Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S A Cooper

Publications and source records attributed to S A Cooper.

96 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Picenadol in a large multicenter dental pain study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the analgesic dose of picenadol hydrochloride equal to codeine 60 mg in a dental pain model. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, parallel, dose-response study. SETTING: Four university-based dental clinics. PATIENTS: Four hundred eight adult patients with moderate or severe pain after extraction of one or more impacted molar teeth plus bone removal. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received orally administered single doses of picenadol 15 and 30 mg, codeine phosphate 30 and 90 mg, or placebo. METHODS: Single oral doses of picenadol 15 and 30 mg, an opioid agonist-antagonist, were compared with codeine 30 and 90 mg and placebo in 408 patients with moderate or severe pain from third molar extraction in a randomized, double-blind, parallel study. Assessments were performed for pain intensity, pain relief, and adverse events for up to 6 hours after drug administration. MAIN RESULTS: Picenadol 30 mg and codeine 90 mg were more effective than placebo based on sum of pain intensity differences, total pain relief, peak pain relief, and duration of analgesia (p < 0.05). Compared with placebo, the frequency of adverse events was highest for patients receiving codeine 90 mg (p < 0.05). No patients discontinued due to adverse events, and all such events resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Picenadol 22 mg was estimated to be equianalgesic to codeine 60 mg, and picenadol 30 mg was safe in this dental pain model.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Bromfenac sodium, acetaminophen/oxycodone, ibuprofen, and placebo for relief of postoperative pain.

The objective of this double-masked, parallel-group, multicenter, inpatient study was to compare bromfenac with an acetaminophen/oxycodone combination and ibuprofen in patients who had pain due to abdominal gynecologic surgery. In the 8-hour, single-dose phase, 238 patients received single oral doses of bromfenac (50 or 100 mg), acetaminophen 650 mg/oxycodone 10 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg, or placebo. In the multiple-dose phase, 204 patients received bromfenac, acetaminophen/oxycodone, or ibuprofen for up to 5 days. In the single-dose phase, both bromfenac doses produced peak analgesic responses equivalent to acetaminophen/oxycodone, but the responses to bromfenac were longer lasting. Bromfenac produced significantly better overall (8-hour) analgesic summed scores than acetaminophen/oxycodone. Ibuprofen was less efficacious than the other analgesics. The remedication rate was lower in both bromfenac groups than in the other treatment groups. The acetaminophen/oxycodone group reported more somnolence and vomiting. Single doses of bromfenac provided analgesia at least equivalent to that of the acetaminophen/oxycodone combination, with a longer duration of action. Both doses of bromfenac and acetaminophen/oxycodone were superior to ibuprofen in this study.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Analgesic efficacy and safety of two oral controlled-release morphine preparations in orthopedic postoperative pain.

This single-dose, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study compared the analgesic efficacy and safety of MS Contin (MSC) and Oramorph SR (OSR), two controlled-release preparations of oral morphine sulfate, in patients following orthopedic surgery. One hundred patients received MSC 30 mg, MSC 60 mg, or OSR 60 mg (two 30-mg tablets) when postoperative pain became moderate or severe. Patients self-rated pain intensity and relief on categorical (CAT) and visual analogue scales (VAS) hourly for up to 12 hours. MSC 60 mg produced the greatest peak analgesic effect and was more efficacious than OSR 60 mg through the sixth hour, with statistical significance achieved at 1, 2, and 3 hours postdosage. Compared with OSR 60 mg, both MSC dosages provided significantly more rapid times to peak effect by CAT and VAS ratings. The OSR group experienced almost twice as many adverse events as did the two MSC groups and also reported somnolence and dizziness more frequently. MSC 60 mg provided more rapid and greater peak analgesia with fewer adverse effects than did OSR 60 mg.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Double-blind comparison of an acetaminophen-codeine-caffeine combination in oral surgery pain.

The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the contribution of low dosages of codeine and caffeine when added to acetaminophen. Subjects were dental outpatients undergoing oral surgery involving bone removal. This was a single-dose, parallel group, double-blind assay evaluting 99 subjects. The treatment groups were acetaminophen 1000 mg, acetaminophen 1000 mg + codeine 16 mg + caffeine 30 mg and placebo. The results demonstrated that both active treatments were superior to placebo. Overall, the combination was slightly better than acetaminophen alone. The advantage of the combination appeared more evident in the "severe" baseline pain group.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Efficacy of low dose combination analgesics: acetaminophen/codeine, aspirin/butalbital/caffeine/codeine, and placebo in oral surgery pain.

A double-blind, randomized, single-dose study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of two commonly prescribed combination analgesic products to placebo. The combinations were acetaminophen 300 mg/codeine 30 mg(†), and aspirin 325 mg/butalbital 50 mg/caffeine 40 mg/codeine 30 mg(††). One hundred twenty-three (123) oral surgery outpatients took study medications when their pain became moderate to severe and recorded the levels of pain intensity, pain relief, anxiety and relaxation at 30 minutes and hourly for 6 hours after dosing. Remedication was permitted if study medications did not provide adequate pain relief. Time to remedication, and the number of observations with 50% or better relief, were noted as were any side effects. An overall evaluation was obtained from each patient. Results of the study showed that the aspirin/butalbital/caffeine/codeine combination was significantly more effective than placebo for total pain relief, peak relief and global evaluation. While the acetaminophen/codeine combination was numerically superior to placebo, it achieved statistical significance only for global evaluation. The aspirin/butalbital/caffeine/codeine combination was numerically superior to acetaminophen/codeine for every measure of analgesic efficacy but the differences did not achieve statistical significance. Both active treatment groups experienced significantly less total anxiety than did the placebo group. Only 11 patients reported mild, transient adverse effects; the most common was drowsiness. The adverse effects occurred equally among the three treatment groups. In this study, the aspirin/butalbital/caffeine/codeine combination was significantly superior to placebo and somewhat better than acetaminophen/codeine.

Acetaminophen↗