Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S C Ranganathan

Publications and source records attributed to S C Ranganathan.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Exploring the relationship between forced maximal flow at functional residual capacity and parameters of forced expiration from raised lung volume in healthy infants.

The raised volume rapid thoraco-abdominal compression technique (RVRTC) is being increasingly used to assess airway function in infants, but as yet no consensus exists regarding the equipment, methods, or analysis of recorded data. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between maximal flow at functional residual capacity (V'(maxFRC)) and parameters derived from raised lung volumes, and to address analytical aspects of the latter technique in an attempt to assist with future standardization initiatives. Forced vital capacity (FVC) from lung volume raised to 3 kPa, timed forced expiratory volumes (FEV(t)), and forced expiratory flow parameters at different percentages of expired FVC (FEF(%)) were measured in 98 healthy infants (1-69 weeks of age). V'(maxFRC) using the tidal rapid thoraco-abdominal compression (RTC) technique was also measured. The within-subject relationships and within-subject variability of the various parameters were assessed. Duration of forced expiration was < 0.5 sec in 5 infants, meaning that FEV(0.3) and FEV(0.4) were the only timed volume parameters that could be calculated in all infants during the first months of life, and even when it could be calculated, FEV(0.5) approached FVC in many of these infants. It is recommended that FEV(0.4) be routinely reported in infants less than 3 months of age. Contrary to previous reports, within subject variability of V'(maxFRC) was less than that of FEF(75) (mean CV = 6.3% and 8.9%, respectively).A more standardized protocol when analyzing data from the RVRTC would facilitate comparisons of results between centers in the future.

Crown-Rump Length↗

Airway function in infants newly diagnosed with cystic fibrosis.

The lung function of infants with cystic fibrosis is often reduced shortly after diagnosis. We measured the airway function of newly diagnosed infants to test whether this reduction is independent of clinically recognised lower respiratory illness. We compared the airway function of 33 infants with cystic fibrosis and 87 healthy controls after adjustment for sex, age, bodyweight and length, and exposure to maternal smoking. Airway function was significantly reduced in children with cystic fibrosis, even in those without clinically recognised previous lower respiratory illness. Our findings raise important questions about the onset and natural history of impaired airway function in infants with cystic fibrosis.

Case-Control Studies↗

Difficult asthma: defining the problems.

A retrospective survey was undertaken of children with difficult asthma, attending a respiratory clinic. The clinical and laboratory profiles of asthmatic children who were poorly controlled on > or = 800 microg of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) were studied and compared to children well-controlled on > or = 800 microg ICS. Assessments were made of atopy, growth, lung function, treatment adherence, home environment, and responsiveness to corticosteroids (CS). Fiftyseven "difficult" and 23 well-controlled children were studied. Significant differences in the home environment were identified. Smoking was significantly more common in the difficult-to-control group. Nine children had alternative diagnoses. Poor CS responsiveness was present in 10 children. Adverse home environments, poor treatment supervision, alternative diagnoses, and unresponsiveness to CS were the most important factors in difficult asthma. A full assessment, including bronchoscopy, is indicated to avoid unnecessary increases in CS to doses that could cause side-effects.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Lung function testing in infants with cystic fibrosis: lessons from the past and future directions.

Despite the increasing awareness of the need to identify early pulmonary changes in cystic fibrosis (CF) noninvasively, the role of lung function testing in infancy and early childhood remains less clear than in older children with CF. The aim of this review is to summarize available data, discuss the information gained from these publications, and put this information into perspective with more recent developments of lung function testing in both infants and older children with CF. While some of the available data have been the foundation of the current level of understanding of respiratory physiology in CF, interpretation of other data has been hampered by differences between centers with regard to the methods and equipment used, patient selection, small number of subjects, and lack of appropriate reference data. A structured multicenter approach based on recently published recommendations for the measurement of lung function in infancy, together with pursuit of recent developments such as assessment of raised lung volume flow volume curves and ventilation inhomogeneity may help to more effectively utilize lung function tests in infants in the future.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

What do parents of wheezy children understand by "wheeze"?

BACKGROUND: Reported wheeze is the cornerstone of asthma diagnosis. AIMS: To determine what parents understand by wheeze. METHODS: Two studies were undertaken: (1) Parents of clinic attendees with reported wheeze (n=160) were asked by questionnaire what they understood by "wheeze" and how they knew their child was wheezy. Responses were compared to definitions of wheeze in 12 epidemiology studies and their response options. (2) The extent of agreement of parents' reports (n=139) of acute wheezing in their children and clinicians' findings of "wheeze" and "asthma" was examined. RESULTS: (1) "Sound" and "difficulty in breathing" were perceived central to "wheeze". "What you hear" was not selected by 23% (95% confidence interval (CI) 16-30%). "Whistling" was mentioned by 11% (CI 6-15%) but featured in 11 of 12 epidemiology questionnaires. (2) There was les than 50% agreement between parents' and clinicians' reports of wheeze and asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Conceptual understandings of "wheeze" for parents of children with reported wheeze are different from epidemiology definitions. Parents' reports of acute wheeze and clinicians' findings also differ.

Asthma↗