Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Grampp

Publications and source records attributed to S Grampp.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

A new trabecular region of interest for femoral dual X-ray absorptiometry: short-term precision, age-related bone loss, and fracture discrimination compared with current femoral regions of interest.

We defined a new region of interest (ROI) for femoral Ward's triangle, centered on the femoral neck axis including comparatively trabecular-rich bone. Forty-seven premenopausal, 39 healthy postmenopausal, and 35 osteoporotic postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures were evaluated comparing the new with the standard femoral ROIs, using a Hologic QDR-2000. Additionally, spinal dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed. The short-term precision error of the new ROI expressed as the root mean square of the coefficient of variations was 1.34% for premenopausal women, 1.69% for healthy postmenopausal women, and 2.46% for osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Bone mineral density (BMD) values of the new ROI correlated highly with those of the standard femoral ROIs (r = 0.91 - 0.96) and the spinal BMD (r = 0.74). Age-related bone loss of the new ROI was 0.75% per year (r = 0.66) in healthy women, which was approximately 1.5 times higher than the bone loss of the standard femoral ROIs, except for Ward's triangle. Regarding the intergroup discrimination, the t-value of the new ROI was similar to the t-value of Ward's triangle, and the intergroup percent decrements in BMD of the new ROI approximated those of Ward's triangle. For discriminating women with vertebral fractures, the new ROI demonstrated odds ratios of 1.6 similar to most ROIs but lower than that of the trochanteric region. The new, substantially trabecular ROI appears to be an alternative to the Ward's ROI traditionally used in femoral DXA having improved short-term precision and comparable sensitivity.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1997

Universal standardization of bone density measurements: a method with optimal properties for calibration among several instruments.

The International Dual-Photon X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Standardization Committee (IDSC) conducted a cross-calibration study among three models of DXA machines from three different manufacturers. In that study, 100 subjects were scanned on all three machines. A set of equations were derived to convert bone mineral density (BMD) on each machine to a "standardized BMD" (sBMD) such that sBMD from the same subject derived from different machines would be approximately the same. In a reanalysis of the cross-calibration data, we showed that the conversion method used in the IDSC study did not achieve several optimal properties desirable in such conversions. We derived new conversion equations to sBMD based on minimizing differences among sBMD from the three machines. More important is that the new conversions have no residual bias that was present in the IDSC conversions. The performance of the methods were compared on the cross-calibration data as well as an external data set. We conclude that the IDSC conversions are adequate for clinical use on other machines worldwide, but that researchers should standardize their own machines in a laboratory using the new method.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1996

Accuracy and precision study in vitro for peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

We evaluated the accuracy and precision of a peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) scanner, the Stratec XCT-960, using 12 human cadaveric forearms. The accuracy was determined by comparing the total bone mineral content (BMC) with the ash weight (AW). We scanned and ashed three consecutive slices (thickness 2.5 mm) at the standard position (s-position) and at 2.5 mm both proximal and distal to the s-position. The correlation coefficient between the AW and total BMC using slices at the s-position was r = 0.87 with an accuracy error (random component) of 15.5%. The correlation coefficient using all slices was r = 0.90 with an accuracy error of 14.3%. The correlation coefficient improved to r = 0.95 with an accuracy error of 9.7% after averaging the results of all three slices for each forearm. The short-term precision error expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV) of bone mineral density (BMD) and BMC was determined by measuring the forearms five times either with repositioning or without repositioning. The CVs with repositioning were 2.77 and 1.15 for total BMD and BMC, 1.85 for trabecular BMD; without repositioning they were 0.29, 0.58 and 0.69 respectively. To further evaluate the influence of positioning, additional scans were performed at 1, 2 and 5 mm proximal, and 1 and 2 mm distal to the s-position. BMD and BMC were greatly influenced by the scan location; for example, the percentage differences in trabecular BMD 1 mm distal and proximal relative to the s-position were 2.5% +/- 5.1% and 0.18% +/- 6.3%, respectively. The Stratec XCT-960 appears to be a moderately accurate and highly precise scanner with potential usefulness for evaluating BMC and BMD of ultradistal radius.

Bone Density↗
PubMed1996

Distal radius: in vivo assessment with quantitative MR imaging, peripheral quantitative CT, and dual X-ray absorptiometry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate in vivo the relationship between magnetic resonance (MR) imaging relaxation time and bone mineral density (BMD) at the distal radius. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 1/T2* MR imaging relaxation rates and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements were evaluated in the trabecular bone of the distal 5 cm of the radius in 14 healthy premenopausal women and 11 healthy postmenopausal women and in 11 women with osteoporosis. Trabecular and total BMD were measured with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: In healthy women, 1/T2* values and trabecular BMD at peripheral quantitative CT were significantly correlated but 1/T2* and total BMD were not. Statistically significant (P = .03) correlations between 1/T2* and DXA were found only in the most distal area covered with DXA. The 1/T2* values were more closely correlated with age and showed higher relative annual decreases (0.47%-0.81%) than peripheral quantitative CT (0.20%-0.59%) or DXA (0.10%-0.39%). Pre- and postmenopausal healthy subjects could be distinguished only with MR imaging, and postmenopausal healthy and osteoporotic subjects only with CT and DXA. CONCLUSION: MR imaging relaxation rates correlate well with trabecular BMD in vivo.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1996

Quantitative CT assessment of the lumbar spine and radius in patients with osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: We undertook this study to quantify the relationship between bone mineral assessments of the lumbar spine using quantitative CT (QCT) and of the radius using peripheral QCT (pQCT) and to test the sensitivity of both techniques in detecting changes in bone mass that are related to age and osteoporosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-two healthy premenopausal, 38 healthy postmenopausal, and 97 osteoporotic postmenopausal women were examined with pQCT of the distal radius and with QCT of the lumbar spine (L1-L4). The bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and a cross-sectional area of cortical bone were assessed at the distal radius. The BMD of trabecular and total bone and the BMC of total bone were assessed at the midvertebral bodies of the lumbar spine. RESULTS: In the healthy women, correlations of radial BMD with spinal trabecular and total BMD were modest (r = .39 and r = .49, respectively) but were higher for total BMC (r = .79). All correlations in osteoporotic women (r = .19 for trabecular BMD, r = .31 for total BMD, and r = .47 for total BMC) were lower than those in healthy women. For measurement of spinal bone mass in healthy women, trabecular BMD showed a higher correlation with age (r = .81) and a larger relative annual decrease (1.2%) than did total BMD (r = .75, .78%) or total BMC (r = .54, .55%). At the radius, the highest correlations with age were found for total BMC (r = .57, .53%), cortical area (r - .52, .67%), and cortical BMC (r = .48, .78%). Age-adjusted odds ratios for prevalent vertebral fractures were highest for total (4.5) and trabecular (4.4) spinal BMD. For radial measurements, odds ratios were highest for both total BMD (2.3) and cortical area (2.3). CONCLUSION: QCT of spinal trabecular bone showed the strongest capability for assessment of age-related bone loss and for discrimination of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. In comparison, pQCT of radial trabecular bone showed the weakest capability for these applications, and pQCT of radial cortical or total bone showed intermediate capability.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry.

In order to assess precision of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), duplicate bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at the radius were performed in 20 healthy premenopausal, 20 healthy postmenopausal, and 20 osteoporotic postmenopausal women using a Stratec XCT-960 system. The short-term reproductibility in vivo for the total, trabecular, and cortical regions of interest (ROI) was expressed as the absolute precision error (standard deviation, SD) and as the relative precision error (SD/mean x 100, or coefficient of variation, CV, in %). Reproducibility in vivo was good in all volunteers but was influenced by the study group and the ROI. The precision error for trabecular BMD was 3 mg/cm3, or about 1.6%. This is large relative to the aging decrease of 0.22%/year, or to the difference (12 mg/cm3, or 7%) between osteoporotic women and postmenopausal controls. In order to compare pQCT to dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the forearm and at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), 40 premenopausal healthy controls, 40 postmenopausal healthy controls, and 35 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were assessed. DXA measurements performed at the ultradistal, middistal, 1/3, and total ROI of the radius showed only moderate correlations between r = 0.38--0.75, r = 0.27--0.64, and r = 0.38--0.53 for the comparison versus pQCT total BMD, versus pQCT trabecular BMD, and versus pQCT cortical BMD, respectively. Correlations of DXA at the lumbar spine and pQCT were between r = 0.18 and 0.44. DXA at radius and spine was able to discriminate between post- menopausal controls and osteoporotic women (p = 0.001--.004),but BMD measurements by pQCT did not show this ability (p = 0.15--0.52). However, two nonstandard pQCT parameters, namely the surface area of the cortical bone and the cortical BMC were factors that discriminated well between these two groups (p = 0.002, p = 0.005, respectively). These pQCT parameters also yielded the highest relative annual changes in pre- and post-menopausal control subjects. The measurement of cortical bone in the distal radius proved to be a good predictor of vertebral fracture status and was a good indicator of age-related skeletal change. Our data emphasize the importance of cortical measurements when using pQCT of the radius to assess osteoporosis.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1995

MRI of bone marrow in the distal radius: in vivo precision of effective transverse relaxation times.

The effective transverse relaxation time T2* is influenced by the presence of trabecular bone, and can potentially provide a measure of bone density as well as bone structure. We determined the in vivo precision of T2* in repeated bone marrow measurements. The T2* measurements of the bone marrow of the distal radius were performed twice within 2 weeks in six healthy young volunteers using a modified water-presaturated 3D Gradient-Recalled Acquisition at Steady State (GRASS) sequence with TE 7, 10, 12, 20, and 30; TR 67; flip angle (FA) 90 degrees. An axial volume covering a length of 5.6 cm in the distal radius was measured. Regions of interest (ROIs) were determined manually and consisted of the entire trabecular bone cross-section extending proximally from the radial subchondral endplate. Reproducibility of T2* and area measurements was expressed as the absolute precision error (standard deviation [SD] in ms or mm2) or as the relative precision error (SD/mean x 100, or coefficient of variation [CV] in %) between the two-point measurements. Short-term precision of T2* and area measurements varied depending on section thickness and location of the ROI in the distal radius. Absolute precision errors for T2* times were between 1.3 and 2.9 ms (relative precision errors 3.8-9.5 %) and for area measurements between 20 and 55 mm2 (relative precision errors 5.1-16.4%). This MR technique for quantitative assessment of trabecular bone density showed reasonable reproducibility in vivo and is a promising future tool for the assessment of osteoporosis.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Influence of degenerative joint disease on spinal bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal women.

We assessed the impact of various forms of spinal degenerative joint disease (DJD) on bone mineral density (BMD) measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a group of postmenopausal women. Lateral (T4-L4) and AP (L1-L4) spinal radiographs were reviewed for fracture and DJD in 209 women (mean age 62.6 +/- 6.7). The severity of DJD findings was graded as 0, 1, or 2 on the lumbar films, except for vertebral osteophytes which were graded from 0 to 3. Vertebral fractures were defined semiquantitatively as approximately 20% reduction in anterior, middle, or posterior vertebral height. BMD was measured in all subjects by QCT and DXA, including posteroanterior DXA (PA-DXA), lateral DXA (L-DXA) and midlateral DXA (mL-DXA). When BMD was measured by QCT and mL-DXA in the 168 women without fractures, no significant differences were found between women with and those without DJD. However, BMD by PA-DXA was significantly higher in women with DJD changes, particularly when osteophytes were present at the vertebral bodies or facet joints. BMD by L-DXA was less affected by DJD. For this measurement a significant increase in BMD was only noted in subjects with vertebral osteophytes. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) showed that BMD by QCT and mL-DXA was not affected by DJD. In contrast, for all women, BMD by PA- and L-DXA was affected more by DJD than by fracture status. Chi-square testing demonstrated no significant relationships between vertebral fractures and any of the DJD changes. We conclude that QCT and mL-DXA are superior to PA-DXA and L-DXA in detecting bone loss in patients with DJD. Thus, for these patients, BMD assessment by QCT or mL-DXA may be advisable.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1995

Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: a comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.

We compared quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with respect to their ability to discriminate subjects with and without prevalent vertebral fractures. In 240 post-menopausal women (mean age 63.7 +/- 6.9 years) lateral spine radiographs (T4-L4) were reviewed for the presence of vertebral fracture. Using a semiquantitative technique to grade the severity of vertebral deformities, we classified fractures as mild, moderate or severe (grade 1 to 3, respectively). Postero-anterior DXA (PA-DXA) and lateral DXA (L-DXA) measurements (L2-4) as well as QCT measurements of the lumbar spine (T12-L3 or L1-14) were obtained in all women. Seventy-two women were diagnosed with at least one fracture, and of these 40 were graded as mild. Comparing normal women with fractured women, we found the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves to be greatest for QCT (0.81), followed by L-DXA (0.72) and PA-DXA (0.65). The differences among all three techniques were significant. Comparing the normal women with women having only mild fractures, the areas under the ROC curves were 0.79, 0.73 and 0.63 for QCT, L-DXA and PA-DXA, respectively. Significant differences existed between QCT and PA-DXA as well as between L-DXA and PA-DXA. Logistic regression analysis also revealed the highest age-adjusted odds ratios for QCT (3.67; 2.25-5.97) while L-DXA and PA-DXA showed substantially lower odds ratios (2.00; 1.39-2.87, and 1.54; 1.11-2.15, respectively). We conclude that low bone density as measured by QCT, PA-DXA or L-DXA is significantly associated with the prevalence of vertebral fractures. Of the methods studied, QCT of trabecular bone offered the best discriminatory capability. L-DXA proved to be superior to PA-DXA in its diagnostic sensitivity, particularly in women with mild fracture. Mild vertebral fractures are associated with decreased spinal bone density and may be regarded as osteoporotic deformities.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1995

Which vertebrae should be assessed using lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

The purpose of this study was to determine precision and diagnostic capability of bone mineral density measurements using lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine in supine position. Duplicate postero-anterior (PA) and lateral DXA measurements were performed in 60 women. Precision errors of the single vertebral levels using lateral DXA ranged from 3.3% to 4.9%. The combination of all levels improved the precision errors to 2.0%. Paired PA and lateral DXA measurements (Hologic QDR 2000) including the vertebral levels L2 to L4 were performed in 331 postmenopausal women. In 42 women an overlap of L4 by the pelvis was suspected on the lateral DXA images. Vertebral fractures were assessed as a fracture/non-fracture dichotomy. L4 and combinations of vertebrae including L4 showed the best discriminatory capabilities with respect to vertebral fractures in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, t-tests and Z-scores, with smaller variability of the results when multiple vertebral levels were used. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.662 and 0.639 for lateral and PA measurements of L2 to L4, respectively when all women were included. Excluding the women with pelvic overlap on lateral DXA scans improved the ROC area for lateral scans to 0.686 while that for PA scans remained almost constant (0.641). The differences between PA and lateral measurements were not statistically significant. In 162 women of our study cohort an additional quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurement of the vertebral levels L2 to L4 was performed and overlapping bony structures at the three levels were studied.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1995

[Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee joint: MRT compared to CT, scintigraphy and histology].

PURPOSE: We compared MR imaging with scintigraphy and CT in eight patients with spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. The histological changes accounting for the MR signal abnormalities were evaluated. METHODS: Eight patients with spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee joint underwent MR imaging before and after i.v. administration of Gd-DTPA. Nuclear scintigraphy was performed in all 8 patients, three patients also had CT scans of the knee area. Histologic correlation was available in three patients. RESULTS: Increased radionuclide uptake was observed in all patients. In one patient, however, scintigraphy showed increased radionuclide uptake consistent with osteonecrosis only in the medial femoral condyle, while MR imaging demonstrated osteonecrosis both in the medial as well as the lateral femoral condyles. MR demonstrated areas of low signal intensity on precontrast T1-weighted images in the femoral condyle in all patients. All these areas showed high signal intensity on T2-weighted images. On postcontrast T1-weighted images, signal intensity increase was either homogeneous throughout the lesion or it was seen at the periphery of the lesion in a band-like pattern. Histologically, the areas of high signal intensity on T2-weighted and on postcontrast T1-weighted images corresponded to granulation tissue. CONCLUSION: MR imaging detects granulation tissue adjacent to the necrotic zone. Using morphological and signal intensity criteria, MR imaging can be utilised to differentiate spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee from osteochondritis dissecans, degenerative osteoarthritis, and other conditions affecting the knee joint.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Primary bone tumors: value of MR angiography for preoperative planning and monitoring response to chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of our study were to investigate the use of MR angiography with two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) displays in evaluating vascular morphology of musculoskeletal neoplasms for preoperative planning of limb-salvage surgery and to assess the use of MR angiography for monitoring changes in neovascularity and evaluating response to chemotherapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We used MR angiography (2D time-of-flight) to study 13 patients with primary bone tumors (nine osteogenic sarcomas, two Ewing's sarcomas, and two primary lymphomas of bone) at the time of initial presentation. Eight patients (all of whom had osteogenic sarcoma) also underwent MR angiography following chemotherapy before limb-salvage surgery. Two-dimensional maximum intensity projections were obtained. Three-dimensional reconstructions of vascular structures were created from the angiographic source images and were displayed simultaneously with 3D reconstructions of tumor and normal bone generated from conventional MR images. RESULTS: Two-dimensional maximum intensity projections were useful for evaluating small vessel neovascularity; 3D displays demonstrated spatial relationships of tumor, feeder vessels, and normal vascular structures. Tumor encroachment onto or encasement of normal vascular structures was shown in four patients on 2D maximum intensity projections and on 3D displays. The eight patients with osteogenic sarcoma who had follow-up imaging showed marked neovascularity prior to chemotherapy. Five patients responded to chemotherapy (> or = 90% tumor necrosis at histology); MR angiography showed marked reduction in tumor neovascularity in these patients. Three patients did not respond to chemotherapy; MR angiography showed unchanged neovascularity in one and increased neovascularity in two of these patients. CONCLUSION: MR angiography provides good visualization of peripheral vascular branches and tumor neovascularity in patients with primary bone tumors. MR angiography demonstrates encroachment onto and encasement of major vessels by the tumor mass and appears to be useful for assessing response to chemotherapy in osteogenic sarcoma and possibly other primary bone tumors by detecting treatment-induced changes in tumor neovascularity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

[CT and MRI in elastofibroma. A rare, benign soft tissue tumor].

Elastofibroma is a rare, benign soft-tissue tumor that occurs along the chest wall in the periscapular region. We identified five patients with a surgical diagnosis of elastofibroma who had had CT and/or MR scans. CT and MR imaging were compared to histologic findings in two patients. CT was available in three patients and demonstrated periscapular soft-tissue tumor with an attenuation similar to that of adjacent muscle. In one patient, the tumors appeared homogeneous. In two patients, the tumor showed strands of low density similar to that of adjacent subcutaneous fat on CT. On MR imaging, all five tumors showed predominantly low-signal intensity on both T1 and T2-weighted images. The tumors contained focal areas with high-signal intensity on T1-weighted scans that showed intermediate to high-signal intensity with T2-weighting. The areas of low-signal intensity on both T1 and T2-weighted images corresponded histologically to fibroelastic tissue. The areas of high signal intensity on T1-weighting and intermediate to high-signal intensity on T2-weighting reflected focal areas of fat within the tumor. Although CT and MR imaging findings are not specific, the presence of a soft-tissue tumor along the chest wall in a periscapular location that shows predominantly low intensity on all sequences reflecting fibrous tissue with interspersed focal areas of fatty tissue is highly suggestive of elastofibroma.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Prediction of hip fractures from pelvic radiographs: the study of osteoporotic fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

To determine whether simple measurements made on conventional radiographs of the hip could predict hip fractures, we obtained pelvic radiographs on 9704 white women age 65 or older. We analyze the radiographs of all 162 women who subsequently suffered a hip fracture and 162 randomly selected women who did not. Adjusting for age, four measurements independently predicted hip fractures: reduced thickness of the femoral shaft cortex (odds ratio 1.7 per standard deviation; 95% confidence interval 1.2, 2.3) and of the femoral neck cortex (1.4 per standard deviation; 1.0, 1.9), reduction in an index of tensile trabeculae (2.0 per unit; 1.4, 2.9), and wider trochanteric region (1.4 per standard deviation; 1.0, 2.0). The combination of these four measurements predicted hip fracture at least as strongly as did measurement of bone density of the femoral neck (areas of the receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.81 and 0.80, respectively). We conclude that simple measurements made on pelvic radiographs predict hip fractures as well as bone density of the hip.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1994

Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.

The comparison of patient data among different dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners is complicated because no universally accepted cross-calibration procedure or standard currently exists. This study was performed under the auspices of the International DXA Standardization Committee to establish appropriate cross-calibration parameters. Posteroanterior (PA) lumbar spine measurements of 100 women, ages 20-80 years (mean 52.6 +/- 16, range of BMD = 0.4-1.6 g/cm2) were obtained on a Norland XR26 Mark II, a Lunar DPX-L, and a Hologic QDR 2000 densitometer using standard procedures (pencil beam mode for all three scanners). Area, BMC, and BMD results from the different scanners were compared for all patients. In addition, the European spine phantom (ESP) and the European spine phantom prototype (ESP prototype), as well as standard phantoms from all three manufacturers, were evaluated on the three systems. To achieve universal scanner calibration, we used the intercept and slope of the patient's correlations and the value of the middle vertebra of the ESP as a reference point in a series of standardization formulas, and we have expressed the results as sBMD (mg/cm2). The correlations of the patients' spinal BMD values were excellent for each of the three scanner pairs. The average absolute difference in patient spinal BMD values (L2-4) between Hologic and Norland was 0.012 g/cm2 (1.3%); it was 0.113 g/cm2 (11.7%) between Hologic and Lunar and 0.118 g/cm2 (12.2%) between Norland and Lunar. The phantoms' regression lines approximated those of the patient regression lines, and the phantoms with only one measurement point were very close to the patients' regression lines. After applying the standardization formulas, the average absolute differences for the 100 patients were 28 mg/cm2 (2.7%) for Hologic/Norland, 23 mg/cm2 (2.2%) for Hologic/Lunar, and 29 mg/cm2 (2.8%) for Norland/Lunar. Average BMD results for the patients before correction were 0.972 mg/cm2 for Hologic, 1.100 g/cm2 for Lunar, and 0.969 g/cm2 for Norland. After correction, sBMD results for patients were 1045 mg/cm2 for Hologic, 1047 mg/cm2 for Lunar, and 1043 mg/cm2 for Norland. The standardization approach as performed in our study provided compatibility of DXA results obtained on different scanners.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗