Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S A Schroeder

Publications and source records attributed to S A Schroeder.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

The hospitalist: new boon for internal medicine or retreat from primary care?

The growing reliance on hospitalists in the United States has implications for several areas of internal medicine, including patient care, administration, clinical practice, and medical education. This paper discusses some of the potential advantages and disadvantages of the use of hospitalists in each of these areas. The new hospitalist practice mode highlights long-standing tensions about the role and direction of internal medicine, tensions that affect generalist and specialty care in both outpatient and hospital settings. The career trajectory of hospitalists will depend on whether burnout is a problem and on whether hospitalists will be able to compete effectively with sub-specialists, such as cardiologists and physicians specializing in AIDS. Clearly, hospitalism meets a clinical need and expands opportunities for internists, but it is important that it not overreach, forfeiting primary care turf and distorting medical education. This new field warrants close monitoring because of its potential effects and because-unlike related fields, such as emergency medicine and intensive care--its birth was strongly influenced by system-wide financial considerations.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Understanding health behavior and speaking out on the uninsured: two leadership opportunities.

The author reviews the growth of managed care and its transforming effect on academic medical centers. He then maintains that in this time of fundamental changes and stress, academic medical centers should not only attend to the organization and financing of the clinical enterprise and the enhancement of biomedical research capacity, but also ask how academic medicine can live up to the unique opportunities and responsibilities it has been entrusted with to improve the health of the public, particularly in two neglected areas. First, if the nation does not expand the research agenda to include social and behavioral factors involved in preventable causes of morbidity and mortality, it will fail to maximize the dividends from the generous public investment in research and fail to learn how to promote healthy personal behavior. Academic medicine can promote such behavior by increasing the science base of prevention and translating into action what is already known, including how to market that knowledge so the public will respond. Second, the number of the medically uninsured is increasing; the largest percentage are the working poor. It is becoming more difficult for teaching hospitals to continue providing a third of the nation's uncompensated care. The author shares a variety of statistics about the uninsured and their care, and maintains that academic medicine, which has been entrusted with the health of the public, can declare that the high number of the uninsured is not acceptable and is a dangerous side effect of the U.S. health care system that must be treated. Doing so will also set an example to medical students and trainees that medicine's responsibility is to all Americans.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed1999

Person of the year. Steven A. Schroeder, MD.

The mission of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is to improve the health and health care of all Americans. An ambitious goal, but the Foundation has the financial resources to do just that. The Foundation also has another resource: President and Chief Executive Officer Steven A. Schroeder, MD, who has led the philanthropic organization since 1990. For his work with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Dr. Schroeder is New Jersey Medicine's 1999 Person of the Year.

Foundations↗
PubMed1998

Scientific evidence and research in primary care.

The key areas of scientific research in general internal medicine are (1) prevention; (2) the natural history of common illnesses; (3) improving the outcomes and efficiency of the health care system and (4) orphan diseases. Disease prevention is at the top of the list because of the enormous role preventable causes play in morbidity and mortality, above all tobacco. Research in this field is difficult because it touches such questions as individual behaviour and personal choice. Research in the natural history of common illnesses is critical to informed patient decision making. Recent studies show that procedures thought to be safe bear a high percentage of complications, when viewed from the generalist's point of view: high incidence of strokes after elective coronary bypass surgery; higher mortality rates among patients having had pulmonary catheterization; high incidence of incontinence and impotence after transurethral resection of the prostate. A third area for research in primary care is how to improve outcome and efficiency through improvements in the health care delivery system. This field touches the problem of unnecessary surgical interventions and inappropriate prescription of antibiotics. Orphan diseases in this context are conditions no speciality wants to study, such as dementia and low back pain. The most important obstacle for research in the field of general internal medicine is funding. It is much easier to be funded for research in high profile conditions, like heart disease, cancer and AIDS. A second barrier to research relates to the role of special interest groups in influencing not only funding but also policy. Important examples were the pressure on consensus conference decisions on the role of spinal fusion surgery for low back pain and on the question whether women between 40 and 50 should have annual mammography. For generalist research to be fruitful it is of outmost importance to have an adequate intellectual infrastructure, i.e. support by epidemiologists, biostatisticians, economists and research methodologists.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗