Biomedical subjects

S G Chrysant

Publications and source records attributed to S G Chrysant.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Perindopril/hydrochlorothiazide dose combinations for the treatment of hypertension: a multicenter study.

The primary goal of combination therapy is to enhance efficacy without compromising safety. In this multicenter study, the efficacy and tolerability of perindopril added to continuing hydrochlorothiazide therapy were evaluated in patients with mild to moderate (stage I and II), essential hypertension. Two hundred fifty-two patients with supine diastolic blood pressure of 95 mmHg to 114 mmHg were treated for 4 weeks with open-label hydrochlorothiazide at 25 mg/day. The 208 patients whose supine diastolic blood pressure was > or = 90 mmHg at the end of hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy entered a 12-week, double-blind treatment, where placebo or perindopril were added to the 25-mg/ day hydrochlorothiazide therapy as follows: placebo (n = 50) and doses of perindopril at 2 mg/day (n = 52), 4 mg/day (n = 53), and 8 mg/day (n = 53). The perindopril-hydrochlorothiazide combinations decreased both supine systolic blood pressure and supine diastolic blood pressure by 10.3/6.7, 9.6/8.0, and 9.3/6.3 mmHg, for perindopril doses of 2, 4, and 8 mg/day, respectively; there was no difference among the three drug groups. Placebo decreased blood pressure by 1.6/2.0 mmHg, an effect that was significantly lower compared with perindopril-hydrochlorothiazide combinations. Adverse events were mild and similar among all treatment groups, except cough, which was 4.0%, 3.9%, 7.6%, and 13.2% for placebo and perindopril doses of 2, 4, and 8 mg, respectively. The results of this multicenter study indicate that the combination of perindopril and hydrochlorothiazide is safe and effective in lowering blood pressure. The findings also demonstrate that lower doses of perindopril are as effective as higher doses when combined with hydrochlorothiazide.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Effects of benazepril and hydrochlorothiazide, given alone and in low- and high-dose combinations, on blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of several combinations of benazepril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and hydrochlorothiazide, as compared with placebo, in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension. DESIGN: A 6-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel study conducted at 24 centers. A placebo run-in period of 1 to 4 weeks preceded the double-blind phase. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Male and female outpatients, aged 18 years and older, were eligible to participate if their sitting diastolic blood pressure was between 95 and 114 mm Hg at the last two consecutive visits during the placebo phase. Among the 334 patients who entered the double-blind phase, 17% were aged 65 years or older and 26% were black. Eleven patients withdrew because of adverse experiences, including two patients receiving placebo. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received placebo; benazepril, 20 mg; hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg; or combination therapy with benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide, 5/6.25 mg, 10/12.5 mg, 20/25 mg, 20/6.25 mg, or 5/25 mg, once daily for 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean change from baseline in sitting diastolic blood pressure at end point (last postrandomization measurement carried forward) in the double-blind phase. Combination therapy with benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide, 20/25 mg, was compared with benazepril, 20 mg alone, and hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg alone. Sitting systolic blood pressure and the effect of race and age on treatment efficacy were also evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, all benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide combinations produced statistically significant reductions from baseline in sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressures at study end point. In the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide, 20/25 mg, group, the adjusted mean changes in sitting diastolic blood pressure at end point were statistically significantly greater than those in the monotherapy treatment groups (benazepril, 20 mg, P < or = .05; hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg, P < or = .001) alone. All therapies were generally well tolerated. Decreases in mean serum potassium level with hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy were reduced or eliminated with combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Benazepril in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, including a low-dose combination of 5/6.25 mg, is effective in reducing sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

A comparison of the antihypertensive effectiveness of a combination of moexipril or sustained-release verapamil with low-dose hydrochlorothiazide.

The antihypertensive effectiveness of moexipril, a new angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, and sustained-release verapamil (verapamil SR) in combination with low-dose hydrochlorothiazide was investigated in patients with moderate to severe (Stages II and III) essential hypertension. Of 147 patients treated for 4 weeks with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg/day, 108 patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) of 100 to 114 mmHg were randomly assigned to receive either moexipril 7.5 mg/day (n = 56) or verapamil SR 180 mg/day (n = 52) in addition to hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg/day. After 4 weeks of treatment, doses of moexipril or verapamil SR were increased to 15 and 240 mg/ day respectively for patients with SDBP of > or = 90 mmHg. These patients were evaluated for an additional 8 weeks. Electrocardiograms, blood chemistries, blood counts, urinalysis, plasma renin activity, and plasma aldosterone levels were monitored during the study. Moexipril or verapamil SR, in combination with low dose hydrochlorothiazide, resulted in decreased blood pressure in the sitting and standing positions. No correlation between blood pressure response and baseline plasma renin activity was demonstrated. The results of this study indicate that both moexipril and verapamil SR produced an additive hypertensive effect when added to low-dose hydrochlorothiazide. These combinations were well tolerated by the patients and did not result in serious clinical and metabolic side effects.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Comparison of amlodipine and benazepril monotherapy to amlodipine plus benazepril in patients with systemic hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. The Benazepril/Amlodipine Study Group.

A single-blind, run-in, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled comparison trial was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of low-dose amlodipine 2.5 mg daily, low-dose benazepril 10 mg daily, and the combination of the two drugs at the same doses used once daily in patients (n = 401) with mild to moderate (stages I and II) systemic hypertension. Both monotherapy regimens were shown to significantly reduce both systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared with baseline placebo values, and the combination regimen was shown to be superior in lowering systolic and diastolic blood pressure when compared with either of the monotherapy regimens. The combination therapy also resulted in a greater percentage of patients having successful clinical response in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure. The amlodipine and benazepril regimen was also shown to be associated with a similar incidence of adverse experiences as the active monotherapy or placebo regimens, although the group given combination therapy appeared to have a lower incidence of edema than the group given amlodipine alone. Low-dose amlodipine (2.5 mg) plus benazepril (10 mg) provides greater blood-pressure-lowering efficacy than either monotherapy, and has an excellent safety profile.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Sustained blood pressure control with controlled-release isradipine (isradipine-CR).

The safety and efficacy, as measured by peak/trough blood pressure reduction, of a new, once-daily, controlled-release formulation of isradipine (isradipine-CR, ICR) were evaluated in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension during a nine-week trial. After a 3-week placebo washout period, patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure between 100 and 114 mm Hg were randomized to either 1 of 4 ICR treatment groups or placebo. Of 402 randomized patients, 384 completed the study (placebo = 77, ICR-5 mg = 76, ICR 10 mg = 76, ICR-15 mg = 78, and ICR-20 mg = 77). Peak and trough post-dose blood pressure responses and heart rates were monitored for both the sitting and upright positions. Blood chemistries, urinalyses, complete blood counts, and electrocardiograms were done during the study. Both sitting and upright blood pressure decreased with the 5-(P < .05), 10-, 15-, and 20-mg (P < .001) once-daily ICR doses. The peak blood pressure reduction for all ICR doses occurred at 8 to 10 hours post-dose. Maximum peak/trough blood pressure response, achieved with the 10-mg dose, was similar with that of 15 and 20 mg of ICR. No serious clinical or metabolic side effect were noted, except ankle edema, which was dose dependent but did not require discontinuation of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Age Factors↗

PubMed1995

Dose-ranging study of a new, once-daily diltiazem formulation for patients with stable angina.

A double-blind safety and efficacy dose-ranging study was conducted with a new, once-daily, extended-release (XR) diltiazem hydrochloride formulation (Dilacor XR, Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Collegeville, PA) in 189 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. After a 2-week placebo lead-in phase, the patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 once-daily, fixed-dose treatment groups: placebo, XR diltiazem 120 mg, 240 mg, or 480 mg. Extended-release diltiazem, at 240-mg and 480-mg once-daily doses, significantly improved (P < .05) total exercise time during treadmill exercise tolerance testing after 2 weeks of treatment when assessed 24 hours after the previous dose. These increasing doses of XR diltiazem were associated with incremental improvements in exercise tolerance. Outpatient function, as assessed by frequency of anginal attacks, nitroglycerin use, and ambulatory electrocardiogram (Holter, Scole Engineering Culver City, CA) monitoring of ischemic events, was also improved by XR diltiazem. This extended-release diltiazem formulation can be clinically titrated within the 120- to 480-mg dosing range, permitting effective once-daily administration for treating chronic stable angina.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Comparison of moexipril, a new ACE inhibitor, to verapamil-SR as add-on therapy to low dose hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients.

The antihypertensive effects of moexipril, a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, and verapamil-SR as add-on therapy to hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) were investigated in patients with moderate to severe (stages II and III) essential hypertension. Of 147 patients treated for 4 weeks with 25 mg/day HCTZ, 108 whose sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) was 100 to 114 mm Hg inclusive were randomized to 7.5 mg/day moexipril (56 patients) and 180 mg/day verapamil-SR (52 patients) in addition to 25 mg/day HCTZ. If after 4 weeks of treatment the SDBP was > or = 90 mm Hg, the dose of moexipril was increased to 15 mg/day and that of verapamil-SR increased to 240 mg/day; the patients were followed for an additional 8 weeks. Blood chemistries, plasma renin activity, and plasma aldosterone were done during the study. Both moexipril and verapamil-SR were safe and well tolerated and decreased the sitting and standing blood pressure similarly (P < .001). This study demonstrated that the addition of moexipril and verapamil-SR to low dose HCTZ is effective for the treatment of moderate to severe hypertension.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

Sustained blood pressure control with controlled-release isradipine.

The efficacy and safety of different doses of a new controlled release formulation of isradipine (isradipine-CR, ICR) were evaluated in patients with mild to moderate (stages 1 and 2) essential hypertension in a placebo-controlled study. Of 402 randomized patients, 384 completed the study (placebo = 77, 5 mg ICR = 76, 10 mg ICR = 76, 15 mg ICR = 78, 20 mg ICR = 77). All doses of ICR decreased the blood pressure and the effect was greater with doses of 10, 15, and 20 mg once daily (P < .001). The most common clinical side effect was mild ankle edema, which was dose dependent, occurring in 35.5% of the patients taking the 20-mg ICR dose. This study showed that ICR is long acting, effective, and well tolerated.

Blood Pressure↗

PubMed1995

Doxazosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response multicenter study.

A total of 248 hypertensive patients 45 years old or older with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) was included in this 16-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group dose-response study. Doxazosin, a selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist, produced a significant increase in maximum urinary flow rate (2.3 to 3.6 ml. per second) at doses of 4 mg., 8 mg. and 12 mg., and in average flow rate (8 mg. and 12 mg.) compared with placebo. The increase in maximum flow rate was significant with doxazosin versus placebo within 1 week of initiating double-blind therapy. Doxazosin compared to placebo significantly decreased patient-assessed total, obstructive and irritative BPH symptoms. Blood pressure was significantly lower with all doxazosin doses compared with placebo. Adverse events, primarily mild to moderate in severity, were reported in 48% of patients on doxazosin and 35% on placebo. Our results strongly support the use of doxazosin as a nonoperative therapeutic alternative in the management of uncomplicated BPH. Doxazosin would also be particularly useful in the management of patients who have BPH and hypertension.

Aged↗

PubMed1994

Antihypertensive effectiveness of low-dose lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination. A large multicenter study. Lisinopril-Hydrochlorothiazide Group.

OBJECTIVE: To test the antihypertensive and metabolic effects of lisinopril, 10 mg/d (L); hydrochlorothiazide, 12.5 and 25 mg/d (H12.5 and H25); and its combination with lisinopril (L/H12.5 and L/H25) against placebo in patients with mild to moderate (stage I and stage II) hypertension. DESIGN: Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient study of 12 weeks' duration. PATIENTS: After 4 weeks of single-blind placebo treatment, 505 patients whose sitting diastolic blood pressure was 100 to 114 mm Hg were randomized into the study--467 patients completed it (placebo, 71; L, 80; H12.5, 79; H25, 77; L/H12.5, 79; and L/H25, 81). The patients were seen in the clinic every 2 weeks, where measurements of their sitting and upright blood pressure and heart rate were taken 24 +/- 2 hours after drug administration. Complete blood cell counts with differential cell counts, blood chemistry studies, urinalyses, and electrocardiograms were done at baseline and during the study. Roentgenograms were done once at baseline. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, all drug regimens decreased sitting and upright blood pressure (P < .001) and had no effect on sitting and upright heart rate. The greatest effect was obtained with the combinations of L/H12.5 and L/H25. There was no difference between L/H12.5 and L/H25 or between H12.5 and H25. There were no serious clinical side effects except cough, which was slightly higher with L, L/H12.5, and L/H25. The only metabolic side effects were in serum potassium level, which was lower with H25 (P < .01), and serum glucose level, which was higher with H25 and L/H25 (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that (1) monotherapy of hypertension with L, H12.5, H25, L/H12.5, and L/H25 was effective and well tolerated; (2) the best results were achieved with L/H12.5 and L/H25; (3) lower doses of hydrochlorothiazide either alone or in combination with lisinopril were equipotent with higher doses and were free of metabolic side effects.

Blood Pressure↗

PubMed1994

Low-dose combined therapy with fluvastatin and cholestyramine in hyperlipidemic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering efficacy of low-dose combinations of cholestyramine and fluvastatin. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial with a 24-week double-blind treatment period divided into three phases. SETTING: Office-based clinics. PATIENTS: Hypercholesterolemic, with LDL cholesterol of 4.14 mmol/L or greater (> or = 160 mg/dL) and plasma triglycerides of 3.39 mmol/L or less (< or = 300 mg/dL). Four hundred sixty patients were screened; 224 patients were randomized into a double-blind treatment period; 203 completed the study; 6 dropped out because of adverse events. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with 10 mg or 20 mg of fluvastatin alone, 8 g or 16 g of cholestyramine alone, or combinations of these fluvastatin and cholestyramine dosages (six treatment groups). MEASUREMENTS: Changes in lipid variables, particularly LDL cholesterol. RESULTS: The 10-mg and 20-mg fluvastatin monotherapy groups showed considerable reductions in LDL cholesterol initially (-20.1% [SD, 8.8%] and -20.2% [SD, 10.1%], respectively); these reductions were maintained. Reductions in LDL cholesterol that resulted from the addition of cholestyramine, 8 g/d, to 10 mg of fluvastatin and 20 mg of fluvastatin were greater than those observed with monotherapy (10-mg fluvastatin--[10-mg fluvastatin plus cholestyramine], 9.1%; 95% CI, 3.8% to 14.4%) and 20-mg fluvastatin--[20-mg fluvastatin plus cholestyramine], 11.6%; CI, 6.5% to 16.8%). The increase in cholestyramine dose to 16 g/d in the three combination groups provided only a modest additional response. CONCLUSIONS: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reductions of about 25% to 30% can be achieved with low-dose combination therapy with fluvastatin and cholestyramine. The addition of low-dose resin appears to produce greater overall cholesterol reduction than does a simple doubling of the fluvastatin dosage. The low-dose combination treatment was highly successful in achieving the goals of the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

PubMed1994

Effects of atenolol and diltiazem-SR on exercise and pressure load in hypertensive patients.

The effects of monotherapy with atenolol or diltiazem-SR on blood pressure, 24-h blood pressure (BP) load, and exercise capacity were tested in patients with mild to moderate (stages I and II) essential hypertension. After 3-week single-blind placebo therapy, patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) of 94-114 mmHg were randomized to atenolol 50 mg/day (62 patients) or diltiazem-SR 90 mg b.i.d. (60 patients) in a double-blind parallel study. Depending on SDBP response, the dose was increased to 100 mg/day for atenolol and 180 mg b.i.d. for diltiazem-SR. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements and exercise tolerance test by the Bruce protocol were done at the end of placebo and active treatment. Compared with placebo, both atenolol and diltiazem-SR significantly decreased heart rate (HR), sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP), SDBP, ambulatory BP, BP load for waking and sleeping hours, area under the BP curve, rate-pressure product (p < 0.001), and exercise time (NS). Atenolol exerted a greater effect on ambulatory BP, HR, rate-pressure product, waking diastolic BP load, and area under the 24-h BP curve. The drugs were well tolerated and caused no serious side effects necessitating discontinuation of treatment. These findings indicate that (1) monotherapy for hypertension with atenolol or diltiazem-SR is effective and well tolerated, (2) it decreases the 24-h BP load, (3) it does not interfere with exercise capacity.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Betaxolol in the treatment of stable angina pectoris.

Betaxolol, a long-acting cardioselective beta-blocker, was tested alone and in combination with long-acting nitrates in a multicenter, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study of 3 weeks duration in patients with stable angina pectoris. All patients underwent exercise tolerance tests (ETTs) using Bruce's protocol. During the 3- to 4-week single-blind placebo baseline phase, all other drugs except sublingual nitroglycerin and long-acting nitrates were withdrawn. Those patients (n = 115) whose time to onset of moderate angina was between 2.5 and 7.5 min and was within +/- 15% in 2 consecutive ETTs were randomized to betaxolol 20 mg/day (n = 54) or placebo (n = 53). Betaxolol, compared to placebo, increased time to onset of angina, time to 1 mm S-T segment depression, and total exercise time and decreased the double product, weekly anginal attacks, and sublingual nitroglycerin consumption (p < 0.01). Our results indicate that betaxolol given in fixed 20-mg daily doses was efficacious in stable angina pectoris and its combination with long-acting nitrates potentiated its effect.

Angina Pectoris↗

PubMed1993

Efficacy and safety of extended-release isosorbide mononitrate for stable effort angina pectoris.

The efficacy and safety of extended-release isosorbide mononitrate tablets were evaluated in patients with stable effort angina. In a double-blind study, 313 patients with stable effort-induced angina were randomized to receive placebo or extended-release isosorbide mononitrate: 30, 60, 120 or 240 mg once daily in the morning. Serial exercise testing was performed using the standard Bruce treadmill protocol on days 1, 7, 14, 28 and 42 immediately before morning drug administration, and 4 and 12 hours after administration. After initial dosing, all groups that received extended-release isosorbide mononitrate had significant (p < 0.01) increases in mean total exercise time of approximately 30 to 50 seconds in relation to placebo 4 and 12 hours after administration. On day 42, mean changes from baseline in total exercise time of patients who received 120 or 240 mg of extended-release isosorbide mononitrate exceeded placebo by approximately 50 to 60 seconds 4 hours after dosing (p < 0.01), and by 30 to 35 seconds 12 hours after dosing (p < or = 0.05). No significant difference was detected between responses to extended-release isosorbide mononitrate and placebo 24 hours after administration (i.e., immediately before the next dose). Thus, there was neither significant activity nor demonstrable rebound of effort-induced angina (zero-hour effect) at the end of the dosing interval. Transient headache was the most prevalent adverse experience. Extended-release isosorbide mononitrate (120 and 240 mg administered orally once daily) significantly prolonged exercise time to development of moderate effort-induced angina 4 and 12 hours after dosing during long-term therapy, without development of nitrate tolerance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Perindopril as monotherapy in hypertension: a multicenter comparison of two dosing regimens. The Perindopril Study Group.

Perindopril erbumine, a new long-acting, non-sulfhydryl-containing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, was evaluated in 289 patients with hypertension in a 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study. After 4 weeks of single-blind placebo treatment, patients with supine diastolic arterial pressures from 95 to 114 mm Hg were randomized to receive placebo, 4 mg perindopril once daily, or 2 mg perindopril twice daily. The daily dose of perindopril was increased by 4 mg every 4 weeks to a maximum of 16 mg per day. Mean decreases in systolic and diastolic arterial pressure were greater with perindopril than with placebo (p < 0.05). The dose-response curve flattened after 8 mg per day, and there was no difference in arterial pressure reduction or in the percentage of responders between once- and twice-daily administration of perindopril. Adverse reactions with perindopril were generally mild and, with the exception of cough, were similar with placebo. The findings of this study indicate that perindopril is effective, well tolerated, and suitable for once-daily administration for the treatment of hypertension.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

PubMed1992

Antihypertensive and metabolic effects of single and combined atenolol regimens.

The antihypertensive and metabolic effects of placebo (PL), a fixed combination of hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg) and triamterene (50 mg) (HCTZ/TRI), atenolol (25 mg) (Atc-25), atenolol (50 mg) (Ate-50) and their combination with HCTZ/TRI given once daily, were tested on 256 patients with mild-to-moderate essential-hypertension. After 3 weeks of PL monotherapy, 43 patients were randomized to PL (group 1), 41 patients to HCTZ/TRI (group 2), 44 patients to Ate-25 (group 3), 42 patients to Ate-50 (group 4), 43 patients to Ate-25/HCTZ/TRI (group 5), and 43 patients to Ate-50/HCTZ/TRI (group 6) in a double-blind parallel design study and were followed for 4 weeks. At the end of week 7, those patients who were randomized to groups 5 and 6 were allowed to continue for an additional 12 weeks, if their arterial pressure was satisfactorily controlled. Complete blood counts, blood chemistries, urinalyses, and electrocardiograms were done initially and during the study. Monotherapy with HCTZ/TRI, Ate-25, and Ate-50 had significant and equal antihypertensive effects compared with placebo. (P less than .01). However, the combination of Ate-25/HCTZ/TRI and Ate-50/HCTZ/TRI resulted in further reduction of arterial pressure with the effect being greatest with Ate-50/HCTZ/TRI (P less than .001). Patient groups 3 through 6 had also slower heart rates compared with groups 1 and 2 (P less than .01). Mild, but statistically significant, increases in BUN, glucose, triglycerides, and uric acid were noted in groups 2, 5, and 6 (P less than .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Atenolol↗

PubMed1992

Antihypertensive and metabolic effects of concomitant administration of terazosin and methyclothiazide for the treatment of essential hypertension.

The efficacy and safety of once-daily 2.5- or 5.0-mg methyclothiazide (MCTZ) added to once-daily 5.0-mg terazosin (TRZ) versus 5.0-mg TRZ alone was evaluated in this double-blind, multicenter study. All patients received TRZ during a 6-week titration period. Hypertensive patients (222) (mean blood pressure of 159/104 mm Hg) were randomized to one of three treatment groups: TRZ alone (N = 76); TRZ+MCTZ-2.5 mg (N = 74); and TRZ+MCTZ-5.0 mg (N = 72) for the 8-week double-blind period. Changes in the supine and standing SBP/DBP from preTRZ period were: TRZ alone (-4.8/-8.1 and -2.6/-6.1 mm Hg); TRZ+MCTZ-2.5 mg (-17.3/-12.4 and -16.0/-11.2 mm Hg); and TRZ+MCTZ-5.0 mg (-20.6/-14.4 and -23.3/-14.6 mm Hg). Blood pressure changes in the combination groups were significantly greater than those in the TRZ alone group. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the TRZ+MCTZ-2.5-mg and TRZ+MCTZ-5.0-mg groups. The combination of TRZ and MCTZ tends to mitigate the adverse effects on serum glucose, uric, potassium and lipids usually associated with thiazide diuretics. Thus, combination treatment that begins with TRZ and adds MCTZ is effective in lowering blood pressure without any significant adverse metabolic effects.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗

PubMed1991

Cardiac changes from beta-blocker, diuretic and minoxidil combination in hypertension.

The open, long-term antihypertensive, hemodynamic and metabolic effects of betaxolol in combination with furosemide and minoxidil were investigated on 30 male patients with moderate to severe essential hypertension. Twenty-three patients were observed for 104 weeks, and 7 patients for 128 weeks. The patients were seen in the clinic every 4 weeks. Blood chemistries, electrocardiograms, chest x-rays and echocardiograms were done at set intervals during the study. This drug combination caused a significant and sustained decrease in arterial pressure and heart rate (p less than 0.001), a significant increase in the cardiothoracic ratio (p less than 0.05), left and right ventricular diameter in end diastole and in left ventricular mass (p less than 0.001), and had no effect on left ventricular wall thickness, interventricular septal thickness, left ventricular ejection fraction, myocardial fiber shortening or metabolic functions. Clinical side effects included hypertrichosis, weight gain and edema. We conclude: (1) Single daily administration of betaxolol, furosemide and minoxidil produced a significant and sustained antihypertensive effect. (2) It caused cardiac enlargement and increased left ventricular mass without deterioration of myocardial function. (3) The clinical significance of the latter findings is not known at present time.

Betaxolol↗