Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Robert V Harrison

Publications and source records attributed to Robert V Harrison.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Auditory brain stem and midbrain development after cochlear implantation in children.

Input to the central auditory system through a cochlear implant promotes psychophysical improvement of auditory skills. However, the developmental changes along the pathways have never been characterized in children with hearing loss who use implants. We aimed to measure auditory development in such children by using the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response (EABR). We made repeated measures of the EABR in 41 nonsedated children with implants before chronic stimulation and after 2, 6, and 12 months of consistent implant use. The results show that EABRs were present in all of the children even before chronic auditory stimulation, and that EABR wave latencies decreased from the time of initial activation throughout the first year of cochlear implant use. These findings reflect auditory development to the level of the midbrain as a result of the cochlear implant. The decreasing latencies likely reflect decreased neural conduction times at this level, in part because of increased synaptic efficacy.

Adolescent↗

Influence of age at implantation and of residual hearing on speech outcome measures after cochlear implantation: binary partitioning analysis.

The goal of this study was to evaluate speech understanding outcomes in prelingually deaf children who use a cochlear implant device. Specifically, we discuss investigations on 2 prognostic variables--age at implantation and degree of residual hearing--and use a novel method: binary partitioning analysis. Our outcome measures are standard speech perception evaluations, including the Word Intelligibility by Picture Identification (WIPI) test, the Phonetically Balanced-Kindergarten (PBK) test, and the Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure (GASP). Regarding age at implantation, we definitely showed that growth rates of speech understanding do relate to age at implantation, but not in a simple fashion. We used binary partitioning in an attempt to find the age at implantation that best separates the performances of children with younger versus older ages at implantation. We found that there is no one "critical age"; much appears to depend on the nature and difficulty (eg, whether open- or closed-set) of the test used. Regarding residual hearing, binary partitioning analysis was unable to show that the amount of residual hearing (as shown by preimplantation audiometric data) has any significant bearing on speech outcome measures in congenitally or prelingually deaf children.

Adolescent↗