Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Findlay

Publications and source records attributed to S Findlay.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Comparative efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination versus its components alone and placebo in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis often requires the use of a decongestant to improve nasal congestion, along with an antihistamine to adequately control other nasal, as well as nonnasal symptoms. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 874 patients with moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis were treated with one of the following: SCH 434 QD (a combination of 10 mg of loratadine in the coating and 240 mg of pseudoephedrine sulfate in an extended-release core) once daily, 10 mg of loratadine once daily, 120 mg of pseudoephedrine sulfate every 12 hours, or placebo for 2 weeks. RESULTS: SCH 434 QD was consistently superior to placebo in controlling the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Composite symptom scores (total, total nasal, and total nonnasal) were reduced significantly in patients treated with SCH 434 QD as compared with placebo (p < 0.01). When compared with its individual components, reductions in mean symptom scores were consistently greater, numerically, in patients treated with SCH 434 QD than in patients who were treated with either loratadine or pseudoephedrine alone. SCH 434 QD was superior to pseudoephedrine in reducing nonnasal symptoms at all time points (p < 0.01), and superior to loratadine in relieving nasal stuffiness at end point (p < 0.01). In the physicians' evaluation of therapeutic response, the SCH 434 QD group had the greatest number of patients with a good or excellent response at end point (58%). All treatments were generally well tolerated with no serious or unusual adverse events. Insomnia and nervousness, adverse events commonly associated with pseudoephedrine, were noted in a significantly greater number of patients treated with SCH 434 QD or pseudoephedrine (p < or = 0.04) as compared with those treated with loratadine or placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study demonstrate that SCH 434 QD is more effective than placebo or either of its components alone in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Adolescent↗

The use of twice daily nedocromil sodium in the treatment of asthma.

The efficacy and safety of nedocromil sodium inhalation aerosol (4 mg of Tilade administered by metered-dose inhaler) given twice daily was compared with placebo in 112 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma who had been receiving maintenance therapy with oral or inhaled bronchodilators or both. After a 2-week run-in period and a subsequent 2-week baseline period, patients were randomized to active treatment (n = 56) or placebo (n = 56) for 8 weeks. All maintenance bronchodilators were withdrawn before the baseline period, and patients entered the treatment period only after demonstrating a specified level of asthma symptoms. Twice daily administration of nedocromil sodium improved all asthma symptoms in these patients who had symptoms as a result of the withdrawal of their maintenance theophylline and/or oral and inhaled beta 2-agonist bronchodilators. During the primary time period (treatment weeks 5 to 8), statistically significant between-group differences favored nedocromil sodium for the asthma summary score (primary variable, p = 0.001), daytime asthma (p = 0.001), and sleep difficulty caused by asthma (p = 0.006). Furthermore, significant reductions in the use of as-needed rescue medications were reported in the nedocromil sodium group (p = 0.003) compared with the placebo group. Final overall opinions of treatment effectiveness expressed by physicians (p = 0.016) and patients (p = 0.002) strongly favored nedocromil sodium.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Voodoo regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗