Corporate sponsorship and research: impact and outcome.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Richard H Rothman.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Fifty-eight patients received an Osteonics constrained acetabular implant for recurrent instability (46), girdlestone reimplant (8), correction of leg lengthening (3), and periprosthetic fracture (1). The constrained liner was inserted into a cementless shell (49), cemented into a pre-existing cementless shell (6), cemented into a cage (2), and cemented directly into the acetabular bone (1). Eight patients (13.8%) required reoperation for failure of the constrained implant. Type I failure (bone-prosthesis interface) occurred in 3 cases. Two cementless shells became loose, and in 1 patient, the constrained liner was cemented into an acetabular cage, which then failed by pivoting laterally about the superior fixation screws. Type II failure (liner locking mechanism) occurred in 2 cases. Type III failure (femoral head locking mechanism) occurred in 3 patients. Seven of the 8 failures occurred in patients with recurrent instability. Constrained liners are an effective method for treatment during revision total hip arthroplasty but should be used in select cases only.
Limp is one of the most frustrating persistent symptoms after hip arthroplasty for both the patient and surgeon. There are a multitude of causes of limp; however, leg-length inequality is the leading culprit. Leg-length inequality can lead to anger, litigation, morbidity, and ultimately revision surgery. However, geometrically equal leg lengths may not be an attainable goal in all patients. The stability of the total hip arthroplasty is intimately related to leg length, and equality may need to be sacrificed for stability. Therefore, both the patient and the surgeon should have realistic expectations and an awareness of this problem.
BACKGROUND: Although most patients with limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty have manageable symptoms, others may be disabled as a result of pain or functional impairment. In these patients, reoperation may be indicated to equalize the limb lengths. There is a paucity of published data regarding the outcome of surgical intervention to treat this problem. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the results of revision hip surgery for the treatment of symptomatic limb-length discrepancy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of patients who had undergone revision hip surgery at our institution for the treatment of a symptomatic limb-length discrepancy following a previous total hip arthroplasty. We identified twenty-one patients (twenty-one hips) who had an average age of sixty-six years at the time of revision hip arthroplasty. The average duration of follow-up was 2.8 years, and no patient was lost to follow-up. The indications for revision hip arthroplasty were severe hip and/or back pain for eleven patients, instability of the hip for eight, hip pain and ipsilateral limb paresthesia for one, and hip pain and ipsilateral foot drop for one. RESULTS: Revision arthroplasty was performed at a mean of eight months (range, six days to six years) after primary total hip replacement. The mean limb-length discrepancy at the time of the revision was 4 cm (range, 2 to 7 cm). Following revision arthroplasty, which involved revision of a malpositioned acetabular and/or femoral component, equalization of the limb lengths was achieved in fifteen patients. In the remaining six patients, the mean discrepancy had decreased to 1 cm. The mean Harris hip score improved significantly, from 56.5 points before the revision to 83.2 points at the time of the latest follow-up (p < 0.005). All but two patients were satisfied with the outcome of the revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Limb-length discrepancy following hip arthroplasty can be associated with pain, paresthesia, and hip instability. In these patients, careful evaluation of the position and orientation of the components may reveal the cause of the discrepancy. Revision arthroplasty may be indicated when a surgically correctable cause of limb-length discrepancy can be identified.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The incidence of failure after knee replacement is low, yet it has been reported that more than 22,000 knee replacements are revised yearly. The purpose of the current study was to determine current mechanisms of failure of total knee arthroplasties. A retrospective review was done on all patients who had revision total knee arthroplasty during a 3-year period (September 1997-October 2000) at one institution. The preoperative evaluation in conjunction with radiographs, laboratory data, and intraoperative findings were used to determine causes of failure. Two hundred twelve surgeries were done on 203 patients (nine patients had bilateral surgeries). The reasons for failure listed in order of prevalence among the patients in this study include polyethylene wear, aseptic loosening, instability, infection, arthrofibrosis, malalignment or malposition, deficient extensor mechanism, avascular necrosis in the patella, periprosthetic fracture, and isolated patellar resurfacing. The cases reviewed included patients who had revision surgery within 9 days to 28 years (average, 3.7 years) after the previous surgery. More than half of the revisions in this group of patients were done less than 2 years after the index operation. Fifty percent of early revision total knee arthroplasties in this series were related to instability, malalignment or malposition, and failure of fixation.
BACKGROUND: Fixation of the femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty without cement has had variable results. While tapered stems appear to have consistently good results, the duration of follow-up in many series has been relatively short. The purpose of this study was to present a longer-term (ten to fifteen-year) follow-up after total hip arthroplasty with insertion of a tapered femoral component without cement. METHODS: Sixty-seven total hip arthroplasties were performed with insertion of a tapered, cobalt-chromium femoral component without cement in fifty-eight patients from 1983 to 1986. Thirteen patients (fifteen hips) died prior to the fifteen-year follow-up examination, and three patients (three hips) were lost to follow-up after ten years, leaving forty-two patients (forty-nine hips) who were followed clinically for a mean of fifteen years. Thirty-seven of the forty-nine hips were followed radiographically for fifteen years, and the remaining twelve were followed for a minimum of ten years. RESULTS: The mean preoperative Charnley score was 3.0 points for pain, 2.7 points for function, and 3.2 points for motion. At the time of the final follow-up, the mean scores were 5.6, 5.6, and 5.2 points, respectively. Although no preoperative Harris hip scores were available, the mean score at the time of the latest follow-up was 92 points (range, 78 to 100 points). There were no revisions because of isolated aseptic loosening of the femoral component (although revision because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component led to femoral component revision in seven hips). Two femoral components showed radiographic evidence of instability. At fifteen years, the prevalence of thigh pain was 2%. No femoral component that was thought to be stable, with bone ingrowth at two years, lost fixation. CONCLUSIONS: The design features of this cobalt-chromium femoral component (i.e., the collarless, tapered, wedge fit with circumferential porous coating) are thought to be crucial to the achievement of the good-to-excellent results seen in this study.