Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Rod J Rohrich

Publications and source records attributed to Rod J Rohrich.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Platelet gel sealant use in rhytidectomy.

BACKGROUND: A prospective study was used to evaluate the efficacy of a commercially available platelet gel product as a sealant to decrease postsurgical drain fluid rates and volumes in patients who have undergone rhytidectomy procedures. Quantitative assessments of postoperative drain fluid outputs were compared in subjects who did and did not receive platelet gel treatment. METHODS: Autologous platelet concentrate was prepared from each subject (n = 19), combined with bovine thrombin to form a platelet gel, and applied during the rhytidectomy procedure. Surgical drains were placed and effluent was collected postoperatively at 8-hour intervals for 24 hours and the volumes were recorded. A retrospective examination of surgical drain output over time in subjects (n = 14) who did not receive platelet gel treatment was performed; this group served as the control group. RESULTS: Subjects who received the platelet gel sealant treatment had significantly decreased surgical drain fluid levels over 24 hours [109 +/- 8.5 ml (mean +/- SEM)] compared with subjects who did not receive the platelet gel sealant (78 +/- 7.5 ml) (p < 0.02). From 0 to 8 hours postoperatively, platelet gel-treated subjects had a mean 35 percent decrease in fluid levels compared with the controls (p < 0.03). No difference in surgical drain outputs was observed from 8 to 16 hours between the two experimental groups. From 16 to 24 hours, the control group had increased mean fluid levels (20 percent) and the platelet gel sealant group output levels decreased (50 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Platelet gel sealant treatment was associated with decreased surgical fluid drain output in the first 24 hours postoperatively.

Drainage↗
PubMed2006

Go fly a kite!

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Aesthetic management of the nasal component of naso-orbital ethmoid fractures.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Discuss the critical anatomic structures of the nose that are affected in naso-orbital ethmoid fractures. 2. Discuss the advantages of early, complete nasal reconstruction of these fractures. 3. Apply a clinical algorithm to such nasal reconstruction. 4. List the techniques used in aesthetic reconstruction of the nose in naso-orbital ethmoid fractures. BACKGROUND: Fractures of the naso-orbital ethmoid complex pose challenging management issues. Although basic treatment principles have been well described, the aesthetic management of the nasal component has not been adequately addressed in the literature. METHODS: When secondary nasal deformities occur, they are difficult to correct. Optimal primary correction of the nasal deformity is accomplished using the following four principles: (1) rigid fixation of the nasal pyramid and restoration of nasal height and length; (2) restoration of tip projection; (3) septal reduction/reconstruction; and (4) lateral nasal wall augmentation. RESULTS: Successful management of naso-orbital ethmoid fractures is a complex and challenging task. Both the bony and soft-tissue components must be addressed and the extent of the injury must be adequately diagnosed to avoid omission of critical steps in the reconstruction. Inadequate treatment of naso-orbital ethmoid fractures can produce a severe cosmetic deformity that is very difficult to correct secondarily. CONCLUSION: The authors discuss the nasal component of naso-orbital ethmoid complex injuries and detail the key principles in their algorithm for aesthetic nasal reconstruction.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2006

Fluid resuscitation in liposuction: a retrospective review of 89 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: In 1998, the senior author presented the intraoperative fluid ratio, defined as the volume of super-wet solution and intraoperative intravenous fluid divided by the aspiration volume, to guide resuscitation fluid volumes in super-wet liposuction. The senior author demonstrated that intraoperative fluid ratios of 2.1 for small-volume and 1.4 for large-volume liposuction were safe and did not cause volume overload sequelae. A high urine output was common and reflected a mild overresuscitation, which could have adverse consequences in patients with undiagnosed cardiopulmonary disease. The purpose of this study was to compare overresuscitation sequelae in a cohort of consecutive super-wet liposuction patients using a new fluid management formula in which replacement fluid was given after 5000 cc of lipoaspirate instead of 4000 cc, as initially described. METHODS: The charts of 89 consecutive patients undergoing super-wet liposuction were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The intraoperative fluid ratio was 1.8 for the small-volume reductions (< 5000 cc, n = 68) and 1.2 (> 5001 cc, n = 21) for the large-volume reductions. There were no episodes of pulmonary edema, congestive heart failure exacerbation, or other major complications. The average urine output in the operating room, the recovery room, and while on the floor was 1.5, 1.6, and 2.9 cc/kg/hour for the small-volume group and 1.7, 1.8, and 2.5 cc/kg/hour for the large-volume group. CONCLUSIONS: The super-wet subcutaneous infiltration liposuction technique for both small- and large-volume reductions is safe and can be performed without adverse cardiopulmonary sequelae. Given the high urine outputs, the intraoperative fluid ratio can be further improved by possibly eliminating the replacement fluid altogether.

Fluid Therapy↗
PubMed2006

Patient safety in the office-based setting.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Discern the importance of the physician's office administrative capacity. 2. Recognize the necessity of a system for quality assessment. 3. Assess which procedures are safe in the office-based setting. 4. Know the basic steps to properly evaluate patients for office-based plastic surgery. BACKGROUND: At least 44,000 Americans die annually as a result of preventable medical errors. Medical mistakes are the eighth leading cause of death in the United States, costing between $54.6 billion and $79 billion, or 6 percent of total annual national health care expenditures. Office-based procedures comprise a 10-fold increase in risk for serious injury or death as compared with an ambulatory surgical facility. METHODS: This article reviews the literature on office-based patient safety issues. It places special emphasis on the statements and advisories published by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons' convened Task Force on Patient Safety in Office-Based Settings. This article stresses areas of increased patient safety concern, such as deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis and liposuction surgery. RESULTS: The article divides patient safety in health care delivery into three broad categories. First, patient safety starts with emphasis at the administrative level. The physician or independent governing body must develop a system of quality assessment that functions to minimize preventable errors and report outcomes and errors. Second, the clinical aspects of patient safety require that the physician evaluate whether the procedure(s) and the patient are proper for the office setting. Finally, this article gives special attention to liposuction, the most frequently performed office-based plastic surgery procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patient safety must be every physician's highest priority, as reflected in the Hippocratic Oath: primum non nocere ("first, do no harm"). In the office setting, this priority requires both administrative and clinical emphasis. The physician who gives the healing touch of quality care must always have patient safety as the foremost priority.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2006

Neck rejuvenation revisited.

PURPOSE: Restoration of the aesthetic neck contour is an integral component of facial rejuvenation. Multiple deformities of the neck and chin complex can make treatment of the cervical region daunting. An algorithmic approach to neck rejuvenation based on individual anatomic and clinical analysis is prudent. The authors created a simplified anatomic approach to the most common cervical deformities encountered in the patient seeking facial rejuvenation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the senior author's (R.J.R.) technique evolution over the last 15 years was performed. The operative techniques used in neck rejuvenation were evaluated and the long-term postoperative results were reviewed. RESULTS: Recurrent patterns of cervical deformity are present in patients presenting for facial rejuvenation. These patterns can be classified into categories based on specific anatomic deformities. CONCLUSIONS: Facial rejuvenation requires appropriate identification of deformity to effect the desired changes. Cervical deformities are classified into clinically useful categories based on careful preoperative analysis. A thorough understanding of the anatomic bases for the deformities allows the surgeon to choose the appropriate treatments to achieve consistent and reliable results.

Botulinum Toxins, Type A↗
PubMed2006

Autologous human fat grafting: effect of harvesting and preparation techniques on adipocyte graft survival.

BACKGROUND: Autogenous fat transfer with lipoinjection for soft-tissue augmentation is a commonly used technique without a universally accepted approach. The high percentage and variable amount of fat resorption reduce the clinical efficacy of this procedure and often result in the need for further grafting. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of different harvesting and preparation techniques on human fat tissue viability and to determine fat tissue viability rates among the different fat preparations transplanted into a severe combined immune deficiency mouse model at 3 months. METHODS: Using standard liposuction and syringe aspiration, fat was removed from patients (n = 3) undergoing elective body contouring. Tissue was prepared by six different combinations of centrifugation and/or washing the cells with lactated Ringer's solution or normal saline. Metabolic activities of fat cell viability were monitored to assess overall cell viability. To analyze viability over 3 months, freshly harvested tissue specimens (minimum n = 5) were prepared by a combination of various procedures (wash, centrifugation, and different solutions) and subsequently injected under the dorsal flank skin of severe combined immune deficiency mice in two experiments. Mice were monitored for 12 weeks and the fat xenografts were removed for mass and histological evaluations. RESULTS: Metabolic analyses showed improved cell viability in tissue specimens undergoing minimal manipulation. No significant differences in fat cell viability, as assessed by graft weight maintenance or histologic evaluations, were observed with regard to harvesting or preparation techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Improved viability of freshly harvested but untreated fat specimens may be expected as compared with grafts that have undergone additional manipulations. No unique combination of preparation or harvesting techniques appeared to be more advantageous on transplanted fat grafts at 3 months. This study also demonstrated a reliable animal model for future investigation into examining novel applications for augmenting fat graft survival.

Adipocytes↗
PubMed2006

Lifestyle outcomes, satisfaction, and attitudes of patients after liposuction: a Dallas experience.

BACKGROUND: Liposuction is the most common cosmetic operation performed. To the authors' knowledge, no report has examined patients' attitudes and postoperative opinions, lifestyle changes, weight gain changes, and satisfaction with their liposuction procedure in general and by specific site. The authors report on data from a survey provided to patients by two plastic surgeons at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas. METHODS: Six hundred questionnaires were mailed to all patients who had liposuction surgery performed between 1999 and 2003. There were 108 undeliverable surveys; 209 completed surveys were returned (34.8 percent of 600 and 42.5 percent of 492 surveys). Data were analyzed using the chi-square test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The majority of patients (80 percent) were satisfied with their results. Fifty-three percent thought that their appearance was either "excellent" or "very good." With regard to satisfaction by site treated, 60 percent or more of the responders were "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with their results. Weight gain was reported in 43 percent of the responders, with 56 percent of them gaining between 5 and 10 pounds 6 months after their surgery. Fat return was reported in 65 percent of the responders. The abdomen was the most common location for fat return. As a group, 79.7 percent would have the procedure again and 86 percent would recommend the procedure to family or friends. Approximately 75 percent of responders described their postoperative discomfort as mild to moderate, with 60 percent indicating that their discomfort lasted less than 7 days (39.8 percent indicated their pain lasted longer than 7 days); 83 percent indicated that they only needed to use narcotics for 7 days of less. When responders were divided into groups, the great majority of patients were satisfied with the surgery and their results. CONCLUSIONS: Despite postoperative pain, fat return, and weight gain, patients were willing to have the procedure again and recommend it to others. Those patients who were unsatisfied and were less likely to refer patients were those who had the lowest opinion of their appearance.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2006

An algorithmic approach to upper arm contouring.

There has been a renewed interest in upper arm contouring given the recent advances and subsequent patient interest in weight loss. Patients undergoing bariatric surgery are often left with a significant amount of redundant skin and laxity of their upper extremity. Some patients within this group have excess fat in their upper arms with relatively good skin tone, while others have a paucity of excess fat with a significant amount of redundant skin. The optimal treatment for each patient can vary. A clinical algorithm is presented that is designed to select the best method for upper arm contouring based on the aesthetic analysis of the upper arm. Case examples are provided demonstrating results that were obtained by following this algorithm.

Adipose Tissue↗