Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Robert Gramling

Publications and source records attributed to Robert Gramling.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Family history of coronary heart disease: evidence-based applications.

Clinicians sometimes consider family history of CHD when evaluating CHD risk and deciding whether to prescribe a lipid medication. Most clinicians who take family history of CHD into account do so by categorically adjusting the aggressiveness of patient education and preventive medication recommendations (eg, from a low-key informational mode to a more direct influential or persuasive mode). Quantitative methods exist for taking into account any family history of CHD in parents and siblings, when estimating an individual's 10-year risk for a CHD event; at present, these methods are not readily available. For those individuals who have a positive family history of CHD, using family history-adjusted risk estimates could help clinicians more accurately target high-risk individuals who are the most appropriate candidates for therapeutic lifestyle changes and dyslipidemia drug therapy. Electronic health records (EHR) that now include CHD risk estimation as a decision support feature exclude family history from the calculation. Unless family CHD history is included in EHR decision support modules, family history of CHD will be increasingly discounted or ignored, as clinicians come to rely more and more on computerized decision support aids.

Cholesterol, LDL↗
PubMed2004

Visit satisfaction and tailored health behavior communications in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Although studies suggest that computer-tailored health communications can help patients improve health behaviors, their effect on patient satisfaction, when used in healthcare settings, has yet to be examined. METHODS: A stand-alone computer application was developed to provide tailored, printed feedback for patients and physicians about two of the most common adverse health behaviors seen in primary care: smoking and physical inactivity. Ten primary care providers and 150 of their patients were recruited to use the program in the office before their visit. After the visit, patients completed a self-report survey that addressed demographics, computer use history, satisfaction with the visit, and the extent to which the physician addressed the reports during the visit. All data presented were collected between October 2001 and February 2002. RESULTS: Most patients were female (67.6%), approximately half (46.0%) were seen for a routine exam, most (63.3%) had at least one chronic illness, and fewer than one third (31.3%) had ever used the Internet or e-mail. Most (81.1%) patients reported that the program was easy to use, but fewer than half of the doctors looked at the report in front of the patient (49.2%) or discussed the report with the patient (44.3%). Multivariate modeling showed that visit satisfaction was significantly greater among those whose doctor examined the report. This effect of the doctor examining the report on satisfaction was even greater for those who reported a chronic illness. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians who incorporate computer tailored messaging programs into the primary care setting, but who do not address the feedback reports that they create may contribute to patients being less satisfied with their care.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Prevalence of multiple chronic disease risk factors. 2001 National Health Interview Survey.

BACKGROUND: Four common factors--cigarette smoking, risky drinking of alcoholic beverages, physical inactivity, and overweight--contribute substantially to chronic disease prevalence. METHODS: We used data from the 2001 National Health Interview Survey to provide an up-to-date picture of multiple risk factor prevalence and clustering in the U.S. population. We conducted a multinomial logit analysis to examine the independent association between each covariate and the dependent ordinal risk factor variable with three levels (none or one risk factor, two risk factors, and three or four risk factors). RESULTS: Seventeen percent of the sample of 29,183 subjects had three or more risk factors. For the entire sample, the mean number of risk factors was 1.68 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.66-1.70). Many demographic and health factors were significantly associated with the mean number of risk factors including gender, age, ethnic/racial categories, education, martial status, presence of chronic diseases, level of mental distress, country of birth, and presence and type of health insurance. Using the risk factor score as the ordinal dependent variable, adjusted odds for having a risk score of three or four versus zero or one were as follows: men aged <65, 2.49 (95% CI=2.29-2.72); education attainment of high school graduate or less, 3.24 (95% CI=2.86-3.67); and individuals with high levels of mental distress, 2.06 (95% CI=1.65-2.58). CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses confirm earlier reports of the high prevalence of multiple, clustered behavioral risk factors and underline the challenge this presents for primary care and public health systems.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Predictive genetics in primary care: expectations for the motivational impact of genetic testing affects the importance family physicians place on screening for familial cancer risk.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the importance family physicians place on familial cancer-risk screening is influenced by expectations for the motivational impact of a high-risk genetic test result. METHODS: Mailed survey of the Massachusetts Academy of Family Physicians. RESULTS: Respondents expected patients would increase pursuit of screening for cancer (99.6%) and other diseases (89.9%), quit smoking (93.6%), and improve diet/exercise (92.5%). The degree of motivational effect was significantly related to the importance they place on screening. CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians believe that a high-risk cancer genetic-test result would motivate their patients to pursue risk-reduction behavior, and this belief is related to the importance they place on screening their patients for an inherited risk of cancer.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Association between screening family medical history in general medical care and lower burden of cancer worry among women with a close family history of breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Soliciting family medical history (FMH) is the initial step in the process of screening for heritable cancer risk in medical care. We investigate whether recent solicitation of FMH in general medical care is associated with cancer worry among a sample of women having a first-degree relative with a breast cancer diagnosis. METHODS: Surveys were mailed to women registered with the Cancer Genetics Network having a first-degree relative with a breast cancer diagnosis and a regular source of medical care. The independent measure consisted of two items for solicitation of FMH based on validated measures of clinical interactions with one's physician; the dependent measure was a novel measure of cancer worry based on validated patient-centered measure of distress; and the secondary measures were 6-point scales for perceived likelihood of developing breast cancer and perceived severity of breast cancer as a health outcome. RESULTS: A total of 353 women responded and met eligibility criteria (76.4% minimum response rate). One fifth reported no cancer worry during the past 4 weeks. After adjustment for age, education, pedigree features, and clustering within families, recent FMH solicitation was associated with lower odds of cancer worry (odds ratio = 0.58; 95% confidence interval = 0.51-0.70). FMH solicitation was associated with lower perceptions of the severity of developing breast cancer but not with the perception of cancer likelihood. CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support the hypothesis that FMH solicitation in general medical practice causes cancer worry. In fact, we observed a protective association possibly explained by influences on perceptions of breast cancer severity. Prospective research among less select populations is necessary.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Family physician self-efficacy with screening for inherited cancer risk.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has shown low and inconsistent rates of family history screening among generalist physicians. Little has been done to investigate the physician factors likely to mediate this behavior. We investigated family physicians' beliefs about screening their patients for inherited cancer risk, measuring their perceptions of self-efficacy and the importance of screening. METHODS: We mailed a cross-sectional, 1-page questionnaire to all active members (691) of the Massachusetts Academy of Family Physicians, measuring their attitudes about predictive genetic cancer screening. RESULTS: We received responses from 300 of the 691 members (43%). Although 87% believed screening to be important, less than two thirds believed they were effective in screening. CONCLUSIONS: Many family physicians lack confidence in their ability to screen patients for a family history of cancer despite recognizing its importance to their practice.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Collaborative e-learning using streaming video and asynchronous discussion boards to teach the cognitive foundation of medical interviewing: a case study.

BACKGROUND: Advances in electronic technology have created opportunities for new instructional designs of medical curricula. OBJECTIVE: We created and evaluated a 4-week online elective course for medical students to teach the cognitive basis for interviewing skills. METHODS: Ten students, from 2 medical schools, studied online modules on interviewing concepts and viewed videos illustrating the concepts. They then participated in asynchronous discussion groups designed to reinforce course concepts, stimulate reflective learning, and promote peer learning. RESULTS: In qualitative evaluations, learners reported improvements in self-awareness; increased understanding of interviewing concepts; and benefits of online learning vs face to face learning. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with online learning and with achievement of course objectives. Self-reported knowledge scores increased significantly from pre-course completion to post-course completion. CONCLUSIONS: Online education has significant potential to augment curriculum on the medical interview, particularly among students trained in community settings geographically distant from their academic medical center.

Clinical Competence↗