Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S E Fremes

Publications and source records attributed to S E Fremes.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

The influence of risk on the results of warm heart surgery: a substudy of a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: The Warm Heart Investigators Trial randomized isolated coronary bypass patients to cold or warm cardioplegia, and demonstrated that warm cardioplegia significantly reduced the prevalence of low output syndrome and myocardial infarction (as defined by CKMB enzyme release). This study was designed prospectively as a subanalysis of the original trial, to determine the effect of warm heart surgery on high risk patients, who were anticipated to derive the major benefit from warm cardioplegia. METHODS: The prespecified endpoint for this study was a composite outcome of morbidity and mortality (death and/or low output syndrome and/or enzymatic myocardial infarction). Only patients with complete data for all outcomes were included, totalling 1374 patients (692 warm cardioplegia, 682 cold cardioplegia) who were randomized in the Warm Heart Investigators Trial. High medium and low risk patients were identified by a multivariate model of predicted risk for the study outcome. RESULTS: Analysis of the independent and interactive influence of cardioplegia technique and predicted risk demonstrated that warm cardioplegia significantly reduced the overall prevalence of morbidity and mortality (warm: 15.9 versus cold: 25.2%, P < 0.01). However, no significant differences in warm-cold effects were detected among risk terciles. Cardioplegia technique had a similar differential influence on mortality and morbidity in low risk patients (warm: 7.3, cold: 17.4%) as it did in high risk patients (warm: 31.1, cold: 39.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Although our analysis confirms the overall benefits of warm cardioplegia, our unanticipated finding in high risk subjects may be explained by the fact that morbidity and mortality in that patient subgroup is caused not only by poor myocardial protection, but by other clinical and technical factors. Further studies are necessary to identify those patients who might benefit most from improved myocardial protection techniques.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Phase 1 human trial of adenosine-potassium cardioplegia.

BACKGROUND: The cardioprotective role of adenosine in various models of ischemia-reperfusion, including adenosine supplementation to cardioplegic formulations, has been studied extensively. The appropriate dose of adenosine in humans is uncertain and could be limited by systemic hypotension or AV block. METHODS AND RESULTS: An open-label, nonrandomized phase 1 adenosine dose-ranging study was performed. Patients scheduled for primary isolated coronary bypass surgery were eligible for the study. Antegrade warm blood potassium cardioplegia (ratio, 4:1, blood to crystalloid) was administered in the routine fashion, with adenosine added to the initial 1000-mL dose and final 500-mL dose. Patients were studied in blocks of 4 per concentration. An escalating adenosine dosage schedule was planned to produce blood cardioplegia concentrations from 0 to 250 mumol/L, and the blocks were tested sequentially. Stopping rules were defined for systemic hypotension (phenylephrine dose during cardiopulmonary bypass > or = 5.0 mg; phenylephrine dose during cardioplegic induction > or = 800 micrograms) and AV block (permanent pacemaker insertion; temporary pacing dependency for > 90 minutes after cardiopulmonary bypass). Doses of 1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 25 mumol/L were well tolerated. With 50 mumol/L, systemic hypotension occurred during cardioplegic induction in 3 of 4 patients versus 1 of 24 (P < .005) at all lower concentrations (880 +/- 217 versus 297 +/- 286 micrograms phenylephrine per patient). The studies were repeated with an 8:1 blood-to-crystalloid cardioplegia delivery system. Adenosine concentrations of 0 (n = 4), 15 (n = 12), 20 (n = 8), and 25 mumol/L (n = 4) were tested. Hypotension during cardioplegic induction was more prevalent (P = .05) with the higher doses (15 mumol/L, 394 +/- 189 micrograms, 1 of 12 patients; 20 mumol/L, 360 +/- 355 micrograms, 2 of 8 patients; 25 mumol/L, 600 +/- 478 micrograms, 2 of 4 patients). There were no differences with respect to systemic hypotension during cardiopulmonary bypass or for pacing > 90 minutes after discontinuation of cardiopulmonary bypass, and no patient required permanent pacing. There have been no deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, intra-aortic balloon pump insertions, or cerebral infarctions in the total sample of 56 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial investigations have shown that adenosine can be safely administered during cardiopulmonary bypass. The authors recommend that further studies are warranted using adenosine 15 to 25 mumol/L, depending on the delivery system.

Adenosine↗
PubMed1996

Normothermic ischemia in coronary revascularization.

Warm heart surgery-continuous perfusion with normothermic blood cardioplegia-was introduced as an alternative to conventional intermittent hypothermic perfusion for myocardial protection. Interruption of global coronary flow, however, greatly facilitates the performance of distal coronary anastomoses and is the method that has evolved with many surgeons using warm blood cardioplegia for coronary revascularization. We present results (mean +/- SD) in 720 patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery protected with intermittent warm blood cardioplegia and exposed to normothermic ischemia but with electromechanical arrest. An average of 3.2 +/- 0.9 grafts were constructed per case with an average aortic cross clamp time of 61.8 +/- 22.2 minutes. Cardioplegia was interrupted a total of 28.5 +/- 12.4 min per operation. The percent time off cardioplegia (PTOC) expressed as a proportion of the cross clamp was 48.2 + 18.6%. The longest single time off cardioplegia (LTOC) was 11.4 +/- 4.0 min per patient. Calculated mean cardioplegia delivery during the cross clamp period was 75 ml/min. PTOC and LTOC were divided into quartiles (PTOC: < 36, 36-49, 50-62, > 62%; LTOC: < 10, 10-11, 12-13, > 13 min) and related to prespecified composite outcome of mortality, enzymatic myocardial infarct and low output syndrome. PTOC was protective (event rate/quartile 16.1%, 17.2%, 9.4%, 10.6%, p = 0.07) and longer LTOC (event rate/quartile 13.5%, 10.3%, 10.9%, 19.0%, p = 0.046) borderline harmful. The data suggest that when necessary multiple periods of normothermic myocardial ischemia in the presence of electromechanical arrest are well tolerated and potentially protective provided that any single ischemic interval is < 13 min.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗
PubMed1996

The beneficial effects of heat-shock for prolonged hypothermic storage.

Heat-shock has been reported to induce tolerance for subsequent ischemia. We wished to determine whether thermal stress is protective for hypothermic storage. Three groups of Sprague-Dawley rats were studied (n = 8 per group). Control animals received routine care (CONT) while anaesthetized rats were either warmed to 42 degrees C for 20 min (HEAT) or maintained at room temperature (SHAM). Twenty-four hours later, hearts were mounted on a Langendorff apparatus with an intraventricular balloon. Hearts were then flushed and stored in UW solution for 8 hr at 0 degrees C and reperfused for 45 min. Data are reported as a percentage of the prestorage results or as the absolute value (mean +/- SD). Recovery of developed pressure was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in the heat-shocked animals (79.5 +/- 10.2%) than in the SHAM (63.6 +/- 17.2%) or CONT groups (59.0 +/- 10.8%). Coronary flow was similarly enhanced (P < 0.05) in the HEAT group (86.8 +/- 5.5%) vs the CONT (77.0 +/- 12.3%) or SHAM hearts (74.5 +/- 10.2%). Diastolic compliance as assessed by evaluation of the end-diastolic pressure-volume curves was reduced in all groups (P < 0.0001) but not different among groups. Cardiac creatine kinase release during reperfusion was greater in the CONT and SHAM groups (CONT: 726.9 +/- 297.8 IU/g; SHAM: 548.9 +/- 420.9 IU/g) than in the heat-shocked rodents (282.3 +/- 175.5 IU/g, P < 0.05 HEAT vs CONT). Cardiac biopsies were performed sequentially in separate animals (n = 6 per group). Tissue levels of ATP and total adenine nucleotides were greater in the heat-shocked or SHAM hearts following reperfusion compared with controls (P < 0.05). Thermal stress provides additional protection for prolonged hypothermic storage.

Adenine Nucleotides↗
PubMed1996

Can patients with left main stenosis wait for coronary artery bypass grafting?

BACKGROUND: The economic impact of health care reforms may result in waiting lists for coronary artery bypass grafting. This study was designed to examine the clinical results of patients with left main stenosis who were placed on a triaged wait list for operation. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 2,145 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between 1989 and 1994. Critical left main stenosis (LMS, 50% or more stenosis) was present in 281 patients, and 1,864 patients had no left main disease, or a left main stenosis of less than 50% (no LMS). RESULTS: The average time from angiography to operation was shorter in patients with LMS (LMS 38 +/- 46 days versus no LMS 84 +/- 71 days; p = 0.0001). Two patients in the LMS group died; they had declined operation. Four patients suffered non-Q wave myocardial infarctions, all of whom subsequently underwent operation with no perioperative complications. The presence of LMS did not influence operative mortality (LMS 2.8% versus no LMS 1.3%), the incidence of low output syndrome (LMS 8.3% versus no LMS 5.4%), or the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (LMS 3.8% versus no LMS 4.2%). To examine the effect of waiting time on outcomes, patients with LMS were divided into early (operation 10 days or less after angiography) and late revascularization groups (more than 10 days). Operative mortality, low output syndrome, and myocardial infarction were similar in the early and late groups. Patients in the early group were more likely to have New York Heart Association functional class IV symptoms (64% versus late 22%; p < 0.0001), unstable angina (87% versus late 65%; p < 0.0001), or a recent preoperative myocardial infarction (17% versus late 2%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Carefully selected patients with significant left main stenosis can safely wait for operation with a low risk of complications. Early surgical intervention is allocated to patients with severe symptoms or recent preoperative myocardial infarction.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Randomized study of right ventricular function with intermittent warm or cold cardioplegia.

BACKGROUND: Transient right ventricular dysfunction has been previously documented after bypass operations despite adequate myocardial protection with intermittent antegrade cold blood cardioplegia. Recently warm blood cardioplegia has been interrupted during construction of distal anastomoses to improve visualization. The effects of intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegia, and the resultant periods of right ventricular normothermic ischemia, on postoperative right ventricular function are unknown. METHODS: To assess the effects of cardioplegia on right ventricular protection, 52 patients undergoing isolated bypass grafting were randomized to intermittent warm or cold blood cardioplegia. The two groups were similar with respect to age, sex, ventricular function, and right coronary stenoses. Cross-clamp times were similar (warm, 64 +/- 22 minutes; cold, 63 +/- 15 minutes; not significant). The cumulative time of cardioplegia interruption was longer in the cold group (42 +/- 8 minutes) than in the warm group (31 +/- 14 minutes; p < 0.002). A rapid-response thermodilution catheter was employed to assess postoperative right ventricular ejection fraction and end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indices. RESULTS: The right ventricular ejection fraction was greater in the warm group at 6 hours (warm, 0.46 +/- 0.06; cold, 0.37 +/- 0.08; p < 0.05) and 8 hours (warm, 0.43 +/- 0.08; cold, 0.37 +/- 0.08; p < 0.05) postoperatively. The right ventricular end-diastolic volume index was less in the warm group 8 hours postoperatively (warm, 83 +/- 11 mL/m2; cold, 94 +/- 16 mL/m2; p < 0.05). There were no differences in pulmonary arterial pressures or right ventricular stroke work index. CONCLUSIONS: Despite intermittent normothermic ischemia of half the cross-clamp time, patients receiving warm cardioplegia maintained right ventricular hemodynamics after bypass grafting.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Cardiopulmonary bypass, rewarming, and central nervous system dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: During cardiopulmonary bypass a nasopharyngeal temperature greater than 38 degrees C at the end of rewarming may indicate cerebral hyperthermia. This could exacerbate an ischemic brain injury incurred during cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: In a cohort of 150 aortocoronary bypass patients neuropsychologic test scores of 66 patients whose rewarming temperature exceeded 38 degrees C were compared with those who did not. There were no differences between groups with respect to demographic and intraoperative variables. RESULTS: A trend was seen for hyperthermic patients to do worse on all neuropsychologic tests in the early postoperative period but not at 3-month follow-up. By analysis of covariance hyperthermic patients did worse on the visual reproduction subtest of the Weschler memory scale at 3 months (p = 0.02), but this difference was not found by linear regression (p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to demonstrate any significant deterioration in patients rewarmed to greater than 38 degrees C in the early postoperative period. The poorer performance in the visual reproduction subtest of the Wechsler memory scale at 3 months in the group rewarmed to more than 38 degrees C is interesting but far from conclusive. Caution with rewarming is still advised pending more in-depth study of this issue.

Body Temperature↗
PubMed1996

Left ventricular mass regression early after aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy is an important and well-recognized salutary effect of aortic valve replacement. The earliest evidence of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement and the influence of prosthesis type are not well known, and were the focus of this study. METHODS: Transthoracic echocardiography was used to measure left ventricular mass index preoperatively and before discharge in 57 consecutive patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (with or without coronary artery bypass grafting). RESULTS: Three patients were excluded from the study because of inability to obtain accurate M-mode echocardiographic images for left ventricular mass measurement preoperatively (1) or postoperatively (2). Of the remaining 54 patients, mechanical bileaflet valves were used in 19, stented tissue bioprostheses were implanted in 15, and a stentless porcine bioprosthesis was chosen for 20. Postoperative echocardiograms were obtained 4.9 +/- 2.3 days after aortic valve replacement (range, 2 to 9 days). A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance demonstrated a significant reduction of left ventricular mass index before discharge (preoperative 141.4 +/- 45.2 g/m2, postoperative 127.5 +/- 32.8 g/m2; p = 0.0005) but no differences between prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular mass regression begins early after aortic valve replacement, probably because of reduction of transvalvular gradients and left ventricular wall stress. At least in the very early postoperative period, the type of prosthesis does not influence the extent of mass regression.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Impact of preoperative risk and perioperative morbidity on ICU stay following coronary bypass surgery.

Prolonged intensive care unit treatment (> 3 days) contributes to increased health costs and resource utilization. In order to devise strategies to limit intensive care unit stay, and provide cost-effective medical care, it is necessary to identify the pre- and perioperative risk factors of prolonged treatment. Over 100 potential risk variables were collected prospectively in 889 consecutive patients undergoing isolated coronary bypass surgery between 1990 and 1992. The incidence of intensive care unit therapy lasting > 3 days was 6.8%. Univariate statistics identified 23 pre- and perioperative variables that were potential contributors to prolonged intensive care unit therapy. However, multivariate analysis of preoperative risk variables identified only recent myocardial infarction (within 30 days of surgery) and continued preoperative smoking (within 30 days of surgery) to be independent risk factors. Only 6.3% of patients without preoperative myocardial infarction and 6.1% of non-smokers required prolonged intensive care unit treatment, compared with 14.8% of patients with preoperative myocardial infarction (P = 0.01) and 10.1% of smokers (P = 0.07). When multivariate analysis was repeated with both pre- and perioperative variables, only ischemic morbidity (inotropes, myocardial infarction and low-output syndrome; 138 patients) and non-ischemic morbidity (infection, stroke or bleeding; 37 patients) predicted prolonged intensive care unit treatment. Intensive care unit treatment for > 3 days occurred in 26.8% of patients with ischemic morbidity compared with 3.2% of patients without ischemic morbidity (P = 0.001). Prolonged intensive care stay occurred in 32.4% of patients who suffered non-ischemic complications compared with 5.7% of patients who did not suffer these complications. The multiple logistic regression analysis odds ratio for ischemic morbidity was 7.4 (95% c.i. 4.0-13.4) compared with 4.8 (95% c.i. 1.9-10.1) for non-ischemic morbidity. Strategies designed to reduce the incidence of prolonged intensive care unit treatment should include prevention of stroke, infection and bleeding. However, the greatest reduction of intensive care unit utilization would be mediated by prevention of ventricular dysfunction secondary to myocardial ischemia or inadequate myocardial preservation.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Intermittent warm blood cardioplegia. Warm Heart Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Warm heart surgery implies continuous perfusion with normothermic blood cardioplegia. Interruption of cardioplegia, however, facilitates construction of distal coronary anastomoses and is the method practiced by many surgeons. To determine whether intermittency is harmful, we present results from 720 coronary bypass patients, protected with intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegia, that were derived from a previous study of normothermic versus hypothermic cardioplegia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Mean +/- SD age was 60.8 +/- 9.0 years; 27% of cases were urgent; 16% of patients had > 50% left main stenosis, and 19% had grade III or IV ventricles. A mean of 3.2 +/- 0.9 grafts was constructed. The average aortic cross-clamp time was 61.8 +/- 22.2 minutes. The longest single time off cardioplegia (LTOC) averaged 11.4 +/- 4.0 minutes per patient. The cumulative time off cardioplegia as a percentage of the cross-clamp time (PTOC) was 48.2 +/- 18.6% per patient. LTOC and PTOC were divided into quartiles (LTOC, < 10, 10 to 11, 12 to 13, and > 13 minutes; PTOC, < 36%, 36% to 49%, 50% to 62%, and > 62%) and related to the prespecified composite outcome of mortality, myocardial infarction according to serial CK-MB sampling, and low-output syndrome (LOS). Longer LTOC was harmful (event rates per quartile, 13.5%, 10.3%, 10.9%, and 19.0%; P = .046), whereas longer PTOC was protective (16.1%, 17.2%, 9.4%, and 10.6%; P = .07). Stepwise logistic regression was performed, controlling for demographic and angiographic predictors. In the multivariate models, LTOC remained detrimental (P = .07) and PTOC remained beneficial (P = .053). Additional modeling after entering surgeon identity (P < .001) into the risk equation eliminated the PTOC effect, whereas LTOC remained predictive of adverse outcomes (P = .053; odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00, 1.13). CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that a reasonable margin of safety exists with intermittent, antegrade warm blood cardioplegia. Repeated interruptions of warm blood cardioplegia are unlikely to lead to adverse clinical results if single interruptions are < or = 13 minutes.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Perforation of nontarget artery during directional coronary atherectomy.

We report a case of perforation of an intermediate branch during attempted directional atherectomy of an ostial left anterior descending artery lesion, resulting from disruption of the cutter drive cable. Potential contributing factors and means of avoiding this complication are discussed.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Cardiac storage with University of Wisconsin solution and a nucleoside-transport blocker.

Findings from previous investigations conducted at this institution and others have suggested that University of Wisconsin solution (UWS) is preferable for the prolonged hypothermic storage of hearts before transplantation. The benefit seen with UWS may in part be related to the inclusion of adenosine (5 mmol/L) in the UWS. To investigate whether further manipulations of adenosine metabolism might enhance myocardial protection, studies were initially conducted using cultured myocytes, followed by confirmatory experiments using isolated rat hearts. Cultured human ventricular myocytes (7 to 8 dishes/group) were stored for 12 hours at 0 degrees C in unmodified UWS or UWS supplemented with increasing concentrations (1 to 100 mumol/L) of the nucleoside-transport blocker p-nitrobenzylthioinosine. The adenosine triphosphate concentrations were found to be enhanced with nucleoside-transport inhibition, with the best results achieved with the 1- and 3-mumol/L groups (control, 3.37 +/- 0.41 nmol/micrograms DNA; UWS, 2.89 +/- 1.31 nmol/micrograms DNA; 1 mumol/L, 5.91 +/- 3.23 nmol/micrograms DNA; 3 mumol/L, 7.86 +/- 3.45 nmol/micrograms DNA; p < 0.05 versus control or UWS group). Isolated rodent hearts from Sprague-Dawley rats were prepared on a Langendorff apparatus with an intraventricular balloon and subsequently stored for 8 hours at 0 degrees C in unmodified UWS (13 hearts/group) or UWS supplemented with 1 or 3 mumol/L of p-nitrobenzylthioinosine (9 to 10 hearts/group).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adenine Nucleotides↗
PubMed1995

Is body size the cause for poor outcomes of coronary artery bypass operations in women?

Although small body size and coronary artery diameter are recognized as major contributors to the increased risk of coronary artery bypass grafting in women, few studies have established the independent influence of body size and gender on outcome. We studied 7025 consecutive patients (5694 men, 1331 women) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between 1990 and 1994. Women were older, had higher preoperative prevalences of urgent operation because of unstable angina, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, and single-vessel coronary artery disease (p < 0.0001), and a lower prevalence of left ventricular ejection fraction 40% or less (p < 0.0001). The prevalences of operative mortality (men, 1.8%; women, 3.5%), low-output syndrome (men, 6.6%; women, 14.8%), and myocardial infarction (men, 2.8%; women, 5.5%) were higher in women (p < 0.0001). Patients were divided into quartiles for body surface area, weight, height, and body mass index. For both men and women, there was no difference in operative mortality between the highest and lowest quartiles of body size. Women, however, had a higher prevalence of operative mortality than men in the lower quartiles of body surface area, height, and weight and in the higher quartiles of body mass index. Among men, the prevalence of low-output syndrome increased (p < 0.0001) with decreasing body surface area, weight, and body mass index, suggesting that body size did influence the prevalence of low-output syndrome. However, women had a higher prevalence of low-output syndrome than men in every category and quartile of body size (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis identified gender as a significant determinant of operative mortality (odds ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 2.64) and low-output syndrome (odds ratio 2.52, 95% confidence interval 2.05 to 3.11). When multivariable adjustments were made for body size and preoperative risk factors, gender remained a predictor of both operative mortality and low-output syndrome. Multivariable assessment of risk for men and women separately identified that urgent operation was a predictor of operative mortality (odds ratio 2.52, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 5.61) and low-output syndrome (odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 2.17) in women but not men. In conclusion, the increased risk of coronary artery bypass grafting in women may be explained in part by dramatic differences in preoperative risk factors between men and women. In both men and women, small body size did not increase the risk of operative mortality, but may have contributed to the risk of low-output syndrome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Adenosine pretreatment for prolonged cardiac storage. An evaluation with St. Thomas' Hospital and University of Wisconsin solutions.

Adenosine pretreatment has been shown to be beneficial in several models of ischemia-reperfusion. We wished to evaluate whether adenosine pretreatment is cardioprotective for prolonged cardiac storage and whether the presence of adenosine in the storage media affects the results. Isolated rodent hearts were obtained from Sprague-Dawley rats, mounted on a Langendorff apparatus, instrumented with an intraventricular balloon, and ventricularly paced at 300 beats/min. Four groups of hearts were studied in a 2 x 2 factorial experiment (n = 8 to 12 per group). Hearts were subjected to normal perfusion or to solution supplemented with adenosine 50 mumol/L for 10 minutes followed by adenosine-free perfusion for 10 minutes. Hearts then were stored for 8 hours at 0 degrees C in either University of Wisconsin solution (adenosine 5 mmol/L) or St. Thomas' Hospital II solution (adenosine free). Adenosine pretreatment increased tissue levels of adenosine triphosphate before storage (p = 0.04). Nonfunction was less common after storage (1/19 versus 6/20 hearts, p < 0.05), and diastolic function was better preserved in the adenosine groups in the reperfusion phase (p = 0.01). The beneficial effects of adenosine pretreatment were independent of which storage solution was used. Developed pressure was increased (p < 0.05) and release of creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase was reduced (p < 0.0001) in hearts treated with University of Wisconsin solution compared with those treated with St. Thomas' Hospital solution. These studies suggest that adenosine pretreatment improves recovery after prolonged hypothermic storage and that the presence of adenosine in the preservation solution does not alter the results. The experiments provide further evidence that extended myocardial protection is better enhanced with University of Wisconsin solution than with St. Thomas' Hospital II solution.

Adenosine↗
PubMed1995

The technique of radial artery bypass grafting and early clinical results.

There is renewed interest in the use of the radial artery as a conduit for coronary artery bypass. Fifty patients underwent bypass surgery using the radial artery in addition to other conduits between November 24, 1992 and November 8, 1994 at our institution. The mean age was 54.4 +/- 9.1 years (mean +/- SD) and 47 of the patients were male. There were 3.6 +/- 0.9 and stomses per patient, of which 2.2 +/- 0.4 were arterial anastomoses. The most common target vessel for the radial artery has been the obtuse marginal (58.8%), with the aorta as the usual site for proximal anastomosis (80.4%). There have been no ischemic hand complications and no radial nerve deficits. There have been no early or late deaths and no myocardial ischemic complications related to the use of the radial artery. We present the techniques used at our institution for the use of the radial artery as a conduit for coronary artery bypass.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMed1994

Determinants of low systemic vascular resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Although low systemic vascular resistance occurs during normothermic and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, the determinants of depressed systemic vascular resistance and its effect on outcomes are unknown. To assess the predictors and clinical effects of low systemic vascular resistance, 555 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were evaluated prospectively. The extent of low systemic vascular resistance during bypass was estimated by the amount of the vasoconstrictor phenylephrine administered: group 1, 0 to 160 micrograms; group 2, 161 to 800 micrograms; group 3, more than 800 micrograms. Multivariate analysis identified bypass temperature, bypass time, and ventricular function as determinants of low systemic vascular resistance. Patients on normothermic bypass accounted for 65% of the patients in group 3 and only 34% of the patients in group 1 (p < 0.0001). The bypass time was longer in the patients in group 3 (97 +/- 28 minutes) than in the patients in group 1 (89 +/- 24 minutes; p < 0.006). Patients with a preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 or less required less phenylephrine during cardiopulmonary bypass (498 +/- 68 micrograms) than did patients with a fraction exceeding 0.40 (1,087 +/- 88 micrograms; p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, advanced age and the presence of peripheral vascular disease were found to decrease the likelihood of low systemic vascular resistance during normothermic bypass. Diabetes, the left ventricular ejection fraction, the bypass time, and the total cardioplegia infused were found to influence the likelihood of low systemic vascular resistance during hypothermic bypass. Patients in group 3 had a higher cardiac index and lower-mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance postoperatively. In those patients who received a left internal mammary artery graft, the incidences of the low-output syndrome (group 1, 4.9%; group 3, 2.7%; p = not significant) and myocardial infarction (group 1, 1.4%; group 3, 1.8%; p = not significant) were not influenced by the amount of phenylephrine infused during cardiopulmonary bypass. In those patients who were at high risk of suffering a stroke preoperatively, the hypotension induced by the low systemic vascular resistance and its treatment with phenylephrine was not associated with an increased incidence of stroke (group 1, 5.8%; group 3, 2.8%; p = not significant).

Aged↗