict correspondence between the order of genes (3' to 5') along the chromosome and the order of their expression domains (anterior to posterior) in the developing embryo. We show here how this, and other points of similarity, may indicate that both species use a common mechanism of chromosomal imprinting in order to retain cellular memory of homeogene expression patterns throughout embryonic development.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Mouse homeo-genes within a subfamily, Hox-1.4, -2.6 and -5.1, display similar anteroposterior domains of expression in the embryo, but show stage- and tissue-dependent differences in their regulation.

By use of in situ hybridization experiments on mouse embryo sections, we compare the transcript patterns of three homeo-genes from the Hox-1.4 subfamily (Hox-1.4, -2.6 and -5.1). Genes within a subfamily are true homologues, present in the genome as a result of duplication of an ancestral homeo-gene cluster. We show that Hox-1.4, -2.6 and -5.1 are similar, although apparently not identical, in the limits of their transcript domains along the anteroposterior axis. Within the prevertebral column of the 12 1/2 day embryo, for example, the anterior boundary of transcripts for each of the three genes was most obvious at the junction of the first and second prevertebrae. Similarly, all three genes showed an anterior boundary of transcripts within the central nervous system that was located in the mid-myelencephalon of the hindbrain. Both in the prevertebral column and hindbrain, however, Hox-2.6 and Hox-5.1 transcripts extended slightly anterior to the anteriormost limits detected for Hox-1.4. In spite of close similarities in the positions of their transcript domains, Hox-1.4, -2.6 and -5.1 displayed striking stage- and tissue-dependent differences in the relative abundance of their transcripts. For example, Hox-5.1 transcripts were abundant within mesoderm and ectoderm of early stages (8 1/2 and 9 1/2 days), yet were detected only weakly in mesodermal components of the lung and stomach at 10 1/2 days, and were apparently absent from these tissues at 12 1/2 days. In contrast, Hox-1.4 and Hox-2.6 transcripts were relatively weakly detected at 8 1/2 and 9 1/2 days, but were abundant within the lung and stomach at 12 1/2 days. Our findings suggest, but do not prove, that genes within the Hox-1.4 subfamily might be coordinately regulated in their expression. We discuss the patterns of mouse homeo-gene expression now observed in terms of models originally devised for Drosophila. We also propose how our new findings may help to explain any selective advantage to the vertebrates of homeo-gene duplication to form subfamilies.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Hox-5.1 defines a homeobox-containing gene locus on mouse chromosome 2.

We have isolated a murine homeobox-containing gene, Hox-5.1, by virtue of its relatedness to the Hox-1.4 gene. In situ hybridization to metaphase spreads mapped Hox-5.1 to band D of mouse chromosome 2. Sequence comparisons indicate that Hox-5.1 is the murine homolog of the human C13 homeobox-containing gene. Hox-5.1 also bears significant similarity to the Xenopus Xhox-1A homeobox-containing gene and the Drosophila deformed homeotic gene at N-terminal and homeobox regions. Hox-5.1 transcripts were detected in mouse embryos, in adult mouse testis, kidney, heart, and intestine, and in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells treated with retinoic acid. In situ hybridization to sections from whole mouse embryos revealed Hox-5.1 expression in spinal cord and prevertebrae.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1988

Isolation and expression of a new mouse homeobox gene.

A homeobox-containing clone has been isolated from an adult mouse kidney cDNA library and shown by DNA sequence analysis to be a new isolate, Hox-6.1. A genomic clone containing Hox-6.1 has been isolated and found to contain another putative homeobox sequence (Hox-6.2), within 7 kb of Hox-6.1. In situ hybridization of mouse metaphase chromosomes shows this Hox-6 locus to be located on chromosome 14 (14E2). Hox-6.1 has been studied in detail and the predicted protein sequence of the homeobox is 100% homologous to the Xenopus Xeb1 (formally AC1) homeobox and the human c8 homeobox (Carrasco et al. 1984; Boncinelli et al. 1985; Simeone et al. 1987). Southern blotting shows that the DNA sequence encoding Hox-6.1 is single copy. Expression of Hox-6.1 has been studied in adult tissues and embryos by RNase protection assays, Northern blotting analysis and in situ hybridization. RNase protection assays show that Hox-6.1 transcripts are present in embryos between days 9 1/2 and 13 1/2 of gestation and in extraembryonic tissues at day 9 1/2. Adult expression is detectable in kidney and testis but not in liver, spleen and brain. One major transcript is detectable on Northern blots of kidney and day-13 1/2 embryo RNA. In kidney, this transcript is 2.7 kb whereas in embryos the major transcript is smaller at 1.9 kb, a much fainter band being visible at 2.7 kb. Localized expression of Hox-6.1 is observed in the spinal cord and prevertebral column of day-12 1/2 embryos, and in the posterior mesoderm and ectoderm of day-8 1/4 embryos. An anterior boundary of expression is located just behind the hindbrain whereas the boundary in the mesoderm is located at the level of the 7th prevertebra.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1988

Mouse homeobox gene transcripts occupy different but overlapping domains in embryonic germ layers and organs: a comparison of Hox-3.1 and Hox-1.5.

By use of in situ hybridization experiments, the mouse homeobox genes Hox-3.1 and Hox-1.5 are compared in the temporal and spatial patterns of their embryonic transcripts. Transcripts of both genes are first detected at about 7 1/2 days, although the appearance of Hox-3.1 transcripts apparently follows Hox-1.5 after a small delay. Hox-3.1 and Hox-1.5 transcripts occupy domains which are different, although overlapping, along the anteroposterior axis of the embryo. The domains are first established within the ectoderm and mesoderm germ layers at 7 1/2-8 days, but subsequently they persist within the nervous system, the prevertebral column and within at least some of the organs (the thyroid, lung, stomach, mesonephric and metanephric kidneys) at 12 1/2 days. In discussion, two different mechanisms are considered by which positional information might first be generated within the germ layers.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Multiple forms of ram and bull sperm hyaluronidase revealed by using monoclonal antibodies.

Two monoclonal anti-sperm hyaluronidase-producing cell lines were isolated following inoculation of mice with ram sperm hyaluronidase monomer. Both lines produced antibodies of the IgG1 class; these bound to ram hyaluronidase after 'Western blotting' but did not recognize the native enzyme. Whereas the 1A4 antibody was specific for ram hyaluronidase, and did not react with 'blotted' bull, boar or rabbit hyaluronidase, the 1D6 antibody recognized bull as well as ram hyaluronidase. The antibodies could be used for immunocytochemical localization of hyaluronidase in fixed spermatozoa. However, although some form of denaturation was required to unmask or form the epitopes with which the antibodies reacted, the degree and type of fixation required was critical, for the epitopes were readily destroyed; in particular, they were very sensitive to chemical modification such as glutaraldehyde treatment. It could be demonstrated that, like ram, bull spermatozoa contained an extended oligomeric family of hyaluronidase forms, apparently the result of intermolecular disulphide cross-linking of monomers. In spermatozoa of both species, the enzyme was confined to the anterior acrosomal region of the head.

Acrosome↗
PubMed1987

Homoeobox gene Hox-1.5 expression in mouse embryos: earliest detection by in situ hybridization is during gastrulation.

We showed earlier (Gaunt, Miller, Powell & Duboule, 1986) that the mouse homoeobox gene Hox-1.5 is expressed in posterior ectoderm and mesoderm of 7 1/2- and 7 3/4-day embryos, and in the 9 1/2-day nervous system posterior to a discrete boundary within the hindbrain. In further in situ hybridization experiments, it is now shown that restriction of Hox-1.5 expression to the posterior regions of the embryo can be detected at stages of development between 7 1/2 and 9 1/2 days. During this period, the intensity of transcription in presomitic and somitic mesoderm declines relative to that in the overlying neural ectoderm, and the transcription boundary within the presumptive hindbrain region sharpens. Hox-1.5 expression posterior to the hindbrain boundary is detected in the 10 1/2- and 12 1/2-day embryo, but this is no longer found in newborn mice. Embryos of ages 3 1/2, 6 1/2 and 7 1/4 days showed no evidence of Hox-1.5 transcripts. It is concluded that embryos undergoing gastrulation (at 7 1/2 days) are the earliest stage at which Hox-1.5 transcripts can be detected by the in situ hybridization technique. In discussion, it is shown how this lies within the period of development during which tissues become determined along the anteroposterior axis of the mouse. Since there may be anterior-to-posterior variation in the time of determination along the body axis, it is suggested that homoeobox genes expressed more posteriorly, such as Hox-3 (Awgulewitsch et al. 1986), might start expression at times later in development.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1985

Development of a maturation antigen on the plasma membrane of rat spermatozoa in the epididymis and its fate during fertilization.

The ontogeny of a surface membrane antigen on rat spermatozoa has been investigated using the monoclonal antibody, 2D6. Using indirect immunofluorescence microscopy the 2D6 antigen was first detected on spermatozoa from the proximal corpus epididymidis; no reaction was present on testicular cells. The 2D6 antibody also bound to spermatozoa flushed from the uterus of mated rats and to a sperm-derived antigen on the surface of newly fertilized eggs. When frozen sections of epididymal tissues were stained with 2D6 monoclonal antibody immunofluorescence was confined to the epithelium lining the duct in the proximal and distal corpus epididymidis. Fluorescence in the tissue was androgen-dependent. Immunoblots of proteins in luminal secretions collected by micropuncture from different sites along the epididymal duct showed that in the proximal corpus epididymidis the 2D6 monoclonal antibody recognized a 32 kD antigen, but in secretions from the distal corpus and cauda epididymidis the monoclonal antibody also recognized antigens with molecular weights of 28, 23 and 20 kD. Immunoblots of proteins from spermatozoa collected from the corpus epididymidis revealed a reaction over a 32 kD antigen, while on spermatozoa from the cauda epididymidis the 2D6 monoclonal antibody recognized only a 23 kD antigen. Two hypotheses are proposed to account for the varied reactivity of the monoclonal antibody and their relative merits are discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

In vivo and in vitro cultured mouse preimplantation embryos differ in their display of a teratocarcinoma cell surface antigen: possible binding of an oviduct factor.

By use of a monoclonal antibody, 2B5, in indirect immunofluorescence experiments, it was found that both fertilized and unfertilized mouse eggs obtained directly from the oviduct commenced expression of a cell surface antigen at about 5 h after ovulation. Surface labelling became intense by 16 h after ovulation and persisted over all blastomeres throughout preimplantation development. In contrast, embryos cultured in vitro did not appearance of 2B5 antigen until about 48 h after ovulation, at which time they were at the 2- to 4-cell stage. Antigen expression in vitro commonly began on a single blastomere and did not appear consistently over all blastomeres until the 8-cell stage (72 h after ovulation). Unfertilized eggs maintained for 72 h in culture did not acquire 2B5 antigen. It is postulated that the absence of 2B5 antigen on 1-cell eggs cultured in vitro may be due either to a failure of normal synthesis by eggs as a result of a deficiency in the culture medium, or alternatively, to absence of a soluble oviduct factor which carries the 2B5 antigen, and which normally becomes bound to the surface of eggs after ovulation. The second of these two possibilities was supported by egg transfer experiments which showed that unfertilized eggs within the oviduct became 2B5 antigen-positive even after their prior fixation in glutaraldehyde. By the 2- to 4-cell stage, however, embryos developed their own capacity for synthesis of 2B5 antigen-positive cell surface molecules. This synthesis was inhibited by tunicamycin, suggesting that the antigenic site involved the sugar component of glycoprotein. The range of tissues within the postimplantation embryo and adult reproductive tracts which labelled with 2B5 antibody was found to be very similar to that known for SSEA-1 monoclonal antibody (Solter & Knowles, 1978; Fox et al. 1981; Fox, Damjanov, Knowles & Solter, 1982), and as further evidence of a relationship between 2B5 and SSEA-1 antigens it was found that 125I SSEA-1 antibody could be blocked in its binding to teratocarcinoma cells by preincubation in 2B5 monoclonal antibody.

Animals↗
PubMed1983

Identification of mobile and fixed antigens on the plasma membrane of rat spermatozoa using monoclonal antibodies.

We have used monoclonal antibodies to study the mobility and distribution of three different antigens on the cell surface of rat spermatozoa. We classified two of the antigens (designated 2B1 and 2D6) as 'mobile', since when detected by indirect immunofluorescence they were situated over the entire sperm flagellum and were susceptible to antibody-induced patching. Patching was critically dependent upon antibody concentrations and was much reduced at 4 degrees C. Patching of the 2B1 antigen was not induced by the 2B1 monoclonal antibody alone. Thus, 2B1 antibody labelled directly with fluorescein bound with a uniform distribution over the sperm flagellum, but this uniform fluorescence was made patchy on subsequent incubation in an unlabelled second antibody layer of anti-mouse IgG anti-serum. By 'Western blotting', the 2B1 antigen was found to be located to a 40 kD molecular weight polypeptide. The remaining 'fixed' antigen (designated 1B6) was not susceptible to antibody-induced patching, and was restricted to a discrete domain on the post-acrosomal region of the sperm surface. We discuss the relationship between mobility of sperm surface antigens and their segregation to discrete domains on the plasma membrane.

Animals↗
PubMed1983

Spreading of a sperm surface antigen within the plasma membrane of the egg after fertilization in the rat.

The rat sperm surface antigen 2D6, located over the entire surface of the spermatozoon, is shown by use of a monoclonal antibody in indirect immunofluorescence experiments to spread laterally over the surface of the egg after fusion of sperm and egg plasma membranes at fertilization. Freshly fertilized eggs, obtained from superovulated rats 14 h after hCG injection, showed the 2D6 antigen to have spread in a gradient over a discrete fan-shaped area of the egg surface anterior to the protruding sperm tail. Eggs at a later stage of sperm incorporation, obtained 20 h after hCG injection, showed that the spread of antigen had extended to cover most or all of their surfaces. By 40 h after hCG injection, the approximate time that fertilized eggs cleaved to form 2-cell embryos, most of the 2D6 antigen had been lost from the cell surface. Fertilized eggs, but not unfertilized eggs or 2-cell embryos, were lysed by 2D6 monoclonal antibody in the presence of guinea pig complement. A model for sperm-egg fusion is presented to account for the observed pattern of spreading shown by the 2D6 antigen. The possible role of sperm antigens on the egg surface is discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1979

Metabolic co-operation between embryonic and embryonal carcinoma cells of the mouse.

Mouse embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells form permeable junctions at their homotypic cell-to-cell contacts which permit intercellular exchange of metabolites (metabolic co-operation). Hooper & Slack (1977) showed how this exchange could be detected by autoradiography as the transfer of [3H]nucleotides between PC13 (a pluripotential EC line) and PC13TG8 (a variant of PC13 which is deficient in hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase). We now show that cells taken from several different tissues of early mouse embryos, that is, from the morula, the inner cell mass of the blastocyst, and the endoderm, mesoderm and embryonic ectoderm of the 8th day egg cylinder, are able to serve as donors of [3H] nucleotides to PC13TG8. In contrast, trophectodermal cells of cultured blastocysts, and the trophectodermal derivatives in the 8th day egg cylinder, that is, extra-embryonic ectoderm and ectoplacental cone cells, showed little or no metabolic co-operation with PC13TG8. With reference to some common properties of EC and embryonic cells, we suggest how our findings may provide insight into cell-to-cell interactions in the early mouse embryo.

Animals↗