Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S D Clarke

Publications and source records attributed to S D Clarke.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Regulation of gene expression by dietary fat.

Dietary fat is an important macronutrient for the growth and development of all organisms. In addition to its role as an energy source and its effects on membrane lipid composition, dietary fat has profound effects on gene expression, leading to changes in metabolism, growth, and cell differentiation. The effects of dietary fat on gene expression reflect an adaptive response to changes in the quantity and type of fat ingested. Specific fatty acid-regulated transcription factors have been identified in bacteria, amphibians, and mammals. In mammals, these factors include peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR alpha, -beta, and -gamma), HNF4 alpha, NF kappa B, and SREBP1c. These factors are regulated by (a) direct binding of fatty acids, fatty acyl-coenzyme A, or oxidized fatty acids; (b) oxidized fatty acid (eicosanoid) regulation of G-protein-linked cell surface receptors and activation of signaling cascades targeting the nucleus; or (c) oxidized fatty acid regulation of intracellular calcium levels, which affect cell signaling cascades targeting the nucleus. At the cellular level, the physiological response to fatty acids will depend on (a) the quantity, chemistry, and duration of the fat ingested; (b) cell-specific fatty acid metabolism (oxidative pathways, kinetics, and competing reactions); (c) cellular abundance of specific nuclear and membrane receptors; and (d) involvement of specific transcription factors in gene expression. These mechanisms are involved in the control of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, cell differentiation and growth, and cytokine, adhesion molecule, and eicosanoid production. The effects of fatty acids on the genome provide new insight into how dietary fat might play a role in health and disease.

Animals↗

Somatotropin-dependent decrease in fatty acid synthase mRNA abundance in 3T3-F442A adipocytes is the result of a decrease in both gene transcription and mRNA stability.

Somatotropin (ST) markedly decreases lipogenesis, fatty acid synthase (FAS) enzyme activity and mRNA abundance in pig adipocytes. The present study was conducted to determine whether the decrease in FAS mRNA in 3T3-F442A adipocytes was the result of a decrease in transcription of the FAS gene and/or a change in FAS mRNA stability. Insulin increased the abundance of FAS mRNA 2-13-fold and fatty acid synthesis 3-7-fold. Somatotropin decreased the stimulatory effect of insulin on the abundance of FAS mRNA and lipogenesis by 40-70% and 20-60% respectively. Subsequent run-on analyses demonstrated that the decrease observed in FAS mRNA in response to ST was associated with an 82% decrease in transcription; ST significantly shortened the half-life of FAS mRNA from 35 to 11 h. To corroborate the run-on analyses, cells were stably transfected with a pFAS-CAT5 (in which CAT stands for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase) reporter construct that contained 2195 bp of the 5' flanking region of the rat FAS gene. Insulin treatment increased FAS-CAT activity 4.7-fold. When ST was added to the insulin-containing medium there was an approx. 60% reduction in FAS-CAT activity. In summary, our results indicate that ST decreases FAS mRNA levels and that this is the result of a marked decrease in both transcription of the FAS gene and stability of the FAS mRNA.

3T3 Cells↗

Polyunsaturated fatty acid inhibition of fatty acid synthase transcription is independent of PPAR activation.

Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) of the (n-6) and (n-3) families inhibit the rate of gene transcription for a number of hepatic lipogenic and glycolytic genes, e.g., fatty acid synthase (FAS). In contrast, saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids have no inhibitory capability. The suppression of gene transcription resulting from the addition of PUFA to a high carbohydrate diet: occurs quickly (< 3 h) after its addition to a high glucose diet; can be recreated with hepatocytes cultured in a serum-free medium containing insulin and glucocorticoids; can be demonstrated in diabetic rats fed fructose; and is independent of glucagon. While the nature of the intracellular PUFA inhibitor is unclear, it appears that delta-6 desaturation is a required step in the process. Recently, the fatty acid activated nuclear factor, peroxisome-proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) was suggested to be the PUFA-response factor. However, the potent PPAR activators ETYA and Wy-14643 did not suppress hepatic expression of FAS, but did induce the PPAR-responsive gene, acyl-CoA oxidase (AOX). Similarly, treating rat hepatocytes with 20:4 (n-6) suppressed FAS expression but had no effect on AOX. Thus, it appears that the PUFA regulation of gene transcription involves a PUFA-response factor that is independent from PPAR.

5,8,11,14-Eicosatetraynoic Acid↗

A novel 3T3-L1 preadipocyte variant that expresses PPARgamma2 and RXRalpha but does not undergo differentiation.

This report describes a novel adipocyte-like cell line termed 3T3-L1/RB1 that was derived from preadipocyte cell line, 3T3-L1. The 3T3-L1/RB1 cells continued to divide after reaching confluence, formed foci, and constitutively expressed a low level of adipose fatty acid binding protein (A-FABP) mRNA. However, 3T3L-1/RB cells did not undergo terminal differentiation as indicated by the failure of insulin and thiazolidendiones to induce the expression of A-FABP, lipoprotein lipase, and fatty acid synthase. We hypothesized that the 3T3-L1/RB1 variant did not respond to differentiation stimuli because it did not express either peroxisomal proliferator activated receptor gamma2 (PPARgamma2) or its heterodimer partner, retinoid X receptor alpha (RXRalpha). Surprisingly, Western blots revealed that 3T3-L1/ RB1 cells contained both PPARgamma2 and RXRalpha proteins at levels equal to or greater than that of the parent cell line. However, gel retardation assays using the adipose response element from A-FABP and nuclear protein extracts from 3T3-L1/RB1 cells treated with insulin or pioglitazone revealed that nuclear protein extracts from 3T3-L1/RB1 cells had very little ability to bind the PPARgamma2 recognition sequence of the A-FABP gene. These data suggest that the 3T3-L1/RB1 variant contains a mutation that may prevent ligand activation of PPARgamma2, and the subsequent conversion of 3T3-L1/RB1 cells to mature fat cells.

3T3 Cells↗

Cytosolic and nuclear distribution of PPARgamma2 in differentiating 3T3-L1 preadipocytes.

In light of the pivotal role that PPARgamma2 plays in the expression of fat specific genes (e.g., A-FABP), we have examined the hypothesis that a rise in PPARgamma2 protein is required for the expression of A-FABP, and that the acceleration of fat cell differentiation by the thiazolidinedione agent, pioglitazone (PIOG), reflects an increase in the abundance of PPARgamma2 mRNA and protein. Western analyses surprisingly revealed that undifferentiated 3T3-L1 fibroblasts contained significant levels of PPARgamma2 protein; that the amount of total cellular PPARgamma2 only increased 2-fold during differentiation; and that the levels of PPARgamma2 protein and mRNA were not increased by PIOG even though fat cell differentiation was accelerated by PIOG as revealed by a 20-fold increase in A-FABP expression. Cell fractionation studies revealed that PPARgamma2 was evenly distributed between the cytosolic and nuclear compartments in both undifferentiated and differentiating 3T3-L1 cells. Immunocytochemical studies with a PPARgamma2-specific antibody indicated that PPARgamma2 was diffusely distributed throughout the cytosol of undifferentiated 3T3-L1 cells, but as the differentiation progressed, the PPARgamma2 became focused around the developing lipid droplets. In contrast to PPARgamma2, undifferentiated 3T3-L1 cells contained no measurable quantities of RXRalpha, but once fat cell differentiation was initiated by treatment with IBMX and dexamethasone, the cellular content of RXRalpha increased several fold. The rise in RXRalpha content paralleled the induction of A-FABP, but the expression of RXRalpha was not enhanced by PIOG. Although the amount of PPARgamma2 and RXRalpha was unaffected by PIOG, gel shift assays revealed that PIOG stimulated PPARgamma2/RXRalpha binding to the adipose response element of A-FABP by 5-fold in less than 12 h. Apparently, RXRalpha rather than PPARgamma2 is the pivotal trans-factor essential for the initiation of terminal fat cell differentiation. However, the high cytsolic content of PPARgamma2 and its association with the lipid droplet of differentiating 3T3-L1 cells suggests PPARgamma2 may possess a cytosolic function in the developing fat cell.

3T3 Cells↗

Fatty acid regulation of gene expression. Its role in fuel partitioning and insulin resistance.

Dietary polyenoic (n-6) and (n-3) fatty acids uniquely regulate fatty acid biosynthesis and fatty acid oxidation. They exercise this effect by modulating the expression of genes coding for key metabolic enzymes and, in doing this, PUFA govern the intracellular as well as the interorgan metabolism of glucose and fatty acids. During the past 20 years, we have gradually elucidated the cellular and molecular mechanism by which dietary PUFA regulate lipid metabolism. Central to this mechanism has been our ability to determine that dietary PUFA regulate the transcription of genes. We have only begun to elucidate the nuclear mechanisms by which PUFA govern gene expression, but one point is clear and that is that it is unlikely that one mechanism will explain the variety of genes governed by PUFA. The difficulty in providing a unifying hypothesis at this time stems from (a) the many metabolic routes taken by PUFA upon entering a cell and (b) the lack of identity of a specific PUFA-regulated trans-acting factor. Nevertheless, our studies have revealed that PUFA are not only utilized as fuel and structural components of cells, but also serve as important mediators of gene expression, and that in this way they influence the metabolic directions of fuels and they modulate the development of nutritionally related pathophysiologies such as diabetes.

Animals↗

Dietary fat, genes, and human health.

These studies show that a macronutrient like dietary fat plays an important role in gene expression. In the cases presented here, dietary fat regulates gene expression leading to changes in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. The interesting outcome of these studies is the finding that the molecular targets for dietary fat action did not converge with the principal targets for hormonal regulation of gene transcription, like hormone receptors. Instead, PUFA-RF targets elements that play key ancillary roles in gene transcription. This is important because it shows how PUFA can interfere with hormone regulation of a specific gene without having generalized effect on overall hormonal control, i.e. PUFA effects are promoter-specific. How PUFA-RF interferes with gene transcription will require the isolation and characterization of PUFA-RF along with the tissue-specific factors targeted by PUFA-RF. A different story emerges when fatty acids activate PPAR. Based on the studies presented here and elsewhere, long chain-highly unsaturated fatty acids (like 20:5,n-3 and 22:6, n-3) or high levels of fat activate PPAR. PPAR directly activates genes like AOX, but also inhibits transcription of genes like S14, FAS, apolipoprotein CIII, transferrin. For S14, the mechanism of inhibition involves sequestration of RXR, a critical factor for T3 receptor binding to DNA. Thus, PPAR can have generalized effects on T3 action or on other nuclear receptors, like vit. D (VDR) and retinoic acid (RAR) receptors, that require RXR for action. For apolipoprotein CIII and transferrin, PPAR/RXR heterodimers compete for HNF-4 binding sites (DR + 1). In addition to HNF-4, COUP-TF, ARP-1 and RXR all bind the DR + 1 type motif. These factors are important for tissue-specific regulation of gene transcription. PPAR can potentially interfere with the transcription of multiple genes through disruption of nuclear receptor signaling leading to changes in phenotype. Clearly, more studies are required to assess the role PPAR plays in the fatty acid regulation of gene transcription and its contribution to chronic disease. Finally, it is clear that dietary fat has the potential to affect gene expression through multiple pathways. Depending on the gene examined, PUFA might augment or abrogate gene transcription which leads to specific phenotypic changes altering metabolism, differentiation or cell growth. These effects can be beneficial to the organism, such as the n-3 PUFA-mediated suppression of serum triglycerides or detrimental, like the saturated and n-6 PUFA-mediated promotion of insulin resistance. How such effects contribute to the onset or progression of specific neoplasia is unclear. However, studies in metabolism might provide important clues for this connection.

Animals↗

Polyunsaturated fatty acids regulate lipogenic and peroxisomal gene expression by independent mechanisms.

Polyunsaturated fatty acids of the (n-6) and (n-3) families uniquely coordinate hepatic lipid synthesis and oxidation by suppressing the transcription of hepatic genes encoding lipogenic and glycolytic enzymes while concomitantly inducing the activity of enzymes in mitochondrial and peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation. Recently a group of fatty acid activated nuclear transcription factors termed peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) were cloned. The discovery of PPARs led us to hypothesize that polyunsaturated fatty acids coordinately modulated the transcription of lipogenic and oxidative genes via a PPAR mediated process. Rats and mice were fed a potent PPAR activator, 5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid (ETYA), to ascertain if the expression of hepatic fatty acid synthase and peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase were coordinately suppressed and induced in response to PPAR activation. Expectedly, ETYA increased peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase mRNA abundance, but PPAR activation neither suppressed fatty acid synthase transcription nor reduced the level of fatty acid synthase mRNA. In fact, ETYA prevented the suppression of hepatic fatty acid synthase expression that characteristically results from feeding corn oil. Fatty acid composition analyses indicated that ETYA interfered with 18:2 (n-6) conversion to 20:4 (n-6). Thus, it appears that PPAR is not the sole factor responsible for the coordinate regulation of lipid synthesis and oxidation by polyunsaturated fatty acids. In addition, our data indicate that the active polyenoic fatty acid responsible for the regulation of gene transcription must undergo delta-6 desaturation.

5,8,11,14-Eicosatetraynoic Acid↗

Hepatic fatty acid synthase gene transcription is induced by a dietary copper deficiency.

A dietary copper (Cu) deficiency is associated with a twofold increase in hepatic fatty acid biosynthesis. We hypothesized that the induction of hepatic lipogenesis associated with a dietary Cu deficiency reflected an enhanced expression of genes encoding lipogenic enzymes, i.e., fatty acid synthase (FAS). Male weanling rats were pair-meal fed for 42 days a high-sucrose diet that was Cu deficient (CuD; 0.7 microgram Cu/g) or Cu adequate (CuA; 5.0 micrograms Cu/g). The CuD diet increased FAS enzymatic activity twofold (P < 0.05). This rise in enzymatic activity was accompanied by a threefold increase in FAS mRNA and a 2.5-fold increase in FAS gene transcription (P < 0.05). Neither the mRNA abundance nor the rate of gene transcription for phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase or beta-actin was affected by the CuD diet. The induction of FAS gene transcription was associated with a 65-85% increase in hepatic reduced glutathione (GSH; P < 0.05). When hepatic GSH synthesis was suppressed by treating CuD rats with L-buthionine sulfoximine, the induction of FAS expression was completely prevented. Similarly, feeding N-acetylcysteine to CuA rats increased hepatic GSH levels 2.5-fold, and this was accompanied by a significant induction in FAS expression. These data indicate that the increase in hepatic lipogenesis associated with a Cu deficiency reflects an induction in hepatic lipogenic gene transcription (i.e., FAS) and that the rate of gene transcription may be dependent on hepatic thiol redox.

Actins↗

Nutrient regulation of gene expression: a methodological strategy.

Nutrients should be viewed as the earliest of the hormone signals which allowed an organism to respond to changes in its nutrient environment. Defining nutrient function at the nuclear level will permit us to understand how our dietary environment is related to the development of nutritionally related pathophysiologies such as diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. Moreover, through the application of molecular techniques, we will begin to understand how specific nutrients govern the developmental pattern of specific organs such as the kidney. In this review, the fatty acid synthase gene is employed as a model to demonstrate how one sequentially approaches questions pertaining to the regulation of gene expression by a nutrient, and the article presents a nuclear explanation for how dietary polyunsaturated fats decrease blood triglycerides. More importantly, studies of this nature provide a basis for screening genetically susceptible populations and information that will allow the nutritionists of the 21st century to customize a diet for patients at risk.

Animals↗

Suppression of renal gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase expression in dietary copper deficiency.

A dietary deficiency of copper (CuD) is associated with a 50-70% and a 2-fold increase in hepatic reduced glutathione (GSH) concentration and synthesis, respectively, which leads to a 50-80% increase in plasma GSH. Moreover, the kidneys of CuD rats remove 40% more GSH from the blood than copper adequate (CuA) rats. These findings have led us to propose that the increase in hepatic synthesis of GSH in CuD rats is accompanied by a comparable increase in the hepatic expression of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (gamma-GCS), the rate limiting enzyme of glutathione biosynthesis, and that the enhanced uptake of GSH by the kidney would lead to a compensatory decrease in renal gamma-GCS expression. In experiment I, male weanling rats (3-4 weeks) were ad libitum fed a CuD (0.5 microgram Cu/g) or CuA (5.8 micrograms/g) diet for 70 days; and in experiment II, male weanling rats were pair-meal fed the CuD or CuA diet for 35 days. In both studies, CuD diet caused a significant increase in hepatic GSH concentration, but hepatic gamma-GCS activity and mRNA abundance were unchanged. In contrast, renal GSH concentration was unaffected by the CuD diet. However, renal gamma-GCS activity was reduced 40% and this was paralleled by a 50% decrease in gamma-GCS mRNA. Moreover, the decrease in renal gamma-GCS mRNA was caused by a reduction in renal gamma-GCS gene transcription. The results of these studies indicate that the increase in renal uptake of GSH resulting from a dietary Cu deficiency is associated with a compensatory decrease in gamma-GCS expression.

Animals↗

Polyunsaturated fatty acid regulation of hepatic gene transcription.

Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) of the n-6 and n-3 families inhibit transcription of a number of hepatic lipogenic and glycolytic genes, e.g. fatty acid synthase. In contrast, saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids exert no suppressive action on lipogenic gene expression. The unique PUFA regulation of gene expression extends beyond the liver to include genes such as adipocyte glucose transporter-4, lymphocyte stearoyl-CoA desaturase 2, and interleukins. Some of the transcriptional effects of PUFA appear to be mediated by eicosanoids, but PUFA suppression of lipogenic and glycolytic genes is independent of eicosanoid synthesis and appears to involve a nuclear mechanism directly modified by PUFA. With the recent cloning of a fatty acid-activated nuclear factor termed peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) has come the suggestion that PPAR may be the PUFA response factor. This review, however, presents several lines of evidence that indicate that the PPAR and n-6 and n-3 PUFA regulation of lipogenic and glycolytic gene transcription involve separate and independent mechanisms. Thus PPAR appears not to be the PUFA response factor.

Animals↗

Polyunsaturated fatty acid regulation of hepatic gene transcription.

Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) modulate the rate of gene transcription for a number of different genes including hepatic lipogenic and glycolytic genes, adipose Glut-4 and stearoyl-CoA desaturase and interleukins. Some of the transcriptional effects of PUFA appear to be mediated by eicosanoids, but the PUFA suppression of lipogenic and glycolytic genes is independent of eicosanoid synthesis and appears to involve a nuclear mechanism directly modified by PUFA. With the recent cloning of a fatty acid-activated nuclear factor termed peroxisome-proliferator- activated receptor (PPAR) has come the suggestion that PPAR may be the PUFA response factor. However, this review presents several lines of evidence that indicate that the PPAR and PUFA regulation of gene transcription involves separate and independent mechanisms, and the PPAR is not the PUFA response factor.

Animals↗

Specific effects of polyunsaturated fatty acids on gene expression.

Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids modulate the transcription of numerous proteins including several hepatic lipogenic enzymes. Several lines of evidence indicate that polyunsaturated fatty acids do not regulate the transcription of hepatic lipogenic genes via a peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor, but the mechanism may involve transcription factors related to the carbohydrate response region.

Animals↗

Dietary protein quality alters ornithine decarboxylase activity but not vitamin B-6 nutritional status in rats.

Weanling male rats were fed diets that varied in protein quality (casein or wheat gluten) and vitamin B-6 (0.0, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 mg pyridoxine HCl/kg diet) to test the hypotheses that low protein quality would depress vitamin B-6 nutritional status and that activity of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) would be a sensitive functional indicator of vitamin B-6 nutritional status. The wheat gluten diet depressed body weight gain approximately 17% at higher vitamin B-6 levels, as expected. However, vitamin B-6 nutritional status was not worse in gluten-fed compared with casein-fed groups, as evidenced by static measures (B-6 vitamer concentrations in plasma and tissues) and a functional indicator (tryptophan load test). The activity of ODC (holo- and total) in liver, kidney and small intestine did not vary significantly at the three higher levels of vitamin B-6 intake. In groups fed casein, total ODC activity in these tissues was two- to fivefold higher in rats fed diets containing 0.0 mg vitamin B-6/kg compared with higher B-6 levels, without corresponding differences in ODC mRNA abundance in liver and kidney. Concentrations of B-6 vitamers (except pyridoxal phosphate in plasma) increased linearly with dietary vitamin B-6 in plasma, liver, kidney and intestine. These data suggest that low quality protein fed as wheat gluten suppresses growth but not vitamin B-6 nutritional status, and that ODC activity is not a sensitive functional indicator of marginal vitamin B-6 status.

Animals↗