Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Ciatto

Publications and source records attributed to S Ciatto.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Surveillance for endometrial cancer with transvaginal ultrasonography of breast cancer patients under tamoxifen treatment.

The association of endometrial thickness with the risk of developing endometrial cancer (EC) within 2 years was investigated in a consecutive cohort of 1205 breast cancer patients under tamoxifen treatment, undergoing transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) for follow-up purpose (asymptomatic, 1068) or for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB, 137). Linkage with tumour registry allowed for the follow-up of 3184.3 person-years. According to underlying incidence, 1.85 EC cases were expected in the study cohort while 12 were observed (observed/expected ratio=6.49, 95% CI 3.35-11.33; asymptomatic=4.09, 95% CI 1.65-8.43, symptomatic=35.71, 95% CI 11.59-83.34). No EC was observed with thickness (half layer) <3 mm. Raising this threshold increased specificity with a substantial loss of sensitivity (>or=3, >or=4, >or=6, >or=9 mm; spec.=25.8, 44.5, 76.1, 91.5%, sens.=100, 91.6, 75.0, 66.6%). The presence of AUB was rather specific (88.94%) but poorly sensitive (41.67%). A combination of AUB presence/absence and thickness allowed the best accuracy (AUB + thickness >or=3, >or=4 or >or=5; sens.=100, 81.6 or 91.6%; spec.=22.8, 40.4, or 56.7%). Breast cancer patients under tamoxifen might be selected for further invasive assessment on the basis of AUB and endometrial thickness assessed at TVUS.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Clinical impact (cost-effectiveness) of qualifying atypical squamous cells of undeterminate significance (ASCUS) in cases favoring a reactive or dysplastic process.

The cost-effectiveness of qualifying ASCUS cases into two different subcategories, favoring a reactive (ASCUS-R) or dysplastic process (ASCUS-S), was evaluated at the Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica of Florence in a prospective study. The study determined the positive predictive value (PPV) for histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or more (CIN>) severe lesion of the two ASCUS subgroups. ASCUS-S had a PPV (10.78%) comparable to low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) (11.40%). For ASCUS-R cases, the recommendation of 6-mo repeat cytology prompting colposcopy in cases of persistent ASCUS or more severe cytology was also effective, as it selected a subgroup with a relatively high PPV (10.34%). The cost-effectiveness of a protocol based on ASCUS qualification was compared with two other possible options for nonqualified ASCUS cases: immediate colposcopy and colposcopy in persistent ASCUS at 6-mo repeat cytology. The detection rate of CIN2> was substantially higher using ASCUS qualification (35.9 vs 14.8 or 17.1). The cost per ASCUS subject was euro 24.99, 27.11, or 25.14 and that per CIN2> detected was euro 697, 1,831 or 1,470 for the three options, respectively. The evidence that ASCUS detection option implies a higher detection rate of CIN2> and subsequently a lower cost per CIN2> detection must be considered with caution and deserves confirmation by other comparative studies.

Cervix Uteri↗
PubMed2003

Practice of opportunistic PSA screening in the Florence District.

The widespread use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test had a great impact on the rise of incidence of prostate cancer. The magnitude of opportunistic screening by PSA varies across countries, being highest in the US, and considerably lower in Europe. To estimate the opportunistic use of PSA over the period of one year (2000) in the District of Florence, we analysed the Regional Database of diagnostic exams. According to the Regional Database, subjects having at least one PSA test during the year 2000 ranged from 5.8 to 6.7%, 8.8-10.8%, 11.7-15.0%, 16.5-22.3%, 18.0-24.3%, 17.0-23.8% and 14.1-18.3% in the 50-54, 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79 and >79 years age groups, respectively. Minimum and maximum values are reported according to exclusion or inclusion of PSA determinations with incomplete subject identification data. Such a high use of PSA should deserve special attention from both the medical and health care provider community. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the frequency of opportunistic screening by PSA in the District of Florence in the general population.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Transperineal sonography guided biopsy of the prostate: critical review of 1107 cases.

PURPOSE: To assess the predictive value for a positive biopsy of different indicators (rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, total PSA, PSA density). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Positive predictive value was assessed on 1107 consecutive US-guided transperineal biopsies performed from 1991 to 2001 (cancer=344, dysplasia (PIN)=64, atypical hyperplasia=4, benign hyperplasia=686, inadequate=9) with univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Increasing age (chi square for trend 52.2, p <0.001), positive rectal examination (chi square 233, df=1, p<0.001) or ultrasonography (chi square 191, df=1, p<0.001), total PSA (chi square for trend 68.9, p<0.001) and PSA density (cutoff 0.15, chi square 104, df=1, p<0.001; cutoff 0.20, chi square 104, df=1, p<0,001) were all significantly associated to the likelihood of a positive biopsy outcome. Multivariate analysis stresses the independent role of Psa density over total PSA. If the parameters studied had determined the biopsy, spared benign biopsies [positive rectal examination=505 (66%), positive ultrasonography=467 (61%), PSA>4=124 (16%), PSA>10=159 (74%), PSA density >0,15=426 (62%), PSA density >0.20=517 (75%)] would not have justified the amount of delayed cancer biopsies [positive rectal examination=103 (29%), positive ultrasonography=55 (15%), PSA>4=42 (12%), PSA>10=569 (46%), PSA density >0,15=73 (25%), PSA density >0,20=107 (37%)]. CONCLUSIONS: The parameters currently available prior to biopsy, if used alone, allow no reliable prediction of biopsy outcome. Positive predictive value, particularly for PSA density, allows a better evaluation of biopsy indication, particularly for random sextant biopsies in the 4-10 ng/ml PSA range, which are frequently negative.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Measuring interval cancers in population-based screening using different assays of fecal occult blood testing: the District of Florence experience.

The fecal occult blood test (FOBT) has demonstrated its efficacy in reducing mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). The guaiac-based FOBT has been criticized for its low sensitivity. In this study, two different assays for FOBT (guaiac or an immunochemical test based on reversed passive hemagglutination [RPHA]) were tested for comparison within a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer in the province of Florence (Italy). The proportional incidence method was used to calculate sensitivity for both FOBTs, according to rank of screening (first or repeat), age at entry (two groups of 50 to 59 and 60 to 70 years old) and lesion site (colon or rectum). When comparing FOBTs, the sensitivity multivariate Poisson regression was used to adjust for other variables. The sensitivity after the first 2 years was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34% to 63%) for the guaiac test versus 82% (95% CI 67% to 92%) for RPHA. At multivariate analysis the risk of developing an interval cancer after a guaiac test is almost 3 times that after RPHA (rate ratio = 2.64; 95% CI 1.3 to 5.4). Our study confirms that RPHA is more sensitive than the guaiac test. The assumption that FOBT screening for CRC has to be based on a guaiac test should be reconsidered, and RPHA should be recommended as the standard FOBT for screening purposes.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Detection of prostate cancer: a comparative study of the diagnostic efficacy of sextant transrectal versus sextant transperineal biopsy.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal biopsy strategy for the detection of prostate cancer still needs to be established, since a considerable proportion of clinically significant cancers remains undiagnosed on routine sextant transrectal biopsy. To assess the efficacy of transperineal biopsy to detect prostate cancer, we compared this approach to systematic sextant transrectal biopsy in a simulation experiment. METHODS: Ultrasound-guided sextant transverse (transrectal) biopsy and subsequent sextant longitudinal (transperineal) biopsy were performed on 40 radical prostatectomy specimens of patients with (transrectal) biopsy-detected prostate cancer. Conditions were simulative and may not be completely analogous to clinical settings. Ultrasound-determined prostate volume, biopsy tumor involvement, number of cores with cancer, and tumor volume were determined. Detailed mapping of radical prostatectomy specimens provided insight into the representativeness of the biopsy techniques. RESULTS: Of 40 cancers, 33 (82.5%) were redetected by the transperineal approach; 29 (72.5%) were detected by repeated transrectal biopsies. For both approaches, the tumor volume of the undiagnosed cancers was significantly smaller (P <0.01) and the prostate volume was significantly larger (P <0.01) than in the redetected ones. Between the two approaches, no difference was found for either of the variables determined in the redetected cancers. Prostate maps clarified that transperineal undiagnosed tumors were either small (0.2 cm(3) or less) or notably located at the prostatic base. CONCLUSIONS: The biopsy procedure in which the biopsy needles enter the prostate at the apex for a longitudinal direction may efficiently sample the prostatic peripheral zone. Since the experiment was artificial in design, caution should be observed in extrapolating these results to patient settings.

Biopsy↗
PubMed2000

Prostate cancer screening: the problem of overdiagnosis and lessons to be learned from breast cancer screening.

Screening for prostate cancer is a relatively new procedure, still under experimental evaluation within prospective randomised trials. The design of prospective studies has been mainly based on the experience of other cancer screenings, particularly breast cancer, for which data of several controlled studies are available. Unfortunately, breast cancer is very different from prostate cancer, particularly for aspects such as early diagnosis and, thus the screening process, originally modelled on the basis of the lesson taught by breast cancer screening, needs continuous re-evaluation and adjustment, based on data which are now being produced from ongoing screening experiences. In this paper, we will consider the most controversial aspects of prostate cancer screening and compare prostate screening with breast cancer screening in order to promote a better understanding of the current problems and lessons to be learned.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Cervical cancer screening in Italy.

Until recently cervical cancer screening in Italy has been mainly spontaneous, with only a few organised programmes. This resulted in low coverage and high frequency of tests in screened women (mostly every year). The situation is, however, rapidly changing. In 1996 nationwide organised programmes, on a regional basis, were recommended. National guidelines recommend personal invitation of women aged 25-64 years for a Pap-test every third year. At the end of 1999 34% of the Italian population 25-64 years old was included in organised programmes. Most organised programmes have fail-safe systems for women referred for colposcopy, protocols for diagnostic work-up and treatment and reference centres for such phases, according to the recommendations of national and European guidelines. However the size of laboratories is frequently smaller than recommended. Most organised programmes implement quality assurance processes for cytology interpretation, that have been intensive in some centre, but there is no nationwide standardisation. In recent years data for monitoring screening activity have been collected in a standardised way by most organised programmes, in the framework of GISCi (Italian Group for Cervical Cancer Screening) allowing internal and external comparisons. In some cases strong improvements of coverage after the introduction of an organised activity have been documented. Data, however, suggest a relevant heterogeneity of criteria for cytology interpretation, requiring actions to increase consistency. The impact of these transformations on incidence of cervical cancer will be observed in the future: preliminary results suggest a reduction in older programmes.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Prediction of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in cytologically normal women by human papillomavirus testing.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has been suggested for primary screening of cervical cancer. Prediction of future high-grade cervical lesions is crucial for effectiveness and cost. We performed a case control study in a retrospective cohort of women with at least two cervical smears, all but the last one being negative, from the organized cervical screening programme in Florence, Italy. We searched for high-risk HPV in all previous, archival, smears from cases (new histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade II or worse) and in one previous smear from each control (last smear cytologically normal, matched by age and interval (latency) from last smear). We applied polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and the b-globin gene was used as a DNA preservation marker. High-risk HPV was identified in 71/92 (77.17%) previous smears from 79 cases and 17/332 controls (5.12%). The odds ratio (OR) was 63.76 (95% CI 30.57-132.96). Among cases the proportion of HPV-positive smears declined slightly with increasing latency. Among cases, HPV was found in 81.24% (95% CI 69.93-88.96%) of smears with latency < 4 years and in 67.80% (95% CI 47.72-82.93%) of those taken at longer intervals, up to 6 years. These findings suggest that testing for high-risk HPV allows predicting 80% of CINII/III 3 years before the cytological diagnosis and two thirds 6 years before. They also suggest that testing women negative for high-risk HPV at longer interval and strictly following-up women who are HPV positive could be an effective strategy for cervical cancer screening.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Screening for colorectal cancer by faecal occult blood test: comparison of immunochemical tests.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two immunochemical faecal occult blood tests based on reversed passive haemagglutination (RPHA) or latex agglutination (Hdia) in a population based screening setting. METHOD: Hdia was interpreted according to three positivity thresholds: 100, 150, or 200 ng of haemoglobin/mg of specimen solution. A total of 5844 subjects were recruited into the study, from 17432 invited subjects aged 50-70. RESULTS: Positivity rates were 3.3% for RPHA, Hdia100 3.5%, Hdia150 2.5%, Hdia200 2.0%. Among subjects complying with the diagnostic work up, colorectal cancer (CRC) was detected in 19 subjects (17 RPHA positive, 16 Hdia100 positive, 15 Hdia150 positive, 14 Hdia200 positive) and high risk adenoma/s in 41 subjects (28 RPHA positive, 32 Hdia100 positive, 29 Hdia150 positive, 25 Hdia200 positive). The prevalence of screen positive CRC in the population was for RPHA 2.9 per thousand, Hdia100 2.7 per thousand, Hdia150 2.6 per thousand, Hdia200 2.4 per thousand. The prevalence of screen positive high risk adenomas in the population was for RPHA 4.8 per thousand, Hdia100 5.5 per thousand, Hdia150 5.0 per thousand, Hdia200 4.3 per thousand. CONCLUSION: Hdia100 was as sensitive as RPHA for cancer and high risk adenomas. As Hdia is less technically complex than RPHA, it is a valid alternative to the latter, provided that full automation of the development procedure is available. Increasing the positivity threshold of Hdia up to 150 or 200 ng of haemoglobin/mg of specimen solution is not advisable as the increase in specificity is too small to justify the corresponding decrease in the detection of screen positive cancers in the population.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2000

[Radiologic analysis of interval cancers in the screening program called Florence Woman Project].

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to provide data on interval cancer incidence after the first round of the screening program in the city of Florence, and to provide and discuss the results of the review of previous screening mammograms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The screening program "Progetto Firenze Donna" involves all women age 50 to 69 years resident in the city of Florence. In the interval from the end of the first and the start of the second screening round 51 interval cancers were identified, of which 41 were available for radiological review. Films were reviewed by expert screening radiologists, not involved in the program and blinded to the final diagnosis, according to the review criteria recommended by the UK Guidelines for radiologists (blind and informed review). RESULTS: Sensitivity (screening errors/total) was different among blind reviewers (reader A = 7.3%, reader B = 14.6%), as well as specificity which shows an inverse pattern (reader A = 98.4%, reader B = 97.6%). Informed review classified 5 cases as "screening error" (12.2%), 11 as "minimal sign" (26.8%) and 25 as "occult" (61%). Informed review classified a higher proportion of cases as "minimal sign" (minimal abnormalities are better perceived with the knowledge of the site and the pattern of subsequent cancer). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of interval cancers is fundamental for the quality control of a screening program. According to this experience, informed review tends to overestimate "minimal signs" in the cancer site and should not be used (or "minimal signs" should be anyhow assumed as negative). Identification of interval cases as "minimal signs" may be influenced by individual variability. Standard criteria should be adopted to identify and review/classify interval cancers to allow comparisons between different programs.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Proficiency test for screening mammography: results for 117 volunteer Italian radiologists.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the performance of a large sample of Italian radiologists undergoing a proficiency test for screening mammography. DESIGN: Evaluation of performance indicators according to reference standards determined by a panel of experts (sensitivity (reference standard > or = 80%), recall rate (reference standard < or = 15%)). SETTING: 117 Italian radiologists of varying experience (years of practice 0.5-18, average 5.9; mammograms read 500-51,000, average 13,000), all currently reporting clinical mammography and planning to take part in screening in the near future. RESULTS: Eighty four of 117 (72%) radiologists reached the standard for sensitivity, 88 (75%) reached the standard for recall rate, and only 59 (50%) reached both standards and passed the proficiency test. The probability of passing the test was significantly correlated with mammographic practice (p = 0.015), mammograms read (p = 0.024), and mammograms read/year (p = 0.043). DISCUSSION: The performance of a large sample of Italian radiologists currently reporting clinical mammography was disappointing, indicating the need for proper training of at least 50% of the tested subjects. When implementing organised screening the health authority should set up a proper process for training and accrediting radiologists, and a proficiency test should be part of such a process.

Chi-Square Distribution↗