Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Chodosh

Publications and source records attributed to S Chodosh.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The effects of dilevalol, metoprolol, and placebo on ventilatory function in asthmatics.

Dilevalol combines a nonselective blocking action on beta-receptors with selective beta 2-agonist activity. In this double-blind, three-way, crossover study, the effects of relatively high single doses of dilevalol (400 mg), metoprolol (200 mg), a placebo on pulmonary function and their interaction with isoproterenol (160 and 480 micrograms) were evaluated in 16 patients with reversible bronchial asthma [isoproterenol-induced increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of greater than or equal to 15%]. When the lowest or minimum values observed during the 2 h postdrug evaluation period were considered, there was no significant difference from baseline in the percentage change in FEV1 after placebo (-4.4%) and dilevalol (-10%), with the difference between these treatments not being statistically significant. However, following metoprolol, FEV1 decreased by 18.3%, a decrease significantly different (p less than 0.01), from baseline and from the effects of placebo (p less than 0.01), although not from dilevalol. Furthermore, following metoprolol, 7 of 16 patients (44%) showed a greater than or equal to 20% decrease in FEV1 as compared to only 3 patients (19%) following dilevalol and 1 patient (6%) following placebo. The effects of the three treatments on forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximal midexpiratory flow (MMEF) were qualitatively similar to those observed in FEV1. Both dilevalol and metoprolol similarly and significantly (p less than or equal to 0.01) inhibited the isoproterenol (160 and 480 micrograms) response in FEV1 as compared to placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗

Comparative trials of doxycycline versus amoxicillin, cephalexin and enoxacin in bacterial infections in chronic bronchitis and asthma.

The comparative efficacy of doxycycline versus amoxicillin, cephalexin, cefaclor and enoxacin was examined in four separate cross-over and blinded studies of acute bacterial bronchitis in chronic bronchitis and asthma. The efficacy of doxycycline over the eleven-year period (1975-1986) covered by these studies also was examined. Patients with acute bacterial exacerbations, defined by increased chest symptoms, increased bacteria and sputum neutrophilia, were randomly entered. When a new acute infection occurred, they were re-entered and received the other antibacterial. Response was recorded as successful or not; early rebound infections and the periods free of infection were noted. A total of 136 exacerbations were evaluated in the comparison of doxycycline with the other 4 antibacterials, and 93 exacerbations in the long-term efficacy of doxycycline. The acute success was similar for doxycycline with the other antibacterials and was superior to cefaclor. Early rebound infections occurred less frequently with doxycycline as compared to the cephalosporins and was similar versus amoxicillin and enoxacin. The infection-free period was longer after doxycycline than with the other four antimicrobials. Doxycycline maintained its efficacy to elicit a prompt response and provide a long infection-free period, but an increase of early rebound infections was noted over the eleven-year period.

Adult↗

Acute bacterial exacerbations in bronchitis and asthma.

Symptomatic exacerbations are frequent problems in the management of chronic bronchitis and bronchial asthma. Identification of a bacterial etiology as the cause of specific exacerbations should be based on changes in clinical symptoms and documentation of significant bronchial bacterial flora and a neutrophilic inflammatory response. Most acute bacterial exacerbations in patients with bronchitis or asthma are caused by Hemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, or Branhamella catarrhalis. Treatment with ampicillins, synthetic tetracyclines, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is successful in 80 to 90 percent of bacterial exacerbations. Emergence of resistant Hemophilus species and pneumococci motivates development of new orally administered antimicrobial drugs. Appropriate treatment depends on the prompt recognition that bacterial infection is present. Once instituted, antimicrobial therapy should be continued for a minimum of 10 to 14 days, which should increase the duration of the infection-free period until the next bacterial exacerbation. Adequate response should be evaluated by the return of symptoms to pre-infectious levels and by decreased sputum bacterial flora and neutrophilic inflammation.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

A multicenter trial of the prophylactic effect of ketotifen, theophylline, and placebo in atopic asthma.

Three hundred seventy-four patients with asthma were entered into a year-long, double-blind, double-placebo controlled study comparing the prophylactic effect of ketotifen (229 patients), theophylline (73 patients), and placebo (72 patients). The ketotifen group was larger to allow the accumulation of additional long-term safety data. The primary measure of therapeutic effect was a decrease in concomitant medication without a significant increase in symptomatology or a decrement in pulmonary functions. A patient daily diary was used to document symptoms (cough, shortness of breath, and wheeze) and concomitant medications taken during the 2-week baseline and the subsequent 12 monthly periods. After 2 months of study-drug therapy, the ketotifen patients had a greater decrease in both concomitant medication and symptomatology than either of the other groups. This delay in the onset of therapeutic activity has been observed in other studies and is characteristic of this compound. The principal side effect observed with ketotifen is initial sedation, which was found to be self-limiting and of little concern to the patient after the first month.

Adolescent↗

Sputum and blood eosinophils during corticosteroid treatment of acute exacerbations of asthma.

Eleven patients with chronic bronchial asthma were studied during a noninfectious exacerbation. Each patient received 80 mg of prednisone daily for three days. Spirometric values, total blood eosinophil counts, and 24-hour quantitation of sputum eosinophils were studied. Three patients had total blood eosinophil counts of less than 250 at the time of presentation. Statistical comparisons with findings on Day 0 showed significant improvements for the one-second forced expiratory volume, total blood eosinophil count, and sputum eosinophil number. On Day 7, the one-second forced expiratory volume maintained a statistically significant difference from that on Day 0, but the total blood eosinophil count did not. Analysis of correlation coefficients showed significant relation between the total blood eosinophil count and one-second forced expiratory volume, the sputum eosinophil count and one-second forced expiratory volume, and the sputum eosinophil and total blood eosinophil counts. The conclusions are (1) blood eosinophilia is not an invariable feature of acute exacerbations of asthma; (2) numbers of blood and sputum eosinophils reflect the response of an acute exacerbation of asthma to corticosteroids; (3) sputum eosinophils may be more meaningful for monitoring the stable postcorticosteroid state; (4) there is no support for the belief that eosinophils disappear from the sputum of asthmatic patients with clinically effective doses of corticosteroids.

Acute Disease↗

Bronchodilator action of the anticholinergic drug, ipratropium bromide (Sch 1000), as an aerosol in chronic bronchitis and asthma.

Ipratropium bromide (also known as Sch 1000) is a new atropine-like bronchodilator drug whose mechanism of action is via an anticholinergic pathway and may decrease cyclic guanosine monophosphate. Although of established efficacy in asthma, there are no studies of the use of ipratropium in patients with chronic bronchitis. The single metered aerosol doses of 10 mug, 20 mug, 40 mug and 80 mug of ipratropium bromide, 75 mug and 150 mug of isoproterenol, and placebo were studied in 20 adult patients, half with asthma and half with chronic bronchitis. To qualify, all patients demonstrated at least 20% improvement in the forced expiratory volume in one second while in the drug-free state when tested with isoproterenol. All subjects were tested for six hours with each agent in a double-blind crossover design. The dose-response aspects of the study indicate that in bronchial asthma the optimal range of dosage is 40 mug to 80 mug of ipratropium bromide. These doses are superior to isoproterenol in duration of action. In chronic bronchitis, all doses of ipratropium showed prolonged efficacy, but 80 mug was superior. Isoproterenol lacked this sustained efficacy. No significant alteration in pulse or blood pressure was observed. Ipratropium appears to be an important addition to the bronchodilator agents used in isoproterenol-responsive obstructive pulmonary disease.

Aerosols↗

Methacycline compared with ampicillin in acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. A double-blind crossover study.

In order to objectively document the accepted clinical efficacy of ampicillin in treating bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, as well as to evaluate the efficacy of methacycline, a double-blind crossover study was designed. Twenty patients with chronic bronchial disease were treated for two separate acute bacterial exacerbations, once with 2 gm of ampicillin daily, and once with 600 mg of methacycline daily, for 14 days. There were a few significant differences when comparing the efficacy of the antimicrobials. For example, the daily volume of sputum significantly went from 35.6 ml initially to 20.5 ml at the end of treatment with methacycline, and from 37.4 to 18.0 ml with ampicillin. Sputum neutrophils excreted per day went from 446 to 147 million with methacycline and from 433 to 94 million with ampicillin. Gram-positive diplococci and cocci on gram stains of sputum significantly decreased form 10.6 to 3.3 with methacycline and from 16.8 to 2.1 with ampicillin. This investigation objectively documents with accepted clinical efficacy of ampicillin and proves methacycline to be an equally effective agent.

Acute Disease↗

[Defence capacities of the respiratory tract].

The defenses of the lung against inhaled gases and particles include aerodynamic filtration mechanisms of the tracheobronchial tree, mechanical clearance and local detoxification. Cough, mucociliary transport, alveolo-bronchiolar fluid flow and clearance to lymph and blood participate in the mechanical excretory mechanisms whereas phagocytosis, immunologic and secretory mechanisms, and tissue reaction represent in-situ detoxification. Impaired mucociliary transport causes obstruction of the airways, the pathophysiologic hallmark of chronic nonspecific lung diseases. The clearance of diseases airways is not easy. It may be accomplished either by changing primarily the physicochemical properties of the mucus or by stimulating ciliary activity. By means of doublebind-crossover studies in patients with stable chronic nonspecific lung diseases, it is shown how drugs which presumably improve the clearance of diseased airways do affect the various physicochemical properties of the tracheobronchial mucus.

Acetylcysteine↗

Examining sputum.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Respiratory Tract Diseases↗