Biomedical subjects

Rover Krips

Publications and source records attributed to Rover Krips.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?

BACKGROUND: The Levels of Evidence Rating System is widely believed to categorize studies by quality, with Level I studies representing the highest quality evidence. We aimed to determine the reporting quality of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) published in the most frequently cited general orthopaedic journals. METHODS: Two assessors identified orthopaedic journals that reported a level of evidence rating in their abstracts from January 2003 to December 2004 by searching the instructions for authors of the highest impact general orthopaedic journals. Based upon a priori eligibility criteria, two assessors hand searched all issues of the eligible journal from 2003-2004 for RCTs. The assessors extracted the demographic information and the evidence rating from each included RCT and scored the quality of reporting using the reporting quality assessment tool, which was developed by the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group. Scores were conducted in duplicate, and we reached a consensus for any disagreements. We examined the correlation between the level of evidence rating and the Cochrane reporting quality score. RESULTS: We found that only the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume (JBJS-A) used a level of evidence rating from 2003 to 2004. We identified 938 publications in the JBJS-A from January 2003 to December 2004. Of these publications, 32 (3.4%) were RCTs that fit the inclusion criteria. The 32 RCTs included a total of 3543 patients, with sample sizes ranging from 17 to 514 patients. Despite being labelled as the highest level of evidence (Level 1 and Level II evidence), these studies had low Cochrane reporting quality scores among individual methodological safeguards. The Cochrane reporting quality scores did not differ significantly between Level I and Level II studies. Correlations varied from 0.0 to 0.2 across the 12 items of the Cochrane reporting quality assessment tool (p > 0.05). Among items closely corresponding to the Levels of Evidence Rating System criteria assessors achieved substantial agreement (ICC = 0.80, 95% CI:0.60 to 0.90). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that readers should not assume that 1) studies labelled as Level I have high reporting quality and 2) Level I studies have better reporting quality than Level II studies. One should address methodological safeguards individually.

Bibliometrics↗

PubMed2006

Ankle instability.

The ankle joint is the most congruent joint of the human body. Stability is provided by the bony configuration of the ankle mortise and the talar dome and by the ankle ligaments. During ankle motions, rotation and translation around and along the movement axes occur. Soft tissue stability is provided mainly by the ligaments. This article discusses ankle instability, injuries, and reconstruction.

Ankle Injuries↗

PubMed2004

The anterior ankle impingement syndrome: diagnostic value of oblique radiographs.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of an oblique radiograph, in addition to a lateral radiograph, for detecting osteophytes in the anterior ankle impingement syndrome was evaluated in a prospective study. The hypothesis was that the application of a lateral radiograph is insufficient to detect osteophytes that are located in the anteromedial aspect of the ankle joint. Oblique anteromedial impingement (AMI) radiographs were hypothesized to be a relevant adjunct, because of their utility to detect these anteromedially located osteophytes. METHODS: Presence or absence of tibial and talar osteophytes on both radiographs was compared with the combined findings of CT, MRI scan, and arthroscopic surgery. Estimates of test characteristics were obtained for 60 consecutive patients with an anterior ankle impingement syndrome. RESULTS: It was shown that the sensitivity of lateral radiographs for detecting anterior tibial and talar osteophytes was 40% and 32%, respectively (specificity, 70% and 82%). When the lateral radiograph was combined with an oblique AMI radiograph, these figures increased to 85% and 73%, respectively (specificity decreased to 45% and 68%). This increase was due to the high sensitivity of the oblique AMI radiographs for detecting anteromedial osteophytes (93% for tibial and 67% for talar osteophytes). CONCLUSION: A lateral radiograph is insufficient to detect all anteriorly located osteophytes. An oblique AMI radiograph is a useful adjunct to routine radiographs and is recommended to detect anteromedial tibial and talar osteophytes.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Treatment of a large intraosseous talar ganglion by means of hindfoot endoscopy.

We report on 2 patients with a large intraosseous ganglion of the talus who were treated by means of a 2-portal endoscopic approach of the hindfoot with the patient in the prone position. By means of this approach, it is possible to visualize, debride, and graft a large intraosseous talar lesion. In both patients, the lesions were treated successfully, with no recurrence at follow up.

Ankle Joint↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Sports activity level after surgical treatment for chronic anterolateral ankle instability. A multicenter study.

The objective of this retrospective multicenter study was to determine whether anatomic reconstruction or tenodesis produces better results in athletic patients with lateral ankle instability. Forty-one patients who underwent anatomic reconstruction and 36 patients who underwent tenodesis were followed up. The median preinjury Tegner score for both groups was 9 (range, 7 to 10). At follow-up, 2 to 10 years after surgical treatment, the median Tegner score for both groups was 8 (range, 4 to 10). In the tenodesis group, 17 patients had a lower Tegner score than before the operation, but in the anatomic reconstruction group only 4 patients had lower scores. Significantly more patients in the tenodesis group (15) had limited ankle dorsiflexion than in the anatomic reconstruction group (3). Plain radiographs revealed that 11 patients in the tenodesis group had medially located osteophytes, compared with only 2 patients in the anatomic reconstruction group. Stress radiographs revealed that more patients in the anatomic reconstruction group had normal laxity values than in the tenodesis group (38 and 28, respectively). According to the rating system developed by Good et al., 36 patients in the anatomic reconstruction group had a good or excellent result, versus 21 patients in the tenodesis group. Anatomic reconstruction was found to be superior to tenodesis in all of the investigated outcome measures.

Adult↗