Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Baehrendtz

Publications and source records attributed to S Baehrendtz.

33 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Lung and chest wall mechanics during differential ventilation with selective PEEP.

Eight patients free from cardio-pulmonary disease and with a mean age of 46 years were studied during general anaesthesia in the lateral position. Measurements of hemithoracic mechanics were made during four different modes of ventilation: 1. Conventional ventilation (free distribution of ventilation) with no positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (CV), 2. differential ventilation (50% of ventilation to each lung) with no PEEP (DV:0), and 3 and 4. DV with selective PEEP of 0.8 and 1.6 kPa, respectively, to the dependent lung only (DV:8, DV:16). During CV, 60% of ventilation was distributed to the non-dependent lung. Non-dependent hemithoracic compliance was 64% greater and inspiratory resistance 39% lower than those of the dependent hemithorax. No significant differences between the two hemithoraces were noted during DV:0, but on application of selective PEEP the compliance of the dependent hemithorax increased and its resistance decreased. With DV:16, the compliances of the two hemithoraces were essentially equal, as were their resistances. Selective PEEP caused a larger volume increase in the dependent lung than general PEEP. Selective PEEP reduced the volume of the non-dependent lung but only by 1/3 of the simultaneous increase in that of the dependent lung. Oesophageal pressure increased only slightly on selective inflation of the dependent lung, and remained negative within the 21 volume range studied. It is suggested that the altered mechanics of the dependent lung during selective PEEP result in a more even distribution of the inspired gas within that lung.

Adult↗

Differential ventilation with selective PEEP in bilateral lung disease.

A patient with severe, acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to bilateral lung disease has been treated with a new ventilation concept aimed at improving the vertical match of ventilation and perfusion. The patient suffered from severe hypoxemia in spite of artificial ventilation with high PEEP and high inspired oxygen fraction. He was intubated with a double lumen bronchial catheter and placed in the lateral decubital posture, whereafter each lung was ventilated in accordance with its assumed perfusion, and selective PEEP of 10-15 cm H2O to the dependent and 0-5 cm H2O to the non-dependent lung was applied. Differential ventilation with selective PEEP resulted in a substantial improvement in pulmonary gas exchange in two separate periods of 3-4 days. The technique thus proved to be efficient and also clinically feasible in a standard intensive care unit.

Aged↗

Variations of regional lung function in acute respiratory failure and during anaesthesia.

Acute respiratory failure and anaesthesia impede ventilation of dependent lung units and perfusion of non-dependent ones, creating considerable ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatch. General PEEP can improve V/Q but it cannot restore it to normal. To improve matching, ventilation must be distributed in proportion to regional blood flow. This can be accomplished by (1) placing the subject in the lateral position, (2) ventilating each lung in proportion to its blood flow (differential ventilation), and (3) applying PEEP solely to the dependent lung to ensure even distribution of inspired gas within that lung (selective PEEP). Differential ventilation with equal distribution of the tidal volume between the lungs and a selective PEEP of 10 cm H2O to the dependent lung resulted in equal distribution of perfusion between the lungs in anaesthetized healthy subjects, suggesting "optimum" V/Q matching. Using this ventilator setting as a rule of thumb in patients with acute, severe, bilateral lung disease, arterial oxygen tension was improved by an average of 45% compared with that during general PEEP, with no reduction in cardiac output. It is concluded that differential ventilation with selective PEEP can offer considerable improvement in gas exchange in acute, bilateral lung disease. However, long-term studies are required before a final evaluation can be made.

Acute Disease↗

Practical aspects of differential ventilation with selective peep in acute respiratory failure.

Hypoxaemia in association with acute respiratory failure continues to be a severe problem in some intensive care patients. Among strategies proposed, we want to focus attention on differential ventilation with selective PEEP, administered in the lateral position. This ventilation technique has proved successful in the treatment of refractory hypoxaemia due to severe bilateral lung disease. The rationale of this concept is briefly presented in this paper, where the main emphasis is laid on the practical aspects of its clinical application. Two case reports are included as examples of our experiences.

Acute Disease↗

Ventilation and perfusion of each lung during differential ventilation with selective PEEP.

Lung perfusion was studied in 10 patients (mean age 58 yr) in the lateral position during enflurane anesthesia. They were ventilated through a double-lumen endotracheal catheter: 1) by one ventilator with free distribution of ventilation between the lungs, with no (zero) end-respiratory pressure (ZEEP); 2) as above but with a general positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 9 cmH2O; or 3) by two ventilators with equal distribution of ventilation between the lungs and with a selective PEEP of 8 cmH2O to the dependent lung only. Total ventilation was on average 8 l/min (BTPS) throughout the study. During the first method, 34% of ventilation was distributed to the dependent and 66% to the nondependent lung. Cardiac output (thermodilution) was 4.5 l/min, 57% being distributed to the dependent lung as assessed by iv boli of Xenon 133. During the second method, ventilation was assumed to be distributed equally between the lungs. Cardiac output was decreased to 3.8 l/min, and the dependent lung received 81% of lung blood flow. During the third method, cardiac output was significantly greater than during the second method (4.1 l/min), 51% passing to the dependent lung. Peak and end-inspiratory airway pressures were 5-18 cm H2O lower during selective than during general PEEP. Arterial oxygen tension was significantly greater during the third method than during either of the other ventilator settings and the alveolar-arterial oxygen tension difference was almost halved compared with the first method. It is concluded that differential ventilation with selective PEEP improves ventilation-perfusion matching and thus oxygenation.

Adult↗

Differential ventilation and selective positive end-expiratory pressure: effects on patients with acute bilateral lung disease.

Eleven patients with acute respiratory failure due to diffuse, bilateral lung disease were treated according to a new ventilation concept. The patients were intubated with a double-lumen catheter and positioned in the lateral decubital posture. With two synchronized ventilators, each lung received half of the tidal volume (VT), in accordance with its presumed perfusion (differential ventilation--DV), and the end-expiratory pressure was increased locally in the dependent lung (selective PEEP). DV with and without selective PEEP was compared with conventional ventilation with free distribution of VT, with and without PEEP applied to both lungs. The major findings were that DV with a selective PEEP of 12 cmH2O to the dependent lung decreased venous admixture by 38% (P less than 0.01) in comparison with conventional ventilation with no PEEP. Furthermore, it was found that selective PEEP, in contrast to general PEEP, had no deleterious effect on cardiac output. Consequently, DV with selective PEEP increased arterial oxygen tension by 23% (P less than 0.05) compared with general PEEP and by 46% (P less than 0.001) in comparison with conventional ventilation with no PEEP.

Acute Disease↗

Differential ventilation and selective PEEP during anaesthesia in the lateral decubitus posture.

The potential of differential ventilation (DV) with selective positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been tested versus conventional ventilation with and without general PEEP. Gas exchange and central haemodynamics were studied in 15 subjects with no clinical or radiological signs of pulmonary disease. The rationale of the method was to ensure ventilation of the well-perfused dependent lung and to counteract airway closure within that lung. The subjects were intubated with a double-lumen catheter prior to scheduled abdominal surgery. During general anaesthesia in the lateral posture, they were given DV. The mean inspired oxygen fraction was 0.32. Fifty per cent ("even" tidal volume (VT) distribution) or 70% ("inverted" VT distribution) of the inspired volume was administered to the dependent lung. Two synchronized ventilators were used. In eight subjects DV was also combined with PEEP applied solely to the dependent lung (selective PEEP). The major findings were that DV with even VT distribution reduced venous admixture by 26% (P less than 0.05) and the alveolo-arterial oxygen tension gradient (P(A-a)o2) by 30% (P less than 0.05) in comparison with conventional ventilation in the lateral position. The addition of selective PEEP further reduced the P(A-a)o2 by 13%. P(A-a)o2 was consequently 43% lower than during conventional ventilation without PEEP in the lateral posture (P less than 0.01). Selective PEEP also had less impact on cardiac output than general PEEP (P less than 0.05). It is concluded that DV with even distribution of VT and selective PEEP can reduce the P(A-a)o2 in anaesthetized lung-healthy subjects in the lateral position.

Adult↗

Differential ventilation in acute bilateral lung disease. Influence on gas exchange and central haemodynamics.

Eight patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to diffuse and rather uniform lung disease were intubated with a double-lumen bronchial tube and ventilated in the lateral decubital position by two synchronized ventilators. Ventilation of each lung was individually adjusted to match the expected regional blood flow (differential ventilation). When ventilation with equal volumes (i.e. 50% of tidal volume to each lung) was performed, a 19% reduction of venous admixture (P less than 0.001) and a 22% increment in arterial oxygen tension (P less than 0.001) were seen. Comcomitantly, the cardiac output increased by 17% (P less than 0.001), to which a reduced pulmonary vascular resistance may have contributed. The net result was a 14% increment of the oxygen availability (P less than 0.001). An attempt to go further, giving 2/3 of the tidal ventilation to the dependent lung, was made on six of the patients. However, this ventilatory pattern did not further improve the gas exchange and also had detrimental effects on the haemodynamics. It is concluded that differential ventilation with equal tidal volumes in the lateral position can substantially improve gas exchange and central haemodynamics in patients with ARF due to diffuse lung disease.

Acute Disease↗

Selective PEEP in acute bilateral lung disease. Effect on patients in the lateral posture.

Seven patients with acute respiratory failure due to diffuse and fairly uniform lung disease were studied during mechanical ventilation in the lateral decubital position with: (a) zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) through a double-lumen oro-bronchial tube to permit a recording of the ventilation to each lung; (b) bilateral positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 1.2 kPa, with maintenance of ventilation distribution between lungs as observed during ZEEP; (c) selective PEEP of 1.2 kPa, applied to the dependent lung only, with ventilation as during ZEEP; and (d) conventional PEEP of 1.2 kPa applied to both lungs through a single-lumen tube, with free distribution of ventilation between the lungs. During ZEEP, 69% of ventilation was distributed to the non-dependent and 31% to the dependent lung; cardiac output was 6.51 X min-1, venous admixture (QS/QT) 40% and arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) 8.3 kPa. With bilateral PEEP, functional residual capacity (FRC) increased by 0.331, cardiac output was reduced to 5.11 X min-1 and venous admixture to 32%. PaO2 increased to 10.1 kPa. With selective PEEP the dependent lung FRC increased by 0.211 and the FRC of the non-dependent lung decreased by 0.081. Cardiac output increased to 6.11 X min-1, which was no longer significantly different from that during ZEEP. Venous admixture remained at the same level as with bilateral PEEP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗

Regional differences in lung function during anaesthesia and intensive care: clinical implications.

Anaesthesia and most frequently acute respiratory failure are accompanied by a lowered functional residual capacity (FRC). This lowering promotes airway closure in dependent lung units and forces ventilation to non-dependent regions. Perfusion, on the other hand, is forced towards dependent lung units. A ventilation-perfusion mismatch is created and hypoxaemia may develop. General PEEP counters airway closure, but impedes cardiac output and forces perfusion further to dependent regions. In addition, barotrauma may occur. Improved matching of ventilation and perfusion can be achieved by: (1) positioning the subject in the lateral posture; (2) ventilating each lung separately in proportion to its perfusion (differential ventilation); and (3) applying PEEP only to the dependent lung (selective PEEP). Because of less overall intrathoracic pressure and lung expansion, interference with the total lung blood flow and the danger of barotrauma should be less than with general PEEP. Improved gas exchange with a 50-100% increase in PaO2 has been observed in a limited number of patients with acute bilateral lung disease studied so far during differential ventilation and selective PEEP.

Anesthesia↗

Statistical models for prediction of arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions during mechanical ventilation.

The possibility of constructing statistical models for prediction of alveolar oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions has been investigated in 20 mechanically ventilated patients in acute respiratory failure (ARF). Linear multiple regression analysis using PaCO2 and PaO2 as dependent variables was used to construct (a) models for individual patients, (b) models for specific diagnostic groups and (c) general models (all patients). The coefficient of determination (R2) was highest for the individual patient models (0.38-0.99) and lowest for the general models (0.28-0.49). In order to achieve a high predictive accuracy, models matching individual patients should be constructed on the basis of initial invasive blood gas measurement. Statistically derived models may bring better understanding of the behaviour of factors influencing arterial gas tensions in ARF and may be of value in the management of patients on mechanical ventilation.

Adult↗

Differential ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Indications and outcome.

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a life-threatening condition which frequently requires ventilatory support. Many patients die of hypoxaemia despite a high inspired oxygen concentration and application of general positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Differential ventilation has been used in selected patients with unilateral lung disease or with large inequalities in pathology between the two lungs. An important contributor to the hypoxaemia is a vertical inequality in the ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching. This can be compensated for by placing the patient in the lateral position, ventilating each lung separately in proportion to its assumed blood flow, and applying PEEP selectively to the dependent lung to counteract airway closure and alveolar collapse and thus improve the gas distribution within that lung. This ventilatory regime should promote V/Q matching better than general PEEP, and will not impede cardiac output. Major improvement in gas exchange has been achieved in short-term experiments and in prolonged ventilator treatment of patients with ARF.

Acute Disease↗