Chronic kidney disease.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Rosemary Ouseph.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of this study was to determine if the impact of urinary incontinence on activities of daily living, as measured by a disease-specific quality of life instrument, is dependent on comorbid conditions. Incontinent kidney transplant recipients participated in a survey to determine the impact of urinary incontinence on activities of daily living using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7). Similar information was collected from the charts of nontransplant incontinent women. Participants were matched for age, incontinence severity, pads per day, and leaks per day noted in a 3-day 24-h bladder diary. IIQ-7 scores from participants were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Nontransplant incontinent women reported a 200% greater affect of incontinence on activities of daily living than incontinent renal transplant recipients (35.5+/-26.5 vs 12.9+/-15.4, p<0.0001) despite similarities in incontinence severity measures. Urinary incontinence has less of an impact on activities of daily living for renal transplant recipients than nontransplant incontinent women with similar incontinence severity measures because the disease-specific quality of life instrument used in this study was sensitive to their comorbid condition (transplant status).
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and its impact on activities of daily living in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: The continence status, severity, and impact of urinary incontinence on activities of daily living in female kidney transplant recipients was studied by using Sandvik's Incontinence Severity Index and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Clinical and sociodemographic data from post-transplant incontinent and continent participants were compared by using chi(2), Student t, and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: One hundred of 123 female kidney transplant recipients completed the survey for a response rate of 81.3%. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in female kidney transplant recipients was 28%. The mean Sandvik's Incontinence Severity Index score was 5.1 (median 3.5; 95% confidence interval 3.6, 6.6). The mean Incontinence Impact Questionnaire score was 12.9 (median 4.8; 95% confidence interval 6.7, 18.9). Incontinent kidney transplant recipients recorded a greater daily fluid intake on their 3-day diaries than continent kidney transplant recipients (2,951.9 +/- 1,228.6 mL compared with 1,854.6 +/- 614.8 mL, P =.04). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence rate of urinary incontinence from interviewed kidney transplant recipients was 28%, which had minimal impact on activities of daily living and may not be predicted by a history of incontinence before kidney failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3
BACKGROUND: Neutrophil oxygen radical production is increased in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and it is further enhanced during dialysis with low-flux cellulosic membranes. This increased oxygen radical production may contribute to the protein and lipid oxidation observed in ESRD patients. We tested the hypothesis that high-flux hemodialysis does not increase oxygen radical production and that it is not associated with protein oxidation. METHODS: Neutrophil oxygen radical production was measured during dialysis with high-flux dialyzers containing polysulfone and cellulose triacetate membranes. Free sulfhydryl and carbonyl groups and advanced oxidation protein products were measured to assess plasma protein oxidation. RESULTS: Pre-dialysis, neutrophil oxygen radical production was significantly greater than normal and increased significantly as blood passed through the dialyzer in the first 30 minutes of dialysis. Post-dialysis, however, neutrophil oxygen radical production had decreased and was not different from normal. Pre-dialysis, significant plasma protein oxidation was evident from reduced free sulfhydryl groups, increased carbonyl groups, and increased advanced oxidation protein products. Post-dialysis, plasma protein free sulfhydryl groups had increased to normal levels, while plasma protein carbonyl groups increased slightly, and advanced oxidation protein products remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that neutrophil oxygen radical production normalizes during high-flux dialysis, despite a transient increase early in dialysis. This decrease in oxygen radical production is associated with an improvement in some, but not all, measures of protein oxidation.
Dialyzer performance may change with reuse depending on whether or not the dialyzer is cleaned with bleach. Bleach is usually used in conjunction with formaldehyde as the germicide. Because few data are available for dialyzers cleaned with bleach and disinfected with peracetic acid, we examined dialyzer performance in a cross-over study of dialyzers containing polysulfone membranes reprocessed using bleach and peracetic acid or peracetic acid alone. Each dialyzer was used for a total of 16 treatments, or until it failed standard criteria for continued use. Urea, beta2-microglobulin, and albumin removal were determined during the first, second, seventh, and 16th use of each dialyzer. Urea removal did not differ between the two reprocessing methods and did not change with reuse. Overall, beta2-microglobulin removal remained unchanged in dialyzers reprocessed with peracetic acid alone, but tended to increase after the seventh use in dialyzers reprocessed with bleach and peracetic acid. Approximately 60% of beta2-microglobulin removal resulted from trapping of beta2-microglobulin at the dialyzer membrane. Albumin loss into the dialysate was clinically insignificant throughout the study with both reprocessing methods. These data show that the clearance of both small and large molecules by dialyzers containing polysulfone membranes is well maintained by reprocessing with peracetic acid and that additional cleaning with bleach has limited impact on performance.
Patient safety has become an important focus of the Institute of Medicine and the medical community. Although hemodialysis is a routine therapy, it is nonetheless a complex procedure where errors can occur. In particular, errors related to water quality can lead to patient injury and to increased medical costs. Using the Institute of Medicine report on errors in medicine as a basis, this article discusses previously published incidents of patient injury related to water quality in terms of the types of errors that occurred. Epidemiologic techniques provide a framework to identify, correct, and possibly avert these types of errors in the future. While the ultimate responsibility for ensuring water quality rests with the medical director of the hemodialysis unit, patient safety should be a concern of all members of the nephrology community.