Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Richard G Berrisford

Publications and source records attributed to Richard G Berrisford.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

A prospective comparison of quality of life measures for patients with esophageal cancer.

Among the most widely used instruments to assess quality of life (QOL) in patients with cancer are the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy, cancer instrument (FACT-G). This study compared these approaches in patients who had undergone esophagectomy for cancer. The EORTC core questionnaire and esophageal module and the FACT-G and esophageal scale were completed by 57 patients. Missing data, relationships between QOL scales and analyses of patients' preferences were examined. There were 14/2736 (0.5%) missing items from EORTC questionnaires and 45/2565 (1.8%) from FACT instruments (p < 0.01). Relationships between corresponding generic EORTC and FACT scales were average to good (r > 0.57) except for the social function scale (r = 0.01). EORTC symptom scores were moderately correlated with the FACT general scale, but poorly related to the FACT esophageal scale (r < 0.28). EORTC swallowing scores were moderately correlated with all FACT scales. The FACT-E and EORTC QLQ-C30 measure assess similar generic aspects of QOL (except social function). EORTC esophageal symptom scores relate poorly to FACT esophageal scales, except for swallowing. Choice of QOL measure after esophagectomy for cancer depends upon outcomes of interest. Future studies will determine which instruments are appropriate in each context.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Invited commentary.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Esophageal Neoplasms↗
PubMed2002

Long term results of diaphragmatic plication for unilateral diaphragm paralysis.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether diaphragmatic plication is an effective and lasting treatment option for non-malignant diaphragmatic paralysis. METHODS: Nineteen patients who had undergone diaphragm plication (1983-1990) were recalled for interview, pulmonary function testing and chest X-ray. RESULTS: There were 13 men and six women aged 24-73 (mean 55). Diaphragm paralysis was idiopathic (n=9), postsurgical (n=3), related to cervical spondylosis (n=4) and neck injury (n=2). Patients presented with breathlessness (18/19) or orthopnoea (1/19). Symptoms had lasted 3-60 months (mean 24 months). All patients had a raised hemidiaphragm on chest X-ray with paradoxical movement on ultrasound. Mean preoperative FVC was 71% predicted (range 38-93, SD 12.9) and mean FEV(1) was 67% predicted (range 33-90, SD 10.8). Supine lung volumes were 81% (mean) of sitting values. There were six right plications and 13 left. There were no postoperative deaths. One patient required re-plication. Follow-up (18/19 of original operated patients) ranged from 7-14 years (mean 10 years). Three patients had died of unrelated causes and one patient failed to attend long term follow-up, leaving 15 patients of the original 19 operated on. Positional change in lung volumes was not affected by surgery at early (6 week) or late (>5 year) follow-up. FVC, FEV(1), FRC and TLC improved by 10.1*, 11.8*, 16.9* and 9.2*%, respectively, at early follow-up and 11.8*, 15.4*, 26 and 13.3*% at late follow-up (*P<0.005 signed rank). Dyspnoea scores at long term follow-up improved 1 point (n=5), 2 points (n=5) and 3 points (n=2), remained unchanged (n=1) or dropped 1 point (n=2). Of the 15 patients followed up all but one who had been employed returned to work. 14/15 patients expressed satisfaction with their surgery. CONCLUSION: Diaphragm plication is an effective procedure with lasting results.

Adult↗