Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Biran

Publications and source records attributed to S Biran.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Construction of freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinsonism.

Background: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common, poorly understood, parkinsonian symptom interfering with daily functioning and quality of life. Assessment of FOG is complex because of the episodic nature of this symptom, and the influence of mental and environmental factors on it.Objective: To design a self-reportable reliable questionnaire for FOG.Method: A questionnaire consisting of 16 items regarding gait and falls was administered together with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) to 40 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients (26 males) with a mean age of 72.3+/-9.3 years and mean Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stage at "Off" of 2.85+/-0.84. A principal component analysis with Varimax rotation was conducted on the results. Item analyses were performed and reliability computed for an abbreviated FOG questionnaire.Results: Based on these analyses, a short (six item) FOG questionnaire was constructed, which was found to be highly reliable (Cronbach alpha=0.94) for assessment of FOG and with moderate correlation with the activity of daily living (ADL) and motor parts of the UPDRS (0.43 and 0.40, respectively). Moderate correlation was also found with the FOG item at the ADL part of the UPDRS (alpha=0.66 for the "Off" and 0.77 for the "On" state).Conclusion: The FOG questionnaire that was constructed is highly reliable in assessing freezing of gait, unrelated to falls, in patients with PD.

Journal Article↗

Chemo-immunotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma using sequential treatment with dacarbazine and recombinant human interleukin-2: evaluation of hematologic and immunologic parameters and correlation with clinical response.

We have treated 18 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (MM) with high-dose IL-2 administered by continuous iv infusion in combination with dacarbazine (DTIC), and correlated the clinical response with various hematologic and immunologic parameters. Two regimens differing in the sequence of treatment were employed, and 1-6 treatment cycles were given, depending on patient response. Two patients had a complete response (CR, 46+m, 14m), two patients a partial response (PR, 16m,6m), one a minimal response and four had a stable disease lasting 2-7 months, thus the response rate (CR+PR) was 22%. None of the following parameters, tested prior to initiation of the therapy and 1-2 days after termination of each course of IL-2, correlated with the clinical response: WBC counts (total and differential), levels of blood CD4 and CD8 T cells, NK cells, monocytes and B cells, production of IL-1 and IL-1 inhibitor by monocytes, responsiveness to 3 mitogens, NK/LAK cell activity, and serum levels of IL-1 alpha, IL-2, soluble IL-2 receptor, and TNF alpha. The only prognostic parameter was the greater increase in the level of IL-2 receptor (Tac)-bearing lymphocytes in the responding patients after 1-3 cycles of IL-2. The data suggests that non-specific immune parameters have no prognostic value for patients undergoing IL-2-based immunotherapy.

Adolescent↗

Second line hormonal therapy with aminoglutethimide in metastatic breast cancer.

One hundred and twenty patients with metastatic breast cancer, whose disease progressed on hormonal therapy with tamoxifen, were treated with aminoglutethimide. The overall response rate was 34% and the median duration of response 9.5 months. Response to aminoglutethimide was achieved in all metastatic sites except lung and brain. Even 25% of patients who had failed to respond to prior tamoxifen did respond objectively to aminoglutethimide. The actuarial survival for all patients at 30 months was 22%. Although initial toxicity was high (70%), side effects of aminoglutethimide were transient, and treatment had to be discontinued in only four patients. The results of this trial confirm that aminoglutethimide is an effective treatment in metastatic breast cancer.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Radiation therapy for locally advanced breast cancer: prognostic factors and complication rate.

A retrospective analysis was carried out in 100 patients with locally advanced breast cancer without distant metastases treated by radiotherapy between 1960 and 1979. The primary tumor was irradiated to a total dose of 60 Gy in 76 patients and to doses ranging between 60 and 80 Gy in 24 patients. The regional lymphatics were treated with doses between 50 and 60 Gy. Following radiotherapy, chemotherapy was administered to 58 patients and hormonal therapy to 29, while 13 patients received no further therapy. Locoregional recurrences were documented in 29% and distant metastases in 49% of patients. The actuarial survival was 56% at 5 years, 21% at 10 years and 14% at 15 years. At 10 years 90% of the surviving patients had some degree of radiation damage.

Adult↗

Cisplatin, bleomycin, and methotrexate (PBM) chemotherapy in locally advanced and metastatic head and neck cancer.

Twenty-two patients with locally advanced or metastatic head and neck tumors received a total of 84 courses of a combination of cisplatin, bleomycin, and Methotrexate (PBM) for a median of four courses per patient (range, 1-7). Among these 22 patients there were four patients (18%) who achieved complete remission (CR) and 13 patients (60%) who had a partial remission (PR). The overall remission rate (CR + PR) thus reached 78%; five patients (22%) progressed while on therapy. The mean duration of objective response (CR + PR) was 8 months; CR lasted a median of 18 months (range, 2-48). Survival was not influenced by tumor histology or by previous surgery. The presence of locoregional disease did adversely affect survival from the onset of chemotherapy (P = 0.1). The rate of survival was also affected by primary tumor site; patients with nasopharyngeal primaries survived longer than all other patients (22 vs. 11 months, P = 0.06). Toxicity to chemotherapy consisted mainly of nausea and vomiting and stomatitis. Three patients developed fever while leukopenic. One patient experienced irreversible renal damage, and another suffered from bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. The high response rate obtained in our group of patients did not have a substantial impact on overall survival. Aggressive, multimodality approaches should be considered in the treatment of these patients when possible.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Systemic administration of doxorubicin-containing liposomes in cancer patients: a phase I study.

A clinical study was designed to evaluate the tolerance of cancer patients to liposome-associated doxorubicin (L-DXR). The liposomes used contain phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol, and DXR intercalated in the lipid bilayer, and have a mean size in the range of 0.3-0.5 microns. Thirty-two patients, most of them with primary or metastatic liver cancer refractory to conventional therapy, were entered into the study. A total of 69 courses of therapy was administered by intravenous infusion of a suspension of L-DXR (0.5-2.0 mg DXR/ml) in physiologic saline at an approximate rate of 2 ml/min given on a 3-week intermittent schedule. The L-DXR and phospholipid doses were escalated from 20 mg/m2 and 0.3 g/m2 to 120 mg/m2 and 3.2 g/m2 respectively. Treatment was generally well tolerated and acute toxic effects such as nausea and vomiting were mild and infrequent. Chills and fever (greater than 38.0 degrees C) were observed in three patients during infusion of L-DXR and in seven patients 6-12 h after the end of infusion. Median WBC nadir counts were 2700, 2300 and 700/microliters at 85, 100 and 120 mg/m2 respectively. All three patients receiving 120 mg/m2 developed grade 4 leukopenia and fever requiring intravenous antibiotics, and, in two of them, severe stomatitis (grades 3 and 4) was observed. Significant hair loss was apparent in all patients receiving doses higher than 50 mg/m2. The maximal tolerated dose of L-DXR appears to be 120 mg/m2, with leukopenia and stomatitis being the dose-limiting factors. While the subacute toxicity of L-DXR appears to be qualitatively similar to that of free DXR, its tolerance exceeds the recommended dose of free DXR (75 mg/m2) in the standard 3-weekly schedule.

Adult↗

Methylprednisolone and chlorpromazine in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy: a prospective non-randomized study.

Seventy-six consecutive patients receiving chemotherapy were evaluated for the antiemetic efficacy and side-effects of the combination of chlorpromazine (CPM) and methylprednisolone (MPN). All patients had previously received the same chemotherapy with metoclopramide in conventional dosage and experienced severe emesis. A significant antiemetic response was achieved in 70% of the patients, and in 28% of them the antiemetic protection was complete. The most common side effects were drowsiness, dry mouth and headache. The combination of CPM and MPN is effective, well tolerated and is recommended for outpatients receiving chemotherapy for cancer.

Adolescent↗

Methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide as antiemetic treatment in patients receiving adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy: a randomized crossover blind study.

Nineteen women receiving their first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer were randomized between two antiemetic drugs: methylprednisolone (MPN) 125mg and metoclopramide (MCP) 20mg, both given by intravenous push as a single dose. The chemotherapy included: cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). The total response rates for MPN and MCP were: complete protection 11% versus 0% and partial protection 63% versus 11% of the patients, respectively (P = 0.007). Eighteen patients (95%) preferred MPN over MCP. Common side effects with both drugs were: drowsiness, headache and diarrhea. MPN is recommended as an antiemetic in patients receiving CMF adjuvant chemotherapy.

Adult↗

5-Fluorouracil, doxorubicin (adriamycin) and mitomycin-C (FAM) in advanced gastric cancer: observations on response, patient characteristics, myelosuppression and delivered dosage.

Forty-four patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma were treated with the fluorouracil, adriamycin and mitomycin-C (FAM) regimen. One was excluded from response evaluation. Partial (PR) and minor (MR) response rates were 7 and 9% respectively. These patients enjoyed remission for a median of 7.0 months. Stabilization (S) occurred in 25% and lasted a median of 6.0 months. No response (NR) was associated with a median survival of 3 months (p less than 0.001). The predominant pretreatment factors to affect survival were diagnosis to treatment interval and initial CEA serum level. Performance status influenced survival less markedly. Toxicity was mainly myelosuppression, which resulted in death of one patient. 'Responders' had marrow suppression more frequently than NR. Comparison of PR + MR, PR + MR + S and NR patient groups showed median minimum WBC counts of 1.4 x 10(3), 2.6 x 10(3) and 4.3 x 10(3) per mm3 respectively. Leukopenia (less than 3,000/mm3) was associated with a median survival advantage of 9.5 versus 3.5 months (p less than 0.05) and did not depend significantly on given FAM dosage. The median dosage of FAM agents delivered to nonresponders was reduced. A trend of dose-response (including dose-survival) relationship was found but was inconclusive statistically.

Adult↗

Chlorpromazine and dexamethasone versus high-dose metoclopramide and dexamethasone in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy, particularly cis-platinum: a prospective randomized crossover study.

Sixty-nine patients with malignant tumors receiving cancer chemotherapy, 90% including cis-platinum, were evaluated in a randomized crossover study for the antiemetic efficacy and the side effects of two antiemetic regimens: chlorpromazine (CPM) 2.5 mg/kg in 5 doses plus dexamethasone (DXM) 0.2 mg/kg in 2 doses, and high-dose metoclopramide (HD-MCP) 10 mg/kg in 5 doses plus the same dose of DXM. In 69% of 173 courses of chemotherapy, antiemetic response was achieved, and in 26% emesis was completely prevented. There was no statistical difference in the response to the antiemetic regimens, but 65% of the patients who completed 3 courses of chemotherapy preferred HD-MCP plus DXM. The main side effects of the treatment were drowsiness, nervousness, diarrhea and extrapyramidal reactions. HD-MCP plus DXM is recommended as a first line antiemetic treatment in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Patients resistant to this treatment should receive CPM plus DXM treatment.

Adolescent↗

Chemotherapeutic and surgical induction of pathological complete remission and whole abdominal irradiation for consolidation does not enhance the cure of stage III ovarian carcinoma.

Thirty-eight patients with stage III ovarian carcinoma were treated with a protocol consisting of an initial phase of induction of remission with cyclophosphamide, hexamethylmelamine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CHAD) combination chemotherapy and a second laparotomy for resection of residual tumors, followed by a consolidation phase with curative doses of whole abdominal radiation. Six patients (16%) had stage IIIA disease, ten (26%) IIIB, and 22 (58%) had stage IIIC disease. All patients received three to 14 courses of CHAD chemotherapy with a clinical response rate (complete [CR] and partial [PR]) of 91%. Thirty-three patients underwent the second operation. In 14 patients no residual tumor was found, and in another 11 residual tumors found were totally resected. Thus, 25 of 33 (76%) were classified as in pathological complete remission (PCR) after this operation. Whole abdominal irradiation was well tolerated, although 12 of 29 (42%) of the irradiated patients required more than a 2-week interruption of the treatment course because of leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia. The actuarial 5-year survival and disease-free survival rates for the whole group were 27% and 17%, respectively, and for the 29 patients who received the complete sequence of the prescribed protocol treatments, 35% and 20%, respectively. A univariate analysis of clinical parameters showed that inherent biological features, such as histology and grade, were the most dominant factors affecting prognosis, and that neither the aggressive surgical approach employed, nor the high-dose whole abdominal irradiation, significantly affected the outcome. The long-term results suggest that although our combined modality protocol was well tolerated, it failed to enhance the cure of stage III ovarian carcinoma. The possible biological and therapeutic vectors affecting this outcome are discussed.

Abdomen↗

Characterization of prolactin receptors and their distribution among American and Israeli women with breast cancer: implications for prediction of hormonal dependency and treatment.

A micro-method is reported for the determination and characterization of prolactin (PRL) receptors in human breast cancer specimens using either intact biopsy tissue or the pellet fraction remaining from biopsies previously processed for steroid hormone receptors. Labeled human PRL is used as the ligand. The specific PRL-binding of 307 human breast cancer specimens was evaluated by this micro-method. A significant level of specific PRL-binding (3-25 fmol per mg membrane protein) was detected in 41% of US breast cancer patients and 42% of Israeli patients. Scatchard analyses, performed on pooled membrane fractions with the highest specific PRL-binding revealed one class of receptors having a dissociation constant, Kd = 4.1 x 10(-9), and specific binding capacity, Bmax = 1.3 pmol per mg protein. These preparations were exposed to 3 M MgCl2, which dissociates the endogenous-bound PRL from the hormone-receptor complex and allows the characterization of the "total" PRL receptors. Two classes of receptors were then revealed. One class of receptors showed high affinity (Kd1 = 8.1 x 10(-10) M) and low capacity (Bmax1 = 335 fmol per mg protein), while the other possessed lower affinity (Kd2 = 8.2 x 10(-8) M), but a higher capacity (Bmax2 = 34.4 pmol per mg protein). Since PRL facilitates the growth of human breast cancer cell lines, these results indicate that a high proportion of human breast cancers may be PRL dependent. Routine determination of PRL receptors in biopsies of human breast cancer may permit the selection of a better treatment, since it is possible that the reduction in PRL levels could inhibit those tumors which are prolactin dependent.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Lack of relationship between the levels of prolactin receptors and steroid receptors in women with breast cancer.

The levels of prolactin receptors (PRL-R), based on a new micro-method, estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PG-R), were determined in 159 breast cancer specimens. Sixty-seven of 159 tumors (42%) had PRL-R levels of 20 fmol/mg protein or higher, and were regarded as PRL-R positive. In 60 of the 159 samples (38%), no PRL-R could be detected, and the remaining 32 samples (20%) were considered borderline. While a positive correlation was found between the presence of ER and PGR, no correlation was detected between PRL-R and any steroid receptors (r = -0.024 for ER vs PRL-R, 0.052 for PGR vs PRL-R and 0.002 for ER + PGR vs PRL-R). Furthermore, PRL-R in levels of 20 fmol/mg protein or higher were found in 35% of samples in which no steroid receptors were detected as well as in 38% and in 27% of samples which exhibited positive ER or PGR respectively (greater than or equal to 20 fmol/mg protein). On the other hand, in 47% of the samples possessing both ER and PGR, the PRL receptors could not be found. These results clearly demonstrate that in the human breast cancer, the presence of PRL-R is independent of the status of either ER or PGR. It is suggested that the measurement of PRL-R could serve as a chemical marker to guide a possible therapeutic use of PRL-suppressing drugs in women with breast cancer.

Adult↗

Adjuvant chemotherapy with and without radiotherapy in stage II breast cancer.

The influence of several variables on the effectiveness of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy given to 87 patients with stage II breast cancer was retrospectively analyzed. CMF was given in optimal doses (greater than or equal to 85% of the planned dose) to 17% of the patients; in intermediate doses (66-84% of the planned dose) to 50% of the patients; and in low doses (less than or equal to 65% of the planned dose) to 33% of the patients. Radiotherapy before CMF was given to 68% of the patients; simultaneous radio- and chemotherapy to 17% of the patients; and the remaining 15% received CMF only. At a median follow-up of 8 yr, 61% of the patients were still alive; 54% of them were disease-free. Patients receiving radio- and chemotherapy concomitantly had a higher relapse-free survival (RFS) than those given both treatments sequentially (77% versus 46%; P = 0.05). Dose levels of CMF did not influence RFS. Delay in initiation of CMF, mainly due to the administration of prior radiotherapy was deleterious: patients started on CMF within 3 months of diagnosis had a 77% 8 yr RFS, as compared with 44% for those with a delay of over 3 months (P = 0.01). No differences in local relapse rates were observed between irradiated and non-irradiated patients, although 87% of all distant failures occurred in patients who received radio- and chemotherapy sequentially. The data of this study indicate that delay in onset of CMF is deleterious, and can be avoided by the simultaneous administration of both treatment modalities, since this approach was well tolerated, without significant myelotoxicity.

Actuarial Analysis↗