Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Roger Goldstein

Publications and source records attributed to Roger Goldstein.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Relative responsiveness of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire and four other health-related quality of life instruments for patients with chronic lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Selection of heath-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments that are most responsive to changes in HRQL prevents investigators from drawing false-negative conclusions about the effectiveness of an intervention. The objective of this study was to compare the responsiveness of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ), the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and four other HRQL instruments. METHODS: We enrolled 177 patients with chronic lung disease, primarily COPD (93%), who completed 8 weeks of respiratory rehabilitation. Patients completed the CRQ, the SGRQ and four generic measures (SF-36, Feeling Thermometer, Standard Gamble and Health Utilities index 3) at the beginning of the rehabilitation program and 12 weeks thereafter. We calculated standardized response means (SRMs) for each instrument, from the change score divided by the standard deviation of the change score. RESULTS: We observed the largest SRM for the CRQ (0.24-0.66 for the four CRQ domains on the interviewer-administered and 0.56-0.84 for the self-administered format) and the SGRQ (0.33-0.51 for the three SGRQ domains and total score). The CRQ dyspnea domain was statistically significantly more responsive than any other instrument including the SGRQ. For the SGRQ, the total and impacts domain were significantly more responsive than the generic and preference-based instruments. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the CRQ and SGRQ are substantially more responsive than generic measures, and suggests particularly strong responsiveness for the self-administered CRQ.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Do clinical marker states improve responsiveness and construct validity of the standard gamble and feeling thermometer: a randomized multi-center trial in patients with chronic respiratory disease.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing the validity and responsiveness of utility measures will enhance their usefulness in randomized trials. We evaluated the impact of clinical marker state (CMS) rating prior to patients' rating their own health on two utility instruments (feeling thermometer (FT) and standard gamble (SG)) in patients with chronic respiratory disease (CRD). METHODS: We randomized 182 patients with CRD to complete the FT (self-administered) and SG with CMS (FT+/SG+, n=91) or without marker states (FT-/SG-, n=91) before and after undergoing respiratory rehabilitation in a multi-center trial. RESULTS: Use of CMS did not influence baseline utility scores. Improvement after therapy on the scale from 0 (dead) to 1.0 (full health) was 0.04 both in FT+ (p=0.03) and FT- (p=0.02; the difference between FT+ and FT- was 0.00, p=0.83). Improvement on the SG was 0.05 in both SG+ (p=0.08) and SG- (p=0.04; difference between SG+ and SG- 0.00, p=0.95). Correlations with other health related quality of life scores were highest for FT+. CONCLUSION: Administration of CMS did not improve responsiveness of the FT but may have improved construct validity. The SG showed limited construct validity and responsiveness that was not influenced by CMS use.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Future perspectives in COPD.

The pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is complex. The development of a multidimensional index--such as the BODE index--provides a means of classifying patients with COPD that also correlates with their prognosis. The individual components of the BODE index--body mass index (B), airflow obstruction (O) dyspnoea (D) and exercise capacity (E)--incorporate the pulmonary as well as the systemic effects seen in patients with COPD. Recent research has focussed on examining these impairments (including those of metabolism and inflammation) more carefully, and determining the effects of treatment on both the systemic and physiological aspects of COPD. Ongoing research initiatives by the public and private sector will contribute to our understanding of the disease processes underlying COPD, our understanding of the benefits associated with commonly used pharmacotherapies, as well as laying the foundations for the development of new agents and therapeutic tools. Advances in the use of pharmacotherapy have been mirrored by research to better define the benefits associated with pulmonary rehabilitation. Many questions remain to be answered, but a comprehensive approach is now considered essential to the life-long management of COPD, and will undoubtedly reduce the considerable socio-economic burden of COPD.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed2005

A randomized trial of strategies for assessing eligibility for long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy.

RATIONALE: Restricting oxygen administration to those who benefit is desirable. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of alternative strategies for assessing eligibility for domiciliary oxygen on funded oxygen use, quality of life, and costs. METHODS: We randomized applicants for domiciliary oxygen therapy to an assessment system that relied on data collected by oxygen providers at the time of application and judgments by Home Oxygen Program personnel (conventional assessment) or to a system of data collection by a respiratory therapist that included, in patients unstable at the time of initial assessment, a repeat assessment after 2 months of stability (alternative assessment). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 276 applicants were allocated to the conventional arm and 270 to the alternative assessment. In the year after application, oxygen use was lower in the alternative arm with no between-group differences in mortality, quality of life, or resource use in the community. Although alternative assessment applicants had on average higher assessment costs by dollars Canadian 155 per applicant, these costs were more than offset by decreased Home Oxygen Program costs of dollars Canadian 596 per applicant using Canadian cost weights. The comparable U.S. dollar figures were dollars US 309 and dollars US 432, respectively, and the difference in cost between strategies was therefore smaller using U.S. cost weights. CONCLUSIONS: Reassessment of applicants for domiciliary oxygen after several months of stability identifies an appreciable portion of initially eligible patients who are no longer eligible, thus reducing program costs to public funders without adverse consequences on quality of life, mortality, or other resource use.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

The standard gamble demonstrated lower reliability than the feeling thermometer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Participants rated clinical marker states (CMS) to make respondents familiar with the task of preference instruments, ground their ratings in relation to other health states, and help investigators interpret patient ratings. The objective was to assess the reliability of CMS using appropriate reliability statistics. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Eighty-one patients rated CMSs for mild, moderate, and severe chronic respiratory disease using the feeling thermometer (FT) and the standard gamble (SG) before and after a 3-month respiratory rehabilitation program. To assess reliability we used (a) intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with the variance between CMSs as signal and the variance between raters, the variance within raters, and the signal as noise; (b) scatter plots; and (c) Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: ICCs were 0.47 for the FT and 0.37 for the SG. Scatter and Bland-Altman plots showed large between- and within-person variability; 64.2% and 11.3% of the CMSs ratings were in the correct order on both occasions on the FT and SG, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest moderate reliability of CMSs ratings for the FT and poor reliability for the SG, which may explain their lack of improving the SG's measurement properties. Investigators should use appropriate reliability statistics when addressing related issues.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Measurement properties and interpretability of the Chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ).

The chronic respiratory questionnaire, available as an interviewer and a self-administered instrument, includes 20 items across four domains: dyspnea (5 items), fatigue (4 items), emotional function (7 items), and mastery (4 items). When completing this instrument, patients rate their experience on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (maximum impairment) to 7 (no impairment). The Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire has demonstrated excellent measurement properties for both discriminative and evaluative purposes and served as a model in numerous methodological studies in chronic airflow limitation and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We performed a systematic review of the literature on the chronic respiratory questionnaire to summarize the key qualities of the chronic respiratory questionnaire and to appraise the work regarding the minimal important difference of the chronic respiratory questionnaire. This paper includes a revision of our initial definition of the minimal important difference and a methodological framework for using anchor based approaches to establish the minimal important difference pioneered by Jaeschke and colleagues. Other approaches to evaluate the minimal important difference include distribution-based methods and panel-based methods. Investigators have used all of these approaches to establish the minimal important difference for the chronic respiratory questionnaire and the results are in general agreement with the minimal important difference of 0.5 for the mean domain scores of the chronic respiratory questionnaire. As a result of this literature review and discussion at the workshop, we established several research objectives. These objectives include the exploration of presentation of quality of life information and prospective anchor-based approaches.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2003

Evaluation of the minimal important difference for the feeling thermometer and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with chronic airflow obstruction.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ), the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the feeling thermometer (FT) evaluate change in health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with chronic airflow limitation (CAL). Although the interpretability, and in particular the minimal important difference (MID) in score changes, is well established for the CRQ, this is not the case for the SGRQ and FT. The objective of our study is to explore the interpretation of the SGRQ and FT. METHODS: We analyzed data from 84 patients who completed the CRQ, SGRQ, and FT before beginning pulmonary rehabilitation and 3 months later. We calculated correlations between the four CRQ domains (dyspnea, fatigue, emotional function, and mastery) and the three SGRQ domains (symptoms, activities, and impact), the SGRQ total score, and the FT. When Pearson's correlations were >/=0.5, we constructed regression equations and used the slope to calculate the change in SGRQ and FT score that corresponded to a change in CRQ score of 0.5 (the MID). Having established MID for SGRQ we than used a similar approach to examine the relation between the SGRQ and FT results. RESULTS: Comparison with the CRQ dyspnea domain suggested the MID in SGRQ total score is approximately 3.05 with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) ranging from 0.39 to 5.71 and a change of 5.67 (95% CI 3.43-7.92) represents a moderate change (1.0 on the CRQ dyspnea domain). The MID for the FT based on the CRQ fatigue domain was 6.1 (95% CI 1.87-10.28). The FT MID based on the SGRQ activities domain, impacts domain, and total score were, respectively, 7.4 (95% CI 3.44-11.35), 5.6 (95% CI 1.6-9.64), and 5.9 (95% CI 1.97-9.78). CONCLUSIONS: An MID for the SGRQ approximates the previously suggested estimate of 4 on a scale of 0 to 100. The MID for the FT in patients with CAL is approximately 5 to 8 units on the 0 to 100 scale. These MID estimates should facilitate interpretation of clinical trials in which outcome measures include the SGRQ or FT.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

A comparison of the original chronic respiratory questionnaire with a standardized version.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ), a widely used measure of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with chronic airflow limitation, includes an individualized dyspnea domain (patients identify five important activities, and report the degree of dyspnea on a 7-point scale). Because the individualized domain is unwieldy in multicenter clinical trials, we developed a standardized version and tested its discriminative and evaluative properties. METHODS: We enrolled 51 patients who completed the standardized and individualized CRQ before starting a respiratory rehabilitation program, and again 3 months later. We calculated both cross-sectional and longitudinal correlations between the two versions and a number of other HRQL instruments, and tested the relative ability of the individualized and standardized versions of the CRQ to detect improvement with rehabilitation. RESULTS: The results of the individualized questions suggested greater dysfunction (lower scores) than did the standardized questions both at baseline (3.18 vs 3.92, p < 0.001) and follow-up (4.62 vs 4.84, p = 0.051). The standardized dyspnea domain showed superior discriminative validity. While both techniques detected important, statistically significant improvement with rehabilitation (individualized domain mean change, 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 1.77 [p < 0.001]; standardized domain mean change, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.24 [p < 0.01]), the difference in effect was substantial and statistically significant (mean difference, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.82; p = 0.001). The two versions showed comparable longitudinal validity. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized version of the CRQ dyspnea domain improves the cross-sectional validity, maintains longitudinal validity, but reduces the responsiveness. By increasing sample size, investigators can use the more efficient standardized version of the CRQ without compromising validity.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

The short-term effect of a rollator on functional exercise capacity among individuals with severe COPD.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to examine the short-term effects of using a rollator on functional exercise capacity among individuals with COPD and to characterize which individuals benefit most from its use. DESIGN: Repeated-measures randomized crossover design using the 6-min walk test (6MWT) as the primary outcome measure. SETTING: Respiratory rehabilitation center. PATIENTS: Forty stable subjects who had received a diagnosis of COPD. INTERVENTIONS: Two 6MWTs were performed on each study day. One 6MWT was performed unaided, and the other was performed with a rollator. The order was randomized on the first day and reversed on the second day. RESULTS: Use of the rollator was associated with a significant reduction in dyspnea (p < 0.001) and duration of rest (reduction for the total group, 19 s; and reduction for those who walked < 300 m unaided, 40 s; p = 0.001) during the 6MWT. For subjects who walked < 300 m unaided, there was also a significant improvement in distance walked (p = 0.02). No changes were found for the measures of cardiorespiratory function or gait (p > 0.05). The requirement to rest during an unaided 6MWT was a significant predictor of improved functional exercise capacity with the use of the rollator (p < 0.005). The majority of subjects whose unaided 6MWT distance was < 300 m preferred using the rollator to walking unaided. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a rollator was effective in improving functional exercise capacity by reducing dyspnea and rest duration among stable individuals with severe COPD. Individuals who walked < 300 m and individuals who required a rest during an unaided 6MWT benefited the most from using a rollator in terms of reduced dyspnea, reduced rest time, and improved distance walked.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of informing patients about their pretreatment responses to two respiratory questionnaires.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Previous studies with short recall periods have suggested that informed administration (previous responses available) may improve the responsiveness and validity of health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) questionnaires in comparison to blind administration (previous responses unavailable). Informed administration may, however, have less impact in studies with longer recall periods. The objective of this randomized trial was to compare the validity and responsiveness of the blind and informed Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) with a 3-month interval between questionnaire completion. STUDY DESIGN: We randomized 85 patients to blind or informed administration of the CRQ and SGRQ before and after they underwent a standard respiratory rehabilitation program. Patients also completed other HRQL instruments. RESULTS: At the follow-up administration, we observed important and statistically significant improvement in all four CRQ domains and three SGRQ domains. The results of blind and informed administration differed little. This was true for both the CRQ and the SGRQ, and for both responsiveness and validity. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the improved measurement properties after shorter recall periods, the administration of the informed version after > or = 12 weeks may not result in improvements in responsiveness or validity.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The acute effects of a rollator in individuals with COPD.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the acute benefits of rollator use are consistent over time in individuals with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: Thirty-one stable subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (13 men, 18 women), aged 68 +/- 8 years, with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 0.7 +/- 0.2 L (33% +/- 12% predicted) and a baseline 6-minute walk (6MW) of 261 +/- 68 m, were recruited from a respiratory clinic after completion of a pulmonary rehabilitation program. Two 6MWs were performed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks, one walking unaided and the other walking with the assistance of a rollator. The test order was randomly chosen at baseline, and the same test order was used at each time point. The primary outcome measures were distance walked in 6 minutes (meters), perceived dyspnea using a modified Borg scale, and number of rests taken. RESULTS: Subjects achieved higher 6MW distances during assisted compared with unassisted walking at baseline (292 +/- 67 vs 263 +/- 67 m), 4 weeks (296 +/- 62 vs 275 +/- 63m), and 8 weeks (283 +/- 65 vs 259 +/- 68 m) (P = .013), with no time effect (P = .5). In addition, use of a rollator resulted in a significant improvement in dyspnea (P = .004) at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks, with no time effect (P = .7). The use of a rollator also reduced the number of rests taken during the 6MW (P < .001), with no time effect (P = .9). CONCLUSIONS: Rollator use resulted in improvements in performance in the 6MW, which were consistent over time among individuals with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who walk less than 375 m during an unaided 6MW.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Canadian Thoracic Society recommendations for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease--2003.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common cause of disability and death in Canada. Moreover, morbidity and mortality from COPD continue to rise, and the economic burden is enormous. The main goal of the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) Evidence-Based Guidelines is to optimize early diagnosis, prevention and management of COPD in Canada. Targeted spirometry is strongly recommended to expedite early diagnosis in smokers and exsmokers who develop respiratory symptoms, and who are at risk for COPD. Smoking cessation remains the single most effective intervention in accordance with the increasing severity of symptoms and disability. Long-acting anticholinergics and beta2-agonist inhalers should be prescribed for patients who remain symptomatic despite short-acting bronchodilatory therapy. Inhaled steroids should not be used as first-line therapy in COPD but have a role in preventing exacerbations in patients with more advanced disease who suffer recurrent exacerbations. Management strategies consisting of combined modern pharmacotherapy and nonpharmacotherapeutic interventions (eg, pulmonary rehabilitation/exercise training) can effectively improve symptoms, activity levels and quality of life, even in patients with severe COPD. Acute exacerbations of COPD cause significant morbidity and mortality and should be treated promptly with bronchodilators and a short course of oral steroids; antibiotics should be prescribed for purulent exacerbations. Patients with advanced COPD and respiratory failure require a comprehensive management plan that incorporates structured end-of-life care.

Canada↗