Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S A Amiel

Publications and source records attributed to S A Amiel.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Renal glucose production compensates for the liver during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation.

The extent of the renal contribution to postabsorptive endogenous glucose production (EGP) in humans is controversial. We measured EGP in the absence of the liver during the anhepatic phase (AH) of liver transplantation in five patients (aged 46.4+/-10.2 years, two women). Stable labeling of plasma glucose (PG) was achieved for a 2-h period before the AH by primed continuous infusion of di-deuterated 6,6[2H2]glucose (1.7 mg/min) and continued throughout the AH. PG was maintained above the fasting level (6.1+/-2.73 mmol/l) with 5% dextrose labeled with 6,6[2H2]glucose throughout the AH (mean level during the AH 0.98+/-0.45 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Isotopic enrichment remained stable at 0.84+/-0.21% atom percent excess throughout. EGP, calculated by use of a modified Steele equation, decreased from 2.6+/-1.24 at baseline to 0.97+/-0.9 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (36% baseline, P = 0.045) but recovered at approximately 30 min to reach 1.38+/-0.83 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (54% baseline) by 60 min. Epinephrine, lactate, free fatty acid, and glycerol levels increased significantly (0.79+/-0.74 to 3.65+/-2.1 nmol/l, P = 0.005; 1.88+/-0.43 to 3.46+/-0.9 mmol/l, P = 0.024; 543.9+/-215.5 to 705.5+/-219.2 micromol/l, P = 0.012; 75.6+/-30.2 to 139+/-96.3 micromol/l, P = 0.003, respectively). These data show that postabsorptive nonhepatic glucose production in humans may contribute to greater than one-third of overall EGP, increasing when required, and that it is associated with a stress response and increased gluconeogenic substrate availability. We conclude that extrahepatic tissues, most notably those of the kidney, make a significant contribution to EGP in humans.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2000

Delay in onset of awareness of acute hypoglycemia and of restoration of cognitive performance during recovery.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the time course for the onset of, and recovery from, acute hypoglycemia in healthy subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eight healthy male volunteers were studied on 2 occasions in random order using a hyperinsulinemic (1.5 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)) glucose clamp technique. During control studies, euglycemia (5.01 +/- 0.02 mmol/l) was maintained for 225 +/- 3 min. On the other occasion, after a euglycemic baseline period, arterialized plasma glucose was allowed to fall rapidly to 2.65 +/- 0.02 mmol/l, then maintained at this nadir for 90 min before euglycemia was rapidly restored. RESULTS: Cognitive function assessed by a battery of sensitive tests (4-choice reaction time, Stroop word, and color-word test) became impaired immediately at onset of hypoglycemia (P < 0.05 for all in the hypoglycemic study vs. those in the euglycemic study). Counterregulatory hormone responses (epinephrine, norepinephrine, glucagon, cortisol, and growth hormone) and symptomatic awareness of hypoglycemia (assessed by a questionnaire) were relatively delayed, being detected 20 min after the onset of hypoglycemia. There was no diminution (adaptation) of any responses, cognitive, humoral, or symptomatic, during sustained hypoglycemia. During recovery, the 4-choice reaction time continued to be abnormal even after resolution of symptomatic awareness (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: During hypoglycemia, cognitive performance may become impaired before symptomatic awareness. During recovery from hypoglycemia, recovery of cognitive function lags behind the restoration of glucose levels and resolution of symptoms. Our findings have implications for the design of studies examining experimental hypoglycemia and need to be investigated in people with diabetes.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

An ace in the hole?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed1999

Effect of the fast-acting insulin analog lispro on the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia during intensified insulin therapy. U.K. Lispro Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the effectiveness of insulin lispro, a fast-acting insulin analog, in reducing hypoglycemic episodes when used in a basal bolus regimen by patients with type 1 diabetes using intensive insulin therapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 11 diabetes outpatient clinics in the U.K., 165 subjects with type 1 diabetes were enrolled in a randomized crossover open-label study with a 2-month run-in period and then treated with a basal bolus regimen. Patients used human NPH insulin at night with either premeal insulin lispro for 4 months followed by human regular insulin for another 4 months or human regular insulin for 4 months followed by insulin lispro for another 4 months. The main outcome measures were the number of hypoglycemic episodes during both treatments and HbA1c level. RESULTS: A total of 135 patients were randomized, with 68 receiving insulin lispro and 67 receiving human regular insulin for the first 4 months. The data for the first 4 months of treatment only were compared as two independent groups because of a period effect and a treatment-period interaction. Glycemic control was equally tight during treatment with human regular insulin (HbA1c, 6.2 +/- 0.8%) and insulin lispro (6.0 +/- 0.9%). A total of 1,156 hypoglycemic episodes occurred during treatment with human regular insulin compared with 775 hypoglycemic episodes that occurred during treatment with insulin lispro (P = 0.04). This difference was chiefly because of a reduced number of nocturnal episodes (181 vs. 52, P = 0.001) in the insulin lispro group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a fast-acting insulin analog, insulin lispro, as part of a basal bolus regimen reduces nocturnal hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes who maintain tight glycemic control during intensive insulin therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Regional differences in cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in diabetic man: the effect of insulin.

To determine the effect of insulin on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and glucose metabolism (CMRglu), we performed quantitative dynamic PET scanning of labeled water (H215O) and deoxyglucose (18FDG) using two protocols in 10 diabetic men. In protocol A, to test reproducibility of the technique, insulin was infused at 1.5 mU.kg-1.min-1 twice (n = 5). In protocol B, low (0.3 mU.kg-1.min-1) and high (3 mU.kg-1.min-1) dose insulin was given on separate occasions (n = 5). Euglycemia (5 mmol/L) was maintained by glucose infusion. In protocol A, CMRglu was 6% higher during the first infusion, and catecholamines were also increased, indicating stress. Blood flow was not different. Changing free insulin levels from 20.5 +/- 4.8 to 191 +/- 44.5 mU/L (P < 0.001, low versus high dose, protocol B) did not alter total or regional CMRglu (whole brain 36.6 +/- 4.0 versus 32.8 +/- 6.2 mumol.100 g-1.min-1, P = 0.32) or CBF (41.7 +/- 5.1 and 45.6 +/- 9.7 mL.100 g-1.min-1, P = 0.4) or rCBF. In cerebellum, CMRglu was lower than in cortex and the ratio between rate constants for glucose uptake and phosphorylation (K1 and k3) was reversed. There are regional differences in cerebral metabolic capacity that may explain why cerebral cortex is more sensitive to hypoglycemia than cerebellum. Brain glucose metabolism is not sensitive to insulin concentration within the physiologic range. This suggests that intracerebral insulin receptors have a different role from those in the periphery.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Reduced counterregulation during hypoglycemia with raised circulating nonglucose lipid substrates: evidence for regional differences in metabolic capacity in the human brain?

We have investigated the potential for the human brain to use lipid fuels during acute hypoglycemia. Nine healthy male subjects underwent hyperinsulinemic (1.5 mU/kg x min) stepped hypoglycemic clamps on two occasions, infusing Intralipid (20%) and heparin (0.1 U/kg x min) on one occasion only (ILH), with an identical study without infusion of ILH acting as a control. Five subjects also underwent euglycemic clamping with Intralipid/heparin infusion. During hypoglycemia, ILH raised circulating levels of nonesterified fatty acids, glycerol, and beta-hydroxybutyrate, although the latter did not rise until after the onset of counterregulation. With ILH, epinephrine responses [area under the curve (AUC), 127.9 +/- 31.7 vs. 175.1 +/- 27.4 nmol/L x 180 min; P = 0.03] and GH responses (AUC, 260 +/- 91 vs. 1009 +/- 150, P < 0.01) were reduced and delayed (glucose thresholds, 2.8 +/- 0.04 vs. 3.0 +/- 0.1 mmol/L; P = 0.04), with a trend toward reduced cortisol responses. Similarly, hypoglycemic symptom scores were diminished during ILH (AUC, 647 +/- 162 vs. 1222 +/- 874; P = 0.03). However, there was no significant effect on the deterioration in four-choice reaction time, one measure of cognitive deterioration [glucose thresholds, 2.6 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/L, ILH vs. control (P = 0.75); AUC, 1420 +/- 710 vs. 2250 +/- 1080 ms/min (P = 0.59)]. During euglycemic clamping with Intralipid/heparin infusion studies, there was no rise in hormones, four-choice reaction time, or symptoms other than hunger and tiredness. Both nonesterified fatty acids and glycerol can penetrate the mammalian brain and be metabolized. Raised levels were able to reduce neurohumoral responses to hypoglycemia, but could not protect cognitive function. This suggests that regional differences exist in human brain metabolism between glucose-sensing and cognitive areas of brain, which may be important in the understanding of the mechanisms of glucose sensing and in the genesis of hypoglycemia unawareness in insulin-dependent diabetes.

3-Hydroxybutyric Acid↗
PubMed1998

Carbohydrates as a cerebral metabolic fuel.

The human brain is an extremely active metabolic organ with little endogenous stores of energy. It is thus dependent on circulating glucose to fuel metabolism and support cognitive functioning. However there is growing evidence that the human brain is able to utilise other non-glucose fuels during times of glucose lack. We review the evidence for the potential of the human brain to use the alternate fuels lactate and beta-hydroxybutyrate, and some recent studies examining the ability of regions of brain to use non-glucose lipid fuels. The human brain does not seem to have the ability to use the gluconeogenic precursor alanine to any significant degree. Regionality within the brain can be examined in vivo by the use of positron emission tomography, which offers the exciting prospect of studying human brain metabolism in vivo using a simple and non-interventional technique. Increased understanding of the brain's metabolism, the way in which hypoglycaemia is recognised and the manner in which this can be altered in the syndrome of hypoglycaemia unawareness and deficient counterregulation will help develop further strategies to prevent the clinical problems associated with hypoglycaemia in insulin-dependent diabetic adults and children.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The action profile of lispro is not blunted by mixing in the syringe with NPH insulin.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of mixing the insulin analog lispro (Humalog) with NPH (Humulin I) before injection on lispro's fast, short action profile. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 12 healthy volunteers received subcutaneous abdominal injections of 0.1 U/kg regular insulin and 0.2 U/kg NPH insulin as follows: lispro and NPH injected separately (treatment group A), lispro and NPH mixed in the syringe up to 2 min before single injection (treatment group B), and human regular insulin and NPH mixed and injected as in group B (treatment group C), on separate occasions, in random order. Plasma glucose was maintained for 12 h by intravenous 20% glucose. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were compared by analysis of variance for repeated measures. RESULTS: Peak plasma insulin levels (2.6 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.9 +/- 0.6 ng/ml, P = 0.075), total glucose infused (121.5 +/- 32.8 vs. 135.0 +/- 49.0 vs. 117.3 +/- 39.9 mg.kg-1.min-1, P = 0.53), and maximum glucose infusion rate (GIRmax) (8.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 8.0 +/- 1.7 vs. 7.1 +/- 2.4 mg.kg-1.min-1, P = 0.65) were not significantly different between treatments. The times until peak insulin concentrations were similar in treatment groups A and B, but significantly shorter than in treatment group C (0.9 +/- 0.3 and 1.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.4 h, respectively, P = 0.042). The times until GIRmax were also not different (113.9 +/- 41 and 122.0 +/- 45 vs. 209.0 +/- 51.3 min, respectively, P = 0.002). The glucose infusion rate (GIR) then fell to 50% GIRmax more quickly in treatment groups A and B than in treatment group C (239.9 +/- 40.5 vs. 292.4 +/- 133.3 vs. 399.5 +/- 78.3, respectively, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The action profile of lispro is not attenuated by mixing lispro with NPH in the syringe immediately before injection. The advantages are available to those individuals who need to combine types of insulin before injection to achieve optimal diabetes control.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Results and cost analysis of distal [crural/pedal] arterial revascularisation for limb salvage in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

In order to compare the outcome and costs of femorodistal grafting in diabetic and nondiabetic patients presenting with critical limb ischaemia we analysed a consecutive series of 109 femorodistal bypasses, 38 (35%) performed on people with diabetes and 71 (65%) on non-diabetic patients. The same aggressive revascularization policy was used in both groups with the decision to operate based on the presence of a calf or foot vessel on preoperative intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA). Data were collected prospectively and the median follow-up was 15.4 months (range 0 to 42 months). There were no significant differences in 30-day (5.3% vs 4.2%) and in-hospital mortality (13.2% vs 14.1%) between the two groups. Life table curves at 3 years in diabetic and non-diabetic patients showed 48% vs 60% survival, 76% vs 72% knee salvage, 45% vs 56% limb salvage, and 38% vs 47% secondary patency. Although there was a trend for diabetic patients to perform less well, there was no statistically significant difference in these outcome measures. In cost comparison the only significant difference was found in the total hospital cost, which was Pounds 9181 in diabetic, compared to Pounds 6350 in nondiabetic patients (p = 0.026, Mann-Whitney). However, this cost was significantly less than that of primary amputation in either group (Pounds 15500 and Pounds 12040, respectively). Femorodistal reconstruction in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, whenever feasible, is a cheaper option than primary amputation, even though vascular surgery may be more expensive in people with diabetes.

Amputation, Surgical↗