Intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament graft placement on the average most isometric line on the femur. Does it reproducibly restore knee kinematics?
In the past, there has been a plausible hypothesis that anterior cruciate ligament graft placement at isometric sites, such that the tibial and femoral attachment sites remain equidistant from each other throughout knee range of motion, would increase the likelihood of a satisfactory outcome. For a given tibial placement we wanted to determine whether placing the graft on the average of the most isometric femoral line, a fixed distance from the outlet of the intercondylar notch, would return normal laxity to all knees. The three-dimensional kinematics of seven cadaveric knees were measured for angles from full extension to 90 degrees of flexion at 15 degrees increments. Physiologic levels of quadriceps muscle forces were applied to the intact knee, after transection of the anterior cruciate ligament, and after ligament reconstruction with a patellar tendon graft. On average, the reconstruction was found to return anterior-posterior translation, internal-external rotation, and varus-valgus rotation to levels not significantly different from those of the intact knee. However, the ranges of the translation and rotations were large. Placing the graft on the average most isometric femoral line did not restore knee laxity to normal in all knees. This supports the need to customize graft placement in each knee at the time of surgery.