Biomedical subjects

Robert Oelrichs

Publications and source records attributed to Robert Oelrichs.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Monitoring of human immunodeficiency virus infection in resource-constrained countries.

The reference standards used to monitor human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are flow cytometric analysis of T lymphocyte subsets to provide the CD4+ T cell count and molecular assays to quantify plasma HIV load. Few laboratories in resource-constrained countries can afford to perform these tests. A number of lower-cost assays requiring less expensive equipment may be well-suited to such countries. These include manual CD4 cell assays (Dynal, Coulter, BioRad) and ultrasensitive reverse transcriptase (Cavidi) and p24 (Perkin Elmer Life Sciences) assays to monitor virus load. Quality control and access to quality assurance programs are essential. The total lymphocyte count, although readily available and inexpensive, generally does not correlate as closely with CD4+ T cell counts. Other surrogate markers, such as beta2-microglobulin, are not suitable for routine monitoring of HIV infection. This review discusses the above assays and their role in addition to clinical monitoring in resource-constrained countries.

Biomarkers↗

PubMed2003

No increase in protease resistance and a decrease in reverse transcriptase resistance mutations in primary HIV-1 infection: 1992-2001.

Rates of antiretroviral resistance in recently transmitted virus in Sydney, Australia fluctuated over the past decade, influenced by treatment trends. Current rates of drug resistance are not high in historical terms or compared with those reported. Rates of resistance to reverse transcriptase inhibitors peaked in the mid-1990s, fell dramatically with the introduction of combination therapy and appear to have plateaued at 10-15% over the past 3 years. Primary resistance mutations in the protease gene are still rare.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2003

Rates of transmission of antiretroviral drug resistant strains of HIV-1.

BACKGROUND: It is clear that transmission of drug resistant HIV-1 is possible and occurs regularly. However, there is a lack of clarity concerning the true rate of this transmission in a given population, the impact of combination therapies on this rate, and the contribution of transmitted resistant virus to treatment failure either in an individual or on a population basis. OBJECTIVES: To provide a review of our current understanding of rates of transmission of drug resistant HIV-1 in various populations and to report the results of a study conducted to determine this rate in Sydney, Australia in the years 1992-2000. STUDY DESIGN: A review of the literature combined with a prospective study of antiretroviral drug resistance in 130 individuals who were diagnosed with symptomatic primary infection at St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia between 1992 and 2000. Sequencing of reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (PR) was performed by the TruGene HIV-1 genotyping kit (Visible Genetics Inc.). RESULTS: The results found in the Sydney population contrast with much of the literature. The prevalence of mutations that conferred primary resistance to protease inhibitors (PIs) was only 0.8% at position V82I. Secondary mutations/polymorphisms were seen in the PR at position L10I/V, K20R, M36I, L63P, A71T/V, or V77I in 60%. L63P was the most frequently found mutation (46.3%). The incidence of protease-resistant strains of HIV in primary HIV-1 infection did not change after the introduction of PIs in 1996. The distribution of the most common resistance mutations in the RT was as follows; M41L (8.5%) and T215Y (8.5%) and K70R (4.8%). The frequency of mutations associated with NRTI resistance was significantly lower in the post 1995 samples (43.9 vs. 19.1%, P < 0.05). Moreover, both M41L and K70R, but not T215Y, occurred with significantly decreased frequency in the post 1995 samples. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to other studies we found no increase in the rate of PR resistance and a decrease in the rate of RT resistance in recently transmitted virus over the period 1992-2000. The reasons for the differences between these results and those reported from elsewhere may relate to treatment regimens used in the transmitting population and may have implications for treatment policies in this country.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

PubMed2002

Adaptive changes after human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission.

Primary HIV-1 infection (PHI) is associated with a period of viremia, the resolution of which generally coincides with the development of both humoral and cellular immune responses. In this study replication-competent quasispecies were derived from virus isolated from an individual before and after seroconversion. Virus was also isolated from the presumed donor. Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of biological clones identified transmission of an R5/M-tropic phenotype. However, the ability of clones derived from the recipient to replicate in primary macrophages and PBMCs was restricted after transmission. This apparent selection process was supported by analysis of molecular clones derived from the isolated virus. Analysis of the ratio of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions predicted the existence of selective pressure soon after transmission, coincident with the development of HIV-1-specific antibodies. An Env trans-complementation assay demonstrated that the infectivity of a clone derived from the recipient after seroconversion was enhanced in the presence of a selected neutralizing antibody, indicating that the developing humoral immune response may have at least in part contributed to the selective pressure identified.

Adaptation, Physiological↗