Biomedical subjects

S A Johnsson

Publications and source records attributed to S A Johnsson.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Independent checking of the delivered dose for high-energy X-rays using a hand-held PC.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The requirements on the delivered dose in radical radiation therapy are extremely high. The dose should be within a few percent and also delivered with high accuracy in space. Vendors and users have successfully managed to implement radiation therapy systems, which are able to achieve these demands with high accuracy and reproducibility. These systems include computerized tomography scanners, treatment planning systems, simulators, treatment machines, and record and verify systems. More and more common are also computer networks to assure data integrity when transferring information between the systems. Even if these systems are commissioned and kept under quality assurance programs to maintain their accuracy, errors may be introduced. Especially, the human factor is an uncontrolled parameter that may introduce errors. Thus, unintentional changes or incorrect handling of data may occur during clinical use of the equipment. Having an independent dose calculation system implemented in the daily quality assurance process may assure a high quality of treatments and avoidance of severe errors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To accomplish this, a system of equations for calculating the absorbed dose to the prescription point from the set-up information, has been compiled into a dose-calculation engine. The model is based on data completely independent of the treatment planning system (TPS). The fundamental parameter in the dose engine is the linear attenuation coefficient for the primary photons. This parameter can readily be determined experimentally. The dose calculation engine has been programmed into a hand-held PC allowing direct calculation of the dose to the prescription point when the first treatment is delivered to the patient. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The model is validated with measurements and is shown to be within +/-1.0% (1 SD). Comparison against a state-of-the-art TPS shows an average difference of 0.3% with a standard deviation of +/-2.1%. An action level covering 95% of the cases has been chosen, i.e. +/-4.0%. Deviations larger than this are with a high probability due to erroneous handling of the patient set-up data. This system has been implemented into the daily clinical quality control program.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2000

On beam quality and stopping power ratios for high-energy x-rays.

The aim of this work is to quantitatively compare two commonly used beam quality indices, IPR(20/10) and %dd(10)x, with respect to their ability to predict stopping power ratios (water to air), s(w,air), for high-energy x-rays. In particular, effects due to a varied amount of filtration of the photon beam will be studied. A new method for characterizing beam quality is also presented, where the information we strive to obtain is the moments of the spectral distribution. We will show how the moments enter into a general description of the transmission curve and that it is possible to correlate the moments to s(w,air) with a unique and simple relationship. Comparisons with TPR(20/10) and %dd(10), show that the moments are well suited for beam quality specification in terms of choosing the correct s(w,air).

Air↗

PubMed1999

Transmission measurements in air using the ESTRO mini-phantom.

The aim of this work is to study the possibility of using the ESTRO mini-phantom for transmission measurements of primary kerma in water at a point free in air. We discuss in-air measurements in general, with special attention given to in-air equivalent measurements using a water equivalent mini-phantom. The study includes four different photon energies (4, 6, 10 and 18 MV), where scoring of dose and primary kerma inside a mini-phantom in narrow beam geometry is performed with the Monte Carlo code EGS4. The results reveal that relative measurements (i.e. with and without a water absorber present) at 10 cm depth in a mini-phantom do not represent the variation of primary kerma in water at a point free in air (deviations as large as 7% at 4 MV are observed). Minimum deviations are obtained at depths somewhat larger than the depth of dose maximum. The observed deviations are due to a considerable beam hardening in the water absorber, which changes the amount of attenuation and scatter inside the mini-phantom.

Monte Carlo Method↗

PubMed1997

Off-axis primary-dose measurements using a mini-phantom.

The characterization of the incident photon beam is usually divided into its dependence on collimator setting (head-scatter factor) and off-axis position (primary off-axis ratio). These parameters are normally measured "in air" with a build-up cap thick enough to generate full dose build-up at the depth of dose maximum. In order to prevent any influence from contaminating electrons, it has been recommended that head-scatter measurements are carried out using a mini-phantom rather than a conventional build-up cap. Due to the volume of the mini-phantom, the effects from attenuation and scatter are not negligible. In relative head-scatter measurements these effects cancel and the head scatter is thus a good representation of the variation of the incident photon beam with collimator setting. However, in off-axis measurements, attenuation and scatter conditions vary due to beam softening and do not cancel in the calculation of the primary off-axis ratio. The purpose of the present work was to estimate the effects from attenuation and phantom scatter in order to determine their influence on primary off-axis ratio measurements. We have characterized the off-axis beam-softening effect by means of narrow-beam transmission measurements to obtain the effective attenuation coefficient as a function of off-axis position. We then used a semi-analytical expression for the phantom-scatter calculation that depends solely on this attenuation coefficient. The derived formalism for relative "in air" measurements using a mini-phantom is clear and consistent, which enables the user to separately calculate the effects from scatter and attenuation. For the investigated beam qualities, 6 and 18 MV, our results indicate that the effects from attenuation and scatter in the mini-phantom nearly cancel (the combined effect is less than 1%) within 12.5 cm from the central beam axis. Thus, no correction is needed when the primary off-axis ratio is measured with a mini-phantom.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗