Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Hunt

Publications and source records attributed to S Hunt.

186 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Cost containment: coadministration of diltiazem with cyclosporine after heart transplantation.

Coadministration of diltiazem with cyclosporine (CsA) has been reported to alter the metabolism of CsA, resulting in increased blood concentration with potential nephrotoxicity if dosage is not adjusted. This report analyzes the cost saving resulting from use of diltiazem and CsA together and examines the impact on renal function. Sixty-nine heart transplant recipients (59 men, 10 women) were randomized to diltiazem (n = 32) or to no calcium blocker (n = 37). Age range was 18 to 58 years. All patients received CsA (titrated to a 12-hour trough serum level of 100 to 200 ng/ml), azathioprine, and prednisone. Diltiazem was begun at 30 mg three times daily increasing to 60 mg three times daily at 1 month, as tolerated. Renal function was assessed by serial measurements of serum creatinine. Parameters before and after starting diltiazem were compared by paired t-tests, and differences between group means by analysis of variance. CsA doses and levels were comparable at baseline in both groups. At 12 months, CsA dose requirement was 2.5 +/- 1.0 versus 5.9 +/- 3.2 mg/kg/day (diltiazem group versus no calcium blocker group; p less than or equal to 0.001) to achieve similar serum levels (96 +/- 51 versus 123 +/- 96 ng/ml; p = NS). This represents a 48% reduction in dose cost of CsA. The average cost of CsA for 2 to 4 months of therapy in a patient weighing 70 kg was reduced from $12,122 in the no calcium blocker group to $6,356 in the diltiazem group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cost Control↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Recurring patterns of inflammatory sinonasal disease demonstrated on screening sinus CT.

PURPOSE: In order to define specific features on screening sinus CT (SSCT) that will aid the endoscopic surgeon in his approach to patients with inflammatory sinonasal disease, we sought to answer four questions: 1) what recurring patterns of inflammatory sinonasal disease are evident on SSCT; 2) what is the relative frequency of these recurring patterns; 3) how do these CT patterns correlate with the known sinus mucociliary drainage routes; and 4) what are the characteristic radiologic features of each pattern? METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and radiologic records of 500 consecutive patients who underwent SSCT as a prelude to possible functional endoscopic sinus surgery. RESULTS: Five recurring radiologic patterns of sinonasal inflammatory disease were identified: 1) infundibular (129/500 or 26%), 2) ostiomeatal unit (126/500 or 25%) 3) sphenoethmoidal recess (32/500 or 6%), 4) sinonasal polyposis (49/500 or 10%), and 5) sporadic (unclassifiable) (121/500 or 24%) patterns. Normal SSCT was seen in 133/500 patients (27%). CONCLUSION: Identification of specific patterns of sinonasal disease permits grouping of patients into nonsurgical (normal CT), routine (infundibular, ostiomeatal unit, and most sporadic patterns) and complex (sinonasal polyposis and sphenoethmoidal recess patterns) surgical groups. Assignment of patients to radiologic patterns allows a tailored surgical approach.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Predictors of survival after repeat heart transplantation. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, and Contributing Investigators.

To examine factors potentially predictive of outcome after repeat heart transplantation, data were analyzed for 449 recipients of second allografts reported to the registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation and a matched group of 421 primary transplant recipients. Survival was markedly decreased in repeat transplantation patients (1 year actuarial survival rate, 48% vs 79%; p less than 0.001). Univariate analysis showed no impact on survival of recipient age or gender, ischemic time, or transplant center experience. Accelerated coronary artery disease as the cause of allograft failure, longer interval between transplants, lack of preoperative mechanical assistance, and second transplantation after 1985 were predictive of increased survival after repeat transplantation. An "ideal candidate" defined by these predictive variables had a 1-year survival rate of 64%. In addition to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry, a multicenter data base was developed with data for 125 repeat transplant recipients and 1325 primary transplant recipients at 13 transplant centers in the United States. In this group of patients the 1-year survival rate was greater than that in the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry (60% vs 48%), and the impact of the predictive variables listed previously was decreased. The incidence of rejection, infection, and accelerated coronary artery disease was not different between secondary and primary allograft recipients. Nonskin malignancies occurred more frequently in repeat transplantation patients (8% vs 4%; p less than 0.05). Recipients of second allografts were more likely to have major surgical complications, had a higher level of sensitization to HLA antigens, and were more likely to have a positive donor-specific crossmatch (17% vs 2%). A trend toward improved survival was noted in patients with repetition in the second donor of mismatched HLA antigens present in the first donor (1-year survival rate of 68% vs 47%; p = 0.06). We conclude that longer interval between transplants, accelerated coronary artery disease as cause of allograft loss, and lack of preoperative mechanical assistance are predictive of longer survival after repeat transplantation. Nonetheless, the "ideal candidate" for repeat transplantation has an anticipated survival rate significantly less than that expected for primary transplant recipients.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Optimization of techniques in screening CT of the sinuses.

The number of screening examinations of the sinuses performed with CT has markedly increased owing to the widespread and increasing use of endoscopic sinonasal surgery. We reviewed scans from 500 patients who had screening CT examinations of the sinuses for preendoscopic evaluation of inflammatory sinonasal disease to better define an optimal imaging protocol. Three aspects of direct coronal imaging of the paranasal sinuses were investigated: (1) preparation of the patient prior to the examination; (2) technical factors of the CT study, including positioning of the patient, optimal coronal angle, slice thickness, and CT exposure factors; and (3) data display. Our experience indicates that pretreatment of the patient with maximal medical therapy enables the best preendoscopic definition of anatomy, disease pattern, and nonreversible disease component for the treating surgeon. CT technical factors are optimized with scanning in the prone position with thin (3-mm) sections obtained through the anterior paranasal sinuses. This allows optimal visualization of the ostiomeatal unit. The remaining posterior portions of the sinuses are adequately imaged with thicker slices (5 mm). The coronal scan angle used is less critical. Exposure factors (mAs) can be reduced dramatically without image compromise. Data display is optimized when the bone algorithm is used to acquire the data and with image display at intermediate window center and width level. Use of the techniques outlined in this article results in a cost-effective yet diagnostic scan of the sinuses with decreased radiation exposure to the patient.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Spinal nerve enhancement with Gd-DTPA: MR correlation with the postoperative lumbosacral spine.

PURPOSE: To search for a probable source of the recurrent signs and symptoms associated with lumbosacral postsurgical syndrome on intravenous gadolinium-enhanced MR. METHODS: A retrospective study of 120 patients with recurrent symptomatology following lumbar disk surgery was carried out with spin-echo MR pre- and postenhancement with gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg). In addition, 10 asymptomatic subjects were evaluated at least 6 months postoperatively using the same imaging protocol. RESULTS: 21.6% of the symptomatic subjects (N = 26) had enhancement of one or more spinal nerve root. This enhancement was focal or multisegmental, and involved single or multiple nerve roots. The abnormal neural enhancement was associated with otherwise isolated epidural fibrosis in 88.5%, and with herniated nucleus pulposus in the remaining 11.5%. The overall clinical correlation of single root enhancement with a monoradiculopathy and multiroot enhancement with a polyradiculopathy was 95.7%. However, 21.7% of these same cases also showed additional nerve root enhancement that did not have an overt clinical correlation. All of these latter patients were imaged relatively early in the postoperative period (5 days to 8 months). The 10 patients in the asymptomatic group all manifested degrees of postoperative epidural scarring on MR, but no abnormal radicular enhancement or other associated pathology. CONCLUSION: In the chronic postoperative phase (more than 6 to 8 months), the presence of radicular enhancement on MR imaging in symptomatic individuals, and its absence in asymptomatic subjects, suggests that neural enhancement serves as a marker for active neural pathology that may in certain individuals be related temporally to the signs and symptoms associated with the lumbosacral postsurgical syndrome.

Adult↗