Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Richard W Rosenquist

Publications and source records attributed to Richard W Rosenquist.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Long-term outcomes during treatment of chronic pain with intrathecal clonidine or clonidine/opioid combinations.

To evaluate the effectiveness of intrathecal clonidine or clonidine/opioid admixture for the treatment of chronic pain states, a retrospective chart audit of 15 patients seen by the Pain Medicine and Neurosurgical Services was performed. Subjects included 9 men and 6 women aged 26-86 years. Diagnoses included complex regional pain syndrome, neuropathic pain, and cancer pain. All patients received a trial of single-shot and/or short-term infusion of clonidine. Those reporting a significant reduction in pain, or at least 50% reduction in their visual analog scale (VAS), received long-term therapy. Intrathecal clonidine as a single-shot dose, infusion, or as intrathecal polytherapy did not improve VAS scales from pre-treatment values in 5 patients. Ten patients reported significant pain relief or >50% decrease in VAS scores with the initial trial and received long-term therapy. Two received clonidine alone for 7-11 months before the therapy failed; others failed after just a few days. Seven of eight initially responded to clonidine alone (75-950 microg/day) before failing and requiring a second drug. Three received hydromorphone (200-8000 microg/day) and four morphine (0.15-15 mg/day) with clonidine. Four patients then failed 2-drug therapy (duration 6-21 months). Two continue with intrathecal clonidine/hydromorphone (duration 19-29 months) and 1 with clonidine/morphine (duration 21 months). After initiation of intrathecal clonidine, one patient reported good relief with clonidine/morphine until his death 5 months later. In this population, intrathecal clonidine was of limited utility for most patients. It may be of benefit for subset(s) of patients, but in our experience, duration of relief is typically <18 months.

Adult↗

An indication for continuous cervical paravertebral block (posterior approach to the interscalene space).

We present a patient who required perioperative analgesia with continuous nerve block for shoulder disarticulation, for whom the only approach possible to the brachial plexus was from posterior. A 51-yr-old woman was suffering from intractable upper extremity pain and dysfunction as a result of severe lymphedema after metastatic spread of breast cancer to the axilla. Her pain was poorly controlled despite aggressive treatment with oral, systemic, and intrathecal opiates. She presented for amputation of her arm as a last resort for management of pain. In order to provide optimal postoperative analgesia, continuous peripheral nerve block was selected in consultation with the patient, and due to anatomic disfigurement and tumor invasion, a continuous cervical paravertebral block was placed preoperatively and shoulder disarticulation was performed using a combined regional/general anesthesia technique. The patient had an uneventful recovery without pain for the 6 postoperative days that the catheter was in place and 0.25% bupivacaine was infused at 5 mL/h. Because of anatomic considerations, which precluded the use of all other approaches to the brachial plexus, the posterior cervical paravertebral approach provided an effective means of pain control in this difficult clinical situation.

Anesthesia, General↗

Postoperative pain guidelines.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative pain is the expected but nonetheless undesirable byproduct of all surgical procedures. Humanitarian concerns and recent quasi-governmental regulations have heightened awareness about the importance of treating postoperative pain. This guideline builds upon the foundation created by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guideline published in 1993, highlights changes that have occurred over the past 10 years, and makes recommendations based on the current scientific evidence. In addition, it takes advantage of the versatile information management inherent in a web-based format to make the information readily available. METHODS: A multidisciplinary group of physicians, dentists, nurses, pharmacists, physical therapists, psychologists, and ethicists from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Department of Defense (DoD) in conjunction with the VHA Office of Quality and Performance and a consultant group developed a postoperative pain algorithm and supporting documentation. The guideline structure and content were determined by a standardized rating of the evidence gleaned from comprehensive electronic searches. RESULTS: An interactive electronic and traditional "paper" guideline with a pre- and postoperative algorithm was developed. A table, which provides a menu of analgesic choices organized by specific operation, was constructed. Preferences for particular analgesic techniques and classes of medications were identified. A postoperative pain interactive pharmacopoeia and printable patient educational materials were also provided. The guideline may be reviewed at the following website: www.oqp.med.va.gov/cpg/cpg.htm. CONCLUSIONS: This postoperative pain guideline provides readily accessible information and evidence-based guidance to a variety of providers. It highlights deficiencies in our understanding of the pain and recovery processes and how they might guide our choices of postoperative analgesic techniques. In combination with the powerful system-wide data collection capabilities of the VHA, there may be improved understanding of what techniques are useful. Finally, it may lead to the development of reliable, individualized analgesic plans for specific surgical procedures that incorporate the full range of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic techniques.

Algorithms↗

Gabapentin.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Acetates↗