Typhoid fever: role of endotoxin.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S E Greisman.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Volunteers infected with Salmonella typhosa develop a remarkable hyperreactivity to the pyrogenic and subjective toxic activities of homologous (S. typhos) and heterologous (Pseudomonas) endotoxins. The present studies quantitate this augmented reactivity and demonstrate by three differing approaches that significant tolerance to these endotoxins can be readily induced within the framework of the hyperreactive state. Thus, (a) tolerance induced before illness by repeated daily intravenous injections of the endotoxins remained demonstrable during overt illness, (b) daily intravenous injections of the endotoxins begun during overt illness evoked progressively increasing tolerance, and (c) continuous intravenous infusions of S. typhosa endotoxin during illness rapidly induced a pyrogenic refractory state. Despite unequivocal activation of the endotoxin tolerance mechanisms by any of the above methods, the febrile and toxic course of typhoid fever proceeded unabated. Similarly, in other volunteers with Pasteurella tularensis infection, continuous intravenous infusions of S. typhosa endotoxin evoked initial hyperreactive febrile and subjective toxic responses followed by rapid appearance of a pyrogenic refractory state without modification of the underlying clinical illness. These observations suggest that circulating endotoxin plays no major role in pathogenesis of the sustained fever and toxemia during typhoid fever and tularemia in man. The mechanisms responsible for the systemic hyperreactivity to endotoxin during typhoid fever and tularemia were further investigated. Low grade endotoxemia, nonspecific effects of tissue injury, impaired ability of the reticuloendothelial system to clear circulating endotoxin, and production of cytophilic antibodies capable of sensitizing leukocytes to endotoxin did not appear responsible. Inflammatory reactions to intradermal S. typhosa endotoxin increased significantly during typhoid fever. However, since no such dermal hyperreactivity developed to Pseudomonas endotoxin during typhoid fever nor to S. typhosa endotoxin during tularemia, the systemic hyperreactivity to bacterial endotoxins during typhoid fever and tularemia could not presently be ascribed to enhanced levels of acquired hypersensitivity.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The mechanisms underlying the pyrogenic refractory state which develops rapidly during a continuous intravenous infusion of bacterial endotoxin have been further explored. The findings demonstrate that: (a) rabbits rendered refractory to a continuous intravenous infusion of E. coli endotoxin at a standard rate (18 x 10(-4) microg/min) become highly refractory to a single intravenous test bolus of endotoxin, but remain fully responsive to preformed endogenous pyrogen and to substances known to release endogenous pyrogen, i.e. influenza virus, old tuberculin in specifically sensitized rabbits, and staphylococcal enterotoxin; (b) administration of fresh whole blood from normal donors containing an average of 1.6 - 10(8) granulocytes fails to restore febrile responsiveness to the continuing E. coli endotoxin infusion; (c) refractory phase plasma and liver homogenates exhibit no enhanced capacity to inactivate E. coli endotoxin pyrogenicity; (d) splenectomized animals readily develop the pyrogenic refractory state during E. coli endotoxin infusions and exhibit diminished, rather than the increased inflammatory responses to intradermal endotoxin seen in sham-operated controls; (e) continuous intravenous infusions of gelatin-stabilized, heat-killed pneumococci produce sustained fevers; and (f) continuous intravenous infusions of old tuberculin into specifically sensitized animals rapidly elicit a pyrogenic refractory state. The present observations, considered together with those of other investigators, support the hypothesis that pyrogenic unresponsiveness to endotoxin involves two distinct immunologic mechanisms. In terms of this hypothesis, the rapid reduction in febrile responsiveness to endotoxin is mediated by desensitization at the cellular level. With small doses of endotoxin, such as those employed in the present studies, this desensitization is primarily specific; with larger doses, nonspecific mechanisms are superimposed. So long as the subsequent doses of endotoxin are closely spaced or continuously infused, optimal conditions are provided for cellular desensitization and pyrogenic unresponsiveness to a given quantity of endotoxin can be induced rapidly and maintained without the requirement for antibody. However, as the interval between endotoxin challenge is lengthened, cellular desensitization wanes and tolerance becomes increasingly dependent upon those antibodies directed against the common toxophore groupings responsible for endotoxin pyrogenicity which assist the reticuloendothelial system in the clearance and destruction of this molecule.