Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Richard H Masland

Publications and source records attributed to Richard H Masland.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Populations of wide-field amacrine cells in the mouse retina.

We surveyed wide-field amacrine cells in the mouse, using a large series of retinas from a transgenic strain that expresses the green fluorescent protein (GFP) in isolated retinal cells. Wide-field cells were present in surprising diversity and number. They formed groups that could be defined by arbor depth, arbor size, and soma size. By conventional criteria, these populations of cells make up 11 amacrine cell "types." Five additional types have been reported by others in the mouse. Roughly two-thirds of the wide-field amacrine cells are axon-bearing cells, which have separate dendritic and axonal arbors. The axonal arbor of a single cell sometimes covers the majority of the retinal surface. The axon-bearing cells appear to be centrifugally conducting neurons similar to those studied electrophysiologically in some other species. Although they are classified as independent morphological types, it seems likely that their physiological functions represent variations on a single organizational plan. These cells are present at every level of the inner plexiform layer, which suggests that they affect most of the mouse retina's final outputs to the brain and, by implication, almost all visual function.

Amacrine Cells↗
PubMed2005

Retinal ganglion cell degeneration is topological but not cell type specific in DBA/2J mice.

Using a variety of double and triple labeling techniques, we have reevaluated the death of retinal neurons in a mouse model of hereditary glaucoma. Cell-specific markers and total neuron counts revealed no cell loss in any retinal neurons other than the ganglion cells. Within the limits of our ability to define cell types, no group of ganglion cells was especially vulnerable or resistant to degeneration. Retrograde labeling and neurofilament staining showed that axonal atrophy, dendritic remodeling, and somal shrinkage (at least of the largest cell types) precedes ganglion cell death in this glaucoma model. Regions of cell death or survival radiated from the optic nerve head in fan-shaped sectors. Collectively, the data suggest axon damage at the optic nerve head as an early lesion, and damage to axon bundles would cause this pattern of degeneration. However, the architecture of the mouse eye seems to preclude a commonly postulated source of mechanical damage within the nerve head.

Amacrine Cells↗
PubMed2005

Sensory systems: fine-tuning the visual scene.

The visual system adjusts its properties for efficient representation of the objects present in the environment at the time. A new report suggests that complex processing of this sort can begin as early as the retina itself, but some important issues remain unresolved.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed2005

Diversity of ganglion cells in the mouse retina: unsupervised morphological classification and its limits.

The dendritic structures of retinal ganglion cells in the mouse retina were visualized by particle-mediated transfer of DiI, microinjection of Lucifer yellow, or visualization of green fluorescent protein expressed in a transgenic strain. The cells were imaged in three dimensions and the morphologies of a series of 219 cells were analyzed quantitatively. A total of 26 parameters were studied and automated cluster analysis was carried out using the k-means methods. An effective clustering, judged by silhouette analysis, was achieved using three parameters: level of stratification, extent of the dendritic field, and density of branching. An 11-cluster solution is illustrated. The cells within each cluster are visibly similar along morphological dimensions other than those used statistically to form the clusters. They could often be matched to ganglion cell types defined by previous studies. For reasons that are discussed, however, this classification must remain provisional. Some steps toward more definitive methods of unsupervised classification are pointed out.

Amino Acids↗
PubMed2005

Different functional types of bipolar cells use different gap-junctional proteins.

Rod signals are transmitted to ON retinal ganglion cells by means of gap junctions between AII amacrine cells and ON bipolars. The AII amacrine cells are known to express connexin36 (Cx36), but previous studies of Cx36 in ON cone bipolars have been ambiguous. Here, we studied bipolar cells in a transgenic mouse line that expresses high levels of green fluorescent protein (GFP) in one type of ON cone bipolar cell. We found strong Cx36 immunostaining in the axon terminals of the GFP-labeled type 357 bipolar cells in both vertical sections and whole mounts of the retina. This finding was confirmed by single-cell immunostaining and single-cell reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). As reported previously (Maxeiner et al., 2005), Cx45 was found in some ON bipolar cells, but RT-PCR showed Cx36 and not Cx45 to be expressed by the type 357 bipolar cells. Some of the remaining GFP-negative bipolar cells expressed Cx45 but not Cx36. It appears that different types of ON cone bipolar cells express different connexins at their gap junctions with AII amacrine cells.

Amacrine Cells↗
PubMed2005

The many roles of starburst amacrine cells.

Starburst amacrine cells release two classical neurotransmitters, ACh and GABA. In a tour de force of paired-cell recording, Zheng et al. now show that the starburst cells are mutually excitatory during early development but mutually inhibitory in adult animals. The change occurs by remodeling of both the cholinergic and the GABAergic synapses between starburst cells. The finding gives a precise mechanistic basis for the developmental waves of activity in the retina.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2005

Synaptic contacts between an identified type of ON cone bipolar cell and ganglion cells in the mouse retina.

We surveyed the potential contacts between an identified type of bipolar cell and retinal ganglion cells in the mouse. By crossing two existing mouse strains (line 357 and line GFP-M), we created a double transgenic strain in which GFP is expressed by all members of a single type of ON cone bipolar cell and a sparse, mixed population of retinal ganglion cells. The GFP-expressing bipolar cells appear to be those termed CB4a of Pignatelli & Strettoi [(2004) J. Comp. Neurol., 476, 254-266] and type 7 of Ghosh et al. [(2004) J. Comp. Neurol., 469, 70-82 and J. Comp. Neurol., 476, 202-203]. The labelled ganglion cells include examples of most or all types of ganglion cells present in the mouse. By studying the juxtaposition of their processes in three dimensions, we could learn which ganglion cell types are potential synaptic targets of the line 357 bipolar cell. Of 12 ganglion cell types observed, 10 types could be definitively ruled out as major synaptic targets of the line 357 bipolar cells. One type of monostratified ganglion cell and one bistratified cell tightly cofasciculate with axon terminals of the line 357 bipolar cells. Double labelling for kinesin II demonstrates colocalization of bipolar cell ribbons at the sites of contact between these two types of ganglion cell and the line 357 bipolar cells.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

The spatial filtering properties of local edge detectors and brisk-sustained retinal ganglion cells.

We compared image computation in the rabbit retina by two different cell types: the so-called 'local edge detecting' ganglion cells and the well-known brisk-sustained ganglion cells. From both anatomical and physiological evidence, these cells are present in nearly equal numbers and thus overlap to sample the same regions of visual space. We recorded simultaneously from overlapping cells on a dense microelectrode array. The results were analysed using an anatomically realistic simulation of the retina's processing levels. The 'local edge detecting' cell was found to be tuned to higher spatial frequencies and to have a narrower spatial frequency bandpass than the brisk-sustained cells. Simulation revealed that this is due primarily to the 'zero-crossing' detector implied by the definition of the local edge detector. The outputs of the simulations in response to complex images were analysed quantitatively. The results showed the population of local edge detectors to transmit a sparser code than the brisk-sustained cells.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2004

Retinal ganglion cell type, size, and spacing can be specified independent of homotypic dendritic contacts.

In Brn3b(-/-) mice, where 80% of retinal ganglion cells degenerate early in development, the remaining 20% include most or all ganglion cell types. Cells of the same type cover the retinal surface evenly but tile it incompletely, indicating that a regular mosaic and normal dendritic field size can be maintained in the absence of contact among homotypic cells. In Math5(-/-) mice, where only approximately 5% of ganglion cells are formed, the dendritic arbors of at least two types among the residual ganglion cells are indistinguishable from normal in shape and size, even though throughout development they are separated by millimeters from the nearest neighboring ganglion cell of the same type. It appears that the primary phenotype of retinal ganglion cells can develop without homotypic contact; dendritic repulsion may be an end-stage mechanism that fine-tunes the dendritic arbors for more efficient coverage of the retinal surface.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Inward rectifying currents stabilize the membrane potential in dendrites of mouse amacrine cells: patch-clamp recordings and single-cell RT-PCR.

PURPOSE: To explore the possible existence of inward rectifying currents in the distal dendrites of amacrine cells. METHODS: Patch-clamp recordings were made from amacrine cells in a new horizontal slice preparation of mouse retina. Single-cell RT-PCR studies were performed after the patch-clamp recordings. RESULTS: In contrast to results from vertical slices or dissociated cells, all amacrine cells tested demonstrated inward rectifying currents, IIR. Within the limits of our sample, this current did not depend on the morphological and physiological type of the amacrine cell. Amacrine cells from which the dendrites had been removed did not possess detectable amounts of IIR. Pharmacological experiments with ZD7288 (100 microM) and single-cell RT-PCR from recorded cells revealed that IIR includes an h-current (I(H)) carried by hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide gated channels (HCN), HCN1 and/or HCN2 subtypes. In the presence of extracellular Cs+ (5 mM), which greatly suppressed IIR, the resting membrane conductance was reduced. IIR suppressed the generation of oscillatory potentials. Intracellular cAMP (8-cpt-cAMP, 1 mM) activated IIR. CONCLUSIONS: IIR appears to occur within dendrites of many amacrine cells, where it tends to stabilize the resting membrane potential. HCN1 and/or HCN2 channels contribute to IIR in amacrine cells. Dendritic IIR would be expected to contribute to functional independence of the distal dendrites of amacrine cells that express it.

Amacrine Cells↗
PubMed2004

The population of bipolar cells in the rabbit retina.

The population of bipolar cells in the rabbit retina was studied using Golgi impregnation and photocatalyzed filling of single cells with dihydrorhodamine, a quantitative sampling technique. The Golgi method revealed the morphology and stratification of cells in detail. The photofilling method allowed us to estimate the frequency of the cell types. From a sample of 243 Golgi-impregnated bipolar cells and 107 photofilled cells, we identified 1 type of rod bipolar cell and 12 types of cone bipolar cells. An analysis based on retinal coverage indicates that this number of types could be contained within the number of bipolar cells known to exist. The dendrites of most cone bipolars contacted all the cones within the individual cone bipolar cell's dendritic field. Types of bipolar cell were encountered at roughly similar frequency, without any one type predominating. The rabbit retina thus contains about a dozen parallel and roughly equipotent through-pathways.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Contextual tuning of direction-selective retinal ganglion cells.

A direction-selective (DS) retinal ganglion cell responds well to a small object moving within its receptive field center, but less well when there is also a moving stimulus in the surrounding area; this has been described as tuning for local motion. We show here an additional selectivity, such that the surround has less effect if there is a discontinuity--that is, a difference in spatial phase, spatial frequency or velocity--between the center stimulus and that present in the surround.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2003

CD15 immunoreactive amacrine cells in the mouse retina.

The mouse retina has become an important model in vision research, mainly because of the wide availability of transgenic animals. In order to study cell function and connectivity in the inner retina, antibodies that differentially stain one cell type, or a small number of cell types, are helpful as markers. Here we characterize the CD15 (3[alpha1-3]-fucosyl-N-acetyl-lactosamine)-positive cells in the mouse retina using immunofluorescence confocal microscopy and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. CD15 immunoreactivity was observed in two distinct types of amacrine cells and, faintly, in some cone bipolar cells. Type I CD15+ amacrine cells are GABAergic wide-field cells that stratify in lamina 3 and 4/5 of the inner plexiform layer. Type II CD15+ amacrine cells are also GABAergic and costratify with the dopaminergic tyrosine hydroxylase-positive cells in lamina 1 of the inner plexiform layer. The densities of types I and II CD15+ amacrine cells in mid-periphery were 258 cells/mm(2) and 274 cells/mm(2). Double labeling with several other markers for amacrine cell types showed that neither type belongs to another previously identified subpopulation of amacrine cells. Single-cell RT-PCR showed that CD15+ amacrine cells coexpress several AMPA receptors - GluR1, GluR2, and GluR4 being the most common combination.

Amacrine Cells↗
PubMed2003

G protein subunit G gamma 13 is coexpressed with G alpha o, G beta 3, and G beta 4 in retinal ON bipolar cells.

We investigated the expression of Ggamma13, a recently discovered G protein subunit, and a selection of Gbeta subunits in retinal bipolar cells, by using a transgenic mouse strain in which green fluorescent protein is strongly expressed in a single type of cone bipolar cell. The cells have ON morphology, and patch-clamp recordings in slices confirmed that they are of the physiological ON type. Immunohistochemistry showed that Ggamma13 is expressed in rod bipolar cells and ON cone bipolar cells, where it is colocalized in the dendrites with Galphaomicron. ON and OFF cone bipolar cells and rod bipolar cells were identified among dissociated cells by their green fluorescence and/or distinct morphology. Hybridization of single-cell polymerase chain reaction products with cDNA probes for G protein subunits Gbeta1 to 5 showed that Gbeta3, Gbeta4, and Ggamma13 are coexpressed in ON bipolar cells but not present in OFF bipolar cells. Gbeta1, 2, and 5 are expressed in partially overlapping subpopulations of cone bipolar cells. Ggamma13 and Gbeta3 and/or Gbeta4, thus, seem selectively to participate in signal transduction by ON bipolar cells.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Starburst cells nondirectionally facilitate the responses of direction-selective retinal ganglion cells.

The mechanism of direction selectivity in retinal ganglion cells remains controversial. An important issue is how the starburst amacrine cells, which are known to provide a major synaptic input to the direction-selective ganglion cells, participate in the directional discrimination. Here, we present evidence that the cholinergic outputs of the starburst cells affect the responses of the ganglion cells symmetrically; they provide a feedforward excitation that facilitates the response of the ganglion cells to movement in both the preferred and null directions. This seems to place a constraint on models of the directional discrimination in which the starburst cells participate, namely, that their cholinergic synapses be nondirectional in their effects on the ganglion cells.

Amacrine Cells↗