Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S C Gallagher

Publications and source records attributed to S C Gallagher.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-titration study of oral pilocarpine for treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of pilocarpine hydrochloride for symptomatic relief of postradiation xerostomia symptoms and for saliva production in patients with head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-two head and neck cancer patients who had received at least 40 Gy of radiation (117 patients had received > 60 Gy) with clinically significant xerostomia were enrolled onto a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center clinical investigation. Patients received 2.5-mg tablets for the first 4 weeks, 5.0-mg tablets for the second 4 weeks, and 10.0-mg tablets for the last 4 weeks of the 12-week study. Patients were allowed to titrate pilocarpine or placebo for improvement in symptoms or to reduce side effects. Patients were evaluated for symptomatic relief by questionnaires and visual analog scales (VAS), and for saliva production by sialometry. RESULTS: Pilocarpine produced a significant improvement (P = .035) in overall global assessments compared with placebo. There was a statistically significant (P = .020) decreased use of oral comfort agents such as artificial saliva, hard candy, and water. Values for symptomatic improvement in dryness approached significance (P = .057). There were statistically significant postdose improvements in whole and parotid salivary flow in pilocarpine treatment groups versus placebo. All pilocarpine dosages tested were judged to be safe. Adverse experiences were primarily sweating, rhinitis, headache, nausea, and urinary frequency, with the most common side effect being mild to moderate sweating. There were no serious drug-related adverse experiences in any of the pilocarpine treatment groups. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that pilocarpine produces clinically significant benefits for the symptomatic treatment of postradiation xerostomia. Best results were obtained with continuous treatment for 8 to 12 weeks with doses greater than 2.5 mg three times per day.

Administration, Oral↗

Microbial growth patterns in a total parenteral nutrition formulation containing lipid emulsion.

Microbial growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans was evaluated in a standard amino acid-dextrose-based total parenteral nutrition (TPN) solution, 10% lipid emulsion, and a combined TPN formulation containing amino acids, dextrose, and lipid emulsion. At an initial inoculum of 10(4) CFU/ml, all three bacterial organisms grew well in 10% lipid emulsion, died in the standard solution and grew only minimally or died in the combined formulation. C. albicans grew in all three formulations at an initial inoculum of 10(4) CFU/ml; however, at an initial inoculum of 10(2) CFU/ml, which approximates touch contamination, growth of Candida in the standard and combined formulations was less than 1 log at 24 hr in contrast to the 10% lipid emulsion which showed significant growth greater than 2 log at 24 hr. It is concluded that a 24-hr infusion time is safe for the combined TPN formulation used in this study. This should result in significant cost savings compared to the previously recommended 12-hr infusion time.

Bacteria↗

Esophagogastric decompression and enteral feeding following cholecystectomy: a controlled, randomized prospective trial.

One hundred fourteen patients scheduled to undergo elective cholecystectomy were prospectively randomized into one of four treatment groups to study the potential benefits of esophagogastric decompression with and without immediate postoperative enteral nutrition. Group I was the control, and patients received only iv fluids and were allowed to eat as tolerated. Group II patients received iv fluids and esophagogastric decompression. Group III patients received esophagogastric decompression and enteral sterile water through the duodenal feeding lumen. Group IV patients received esophagogastric decompression and infusion of an elemental diet through the feeding lumen. The surgical techniques were standardized for all patients. The results of the study indicated no statistically or clinically significant differences among any of the treatment groups regarding; (1) need for parenteral analgesics or antiemetics, (2) tolerance of regular diet, (3) postoperative day of discharge, and (4) postoperative day that other discharge criteria were met. It is concluded that there is no objective benefit to the routine use of esophagogastric decompression with or without enteral nutrition in elective cholecystectomy patients.

Cholecystectomy↗