Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Robert A Bambara

Publications and source records attributed to Robert A Bambara.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Insights into the multiple roles of pausing in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase-promoted strand transfers.

We previously analyzed the role of pausing induced by hairpin structures within RNA templates in facilitating strand transfer by HIV-1 RT (reverse transcriptase). We proposed a multistep transfer mechanism in which pause-induced RNase H cuts within the initial RNA template (donor) expose regions of cDNA. A second homologous RNA template (acceptor) can interact with the cDNA at such sites, initiating transfer. The acceptor-cDNA hybrid is thought to then propagate by branch-migration, eventually catching up with the primer terminus and completing the transfer. The prominent pause site in the template system facilitated acceptor invasion; however, very few of the transfers terminated at this pause. To examine the effects of homology on pause-promoted transfer, we increased template homology before the pause site, from 19 nucleotides (nt) in the initial template system to 52 nt in the new system. Significantly, the increased homology enhanced transfers 3-fold, with 32% of the transfers now terminating at the pause site. Additionally, the acceptor cleavage profile indicated the creation of a new invasion site in the added region of homology. NC (nucleocapsid) increased the strand transfer throughout the whole template. However, the prominent hot spot for internal transfer remained, which was still at the pause site. We interpret the new results to mean that pause sites can also serve to stall DNA synthesis, allowing acceptor invasions initiated earlier in the template to catch up with the primer terminus.

DNA↗

Downregulation of PCNA potentiates p21-mediated growth inhibition in response to hyperoxia.

Prolonged exposure to hyperoxia inhibits cell proliferation in G1 via increased expression of p21. While p21 inhibits proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-dependent DNA synthesis, it can also directly lower PCNA abundance; however, it is unclear whether loss of PCNA contributes to growth arrest. Here, we investigate how PCNA loss affects ability of p21 to exert G1 growth arrest of lung epithelial cells exposed to hyperoxia. In A549 cells that express p21 and growth arrest in G1 during hyperoxia, small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of p21 led to G1 checkpoint bypass, increased cell death, and restoration of PCNA expression. Conditional overexpression of the PCNA binding domain of p21 in H1299 cells that do not normally express p21, or exposure to hyperoxia, caused a time-dependent loss of PCNA. Titrating PCNA levels using siRNA to approximate the low amount observed in cells expressing p21 resulted in S phase arrest. While lowering PCNA by itself caused S phase arrest, the combination of hyperoxia and siRNA against PCNA dramatically reduced PCNA abundance resulting in G1 arrest. G1 growth arrest was markedly enhanced upon the addition of p21 to these cells. Our findings suggest a model in which reducing expression of the abundant protein PCNA allows the less abundant protein p21 to be more effective at suppressing the processivity functions of remaining PCNA, thereby fully exerting the G1 checkpoint. Given that high p21 expression is often associated with lower PCNA abundance, our findings are suggestive of a global growth inhibitory mechanism involving p21-mediated PCNA suppression.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Flap endonuclease disengages Dna2 helicase/nuclease from Okazaki fragment flaps.

Okazaki fragments contain an initiator RNA/DNA primer that must be removed before the fragments are joined. In eukaryotes, the primer region is raised into a flap by the strand displacement activity of DNA polymerase delta. The Dna2 helicase/nuclease and then flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) are proposed to act sequentially in flap removal. Dna2 and FEN1 both employ a tracking mechanism to enter the flap 5' end and move toward the base for cleavage. In the current model, Dna2 must enter first, but FEN1 makes the final cut at the flap base, raising the issue of how FEN1 passes the Dna2. To address this, nuclease-inactive Dna2 was incubated with a DNA flap substrate and found to bind with high affinity. FEN1 was then added, and surprisingly, there was little inhibition of FEN1 cleavage activity. FEN1 was later shown, by gel shift analysis, to remove the wild type Dna2 from the flap. RNA can be cleaved by FEN1 but not by Dna2. Pre-bound wild type Dna2 was shown to bind an RNA flap but not inhibit subsequent FEN1 cleavage. These results indicate that there is a novel interaction between the two proteins in which FEN1 disengages the Dna2 tracking mechanism. This interaction is consistent with the idea that the two proteins have evolved a special ability to cooperate in Okazaki fragment processing.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Mechanisms by which Bloom protein can disrupt recombination intermediates of Okazaki fragment maturation.

Bloom syndrome is a familial genetic disorder associated with sunlight sensitivity and a high predisposition to cancers. The mutated gene, Bloom protein (BLM), encodes a DNA helicase that functions in genome maintenance via roles in recombination repair and resolution of recombination structures. We designed substrates representing illegitimate recombination intermediates formed when a displaced DNA flap generated during maturation of Okazaki fragments escapes cleavage by flap endonuclease-1 and anneals to a complementary ectopic DNA site. Results show that displaced, replication protein A (RPA)-coated flaps could readily bind and ligate at the complementary site to initiate recombination. RPA also displayed a strand-annealing activity that hastens the rate of recombination intermediate formation. BLM helicase activity could directly disrupt annealing at the ectopic site and promote flap endonuclease-1 cleavage. Additionally, BLM has its own strand-annealing and strand-exchange activities. RPA inhibited the BLM strand-annealing activity, thereby promoting helicase activity and complex dissolution. BLM strand exchange could readily dissociate invading flaps, e.g. in a D-loop, if the exchange step did not involve annealing of RPA-coated strands. Use of ATP to activate the helicase function did not aid flap displacement by exchange, suggesting that this is a helicase-independent mechanism of complex dissociation. When RPA could bind, it displayed its own strand-exchange activity. We interpret these results to explain how BLM is well equipped to deal with alternative recombination intermediate structures.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Evidence that creation of invasion sites determines the rate of strand transfer mediated by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.

Strand transfer during reverse transcription can produce genetic recombination in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) when two genomic RNAs, that are not identical, are co-packaged in the virus. Strand transfer was measured in vitro, in reactions involving primer switching from a donor to acceptor RNA template. The transfer product appeared with much slower kinetics than full-length synthesis on the donor template. The goal of this study was to learn more about the transfer mechanism by defining the steps that limit its rate. We previously proposed transfer to include the steps of acceptor invasion, hybrid propagation, terminus transfer, and re-initiation of synthesis on the acceptor template. Unexpectedly, with our templates increasing acceptor concentration increased the transfer efficiency but had no effect on the rate of transfer. Templates with a short region of homology limiting hybrid propagation exhibited a slow accumulation of transfer products, suggesting that for tested long homology templates hybrid propagation was not rate limiting. Substituting a DNA acceptor and adding Klenow polymerase accelerated re-initiation and extension exclusively on the DNA acceptor. This lead to a small rate increase due to faster extension on the acceptor, suggesting re-initiation of synthesis on the tested RNA acceptors was not rate limiting. A substrate was designed in which the 5' end of the primer was single stranded, and complimentary to the acceptor, i.e. having a pre-made invasion site. With this substrate, increasing concentrations of acceptor increased the rate of transfer. Together these data suggest that RNase H cleavage, and dissociation of RNA fragments creating an invasion site was rate limiting on most tested templates. When an accessible invasion site was present, acceptor interaction at that site influence the rate.

DNA Primers↗

Reduced dNTP interaction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase promotes strand transfer.

We have recently demonstrated that HIV-1 RT mutants characterized by low dNTP binding affinity display significantly reduced dNTP incorporation kinetics in comparison to wild-type RT. This defect is particularly emphasized at low dNTP concentrations where WT RT remains capable of efficient synthesis. Kinetic interference in DNA synthesis can induce RT pausing and slow down the synthesis rate. RT stalling and slow synthesis rate can enhance RNA template cleavage by RT-RNase H, facilitating transfer of the primer to a homologous template. We therefore hypothesized that reduced dNTP binding RT mutants can promote template switching during minus strand synthesis more efficiently than WT HIV-1 RT at low dNTP concentrations. To test this hypothesis, we employed two dNTP binding HIV-1 RT mutants, Q151N and V148I. Indeed, as the dNTP concentration was decreased, the template switching frequency progressively increased for both WT and mutant RTs. However, as predicted, the RT mutants promoted more transfers compared with WT RT. The WT and mutant RTs were similar in their intrinsic RNase H activity, supporting that the elevated template switching efficiency of the mutants was not the result of the mutations enhancing RNase H activity. Rather, kinetic interference leading to stalled DNA synthesis likely enhanced transfers. These results suggest that the RT-dNTP substrate interaction mechanistically influences strand transfer and recombination of HIV-1 RT.

Binding Sites↗

HIV-1 reverse transcriptase mutants resistant to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors do not adversely affect DNA synthesis: pre-steady-state and steady-state kinetic studies.

We have previously demonstrated that nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-resistant mutants have different levels of replication fitness relative to wild type; those with greater reductions in fitness are less likely to develop during therapy in patients. We have also found that reductions in rates of RNase H cleavage by mutant RTs correlate with reductions in fitness and that NNRTI-resistant RTs catalyze polymerization with a processivity similar to wild type. In this study, we evaluated the polymerase function of 3 clinically occurring NNRTI-resistant RTs (K103N, P236L, and V106A) in greater detail, under both pre-steady-state and steady-state conditions. The overall pathway of single-nucleotide incorporation was unchanged for the mutant RTs compared with wild type. In addition, the NNRTI-resistant mutants were each similar to wild type in rate of nucleotide incorporation (kpol), affinity for dGTP (Kd), and steady-state rate of polymerization (kss and kcat), using either RNA or DNA templates. These findings suggest that the close proximity of the NNRTI-resistance mutations to the polymerase active site does not affect the interactions of the enzyme with the incoming nucleotide or the primer-template sufficiently to affect polymerization and support the hypothesis that these reductions in RNase H activity contribute to reductions in replication fitness.

Base Sequence↗

Reconstituted Okazaki fragment processing indicates two pathways of primer removal.

Eukaryotic Okazaki fragments are initiated by an RNA/DNA primer and extended by DNA polymerase delta (pol delta) and the replication clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Joining of the fragments by DNA ligase I to generate the continuous double-stranded DNA requires complete removal of the RNA/DNA primer. Pol delta extends the upstream Okazaki fragment and displaces the downstream RNA/DNA primer into a flap removed by nuclease cleavage. One proposed pathway for flap removal involves pol delta displacement of long flaps, coating of those flaps by replication protein A (RPA), and sequential cleavage of the flap by Dna2 nuclease followed by flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1). A second pathway involves reiterative single nucleotide or short oligonucleotide displacement by pol delta and cleavage by FEN1. We measured the length of FEN1 cleavage products on flaps strand-displaced by pol delta in an oligonucleotide system reconstituted with Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins. Results showed that in the presence of PCNA and FEN1, pol delta displacement synthesis favors formation and cleavage of primarily short flaps, up to eight nucleotides in length; still, a portion of flaps grows to 20-30 nucleotides. The proportion of long flaps can be altered by mutations in the relevant proteins, sequence changes in the DNA, and reaction conditions. These results suggest that FEN1 is sufficient to remove a majority of Okazaki fragment primers. However, some flaps become long and require the two-nuclease pathway. It appears that both pathways, operating in parallel, are required for processing of all flaps.

DNA↗

A tale of two estrogen receptors (ERs): how differential ER-estrogen responsive element interactions contribute to subtype-specific transcriptional responses.

The interaction of ERalpha and ERbeta with ERE constitutes the initial step in the canonical nuclear E2 signaling in which E2-ERbeta is a weaker transactivator than E2-ERalpha. This perspective summarizes recent findings to discuss potential mechanisms that contribute to ER subtype-specific transcriptional responses.

Journal Article↗

The Rad9 protein enhances survival and promotes DNA repair following exposure to ionizing radiation.

Following DNA damage cells initiate cell cycle checkpoints to allow time to repair sustained lesions. Rad9, Rad1, and Hus1 proteins form a toroidal complex, termed the 9-1-1 complex, that is involved in checkpoint signaling. 9-1-1 shares high structural similarity to the DNA replication protein proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and 9-1-1 has been shown in vitro to stimulate steps of the repair process known as long patch base excision repair. Using a system that allows conditional repression of the Rad9 protein in human cell culture, we show that Rad9, and by extension, the 9-1-1 complex, enhances cell survival, is required for efficient exit from G2-phase arrest, and stimulates the repair of damaged DNA following ionizing radiation. These data provide in vivo evidence that the human 9-1-1 complex participates in DNA repair in addition to its previously described role in DNA damage sensing.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

Stimulation of HIV-1 minus strand strong stop DNA transfer by genomic sequences 3' of the primer binding site.

The mechanism of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) minus strand transfer was examined using a genomic RNA sequence-based donor-acceptor template system. The donor RNA, D199, was a 199-nucleotide sequence from the 5'-end of the genome to the primer binding site (PBS) and shared 97 nucleotides of homology with the acceptor RNA. To investigate the influence of RNA structure on transfer, a second donor RNA, D520, was generated by extending the 3'-end of D199 to include an additional 321 nucleotides of the genome. The position of priming, length of homology with the acceptor, and length of cDNA synthesized were identical with the two donors. Interestingly, at 200% NC coating, donor D520 yielded a transfer efficiency of about 75% compared with about 35% with D199. A large proportion of the D520 promoted transfers occurred after the donor RNA was copied to the end. Analysis of donor RNA cleavage, the acceptor invasion site and R homology requirements indicated that transfers with D520 involved a similar but more efficient acceptor invasion mechanism compared with D199. RNA structure probing by RNase T1 and the RT pause profile during synthesis indicated conformational differences between D199 and D520 in the starting structure, and in dynamic structures formed during synthesis within the R region. Overall observations suggest that regions 3' of the primer binding site influence the conformation of the R region of D520 to facilitate steps that promote strand transfer.

3' Flanking Region↗

Mechanism of stimulation of human DNA ligase I by the Rad9-rad1-Hus1 checkpoint complex.

Accumulating evidence suggests that the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 (9-1-1) checkpoint complex, known to be a sensor of DNA damage, is also a component of DNA repair systems. Recent results show that 9-1-1 interacts with several base excision repair proteins. It binds the DNA glycosylase MutY homolog, and stimulates DNA polymerase beta, flap endonuclease 1, and DNA ligase I. 9-1-1 resembles proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), which stimulates some of these same repair enzymes, and is loaded onto DNA in a similar manner. The complex of 9-1-1 with DNA ligase I can be immunoprecipitated from human cells. Moreover, UV irradiation stimulates 9-1-1.ligase I complex formation, suggesting a role for 9-1-1 in DNA repair. Examining the nature of 9-1-1 interaction with DNA ligase I, we show that there is a similar degree of stimulation on ligation substrates with different structures, and that there is specificity for DNA ligase I. 9-1-1 improves the binding of DNA ligase I to nicked double strand DNA. Furthermore, although high concentrations of casein kinase II strongly inhibits DNA ligase I activity, it does not affect the ability of 9-1-1 to stimulate. This suggests that 9-1-1 is also an activator of DNA ligase I during DNA damage. Unlike PCNA, 9-1-1 stimulates DNA ligase I activity to the same extent on both linear and circular substrates, indicating that encirclement is not a requirement for stimulation. These data are consistent with a direct role for 9-1-1 in DNA repair, but possibly employing a different mechanism than PCNA.

Base Sequence↗

Evidence that HIV-1 reverse transcriptase employs the DNA 3' end-directed primary/secondary RNase H cleavage mechanism during synthesis and strand transfer.

We previously analyzed strand transfers catalyzed by human immunodeficiency virus, type 1 reverse transcriptase (RT) in a hairpin-containing RNA template system. In this system, RT produces a series of adjacent RNase H cuts before the hairpin base on the first, or donor template that clears a region of the donor, facilitating invasion by the second, or acceptor RNA. Here we analyze characteristics of the prominent cuts before the hairpin base and their role in strand transfers. Analysis of the template cleavage pattern during synthesis suggested that the RT performs DNA 3' end-directed primary and secondary cuts while paused at the hairpin base and that these cuts contribute to creation of the invasion site. RT catalyzed similar cleavages on a substrate representing a paused cDNA-template intermediate. DNA 3' end-directed secondary cuts, which require positioning of the polymerase active site downstream of the primer terminus, had previously not been specifically identified during synthesis. Our findings indicate that during synthesis DNA 3' end-directed primary and secondary cuts occur at pause sites. RT mutants with substitutions at the His(539) residue in the RNase H active site were defective in secondary cleavages. Analysis of the template cleavage pattern generated by the His(539) mutants during synthesis revealed inefficient cleavage at the invasion site, correlating with defects in strand transfer. Overall, results indicate RT can catalyze pause-associated DNA 3' end-directed primary and secondary cuts during synthesis and these cuts can contribute to strand transfer by creation of an invasion site.

3' Flanking Region↗

Effects of donor and acceptor RNA structures on the mechanism of strand transfer by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.

Template switching during reverse transcription contributes to recombination in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Our recent studies suggest that the process can occur through a multi-step mechanism involving RNase H cleavage, acceptor invasion, branch migration, and finally primer terminus transfer. In this study, we analyzed the effects of reverse transcriptase (RT)-pausing, RNase H cleavages and template structure on the transfer process. We designed a series of donor and acceptor template pairs with either minimal pause sites or with pause sites at various locations along the template. Restriction sites within the region of homology allowed efficient mapping of the location of primer terminus transfer. Blocking oligomers were used to probe the acceptor invasion site. Introduction of strong pause sites in the donor increased transfer efficiency. However, the new pauses were not necessarily associated with effective invasion. In this system, the primary invasion occurred at a region of donor cleavage associated with weak pausing. These results together with acceptor structure predictions indicated that a potential invasion site is used only in conjunction with a favorable acceptor structure. Stabilizing acceptor structure at the predicted invasion region lowered the transfer efficiency, supporting this conclusion. Differing from previous studies, terminus transfer occurred at a short distance from the invasion site. Introduction of structure into the acceptor template shifted the location of terminus transfer. Nucleocapsid protein, which can improve cDNA-acceptor interactions, increased transfer efficiency with some shift of terminus transfer closer to the invasion site. Overall results support that the acceptor structure has a major influence on the efficiency and position of the invasion and terminus transfer steps.

Base Sequence↗

Binding of estrogen receptor beta to estrogen response element in situ is independent of estradiol and impaired by its amino terminus.

The functions of 17beta-estradiol (E2) are mediated by estrogen receptor (ER) alpha and beta. ERs display similar DNA- and ligand-binding properties in vitro. However, ERbeta shows lower transcriptional activity than ERalpha from the estrogen response element (ERE)-dependent signaling. We predicted that distinct amino termini contribute to differences in transcription efficacies of ERs by affecting in situ ER-ERE interactions. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation and a novel in situ ERE competition assay, which is based on the ability of ER to compete for ERE binding with a designer activator that constitutively induces transcription from an ERE-driven reporter construct. Interference of activator-mediated transcription by unliganded or liganded ERs was taken as an indication of ER-ERE interaction. Results revealed that ERs interacted with ERE similarly in the absence of E2. However, E2 enhanced the ERE binding of ERalpha but not that of ERbeta. The removal of the amino terminus increased the ERbeta-ERE interaction independent of E2. The ERbeta amino terminus also prevented E2-mediated enhancement of the chimeric ERalpha-ERE interaction. Thus, the amino terminus of ERbeta impairs the binding of ERbeta to ERE. The abrogation of ligand-dependent activation function 2 of the amino-terminally truncated ERbeta resulted in the manifestation of E2 effect on ERbeta-ERE interaction. This implies that E2-mediated enhancement of ERbeta-ERE interaction is masked by the activation function 2, whereas the intact amino terminus is a dominant region that decreases the binding of ERbeta to ERE. Thus, ERbeta-ERE interaction is independent of E2 and is impaired by its amino terminus. These findings provide an additional explanation for differences between ERalpha and ERbeta functions that could differentially affect the physiology and pathophysiology of E2 signaling.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Evidence that DNA damage detection machinery participates in DNA repair.

The toroidal Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 checkpoint complex (9-1-1) is structurally similar to the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), which serves as a sliding clamp platform for DNA replication and repair. 9-1-1 has been characterized as a sensor of DNA damage that functions in concert with the checkpoint control proteins ATM and ATR. However, recent data suggest that the 9-1-1 complex and its individual Rad9 component serve different and multiple functions in cells by sensing DNA damage, stimulating apoptosis, and regulating gene transcription. Recently it was reported that 9-1-1 interacts with and/or stimulates components of the base excision repair (BER) pathway including the S. pombe MutY homolog (MYH), human polymerase beta (Polbeta), and flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1). Furthermore, preliminary results indicate a stimulation of DNA ligase I. In this review, the likely direct participation of 9-1-1 in DNA repair is discussed.

Animals↗

Acceptor RNA cleavage profile supports an invasion mechanism for HIV-1 minus strand transfer.

We previously proposed that HIV-1 minus strand transfer occurs by an acceptor invasion-initiated multi-step mechanism. During synthesis of minus strong stop DNA, reverse transcriptase (RT) transiently pauses at the base of TAR before continuing synthesis. Pausing promotes RT-RNase H cleavage of the donor RNA, exposing regions of the cDNA. The acceptor RNA then invades at these locations to interact with the minus strong stop DNA. Whereas primer extension continues on the donor RNA, the cDNA-acceptor hybrid expands by branch migration until transfer of the primer terminus is completed. We present results here showing that the interaction of the acceptor RNA and the cDNA can be determined by examining the time-dependent cleavage of the acceptor RNA by RNase H. Our approach utilizes a combination of RT-RNase H and Escherichia coli RNase H to allow assessment of acceptor-cDNA interactions at high sensitivity. Results show an initial interaction of the acceptor RNA with cDNA at the base of TAR. We observe a time-dependent shift in RNase H susceptibility along the length of the acceptor toward the 5' end, suggesting hybrid propagation from the initial invasion point. Control experiments validate that the RNase H cleavage profile represents the formation and expansion of the acceptor-DNA interaction and that the process is promoted by the nucleocapsid. Observations with this new approach lend additional support to the proposed multistep transfer mechanism.

DNA↗