Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S E Kern

Publications and source records attributed to S E Kern.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Functional mapping of the MH1 DNA-binding domain of DPC4/SMAD4.

The transcription factor Smad4 binds DNA in response to a TGF-beta ligand-initiated intracellular signaling cascade. SMAD4 is deleted or mutated during tumorigenesis in many human tumors. Some of these mutations occur in the N-terminal portion of the protein, the Mad homology 1 (MH1) region, which exhibits sequence-specific DNA-binding. We used alanine scanning mutagenesis and natural mutations to map the subregion of the MH1 domain necessary for that function. We created 20 individual mutations in the MH1 region of human Smad4 and assayed their effect on DNA-binding in vitro. Mutation of residues in the less conserved N- and C-terminal areas of the MH1 region had no effect on DNA-binding. However, mutations in the domain from L43 to R135 caused a dramatic reduction of the ability of Smad4 to bind DNA. Previous work demonstrated a beta-hairpin protein motif within this region to be responsible for DNA-binding, but suggested that the tumorigenic mutations occurring outside this motif may target a separate function of the MH1 domain. Our results demonstrate that the MH1 domain as a whole is very sensitive to changes in overall structure, and that tumorigenic mutations within the region of L43-R135 indeed would target DNA-binding.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2000

A novel histone deacetylase inhibitor identified by high-throughput transcriptional screening of a compound library.

Libraries of compounds are increasingly becoming commercially available for the use of individual academic laboratories. A high-throughput system based on a stably integrated transcriptional reporter was used to screen a library of random compounds to identify agents that conferred robust augmentation of a signal transduction pathway. A novel histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, termed scriptaid, conferred the greatest effect, a 12- to 18-fold augmentation. This facilitation of transcriptional events was generally applicable to exogenous gene constructs, including viral and cellular promoters, different cell lines and reporter genes, and stably integrated and transiently introduced sequences. Scriptaid did not interfere with a further induction provided by stimulation of the cognate signal transduction pathway (transforming growth factor beta/Smad4), which implied the functional independence of ligand-stimulated transcriptional activation and histone acetylation states in this system. Additional insights into this and other signal transduction systems are likely to be afforded through the application of compound screening technologies.

Cell Survival↗
PubMed2000

Loss of expression of Dpc4 in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: evidence that DPC4 inactivation occurs late in neoplastic progression.

Infiltrating adenocarcinomas of the pancreas are believed to arise from histologically identifiable intraductal precursors [pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs)] that undergo a series of architectural, cytological, and genetic changes. The role of DPC4 tumor suppressor gene inactivation in this progression has not been defined. Immunohistochemistry for the Dpc4 protein in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue is a sensitive and specific marker for DPC4 gene status, providing a tool to examine DPC4 status in these putative precursor lesions. A total of 188 PanINs were identified in 40 pancreata, 38 (95%) of which also contained an infiltrating adenocarcinoma. Sections containing these 188 duct lesions were labeled with a monoclonal antibody to Dpc4. All 82 flat (PanIN-1A), all 54 papillary (PanIN-1B), and all 23 atypical papillary (PanIN-2) intraductal lesions expressed Dpc4. In contrast, 9 of 29 (31%) severely atypical lesions (PanIN-3 lesions, carcinomas in situ) did not. The difference in Dpc4 expression between histologically low-grade (PanIN-1 and -2) and histologically high-grade (PanIN-3) duct lesions was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). In three cases, the pattern of Dpc4 expression in the PanIN-3 lesions did not match the pattern of expression in the associated infiltrating carcinomas, indicating that these high-grade lesions did not simply represent infiltrating carcinoma growing along benign ducts. Loss of Dpc4 expression occurs biologically late in the neoplastic progression that leads to the development of infiltrating pancreatic cancer, at the stage of histologically recognizable carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Dpc-4 protein is expressed in virtually all human intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: comparison with conventional ductal adenocarcinomas.

DPC4 (MADH4, SMAD4) encodes a nuclear transcription factor shown to be genetically inactivated in over one-half of conventional infiltrating ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas have been suggested to be distinct neoplasms with a significantly less aggressive course than conventional ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas, but molecular comparisons of these tumor types have previously been impaired by technical difficulties. Recently, immunohistochemical labeling for the DPC4 gene product has been shown to be an extremely sensitive and specific marker for DPC4 gene alterations in pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Therefore, we analyzed the immunohistochemical expression of Dpc4 protein in 79 IPMNs using a previously characterized monoclonal antibody. Twenty-nine of the IPMNs also had an associated infiltrating adenocarcinoma available for analysis. The labeling patterns observed were compared to those we have previously reported for conventional ductal carcinomas. All 79 of the intraductal components of the IPMNs strongly expressed Dpc4 protein. In 77 of the 79 cases (97%), the labeling was diffusely positive, and in 2 of the 79 (3%) the labeling was focally positive. Dpc4 expression was seen in 28 (97%) of the associated 29 invasive cancers. The one infiltrating carcinoma that showed loss of Dpc4 expression was associated with an intraductal component which showed focal loss of Dpc4 expression. The strong and almost universal expression of Dpc4 in IPMNs contrasts sharply with the loss of Dpc4 expression seen in approximately 30% of in situ adenocarcinomas of the pancreas (so-called pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasms, grade 3; P: < 0.001) and in 55% of pancreatic duct carcinomas (P: < 0.0001). Differences in Dpc4 expression between IPMNs and ductal carcinomas suggest a fundamental genetic difference in tumorigenesis, which may relate to the significantly better clinical outcomes observed for IPMNs.

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous↗
PubMed2000

Immunohistochemical labeling for dpc4 mirrors genetic status in pancreatic adenocarcinomas : a new marker of DPC4 inactivation.

DPC4 (MADH4, SMAD4) is a tumor suppressor gene inactivated by allelic loss in approximately 55% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Unfortunately, it can be technically very difficult to detect the inactivation of DPC4 at the genetic level because genetic analyses require the microdissection of relatively pure samples of neoplastic and normal tissues. This is especially true for pancreatic adenocarcinomas, which elicit vigorous, non-neoplastic, stromal responses. Immunohistochemical labeling can overcome this hurdle because it preserves morphological information. We therefore studied the expression of the DPC4 gene product in 46 cancers, including 5 cancer cell lines by Western blot analysis and 41 primary periampullary adenocarcinomas by immunohistochemistry. The status of exons 1-11 of the DPC4 gene in all 46 of the cancers had been previously characterized at the molecular level, allowing us to correlate Dpc4 expression directly with gene status. Three cell lines had wild-type DPC4 genes, and Dpc4 expression was detected in all three by Western blot. The two cell lines with homozygously deleted DPC4 genes did not show Dpc4 protein by Western blot analysis. Immunohistochemical labeling revealed that 17 (94%) of the 18 primary adenocarcinomas with wild-type DPC4 genes expressed the DPC4 gene product, whereas 21 (91%) of 23 primary adenocarcinomas with inactivated DPC4 genes did not. Cases in which there was discordance between the immunohistochemical labeling and the genetic analyses were reanalyzed genetically, and we identified a deletion in exon 0 of DPC4 in one of these cases. This is the first report of a mutation in exon 0 of DPC4 in a pancreatic cancer. The contrast between the strong expression of Dpc4 by normal tissues and the loss of expression in the carcinomas was highlighted in several cases in which an infiltrating cancer was identified growing into a benign duct. These observations suggest that immunohistochemical labeling for the DPC4 gene product is an extremely sensitive and specific marker for DPC4 gene alterations in pancreatic carcinomas. The sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical labeling for Dpc4 in other periampullary carcinomas has yet to be determined.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Genetic, immunohistochemical, and clinical features of medullary carcinoma of the pancreas: A newly described and characterized entity.

Medullary carcinomas of the pancreas are a recently described, histologically distinct subset of poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas that may have a unique pathogenesis and clinical course. To further evaluate these neoplasms, we studied genetic, pathological, and clinical features of 13 newly identified medullary carcinomas of the pancreas. Nine (69%) of these had wild-type K-ras genes, and one had microsatellite instability (MSI). This MSI medullary carcinoma, along with three previously reported MSI medullary carcinomas, were examined immunohistochemically for Mlh1 and Msh2 expression, and all four expressed Msh2 but did not express Mlh1. In contrast, all of the medullary carcinomas without MSI expressed both Msh2 and Mlh1. Remarkably, the MSI medullary carcinoma of the pancreas in the present series arose in a patient with a synchronous but histologically distinct cecal carcinoma that also had MSI and did not express Mlh1. The synchronous occurrence of two MSI carcinomas suggests an inherited basis for the development of these carcinomas. Indeed, the medullary phenotype, irrespective of MSI, was highly associated with a family history of cancer in first-degree relatives (P < 0.001). Finally, one medullary carcinoma with lymphoepithelioma-like features contained Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA-1 by in situ hybridization. Therefore, because of medullary carcinoma's special genetic, immunohistochemical, and clinical features, recognition of the medullary variant of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is important. Only by classifying medullary carcinoma as special subset of adenocarcinoma can we hope to further elucidate its unique pathogenesis.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2000

BRCA2 is inactivated late in the development of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: evidence and implications.

Patients harboring germline BRCA2 mutations are at an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer. We investigated the prevalence of biallelic inactivation of BRCA2 in the presumed precursors to invasive pancreatic ductal carcinomas, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN). Surgical resection specimens from three patients with germline BRCA2 mutations who developed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were studied. Fourteen PanINs were needle-microdissected from paraffin-embedded tissue. DNA was isolated from these microdissected tissues and amplified by primer-mediated pre-amplification. Loss of heterozygosity at the BRCA2 locus was determined by polymerase chain reaction amplification and cycle sequencing. The presence of the wild-type alleles was evaluated at the nucleotide positions of the germline BRCA2 mutations. The K-ras gene was sequenced at codon 12 and 13 to confirm the efficacy of microdissection. By histological evaluation the prevalence of PanINs in these patients was not notably elevated. Loss of the wild-type allele of BRCA2 was present in one high-grade PanIN (PanIN 3), but in none of 13 low-grade PanINs (PanIN 1). In contrast, K-ras mutations were detectable in 7 of the 14 PanINs. These results suggest that biallelic inactivation of the BRCA2 gene is a relatively late event in pancreatic tumorigenesis. In contrast to classical molecular progression models of tumorigenesis, the inactivation of the wild-type allele in a carrier of a recessive tumor susceptibility gene may not always be the first somatic event during the molecular evolution of a cancer. The necessity for earlier genetic alterations before biallelic inactivation of a recessive tumor susceptibility gene such as BRCA2 may explain why affected carriers have normal numbers of neoplastic precursor lesions, a relatively low phenotypic penetrance, and late age of onset of pancreatic and other cancers.

BRCA2 Protein↗
PubMed2000

Molecular genetic alterations in ductal pancreatic adenocarcinomas.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas are known to harbor a distinct variety of genetic alterations in oncogenes, tumor-suppressor genes, and occasionally genes that carry out DNA mismatch repair. Although this malignancy occurs at an elevated frequency in patients with familial recurrent acute pancreatitis, the genetic alterations of these particular tumors have not been reported. The changes are likely to be similar to those of sporadic pancreatic cancer; if so, this would provide useful clues for studying the progression of early and advanced neoplasia in such pancreatitis patients to aid their clinical monitoring and provision of therapeutic recommendations.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Genetic counseling and testing for germline p16 mutations in two pancreatic cancer-prone families.

The mortality from pancreatic cancer coincides closely with its incidence, indicating a dismal outlook. Hereditary factors probably account for approximately 5%-10% of the pancreatic cancer burden. The molecular genetic etiology of pancreatic cancer is only beginning to be identified. We describe our genetic counseling experience with 2 large families prone to pancreatic cancer-malignant melanoma in which p16 (CDKN2) germline mutations had been identified. Members of each family underwent intensive counseling before and at the time of disclosure of p16 germline mutation findings. Two non-cancer-affected siblings from each of the 2 families had p16 mutations identified in DNA from their peripheral blood lymphocytes. In each case, a parent affected with pancreatic cancer also harbored the p16 mutation identified in DNA from their respective tumor blocks. The sibling pairs stated that they would seriously consider prophylactic pancreatectomy if biomarkers or imaging findings suggested a precancerous state. Our experience highlights limited options for managing these families and emphasizes the need for better tools to diagnose pancreatic cancer at a curable stage.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Dpc4 protein in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: frequent loss of expression in invasive carcinomas suggests a role in genetic progression.

DPC4 (MADH4, SMAD4) is a nuclear transcription factor shown to be genetically inactivated in over half of infiltrating ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas. Immunohistochemical labeling for the DPC4 gene product using a monoclonal antibody has recently been shown to be an extremely sensitive and specific marker for DPC4 gene alterations in pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) are a biologically less aggressive subtype of pancreatic neoplasm that may show benign, borderline, or overtly malignant features. However, the role of DPC4 inactivation in the development of MCNs has not been examined. The immunohistochemical expression of Dpc4 protein was therefore examined in 36 mucinous cystic neoplasms using this previously characterized monoclonal antibody. The 36 mucinous cystic neoplasms studied included 23 adenomas, 1 tumor with borderline potential, 5 tumors with carcinoma in situ, and 7 invasive carcinomas. Twenty-nine (100%) of the 29 noninvasive mucinous cystic neoplasms strongly expressed Dpc4 in the neoplastic epithelium. In striking contrast, only one (14%) of seven infiltrating carcinomas expressed Dpc4 in the neoplastic epithelium (p = 0.0001). The adjacent stroma retained expression of this protein in all 36 cases. In invasive MCNs with loss of Dpc4 expression, areas of carcinoma in situ were identified in the same paraffin sections, and these areas of carcinoma in situ retained expression of Dpc4. The frequent loss of Dpc4 expression in invasive MCNs indicates that genetic inactivation of Dpc4 occurs late in the neoplastic progression of these tumors and suggests a relationship to the development of invasion.

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous↗
PubMed2000

Molecular genetics of ductal pancreatic neoplasia.

The molecular genetic profiles that characterize pancreatic ductal neoplasia have taken shape recently with the help of immunohistochemistry and the establishment of the nomenclature describing pancreatic ductal tumorigenesis. K-ras mutations frequently occur early, changes in the expression and genetic integrity of the p16 gene appear in intermediate lesions, and the inactivation of the p53, DPC4, and BRCA2 genes occur late in the neoplastic progression. Tumor-suppressor genes inactivated in pancreatic cancer such as ALK5, TGFBR2, MKK4, and STK11/LKB1 have been identified, although their roles in tumor progression are not yet well defined. Additional discoveries in this tumor system may be on the horizon, will further refine the molecular genetic profiles for the disease, and should suggest some clinical uses for this fund of knowledge.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

Immunohistochemical p16INK4a analysis of archival tumors with deletion, hypermethylation, or mutation of the CDKN2/MTS1 gene. A comparison of four commercial antibodies.

The MTS1/CDKN2/p16 gene encoding the p16INK4a tumor-suppressor protein is commonly inactivated by homozygous deletion or hypermethylation of the promoter in a wide range of human malignancies. In select tumor types, including pancreatic adenocarcinomas, intragenic mutations are found in a significant percentage of cases. The immunoreactivity of mutant p16 proteins has not been comprehensively studied. Moreover, the immunohistochemical properties of commercially available antibodies have not been described in detail. We studied 35 pancreatic adenocarcinomas with a molecularly defined p16 status (16 homozygous deletions, 3 hypermethylated cases, and 16 tumors with an intragenic mutation in one allele associated with loss of the second allele). In addition, we studied nine cell lines (three homozygous deletions, three hypermethylated lines, and three intragenic mutations). Paraffin sections of the tumors and cell blocks were reacted with four different anti-p16 antibodies: polyclonal and monoclonal (clone G175-405) antibodies from PharMingen, monoclonal antibody DCS-50 from Oncogene Science, and monoclonal antibody ZJ11 from Neo-Markers. Optimal staining conditions were established for each antibody. The pancreatic carcinomas with homozygous p16 deletions were largely devoid of nuclear staining (admixed nonneoplastic cells served as internal positive controls); only one adenocarcinoma each reacted with DCS-50 and the polyclonal antibody, and five were positive with ZJ11, suggesting that nonspecific nuclear staining can occur under certain conditions. Antibody DCS-50 produced nuclear staining in all three hypermethylated carcinomas, whereas G175-405 stained none of them. Three of the four antibodies produced nuclear immunoreactivity in 7 to 14 of the 16 carcinomas carrying p16 mutations; G175-405 showed only weak reactivity in one case. Cytoplasmic staining was present in all carcinomas and cell lines and with all antibodies and therefore cannot be considered specific; it was strongest with G175-405. Thus, we found antibody G175-405 to be the most specific, and monoclonals DCS-50 and ZJ11 the least specific for wild-type p16. However, the former tends to give stronger cytoplasmic background staining. For tumor types in which p16 mutations are uncommon, the PharMingen polyclonal antibody may be a suitable alternative.

Antibodies↗
PubMed2000

Genomic FHIT analysis in RER+ and RER- adenocarcinomas of the pancreas.

Alterations of the candidate tumor suppressor gene FHIT have been reported in multiple tumor types, including pancreatic carcinoma. The mechanism of FHIT genomic inactivation is unusual, most frequently occurring by homozygous deletion, whereas only rare cases have missense mutations. Altered (shortened) transcripts and reduced protein expression are reported, but a genetic basis for these is often inapparent. We studied FHIT genomic alterations of pancreatic carcinomas. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was found in 41% of 93 carcinomas without microsatellite instability (RER(-)), but no mutations were found by genomic sequencing. Homozygous deletions inside the FRA3B fragile site were found in four RER(-) tumors, but only two affected the FHIT coding region. In contrast, FHIT alterations were found in the three RER(+) pancreatic carcinomas screened; two had FHIT homozygous deletions affecting exon 5 and the third had a heterozygous missense mutation (H76N). The excess occurrence of homozygous deletions at this site in RER(+) pancreatic cancers is statistically significant (P < 0.01). Since homozygous deletions have not previously been reported in RER(+) carcinomas at any genomic site, an extremely high rate of site-specific deletion must exist within the FRA3B-related FHIT gene. Consequently, the paucity of documented inactivating point mutations cannot be used to judge the presence or absence of putative FHIT-related selective pressures that act during tumorigenesis of RER(-) neoplasia. Nonetheless, the identification of a heterozygous mutation as the sole sequence abnormality might raise doubt as to whether strong selective pressures are afforded by FHIT genomic inactivation in this tumor type. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 27:239-243, 2000.

Acid Anhydride Hydrolases↗
PubMed2000

Homozygous deletions inactivate DCC, but not MADH4/DPC4/SMAD4, in a subset of pancreatic and biliary cancers.

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of chromosome arm 18q is frequent in gastrointestinal cancers. Over 90% of pancreatic carcinomas have 18q LOH. Bi-allelic inactivation of the MADH4/DPC4/SMAD4 gene at 18q21.1 is seen in about half of pancreatic carcinomas with 18q LOH. In the remaining tumors with 18q LOH, MADH4 is not mutated and its expression is unaffected, and no alterations in MADH2/SMAD2, a MADH4-related gene at 18q12.3, have been found. A controversial candidate tumor-suppressor gene at 18q21.2 is DCC (deleted in colorectal carcinoma), which encodes a netrin-1 receptor component with functions in cell migration and apoptosis. Reduced or absent DCC expression has been observed in many cancers, but few somatic mutations that would clearly inactivate DCC function have been reported. We studied a panel of 115 pancreatic and 14 biliary cancers for homozygous deletions of DCC exons and flanking 18q regions. Seven homozygous deletions were seen in the region that includes the DCC gene. In two tumors, the deletions inactivate DCC but not MADH4. A physical and transcript map of the deleted regions was constructed, and DCC was the only known gene affected by all seven deletions. These data are the strongest mutational evidence presented yet in support of the hypothesis that DCC or another gene in the region distal to MADH4 is inactivated, playing a causal role in cancer development.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1999

G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction by nuclear Smad4/Dpc4: phenotypes reversed by a tumorigenic mutation.

The tumor suppressor Smad4/Dpc4 is a transcription activator that binds specific DNA sequences and whose nuclear localization is induced after exposure to type beta transforming growth factor-like cytokines. We explored an inducible system in which Smad4 protein is activated by translocation to the nucleus when cell lines that stably express wild-type or mutant Smad4 proteins fused to a murine estrogen receptor domain are treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen. This induced Smad4-mediated transcriptional activation and a decrease in growth rate, attributable to a cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase and an induction of apoptosis. A tumor-derived mutation (Arg-100 --> Thr) affecting a residue critical for DNA-binding demonstrated an "oncogenic" phenotype, having decreases in both the G1 fraction and apoptosis and, consequently, an augmentation of population growth. This model should be useful in the exploration and control of components that lie further downstream in the Smad4 tumor-suppressor pathway.

Amino Acid Substitution↗
PubMed1999

Novel homozygous deletions of chromosomal band 18q22 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma identified by STS marker scanning.

The identification of homozygous deletions in sporadic neoplasms has been pivotal in the positional cloning of several tumor suppressor genes. Chromosomal arm 18q harbors the DPC4, SMAD2, and DCC genes and is suspected on the basis of high frequencies of allelic loss to harbor additional tumor suppressor genes. We applied high-resolution sequence-tagged site (STS) marker scanning to a panel of 106 pancreatic adenocarcinomas to identify novel regions of homozygous deletions on 18q. Three homozygous deletions were identified. Physical mapping of these deletions showed them to be nonoverlapping, but clustered in an approximately 7- to 10-Mb region of chromosome band 18q22. Each deletion spanned physical distances of nearly 1.3 to 3 Mb. A number of transcribed genes map within these deletions. The identification of these homozygous deletions might aid in the identification of novel tumor suppressor genes on chromosomal arm 18q. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 25:370-375, 1999.

Adenocarcinoma↗