Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S D Sullivan

Publications and source records attributed to S D Sullivan.

61 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

The economics of treatment for infants with respiratory distress syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To define clinical outcomes and prevailing patterns of care for the initial hospitalization of infants at greatest risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS); to estimate direct medical care costs associated with the initial hospitalization; and to introduce and demonstrate a simulation technique for the economic evaluation of health care technologies. METHOD: Clinical outcomes and usual-care algorithms were determined for infants with RDS in three birthweight categories (500-1,000g; >1,000-1,500g; and >1,500g) using literature- and expert-panel-based data. The experts were practitioners from major U.S. hospitals who were directly involved in the clinical care of such infants. Using the framework derived from the usual care patterns and outcomes, the authors developed an itemized "micro-costing" economic model to simulate the costs associated with the initial hospitalization of a hypothetical RDS patient. The model is computerized and dynamic; unit costs, frequencies, number of days, probabilities and population multipliers are all variable and can be modified on the basis of new information or local conditions. Aggregated unit costs are used to estimate the expected medical costs of treatment per patient. RESULTS: Expected costs of initial hospitalization per uncomplicated surviving infant with RDS were estimated to be $101,867 for 500-1,000g infants; $64,524 for >1,000-1,500g infants; and $27,224 for >1,500g infants. Incremental costs of complications among survivors were estimated to be $22,155 (500-1,000g); $11,041 (>1,000-1,500g); and $2,448 (>1,500 g). Expected costs of initial hospitalization per case (including non-survivors) were $100,603; $72,353; and $28,756, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An itemized model such as the one developed here serves as a benchmark for the economic assessment of treatment costs and utilization. Moreover, it offers a powerful tool for the prospective evaluation of new technologies or procedures designed to reduce the incidence of, severity of, and/or total hospital resource use ascribed to RDS.

Birth Weight↗

Conservative versus surgical treatment of mallet finger: a pooled quantitative literature evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Although common, mallet finger represents a spectrum of injuries for which there are many questions about the best form of treatment. A long-standing controversy continues as to strategies and techniques of treatment. This quantitative literature analysis is the first that makes use of an evidence-based evaluation process to pool across studies the outcomes of conservative versus surgical treatment of closed mallet finger injuries of both acute and chronic or recurrent types. METHODS: Published articles in English were sought using multiple methods, including the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, reference review, and correspondence with selected experts. Both observational and randomized trials were included. Results were summarized in terms of 95 percent confidence intervals, and sensitivity analysis was performed for two other amounts of residual extensor lag. RESULTS: Of the 41 reports retrieved, 26 met inclusion criteria, including 21 for initial acute treatment (1146 pooled digits) and 5 for chronic or recurrent treatment (148 pooled digits). Successful outcomes were found in about 77 percent of mallet fingers treated conservatively by splintage, including 480 patients who were observed for a 2-year period. Patient satisfaction with conservative treatment was found to be about 83 percent in 6 studies recording overall patient satisfaction (315 pooled patients). Successful outcomes of surgical treatment for acute mallet finger averaged about 85 percent in 3 studies (60 pooled digits) and about 73 percent in 5 studies of chronic or recurrent mallet finger. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment of at least 80 percent of mallet finger injuries is safe, effective, well accepted by patients, and cost efficient compared with surgical treatment. Multiple types of surgical procedures are available when surgery is indicated for a limited number of open or otherwise complex mallet finger injuries as well as for chronic or recurrent mallet finger.

Chronic Disease↗

Expectant, medical, or surgical treatment of spontaneous abortion in first trimester of pregnancy? A pooled quantitative literature evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous abortion is a common problem in everyday clinical practice, accounting for 15 to 20 percent of all recognized pregnancies. The traditional treatment of this problem has been surgical, emptying the uterus by dilatation and curettage (D&C). Recent therapeutic and laboratory advances call surgical therapy into question for many patients. It is believed that this pooled quantitative literature evaluation is the first with the goal to clarify the roles of expectant, medical, and surgical treatment of this common problem. METHODS: The literature review was focused on published studies in the English language of outcomes of therapy for spontaneous abortion in the first trimester. We looked for both observational and randomized controlled trials. A successful outcome of treatment required that three criteria be met: vaginal bleeding stopped by 3 weeks, products of conception fully expelled by 2 weeks, and absence of complications. Pooled weighted average success estimates and standard errors were determined for each study; 95 percent confidence intervals were calculated for each form of treatment. Sensitivity analysis compared randomized controlled trials with observational studies for both expectant and surgical treatment. RESULTS: Of the 31 studies retrieved, 18 met inclusion criteria, including 9 involving expectant treatment (545 pooled patients), 3 for medical treatment (prostaglandin or antiprogesterone agents) (198 pooled patients), and 10 for surgical treatment (D&C) (1408 pooled patients). Successful outcomes were found in 92.5 percent of patients receiving expectant treatment, in 93.6 percent of those undergoing D&C, and in 51.5 percent of patients receiving medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Expectant management of spontaneous abortion in the first trimester is safe and effective for many afebrile patients whose blood pressure and heart rate are stable and who have no excess bleeding or unacceptable pain. Transvaginal sonographic studies might be useful in patient selection, and serial chorionic gonadotropin monitoring should be considered while observing the initial course of expectant treatment. Currently there is insufficient evidence to support medical therapy of spontaneous abortion, and further research is needed to clarify the more limited role of surgical treatment.

Abortion, Spontaneous↗

An economic evaluation of the JNC hypertension guidelines using data from a randomized controlled trial. Joint National Committee.

BACKGROUND: We wanted to determine the clinical cost of managing hypertension when following the Joint National Committee on Hypertension (JNC) guidelines, including drug therapy, the cost of monitoring for and treating side effects, compliance, and the cost of switching after therapeutic failures. METHODS: The base-case analysis considers antihypertensive agents from four therapeutic classes that were recently evaluated in a large randomized trial: enalapril, amlodipine, acebutolol, and chlorthalidone. Clinical evaluation, therapy, and monitoring for hypertension are modeled with an incidence-based Markov model. Clinical inputs include agent efficacy, side effects, and compliance with dosing schedules. JNC-recommended clinical and laboratory monitoring schedules are followed for each agent. Switches between classes occur for therapeutic failures. Drug and medical care costs are valued in 1995 US dollars. RESULTS: Although patients whose hypertension was initially treated with amlodipine achieved control more readily than patients who were given the other agents, the initial costs to achieve and maintain hypertension control were lowest for chlorthalidone ($641), followed by acebutolol ($920), amlodipine ($946), and enalapril ($948). Maintenance costs were lowest for chlorthalidone. For all agents except chlorthalidone, drug costs were the largest component of overall costs, followed by the costs of office visits, laboratory monitoring, and switching between classes for therapeutic failures. CONCLUSIONS: By following JNC guidelines, a slightly higher percentage of patients will achieve hypertension control with a newer class calcium channel blocker (amlodipine) but at a substantially higher cost than with a generic diuretic (chlorthalidone).

Acebutolol↗

Clinical and economic considerations of vaccination against varicella.

We evaluated the medical and economic literature pertaining to varicella vaccine in healthy children in an effort to provide perspective for both clinicians and those responsible for making payment policies. Chickenpox is relatively mild in most immunocompetent children; however, disease-related direct and indirect medical costs have been estimated at approximately $400 million/year. A vaccine effective in preventing the disease is now available in the United States and may offset some of these expected costs. Universal vaccination for patients older than 12 months of age without history of varicella infection or other contraindication is recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. It is estimated that it would save $0.90/dollar spent and $5.40/dollar spent from payers' and society's perspectives, respectively. Thus varicella vaccination is cost-beneficial only when considered from a societal perspective.

Adolescent↗